<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[Gizmodo]]></title>
		
		<link>http://gizmodo.com</link>
		<description><![CDATA[Gizmodo, the gadget guide. So much in love with shiny new toys, it's unnatural.]]></description>
				        			
																									<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Kit With Wiimote Accesories for 38 Sports You Will Never Practice In Real Life [Wii] ]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/07/504x_wiiaccessories.jpg" class="left image500" width="500">Just when I thought the whole Wiimote accessories situation couldn't get any more stupid, here comes a plastic crap-o-la vendor with a <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged 38-IN-1 WII SPORT KIT" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/38_in_1-wii-sport-kit/">38-in-1 Wii Sport Kit</a> to remind me that I am <i>wrong</i>. [<a href="http://www.areustech.com/">Areustech</a> via <a href="http://www.crunchgear.com/2009/07/09/38-in-1-wii-sport-kit-go/">CrunchGear</a>]</p> ]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5312067/kit-with-wiimote-accesories-for-38-sports-you-will-never-practice-in-real-life]]></link>
			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5312067]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ Wii ]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[38-in-1 Wii Sport Kit]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Nintendo]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Wiimote]]></category>			
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 10 Jul 2009 17:20:00 -0400]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jesus Diaz]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5312067&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
        			
																									<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Zubbles Are World's First Stainless Colored Bubbles [Sun Powered Fun] ]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/07/504x_colored-bubbles-540x386.jpg" class="left image500" width="500">Scientists believe that bubbles are made of sugar, spice, and everything nice. Or maybe they don't, but I do. These are called Zubbles, and they are the world's first stainless color bubbles. Summer blowin' on the beach, here I come.</p> <p>Zubbles <a href="http://gizmodo.com/139113/zubbles-technicolor-bubbles">were invented in 2005</a>, but they have been in commercial limbo until now. Kids and adults can now buy two bottles for $15 at the Zubble web site.</p> <p>Bubbles are the most popular toy on Earth&mdash;even <a href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/legotrip/">bigger than Lego</a>&mdash;with 200 million bottles sold annually. Stainless colored bubbles where believed to be chemically impossible, but inventor Tim Kehoe spent 15 years and $3 million making his daydream a reality. Hopefully, they will work out for him, because I like zubbles. I like plain bubbles too. And I love Bubble Toes:</p> <p><object width="502" height="309" class="left gawkerVideo embeddedVideo videoObject_0"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/RhRvyFF21_Q&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22"> <param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"> <embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/RhRvyFF21_Q&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="502" height="309" class="left gawkerVideo"></object></p> <p>[<a href="http://zubbles.com/">Zubbles</a> via <a href="http://dsc.discovery.com/news/2009/07/10/colored-bubbles.html">Discovery</a> via <a href="http://www.infoaddict.com/blowing-bubbles-finally-receives-technological-breakthrough">Infoaddict</a>&mdash;Thanks Rosa!]</p> ]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5311998/zubbles-are-worlds-first-stainless-colored-bubbles]]></link>
			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5311998]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ Sun Powered Fun ]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Bubbles]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Summer]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Toys]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Zubbles]]></category>			
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 10 Jul 2009 17:00:00 -0400]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jesus Diaz]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5311998&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
        			
																									<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ "You Can Call Me Ripley" [Medicine] ]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/07/504x_SarahMayScottScar-thumb-500x222-23176.jpg" class="left image500" width="500">This is <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged SARAH MAY SCOTT" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/sarah-may-scott/">Sarah May Scott</a>. She got a grave <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged SPINAL CORD INJURY" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/spinal-cord-injury/">spinal cord injury</a> in 2005. And if everything goes well, she may start walking again:</p> <blockquote> <p>I am not a cyborg, but I am getting closer and closer to being a terminator. My back is already full of titanium, and I've got a radio-controlled device in my abdomen that feeds medication into my spinal canal. If the trials go well, I hope to get my chance at being the female Hardiman with the ReWalk system. You can start calling me Ripley when that happens.</p> </blockquote> <p>It is when I read these things that I become fully aware of both my limitations and the tiny dimensions of any troubles I think I may have. Go read Sarah's interview at BBG. [<a href="http://www.boingboing.net/2009/07/09/an-interview-with-sa.html">BBG</a> and <a href="http://maydayprdx.blogspot.com/">Sarah's Blog</a>]</p> ]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5311926/you-can-call-me-ripley]]></link>
			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5311926]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ Medicine ]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Sarah May Scott]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Sci]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Spinal cord injury]]></category>			
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 10 Jul 2009 12:50:00 -0400]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jesus Diaz]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5311926&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
        			
																									<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ The Max Launch Abort System Launch Makes Me Want to Be an Astronaut Again [Space] ]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/07/504x_mlas.jpg" class="left image500" width="500">Looks like Flash Gordon came to Virginia this Wednesday. Here you have images and video of the spectacular <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged MAX LAUNCH ABORT SYSTEM" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/max-launch-abort-system/">Max Launch Abort System</a> in action. Sadly, the spiffy spacecraft won't be in <a href="http://gizmodo.com/367722/orion-crew-test-module-timelapse-build">Orion</a>. Maybe they can send me one to test.</p> <p><object width="502" height="309" class="left gawkerVideo embeddedVideo videoObject_0"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/g2Z35JqnV7I&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22"> <param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"> <embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/g2Z35JqnV7I&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="502" height="309" class="left gawkerVideo"></object></p> <p>MLAS&mdash;named after Maxime Faget, the designer for the Aerial Capsule Emergency Separation Device in the Mercury program&mdash;is an alternative abort launch system concept developed by a team of NASA engineers, working in parallel with the Constellation program team. It won't replace the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5097050/">Orion abort system</a>, however, but according to NASA this concept has serious potential for future missions:</p> <blockquote> <p>MLAS is of potential interest because it is theorized to have aerodynamic performance benefits, weight savings and be relatively simple in some spacecraft applications. Much of the potential gains would be accomplished by eliminating the launch abort tower, which also means eliminating the attitude control motors.</p> </blockquote> <p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/07/504x_mlas2.jpg" class="left image500" width="500"></p> <p>[<a href="http://www.nasa.gov/exploration/features/mlas.html">NASA</a>]</p> ]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5311764/the-max-launch-abort-system-launch-makes-me-want-to-be-an-astronaut-again]]></link>
			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5311764]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ Space ]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Clips]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Constellation]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Max Launch Abort System]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[MLAS]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Nasa]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[orion]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>			
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 10 Jul 2009 10:00:00 -0400]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jesus Diaz]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5311764&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
        			
																									<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ How The F*ck Did We Get Here? [Image Cache] ]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/07/504x_custom_1247187821898_sxbec166_1__copy_jp_576466c.jpg" class="left image500" width="500">I'm sure that Philippe Kahn&mdash;who has been telling us <a href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/philippe-kahn">the adventures</a> of his <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5308492/the-pegasus-open-50-raceboat-wtf-is-a-sailboat-doing-on-gizmodo">Pegasus Raceboat</a>&mdash;will have a precise and logical answer. The rest of us are allowed to say any stupid thing we want.</p> ]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5311419/how-the-fck-did-we-get-here]]></link>
			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5311419]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ Image cache ]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Raceboat]]></category>			
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 09 Jul 2009 23:45:00 -0400]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jesus Diaz]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5311419&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
        			
																									<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Jay Leno Uses 3D Printer to Replace Rare Old Car Parts [3D Printing] ]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p><a href="http://gizmodo.com/5311414/jay-leno-uses-3d-printer-to-replace-rare-old-car-parts">The image associated with this post is best viewed using a browser.</a>What do you do when you have a passion for rare old cars and one irreplaceable part breaks? If you are a stand-up comedian who looks like a T-Mobile Android G1, you scan it and <i>print</i> a new one.</p> <p>That's exactly what <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged JAY LENO" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/jay-leno/">Jay Leno</a> does: He scans the part in a NextEngine 3D Scanner in about 20 minutes at a 160,000 dots per inch resolution. Then he prints the resulting 3D model in plastic using a Dimension 3D Printer. It takes three hours to get the plastic model, which then he uses it to create a mold that will produce the actual car piece in metal.</p> <p>You can read more about the process in Jay's own words at Popular Mechanics. [<a href="http://www.popularmechanics.com/automotive/jay_leno_garage/4320759.html?page=1">Popular Mechanics</a>]</p> ]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5311414/jay-leno-uses-3d-printer-to-replace-rare-old-car-parts]]></link>
			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5311414]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ 3D printing ]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Cars]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Jay Leno]]></category>			
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 09 Jul 2009 22:20:00 -0400]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jesus Diaz]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5311414&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
        			
																									<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Video of Weaponized RC Plane Shooting Fireworks [DIY] ]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p><object width="502" height="309" class="left gawkerVideo embeddedVideo videoObject_0"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/gBn1h0x-37E&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22"> <param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"> <embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/gBn1h0x-37E&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="502" height="309" class="left gawkerVideo"></object><a href="http://gizmodo.com/5311333/video-of-weaponized-rc-plane-shooting-fireworks">The image associated with this post is best viewed using a browser.</a>To celebrate Independence Day, some guys thought that shooting fireworks from <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged RC PLANES" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/rc-planes/">RC planes</a>&mdash;using an electrical firing system&mdash;was a great <i>safe</i> idea. Judging by the music, however, it seems they were celebrating Hitler's invasion of Poland. [<a href="http://hackedgadgets.com/2009/07/09/rc-plane-that-fires-air-to-ground-rockets/">Hacked Gadgets</a>]</p> ]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5311333/video-of-weaponized-rc-plane-shooting-fireworks]]></link>
			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5311333]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ DIY ]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Clips]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Fireworks]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[RC planes]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>			
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 09 Jul 2009 21:40:00 -0400]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jesus Diaz]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5311333&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
        			
																									<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ There's Finally a Use For the Caps Lock Key [Software] ]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/07/billy_128.png" width="128" height="128" /><a href="http://gizmodo.com/5303389/billy-mays-well+known-tv-pitchman-dead-at-50">Billy Mays may be dead</a> but his spirit will live in your PC with the <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged BILLY MAYS CAPS LOCK" title="Click here to read more posts tagged BILLY MAYS CAPS LOCK" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/billy-mays-caps-lock/">Billy Mays Caps Lock</a>! The <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged BILLY MAYS" title="Click here to read more posts tagged BILLY MAYS" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/billy-mays/">Billy Mays</a> Caps Lock will make Billy say something whenever you press caps lock! Yes, that's right! And there's more!</p> <p>Whenever you run the Billy Mays Caps Lock program, Billy will speak one of his trademark phrases. But that's not all. If you order it right now, we'll double the value! You will get the Billy Mays Caps Lock program <i>and</i> a Billy Mays icon in your system tray. When you are done using the Billy Mays Caps Lock program, just click on the Billy Mays icon and select Exit. And that's not all!</p> <p>What if you don't want to exit the Billy Mays Caps Lock program but you want to temporarily use the actual caps lock key instead of having Billy Mays tell you how he will make your whites whiter? You got it! For the same price, our Billy Mays Caps Lock program includes a special mode that will activate the caps lock whenever you hit the <i>shift</i> key at the same time!</p> <p>What is the price for the Billy Mays Caps Lock? That's the best part: It's completely free! Just click on the link and download it!</p> <p>Seriously, like Rosa told me today: "Oh! There's finally a use for the caps lock key." Someone make a Mac version of this, pronto. [<a href="http://johnhaller.com/jh/useful_stuff/billy_mays_caps_lock/">John Haller</a>&mdash;Thanks <a href="http://lifehacker.com/people/RosaGolijan/posts/">Rosa</a>]</p> ]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5311377/theres-finally-a-use-for-the-caps-lock-key]]></link>
			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5311377]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ Software ]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Billy Mays]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Billy Mays Caps Lock]]></category>			
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 09 Jul 2009 20:40:00 -0400]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jesus Diaz]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5311377&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
        			
																									<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Future iPhones May Recognize Objects, Faces, Alter Your Voice [Apple] ]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/07/504x_iPhone-object-recognition-1.jpg" class="left image500" width="500">If this load of recently filed Apple patents become a reality, your iPhone may become a perfect tool for spies soon, with real world object identification, faces recognition, <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged VOICE ALTERATION" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/voice-alteration/">voice alteration</a>, and <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged TEXT FILTERING" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/text-filtering/">text filtering</a>, among other things:</p> <p><b>• Real world object identification:</b> This function will let you point at any object and obtain information about it after the iPhone recognizes, using either the object itself&mdash;like a painting&mdash;RFID tags, or barcode scanning. Alternatively, you can just search the object up in Google. It's not like it's hard to read a tag or enter a name.</p> <p><b>• Face detection and recognition:</b> Similar to the face recognition feature in iPhoto, this can be used for security access. In other words: We are doomed.</p> <p><b>• Text message filtering:</b> If you are offended by the cursing in <a href="http://cursebird.com/jesusdiaz">my twitters</a> and SMS, the new filtering system will save your ears from bleeding, you **************** *******.</p> <p><b>• Smarter text messaging:</b> There are two patents about this. One allows you to check if text messages fail to reach someone in a group. The other informs you if you have received any messages (mail, text, or voicemails) from someone before you try to contact them, just in case you have received what you wanted before initiating the contact. Paranoids and control freaks rejoice.</p> <p><a href="http://gizmodo.com/5311299/future-iphones-may-recognize-objects-faces-alter-your-voice">The image associated with this post is best viewed using a browser.</a></p> <p><b>• Voice changer:</b> Since I sounds like Daffy Duck, this is my favorite new feature <i>by far</i>. Now I would be able to sound like Sean Connery in every single call. Or, apparently, Oprah. I can go either way. [<a href="http://appft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO1&Sect2=HITOFF&d=PG01&p=1&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsrchnum.html&r=1&f=G&l=50&s1=%2220090175499%22.PGNR.&OS=DN/20090175499&RS=DN/20090175499">USPTO patent on object recognition</a>, <a href="http://appft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO1&Sect2=HITOFF&d=PG01&p=1&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsrchnum.html&r=1&f=G&l=50&s1=%2220090175509%22.PGNR.&OS=DN/20090175509&RS=DN/20090175509">USPTO patent on face recognition</a>, <a href="http://appft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO1&Sect2=HITOFF&d=PG01&p=1&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsrchnum.html&r=1&f=G&l=50&s1=%2220090176517%22.PGNR.&OS=DN/20090176517&RS=DN/20090176517">USPTO patent on SMS</a> via <a href="http://www.unwiredview.com/2009/07/09/next-in-your-iphone-os-live-object-identification-face-recognition-text-filtering-smarter-messaging-voice-alteration/">Unwired Review</a>]</p> ]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5311299/future-iphones-may-recognize-objects-faces-alter-your-voice]]></link>
			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5311299]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ Apple ]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Face regonition]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[iPhone]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[object recognition]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Patents]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Text filtering]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Voice alteration]]></category>			
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 09 Jul 2009 19:40:00 -0400]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jesus Diaz]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5311299&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
        			
																									<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ iPhone 3GS Upstream Speed Limited to 384Kbps [Smartphones] ]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p><a href="http://gizmodo.com/5311116/iphone-3gs-upstream-speed-limited-to-384kbps">The image associated with this post is best viewed using a browser.</a>While the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5293388/iphone-3gs-review">iPhone 3GS</a> got a download speed boost&mdash;to 7.2Mbps&mdash;it didn't get any upload power-up, according to PC World: Its upstream speed is limited by its hardware to 384Kbps. But don't get out the torches and pitchforks yet.</p> <p>Most GSM-based cellphones suffer the same problem: No matter how fast they are at download, they will upload at only 384Kbps, or less, as you can see in our <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5303999/iphone-3g-vs-3gs-network-speed-test-shows-no-real-difference">iPhone 3GS network test</a>. This is because the hardware doesn't support the HSUPA (High-Speed Uplink Packet Access) standard, created by Nokia&mdash;the 3rd Generation Partnership Project (3GPP) refers to this standard as <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged ENHANCED UPLINK" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/enhanced-uplink/">Enhanced Uplink</a>.</p> <p>Some would say that this is not needed because Enhanced Uplink&mdash;which runs at 1.4 and 1.9Mbps&mdash;is not supported by AT&T yet, but in Europe there are networks that already support this standard. I would imagine that users of the popular JesusPhone would love to upload their photos and videos to Facebook and YouTube as fast as possible.</p> <p>On the other side, with AT&T still struggling to get 7.2Mbps off the ground and most of the other networks having problems and slowdowns everywhere, I would be happy if they all just managed to actually deliver their advertised download speeds. [<a href="http://www.pcworld.com/article/168118/iphone_3gs_limited_to_384_kbps_upstream.html?tk=rss_news">PC World</a>]</p> ]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5311116/iphone-3gs-upstream-speed-limited-to-384kbps]]></link>
			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5311116]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ Smartphones ]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Enhanced uplink]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Hsdpa]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[HSUPA]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[iPhone]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[iphone 3gs]]></category>			
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 09 Jul 2009 14:20:00 -0400]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jesus Diaz]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5311116&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
        			
																									<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ My iPod Is Bigger Than Yours [Image Cache] ]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p><a href="http://gizmodo.com/5310984/my-ipod-is-bigger-than-yours">The image associated with this post is best viewed using a browser.</a>Apple designmeisters Jonathan Ive and Jody Turner gave this giant pink nano to fashion genius <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged PAUL SMITH" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/paul-smith/">Paul Smith</a> for his birthday. Smith is the designer&mdash;among many things&mdash;of my NSFW naked pin-up wallet, which you can see after the jump.</p> <blockquote> <p>On Friday 3rd July, I received a really lovely mad gift for my birthday (which is on the 5th) from Jonathan Ive and Jody who works with him at Apple - a perfect model of an Ipod but as you can see slightly bigger than usual. Jonny knows I like strange things; as the real thing gets smaller, he sends me a giant version!</p> </blockquote> <p>Oh, those crazy designers and their crazy presents. Paul, you should send Jon and Jody one of your Mini bags. One the size of a real Mini. [<a href="http://www.paulsmith.co.uk/personal/paul-smith-blog/my-birthday-apple-jeff-koons-at-the-serpentine,114,PWH.html">Paul Smith</a> via <a href="http://macenstein.com/default/archives/4839">Macenstein</a>]</p> <p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/2009/07/custom_1247152118337_3422314-l.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/07/504x_custom_1247152118337_3422314-l.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" style="display:block;float:none;"></a><i>This is my (second) Paul Smith wallet. And this is the Mini bag, which I use to tote my MacBook Pro, camera, and spare t-shirts and underpants in trips.</i></p> <p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/07/504x_P1090592.JPG" class="left image500" width="500" style="display:block;float:none;"></p> ]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5310984/my-ipod-is-bigger-than-yours]]></link>
			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5310984]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ Image cache ]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Design]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[iPod Nano]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Nsfw]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Paul Smith]]></category>			
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 09 Jul 2009 11:40:00 -0400]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jesus Diaz]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5310984&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
        			
																									<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Office 2010 The Movie Doesn't Star Tom Cruise&mdash;Thank Xenu for That [Office] ]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p><object width="502" height="309" class="left gawkerVideo embeddedVideo videoObject_0"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/VUawhjxLS2I&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/VUawhjxLS2I&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="502" height="309" class="left gawkerVideo"></embed></object>Here's the trailer for <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged OFFICE 2010" title="Click here to read more posts tagged OFFICE 2010" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/office-2010/">Office 2010</a>: The Movie, full of matrixy characters and missionimpossibly situations. </p> <p>Thankfully it's just a promo and there won't be any Office 2010 movie. It was created for Microsoft by Dennis Liu, who also did the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5168821/pretending-to-work-video-is-full-of-great-office-tips">how to pretend you are working</a> video. [Thanks Dennis]</p> ]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5310868/office-2010-the-movie-doesnt-star-tom-cruisethank-xenu-for-that]]></link>
			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5310868]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ Office ]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Clips]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Office 2010]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>			
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 09 Jul 2009 09:30:00 -0400]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jesus Diaz]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5310868&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
        			
																									<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ 100% Solar-Powered Airplane Ready To Go Around the World [Airplanes] ]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/07/504x_1260_30_Cockpit-Solar-powered-plane-ready-for-take-off.jpg" class="left image500" width="500"><a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged SOLAR IMPULSE" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/solar-impulse/">Solar Impulse</a>&mdash;the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/262940/solar-impulse-around-the-world-in-a-100-sun+powered-airplane">100% solar-powered airplane that will go around the world</a>&mdash;is complete and ready to circumnavigate the globe. And for the first time ever, its pilot&mdash;actually, the <i>real</i> Piccard&mdash;will use a symbiotic suit.</p> <p>A symbiotic suit will allow Bertrand Piccard&mdash;the pilot and one of the cofounders of the project&mdash;to sleep on his seat at any given time, If anything goes wrong or any flight adjustments are needed, the computer will use the suit to wake him up.<br> <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5310806/100-solar+powered-airplane-ready-to-go-around-the-world"> <img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/07/smallish_1260_30_Cockpit-Solar-powered-plane-ready-for-take-off.jpg" alt=" " title=" " align="left" hspace="2" vspace="2" /> </a> <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5310806/100-solar+powered-airplane-ready-to-go-around-the-world"> <img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/07/smallish_1258_20_Wing-engine-Solar-powered-plane-ready-for-take-off.jpg" alt=" " title=" " align="left" hspace="2" vspace="2" /> </a> <br> With a 262.5-foot wingspan&mdash;that's longer than an Airbus A380&mdash;the Solar Impulse will travel at an average speed of 43.5mph at a maximum altitude of 39,300 feet. [<a href="http://www.computerweekly.com/galleries/236736-11/Solar-cell-Solar-powered-plane-ready-for-take-off.htm">Computer Weekly</a>]</p> ]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5310806/100-solar+powered-airplane-ready-to-go-around-the-world]]></link>
			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5310806]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ Airplanes ]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Gallery]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Green]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Solar]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Solar Impulse]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Solar Power]]></category>			
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 09 Jul 2009 07:20:00 -0400]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jesus Diaz]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5310806&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
        			
																									<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ How Would It Be to Live on the Moon [Space] ]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p><a href="http://gizmodo.com/5310792/how-would-it-be-to-live-on-the-moon">The image associated with this post is best viewed using a browser.</a>If you want a realistic view on how living a quarter million miles from here would be for humans a few decades from now, check out this advance on National Geographic's new documentary. It will even show the Orion simulator:</p> <p><embed src="http://channel.nationalgeographic.com/channel/videos/satellite/satelliteEmbedPlayer.swf" bgcolor="#000000" flashvars="videoRef=06892_00&autoStart=false&shareURL=http%3A%2F%2Fchannel%2Enationalgeographic%2Ecom%2Fseries%2Fnaked%2Dscience%2F4253%2FVideos%2F06892%5F00" allowfullscreen="true" name="flashObj" width="496" height="279" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" swliveconnect="true" pluginspage="http://www.macromedia.com/shockwave/download/index.cgi?P1_Prod_Version=ShockwaveFlash"></p> <p>Yes, it reminds me of Disneyland Epcot's Future Land exhibits, except that this time it seems that we are really close to get there. And yes, a quarter million miles is a big commute from Earth, but hey, I hear that some people come to work in NYC from New Jersey. It can't be much worse than that. [<a href="http://channel.nationalgeographic.com/series/naked-science/4253/Videos/06892_00#tab-Videos/06892_00">National Geographic</a>]</p> ]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5310792/how-would-it-be-to-live-on-the-moon]]></link>
			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5310792]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ Space ]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Clips]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Live on the moon]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Moon]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>			
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 09 Jul 2009 07:00:00 -0400]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jesus Diaz]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5310792&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
        			
																									<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ The Art of Bomber Girls [Art] ]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/07/504x_3694333160_073478ee64_o.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" style="display:block;float:none;">One of the things I remember from my childhood years is falling in love with a bomber girl in the cover of an old PC game. Maybe that's why I like airplanes&mdash;and airplane pinups&mdash;so much:</p> <p> <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5309879/the-art-of-bomber-girls"> <img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/07/smallish_3683922969_5d7b2c92c0_o.jpg" alt=" " title=" " align="left" hspace="2" vspace="2" /> </a> <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5309879/the-art-of-bomber-girls"> <img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/07/smallish_3683926047_20bb5a067f_o.jpg" alt=" " title=" " align="left" hspace="2" vspace="2" /> </a> <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5309879/the-art-of-bomber-girls"> <img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/07/smallish_3693527919_ba9261b78c_o.jpg" alt=" " title=" " align="left" hspace="2" vspace="2" /> </a> <br clear="both" /> <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5309879/the-art-of-bomber-girls"> <img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/07/smallish_3684738372_00afe6d192_o.jpg" alt=" " title=" " align="left" hspace="2" vspace="2" /> </a> <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5309879/the-art-of-bomber-girls"> <img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/" alt=" " title=" " align="left" hspace="2" vspace="2" /> </a> </p> <p>Check the rest at Deputy Dog. [<a href="http://deputy-dog.com/2009/07/fascinating-aircraft-nose-art.html">Deputy Dog</a>]</p> ]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5309879/the-art-of-bomber-girls]]></link>
			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5309879]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ Art ]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Airplanes pin-ups]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Gallery]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Nsfw]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Pinups]]></category>			
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 08 Jul 2009 21:00:00 -0400]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jesus Diaz]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5309879&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
        			
																									<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Sony Ericsson's Android Rachael UI Makes Me Want to Ditch My iPhone [Smartphones] ]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p><object width="502" height="309" class="left gawkerVideo embeddedVideo"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/YDCDUKGaYwI&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22"> <param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"> <embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/YDCDUKGaYwI&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="502" height="309" class="left gawkerVideo"></object><a href="http://gizmodo.com/5310236/sony-ericssons-android-rachael-ui-makes-me-want-to-ditch-my-iphone">The image associated with this post is best viewed using a browser.</a><a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged SONY ERICSSON" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/sony-ericsson/">Sony Ericsson</a> will use their own interface in their next <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5307466/is-sony-ericssons-racheal-their-first-android-handset">Android-powered Rachael smartphone</a>. The good news: It kicks serious ass. Check out the video demonstration, as well as the new images of this hot Android smartphone and the new Kiki.</p> <p>As you can see in the video, the user interface in the 7.2Mbps HSDPA Rachael&mdash;which is rumored to have a Snapdragon processor, an 8-megapixel camera with auto-focus, and 3D acceleration&mdash;is extremely sleek, making full use of the touch interface, with pretty widgets everywhere. It also appears to be heavily oriented to social networks like Facebook and Twitter. I like it enough to make me want to ditch my iPhone&mdash;if it had equivalent apps to the ones I use, that is.</p> <p>People were discarding already Sony Ericsson&mdash;<a href="http://gizmodo.com/5279250/dumb-cellphones-must-die">myself included</a>&mdash;but if they release this on time, bug free, and with this interface, they may have an opportunity to become the leading Android smartphone. [<a href="http://www.esato.com/">Esato</a> via <a href="http://www.boygeniusreport.com/2009/07/08/new-images-of-sony-ericsson-rachael-and-kiki-surface-along-with-a-rachael-ui-video/">Boy Genius Report</a>]</p> <p> <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5310236/sony-ericssons-android-rachael-ui-makes-me-want-to-ditch-my-iphone"> <img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/07/smallish_kiki-preview.jpg" alt=" " title=" " align="left" hspace="2" vspace="2" /> </a> <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5310236/sony-ericssons-android-rachael-ui-makes-me-want-to-ditch-my-iphone"> <img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/07/smallish_rachael-preview.jpg" alt=" " title=" " align="left" hspace="2" vspace="2" /> </a> </p> ]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5310236/sony-ericssons-android-rachael-ui-makes-me-want-to-ditch-my-iphone]]></link>
			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5310236]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ Smartphones ]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Clips]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Gallery]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[rachael]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Sony Ericsson]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Sony ericsson rachael]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Top]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>			
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 08 Jul 2009 14:17:00 -0400]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jesus Diaz]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5310236&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
        			
																									<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ North Korea Now Attacking US Government Sites, Sources Say [War] ]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p><a href="http://gizmodo.com/5310143/north-korea-now-attacking-us-government-sites-sources-say">The image associated with this post is best viewed using a browser.</a>Since <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged NORTH KOREA" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/north-korea/">North Korea</a>'s <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5199611/north-korea-intercontinental-ballistic-missile-fails-miserably">unreliable "Intercontinental Ballistic Missiles"</a> are <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5302604/just-where-can-north-koreas-missiles-hit">still far from hitting the US</a>, Kim Jong Il's hacker hordes are now attacking US government web sites. At least, according to the <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged SOUTH KOREA" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/south-korea/">South Korea</a> Information Security Agency.</p> <p>If the information is true, North Korean hackers launched an offensive using <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged DENIAL OF SERVICE" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/denial-of-service/">denial of service</a> attacks against the Treasury Department, Secret Service, Federal Trade Commission, and Transportation Department's web sites, which were down at some points during July 4 and this week. These attacks have been confirmed by US officials, although the origin hasn't been clarified by the US government yet.</p> <p>The hackers simultaneously attacked South Korea's government sites too, including the Blue House&mdash;the equivalent to the White House&mdash;and the Defense Ministry. The South Koreans are claiming that the DoD attacks used 12,000 zombie PCs in Korea, and 8,000 in other parts of the world.</p> <p>Can I say these guys are fucking bunch of morons? Oh wait, I did already. [<a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090708/ap_on_re_as/as_skorea_cyber_attack">Yahoo News</a>]</p> ]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5310143/north-korea-now-attacking-us-government-sites-sources-say]]></link>
			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5310143]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ War ]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Cyberattack]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[denial of service]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Dod]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[North Korea]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[South Korea]]></category>			
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 08 Jul 2009 12:50:00 -0400]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jesus Diaz]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5310143&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
        			
																									<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ What Is This? [Image Cache] ]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p><a href="http://gizmodo.com/5310076/what-is-this">The image associated with this post is best viewed using a browser.</a>It's a DIY pick-up truck. Or a motor home&mdash;it has a light bulb and a bed. Or a scooter version of a scooter version of a stagecoach. Whatever it is, it is bound to fail. [<a href="http://www.kk.org/streetuse/archives/2009/07/scooter_contraption.php">KK</a> via <a href="http://blog.makezine.com/archive/2009/07/monstrous_frankenscooter_spotted.html">Makezine</a>]</p> ]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5310076/what-is-this]]></link>
			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5310076]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ Image cache ]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Scooter]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Truck]]></category>			
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 08 Jul 2009 11:20:00 -0400]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jesus Diaz]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5310076&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
        			
																									<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Cars Racing On a 105-Foot High Vertical Road Make Me Wish for Antigravity Engines [Art] ]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/07/504x_custom_1247056484689_002.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" style="display:block;">We have seen <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5027177/suv-sculpture-unintentionally-sends-the-wrong-message">Gerry Judah's amazing work before</a>, which mix awesome engineering and technology to get almost-impossible pieces, like this 105-foot high, 44 tonne sculpture showing two Audi cars shooting into the sky. Up close it's mighty impressive:</p> <p>You can see it at the Goodwood Festival of Speed in West Sussex, England. [<a href="http://www.judah.co.uk/projects/audi/audi-central-display-2009">Judah</a> via <a href="http://www.dezeen.com/2009/07/07/audi-sculpture-by-gerry-judah/">Dezeen</a>]</p> <p> <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5309928/cars-racing-on-a-105+foot-high-vertical-road-make-me-wish-for-antigravity-engines"> <img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/07/smallish_008.jpg" alt=" " title=" " align="left" hspace="2" vspace="2" /> </a> <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5309928/cars-racing-on-a-105+foot-high-vertical-road-make-me-wish-for-antigravity-engines"> <img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/07/smallish_007.jpg" alt=" " title=" " align="left" hspace="2" vspace="2" /> </a> <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5309928/cars-racing-on-a-105+foot-high-vertical-road-make-me-wish-for-antigravity-engines"> <img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/07/smallish_003.jpg" alt=" " title=" " align="left" hspace="2" vspace="2" /> </a> <br clear="both" /> <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5309928/cars-racing-on-a-105+foot-high-vertical-road-make-me-wish-for-antigravity-engines"> <img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/07/smallish_002.jpg" alt=" " title=" " align="left" hspace="2" vspace="2" /> </a> <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5309928/cars-racing-on-a-105+foot-high-vertical-road-make-me-wish-for-antigravity-engines"> <img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/07/smallish_005.jpg" alt=" " title=" " align="left" hspace="2" vspace="2" /> </a> <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5309928/cars-racing-on-a-105+foot-high-vertical-road-make-me-wish-for-antigravity-engines"> <img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/07/smallish_006.jpg" alt=" " title=" " align="left" hspace="2" vspace="2" /> </a> <br clear="both" /> <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5309928/cars-racing-on-a-105+foot-high-vertical-road-make-me-wish-for-antigravity-engines"> <img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/07/smallish_010.jpg" alt=" " title=" " align="left" hspace="2" vspace="2" /> </a> <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5309928/cars-racing-on-a-105+foot-high-vertical-road-make-me-wish-for-antigravity-engines"> <img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/07/smallish_004.jpg" alt=" " title=" " align="left" hspace="2" vspace="2" /> </a> <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5309928/cars-racing-on-a-105+foot-high-vertical-road-make-me-wish-for-antigravity-engines"> <img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/07/smallish_009.jpg" alt=" " title=" " align="left" hspace="2" vspace="2" /> </a> <br clear="both" /> <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5309928/cars-racing-on-a-105+foot-high-vertical-road-make-me-wish-for-antigravity-engines"> <img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/07/smallish_001.jpg" alt=" " title=" " align="left" hspace="2" vspace="2" /> </a> </p> ]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5309928/cars-racing-on-a-105+foot-high-vertical-road-make-me-wish-for-antigravity-engines]]></link>
			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5309928]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ Art ]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Audi]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Cars]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Gallery]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[gerry judah]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Sculpture]]></category>			
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 08 Jul 2009 11:00:00 -0400]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jesus Diaz]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5309928&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
        			
																									<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ This Not Your Typical Small Home Office [Image Cache] ]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/2009/07/custom_1247048843747_o20_84013571.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/07/504x_custom_1247048843747_o20_84013571.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" style="display:block;float:none;"></a>It's not an <a href="http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/reader-participation/vote-now-for-the-best-giz-readers-computer-rig-306538.php">ultrafancy rig</a>, but I like the fact that President Obama has a personal computer and a regular printer next to him. But el Señor Jefe of the Free World doesn't fool me: <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5015730/emperor-workstation-belongs-in-the-death-star-my-office"><i>This</i> is really Obama's workstation</a>.</p> <p>Come on. I bet he just clicks a button, and everything transforms into that chair. Then, he spends the day commanding battleships and air drones and playing World of Warcraft with his President buddies as level 120 wizard. [<a href="http://www.boston.com/bigpicture/2009/07/president_obamas_first_167_day.html">Big Picture</a>]</p> ]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5309862/this-not-your-typical-small-home-office]]></link>
			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5309862]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ Image cache ]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[obama]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Small office]]></category>			
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 08 Jul 2009 09:10:00 -0400]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jesus Diaz]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5309862&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
        			
																									<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Apparently, the Secret of the Order of the Universe Is the Lego Brick [Art] ]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p><a href="http://gizmodo.com/5309909/apparently-the-secret-of-the-order-of-the-universe-is-the-lego-brick">The image associated with this post is best viewed using a browser.</a>Little knew Democritus&mdash;the ancient greek philosopher, mathematician, and biologist who first postulated the atom in the 4th century BC&mdash;that his <i>Great Order of the Universe</i> would look like Godtfred Kirk Cristiansen' Patent #3,005,282 for Lego blocks.</p> <p>Created by writer Christian Bök, the illustration shows all the 25 ways to combine two 4 x 2 Lego bricks. I don't know about you, but I love some poetry, science, and bricks in my morning cereal. [<a href="http://www.poetryfoundation.org/archive/poem.html?id=237152">Poetry Foundation</a> via <a href="http://www.brothers-brick.com/2009/07/05/the-great-order-of-the-universe-lego-featured-in-current-issue-of-poetry/">Brothers Brick</a>]</p> ]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5309909/apparently-the-secret-of-the-order-of-the-universe-is-the-lego-brick]]></link>
			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5309909]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ Art ]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Atom]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Democritus]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Lego]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>			
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 08 Jul 2009 08:30:00 -0400]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jesus Diaz]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5309909&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
        			
																									<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Asus Eee Keyboard Open and Fully Naked [PCs] ]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/07/504x_3629088946_a49bea034b_o.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" style="display:block;float:none;">I liked the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5279630/asus-eee-keyboard-with-pc-and-touchscreen-caught-looking-great-on-video">Asus Eee Keyboard before</a>. A lot. I like it because it looks like a super-sleek 21st century version of a Commodore 64. Now, seeing it naked on a <a href="http://www.blogeee.net/">French site</a>, I want to have babies with it.</p> <p>Not surprisingly, it looks like an elongated notebook inside. One that uses a lot of tape to hold those cables tight in place.</p> <p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/07/504x_custom_1247053262350_3629086716_e3a98f6ee1_o.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" style="display:block;"></p> <p><object width="502" height="309" class="left gawkerVideo embeddedVideo"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/fWi3mcU_WTc&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22"> <param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"> <embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/fWi3mcU_WTc&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="502" height="309" class="left gawkerVideo"></object><a href="http://gizmodo.com/5309895/asus-eee-keyboard-open-and-fully-naked">The image associated with this post is best viewed using a browser.</a></p> <p>Now the question remains: <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5306064/asus-eee-keyboard-blithely-glides-past-june-release-now-scheduled-for-august">When the hell is this coming out</a>? [<a href="http://www.blogeee.net/2009/07/08/test-eeekeyboard-fonctionnement-et-composants/">Blogeee</a>&mdash;Thanks Martin]</p> ]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5309895/asus-eee-keyboard-open-and-fully-naked]]></link>
			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5309895]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ PCs ]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Asus]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Asus EEE Keyboard]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Clips]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[eee]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Keyboard]]></category>			
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 08 Jul 2009 07:50:00 -0400]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jesus Diaz]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5309895&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
        			
																									<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ How Large Is a Petabyte? [Storage] ]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/07/504x_whatsapetabyte.gif" class="left image500" width="500" style="display:block;">13.3 years of HDTV content. That's approximately 58,292 movies, which means an equal number of large pizzas. So one petabyte equals 52 tonnes of pepperoni pizza. Yes, my head has assploded. For other equivalents, click and zoom in.</p> <p>How big are 20 million four-drawer cabinets? As big as the Sears Tower? I have a hard time visualizing that. Strangely enough, I don't have any problem visualizing 52 tonnes of pepperoni pizza. [<a href="http://mozy.com/blog/misc/how-much-is-a-petabyte/">Mozy</a>]</p> ]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5309889/how-large-is-a-petabyte]]></link>
			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5309889]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ Storage ]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Petabyte]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Pizza]]></category>			
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 08 Jul 2009 07:30:00 -0400]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jesus Diaz]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5309889&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
        			
																									<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ This Is Now the Most Expensive Game In History [Nintendo] ]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p><a href="http://gizmodo.com/5309849/this-is-now-the-most-expensive-game-in-history">The image associated with this post is best viewed using a browser.</a>Remember the legendary gold cartridges created for the 1990 Nintendo World Championships, which included <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged SUPER MARIO BROS" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/super-mario-bros/">Super Mario Bros</a>, Rad Race, and Tetris, the "Holy Grail of Gaming Collectibles"? Me neither. Someone does, and he paid $17,500 for it.</p> <p>His name is JJ Hendricks, and he beat <a href="http://kotaku.com/385528/this-man-paid-15000-for-a-nes-cartridge">the previous game selling price record</a>&mdash;which was also for one of these&mdash;by a $2,500 margin. Only 26 gold-painted cartridges were made and given to the winners and runner up of the Nintendo World Championships. [<a href="http://blog.videogamepricecharts.com/2009/06/how-i-got-nintendo-world-championships.html">JJ Hendrick's account of the events</a> via <a href="http://www.offworld.com/2009/07/tweet-2445376265.html">Offworld</a> via <a href="http://kotaku.com/5306712/how-one-man-spent-17500-on-a-video-game">Kotaku</a>&mdash;Thanks JJ]</p> ]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5309849/this-is-now-the-most-expensive-game-in-history]]></link>
			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5309849]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ Nintendo ]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Gold cart]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Gold cartridge]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[NWC]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Nwc 2009]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[super Mario bros]]></category>			
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 08 Jul 2009 06:16:38 -0400]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jesus Diaz]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5309849&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
        			
																									<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Killer 5th Generation Russian Stealth Superfighters [Airplanes] ]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/2009/07/custom_1247008364792_SU_PAKFA_pic_6_01.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/07/504x_custom_1247008364792_SU_PAKFA_pic_6_01.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" style="display:block;float:none;"></a>Most people know the US <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5162787/a-look-at-fifth-generation-fighter-planes">fifth generation wonderplanes</a>&mdash;the F-22 Raptor and F-35 Lightning II&mdash;but the Russians are working on their own stealth superfighter: The <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged SUKHOI PAK-FA" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/sukhoi-pak_fa/">Sukhoi PAK-FA</a>. These concepts&mdash;by industrial designer Aleksander Dultsev&mdash;are simply amazing:</p> <p> <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5309592/killer-5th-generation-russian-stealth-superfighters"> <img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/07/smallish_SU_PAKFA_pic_3.jpg" alt=" " title=" " align="left" hspace="2" vspace="2" /> </a> <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5309592/killer-5th-generation-russian-stealth-superfighters"> <img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/07/smallish_SU_PAKFA_pic_9.jpg" alt=" " title=" " align="left" hspace="2" vspace="2" /> </a> <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5309592/killer-5th-generation-russian-stealth-superfighters"> <img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/07/smallish_SU_PAKFA_pic_5.jpg" alt=" " title=" " align="left" hspace="2" vspace="2" /> </a> <br clear="both" /> <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5309592/killer-5th-generation-russian-stealth-superfighters"> <img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/07/smallish_SU_PAKFA_pic_8.jpg" alt=" " title=" " align="left" hspace="2" vspace="2" /> </a> <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5309592/killer-5th-generation-russian-stealth-superfighters"> <img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/07/smallish_SU_PAKFA_pic_6.jpg" alt=" " title=" " align="left" hspace="2" vspace="2" /> </a> <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5309592/killer-5th-generation-russian-stealth-superfighters"> <img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/07/smallish_SU_PAKFA_pic_2.jpg" alt=" " title=" " align="left" hspace="2" vspace="2" /> </a> <br clear="both" /> <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5309592/killer-5th-generation-russian-stealth-superfighters"> <img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/07/smallish_SU_PAKFA_pic_4.jpg" alt=" " title=" " align="left" hspace="2" vspace="2" /> </a> <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5309592/killer-5th-generation-russian-stealth-superfighters"> <img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/07/smallish_SU_PAKFA_pic_7.jpg" alt=" " title=" " align="left" hspace="2" vspace="2" /> </a> </p> <p>Nobody knows if the real PAK-FA will look anything similar to any of these three models, but we will probably discover it sooner than later: The Sukhoi PAK-FA will replace the MiG-29 Fulcrum and the Su-27 Flanker in the Russian Air Force, with a first flight initially projected for this year.</p> <p><iframe src="http://digg.com/api/diggthis.php?u=http://digg.com/design/Killer_5th_Generation_Russian_Stealth_Superfighter" align="right" frameborder="0" height="82" scrolling="no" width="55"></iframe>What we know for sure is that new Sukhoi fighter will directly compete against the F-22 Raptor and the F-35 Lightning II. I, for one, hope that they never have to engage in combat. [<a href="http://www.duler.ru/design.html">Duler</a> via <a href="http://www.flightglobal.com/blogs/the-dewline/2009/07/private-russian-designer-imagi.html">The Dew Line</a>]</p> ]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5309592/killer-5th-generation-russian-stealth-superfighters]]></link>
			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5309592]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ Airplanes ]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[f22]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[F35]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Gallery]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Pak-fa]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Sukhoi]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Sukhoi PAK-FA]]></category>			
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 07 Jul 2009 21:20:00 -0400]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jesus Diaz]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5309592&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
        			
																									<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Ultimate Wiimote Control Hack: 15-Tonne Giant Robot Claws [Nintendo] ]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p><object width="502" height="309" class="left gawkerVideo embeddedVideo"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/v1AJ_OBJUpY&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22"> <param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"> <embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/v1AJ_OBJUpY&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="502" height="309" class="left gawkerVideo"></object><a href="http://gizmodo.com/5309536/ultimate-wiimote-control-hack-15+tonne-giant-robot-claws">The image associated with this post is best viewed using a browser.</a>Forget about <a href="http://gizmodo.com/232000/wii-remote-controls-robosapien-tickles-elmo">puny robots</a>, this is why Wiimote hacking was invented: To control <i>two</i> giant robotic claws, each of them weighing 15 tonnes and pushing 200 bars, which can separate your torso from your legs in a snap. [<a href="http://entitycrisis.blogspot.com/2009/07/python-wiimote-30-tonnes-of-steel.html">Entity Crisis</a>]</p> ]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5309536/ultimate-wiimote-control-hack-15+tonne-giant-robot-claws]]></link>
			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5309536]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ Nintendo ]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[claws]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Clips]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Giant robot project]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Wiimote]]></category>			
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 07 Jul 2009 20:00:00 -0400]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jesus Diaz]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5309536&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
        			
																									<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ NASA to Take Photos of Lunar Landing Sites, End Conspiracy Theories [Space] ]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/07/504x_smile.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" style="display:block;float:none;">Suck it up, conspiracy theorists, because soon your cuckoo stories about the US simulating the Moon landings will be <i>over</i> forever. NASA has confirmed to Gizmodo that the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5309165/nasa-lunar-reconnaissance-orbiter-sends-most-detailed-moon-images-yet">Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter</a> will take photos of all the Apollo landing sites:</p> <p>Jesus Diaz: Would the LRO return images of the moon landings when it flies over them?<br> Grey Hautaluoma (NASA Headquarters, Office of Public Affairs): Yes, it will. We don't have a timeline yet for viewing the Apollo sites, but it will be in the near future.</p> <p>There you have it. Soon we will have photos showing the remains of the Apollo Lunar Modules, also known as LEM (Lunar Excursion Module.) Built by Grumman Aircraft Engineering, the Lunar Module was 20.9-foot tall, with a 14 feet diameter and a landing gear span of 29.75 feet.</p> <p>However, the Lunar Reconnoissance Orbiter will only be able to take photos of what is known as the Descent Stage, the bottom part of the LEM that housed the main propulsion system. This part was left on the Moon's surface, while the Ascent Stage launched after each mission to rendezvous with the Command Module orbiting around the Moon.</p> <p>Other remains left on the Moon include the Lunar Roving Vehicles, used in the Apollo J-class missions: Apollo 15, Apollo 16, and Apollo 17. Since they are 3-meter long, the LRO will be able to distinguish them as well.</p> <p><iframe src="http://digg.com/api/diggthis.php?u=http://digg.com/space/NASA_to_Take_Photos_of_Lunar_Landing_Sites" align="right" frameborder="0" height="82" scrolling="no" width="55"></iframe>Of course, the conspiracy theorist will say it's all Photoshop and 3D now. I wish I can do like <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5301437/buzz-aldrins-new-hip-hop-album-looks-amazing">Buzz Aldrin</a> and smack each and everyone of them.</p> ]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5309453/nasa-to-take-photos-of-lunar-landing-sites-end-conspiracy-theories]]></link>
			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5309453]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ Space ]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Apollo]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Landings]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[lunar]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter]]></category>			
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 07 Jul 2009 15:59:47 -0400]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jesus Diaz]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5309453&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
        			
																									<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Spherical Watch Tells Time Or Makes You Spill Secret Rebel Base Location [Watches] ]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/07/504x_custom_1246987332027_erisbyeaaphotograph006.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" style="display:block;">The Pierre Juno Eris watch can either tell you the time or torture you until you reveal secrets like the color of Princess Leia's underpants&mdash;camouflage pink, I believe. Either way we like it, because it's tiny and sleek.</p> <p>In fact, at a 1.3-inch diameter and weighing only 1.2 ounces, the <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged PIERRE JUNOD" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/pierre-junod/">Pierre Junod</a> <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged ERIS PLANETARY SPHERE WATCH" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/eris-planetary-sphere-watch/">Eris Planetary Sphere Watch</a> is so small that you can use it as a pendant. Definitely smaller than the planet it takes its name from, which is 2,500 kilometers in diameter and 27% more massive than Pluto.</p> <p> <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5309336/spherical-watch-tells-time-or-makes-you-spill-secret-rebel-base-location"> <img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/07/smallish_erisbyeaaphotograph006.jpg" alt=" " title=" " align="left" hspace="2" vspace="2" /> </a> <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5309336/spherical-watch-tells-time-or-makes-you-spill-secret-rebel-base-location"> <img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/07/smallish_eris_1a.jpg" alt=" " title=" " align="left" hspace="2" vspace="2" /> </a> <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5309336/spherical-watch-tells-time-or-makes-you-spill-secret-rebel-base-location"> <img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/07/smallish_erisbyeaaphotograph001.jpg" alt=" " title=" " align="left" hspace="2" vspace="2" /> </a> <br clear="both" /> <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5309336/spherical-watch-tells-time-or-makes-you-spill-secret-rebel-base-location"> <img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/07/smallish_erisbyeaaphotograph003.jpg" alt=" " title=" " align="left" hspace="2" vspace="2" /> </a> <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5309336/spherical-watch-tells-time-or-makes-you-spill-secret-rebel-base-location"> <img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/07/smallish_PierreJunodErisweb.jpg" alt=" " title=" " align="left" hspace="2" vspace="2" /> </a> <br> <br clear="all"></p> <p>The only thing massive about this dark sphere is its price tag: $450. [<a href="http://www.watchismo.com/pierre-junod-eris-watch.aspx">Watchismo</a> via <a href="http://technabob.com/blog/2009/07/06/pierre-junod-eris-planetary-sphere-watch/">Technabob</a>]</p> ]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5309336/spherical-watch-tells-time-or-makes-you-spill-secret-rebel-base-location]]></link>
			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5309336]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ Watches ]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Eris]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Eris Planetary Sphere Watch]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Gallery]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[pierre junod]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Pierre Junod Eris Planetary Sphere Watch]]></category>			
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 07 Jul 2009 15:20:00 -0400]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jesus Diaz]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5309336&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
        			
																									<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ RedSn0w Jailbreak Tool Now Available for iPhone 3GS, More Stable than PurpleRa1n [IPhone] ]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p>If you want to jailbreak your new iPhone 3GS, iPhone 3G, iPhone 2G, and iPod touch 2G, now can get RedSn0w 0.8, and do it easily.</p> <p>This version is allegedly more stable than <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5307693/iphone-3gs-unlocked-with-purplera1n-%252B-ultrasn0w">PurpleRa1n</a>, fully compatible with <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5166126/cydia-opens-iphone-app-store-for-the-jailbroken-community">Cydia</a> and <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5295362/installer-for-iphone-is-dead">Icy</a>, <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5300710/ultrasn0w-30-unlock-for-iphone-3g-ready-for-download">UltraSn0w</a>, and probably many other annoyingly misspelled programs with 1s and 0s in their names. </p> <p>You can download the new version for Windows, Mac, and Linux using a Torrent client. [<a href="http://thepiratebay.org/user/iphonedev/">Torrent</a> via <a href="http://twitter.com/iphone_dev/status/2512752399">Twitter</a>]</p> ]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5309406/redsn0w-jailbreak-tool-now-available-for-iphone-3gs-more-stable-than-purplera1n]]></link>
			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5309406]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ iPhone ]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[iphone jailbreak]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Jailbrek]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[redsn0w]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Ultrasn0w]]></category>			
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 07 Jul 2009 15:00:59 -0400]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jesus Diaz]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5309406&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
        			
																									<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ NASA Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter Sends Most Detailed Moon Images Yet [Space] ]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/07/504x_365431main_nacl000000fd_top_detail.jpg.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" style="display:block;float:none;">While <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5305398/nasa-kills-ulysses-spacecraft-after-18-years-of-studying-the-sun">Ulysses dies in the solitude of space</a>, NASA's <a href="http://gizmodo.com/386907/nasa-to-fly-you-to-the-moon-for-free-sinatra-style">Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter</a> is now alive and fully awake, sending these ultra-detailed images from the Moon's Mare Nubium region. Go on and zoom in. It's actually made of cheese.</p> <p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/07/504x_365426main_nacl000000fd_middle.jpg.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" style="display:block;float:none;"></p> <p>Designed to help the planning of the next lunar missions, NASA's LRO will take the most detailed photographic map of the Moon yet, distinguishing features only 3 meters (9.8 feet) wide, which is better than <a href="http://gizmodo.com/379172/first-high-definition-moon-map-released-uranium-sites-located">JAXA's Selene</a> and way clearer than <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5089936/nasa-scales-up-1966s-moon-image-to-amazing-ultra+high-resolution">NASA's own HD-upscaled images</a> from the 1966's Lunar Orbiter 1.</p> <p>In theory, that's enough resolution to see the lunar landing sites, so I guess we can expect to see a badly parked rover as soon as the spacecraft passes over it.</p> <p>Only the Apollo astronauts and Selene&mdash;which <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5300947/what-is-this">sent close-up images just before crashing</a>&mdash;have relayed photos with more detail than these. However, these weren't taken from orbit.</p> <p>The rest of the instruments on board the LRO are doing fine so far: On June 19 the Lunar Exploration Neutron Detector&mdash;which will look for potential water ice deposits&mdash;and the Cosmic Ray Telescope&mdash;to test the moon's radiation environment&mdash;were activated. Both are working perfectly.</p> <p>In the next days, NASA will turn on and calibrate the Lunar Orbiter Laser Altimeter&mdash;which will create a three-dimensional topographic map of our satellite&mdash;as well as the Diviner Lunar Radiometer Experiment&mdash;prepared to check the temperature of its surface&mdash;and the Miniature Radio Frequency&mdash;that will create images of permanently-shaded craters. Another instrument designed to measure "starlight to search for surface ice"&mdash; the Lyman Alpha Mapping Project&mdash;will activate when all the other instruments complete their calibration process. [<a href="http://www.nasa.gov/home/hqnews/2009/jul/HQ_09-152_LROC_images.html">NASA</a>]</p> ]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5309165/nasa-lunar-reconnaissance-orbiter-sends-most-detailed-moon-images-yet]]></link>
			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5309165]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ Space ]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Images]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[LRO]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Nasa]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[orbiter]]></category>			
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 07 Jul 2009 11:30:00 -0400]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jesus Diaz]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5309165&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
        			
																									<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ New LG Chocolate Looks Good Enough to Lick, Bite [Cellphones] ]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/07/504x_lg-chocolate-4.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" style="display:block;">LG is teasing us with a few obscured and very lickable shots of the next generation <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5025645/lightning-review-lg-chocolate-3-cellphone">LG Chocolate</a>. Looks quite bold and smooth, like a Red Bull and strawberries smoothie with an added vodka punch.</p> <p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/07/504x_lg-chocolate-2.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" style="display:block;"></p> <p>We will have to wait till August to see if the complete cellphone looks as sexy as the teasers. And hopefully, they won't use a <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5279250/dumb-cellphones-must-die">dumb cellphone inoperative system</a>. [<a href="http://www.electricpig.co.uk/2009/07/07/new-lg-chocolate-first-photos/lg-chocolate-2/">Electric Pig</a>]</p> ]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5309071/new-lg-chocolate-looks-good-enough-to-lick-bite]]></link>
			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5309071]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ Cellphones ]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Chocolate]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Lg]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[LG Chocolate]]></category>			
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 07 Jul 2009 08:30:00 -0400]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jesus Diaz]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5309071&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
        			
																									<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Killing Elevators [Image Cache] ]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/07/504x_6a00e54ecdaa8a8833011571692ae6970b-500wi.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" style="display:block;">If you are in Sweden, beware: Getting the trash down in the elevator may kill you. It may be that I'm specially giggly this morning, but the illustration in the <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged WARNING SIGN" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/warning-sign/">warning sign</a> just makes me laugh.</p> <p>So if you go to Sweden, remember to take the trash down the stairs. Trust me here, there are other&mdash;and much better and enjoyable&mdash;things to die for in this country.</p> ]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5309040/killing-elevators]]></link>
			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5309040]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ Image cache ]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Elevator]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Trash]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Warning sign]]></category>			
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 07 Jul 2009 07:23:00 -0400]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jesus Diaz]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5309040&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
        			
																									<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Sixty Videos to Explain Sixty Symbols of Physics and Astronomy [Science] ]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/07/504x_symbols_04.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" style="display:block;float:none;">Do you know what the hell is the Schwarzschild radius? I didn't have a clue, but now I know that if you compress Earth to an 8mm radius ball, you will get a black hole. My fascination didn't stop there.</p> <p><object width="502" height="309" class="left gawkerVideo embeddedVideo"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/PNpa6z2YXXE&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22"> <param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"> <embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/PNpa6z2YXXE&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="502" height="309" class="left gawkerVideo"></object><a href="http://gizmodo.com/5306340/sixty-videos-to-explain-sixty-symbols-of-physics-and-astronomy">The image associated with this post is best viewed using a browser.</a></p> <p>I've spent all morning mesmerized by these videos&mdash;created by a bunch of extremely smart people at the University of Nottingham&mdash;which explain the most common symbols in physics and astronomy so any moron like me can understand them. And if you like physics and astronomy, you should probably do exactly the same. [<a href="http://www.sixtysymbols.com/#">Sixty Symbols</a>]</p> ]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5306340/sixty-videos-to-explain-sixty-symbols-of-physics-and-astronomy]]></link>
			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5306340]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ Science ]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Clips]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Sixty Symbols]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Videos]]></category>			
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 02 Jul 2009 14:00:00 -0400]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jesus Diaz]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5306340&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
        			
																									<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Apple Pulls iPhone App That Allowed for Child Pornography Uploads [IPhone] ]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p><a href="http://gizmodo.com/5306377/apple-pulls-iphone-app-that-allowed-for-child-pornography-uploads">The image associated with this post is best viewed using a browser.</a>Apple has pulled <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5305794/apples-nudie-app-headaches-now-involve-underage-girls">BeautyMeter</a>&mdash;the iPhone/iPod touch app that allowed users to upload naked pictures of themselves for others to rate&mdash;after a 15-yo girl published this picture showing her bare breasts and pubic hair.</p> <p>Charlie Sorrel at Wired argues correctly that Apple will be damned with 17+ apps no matter what:</p> <blockquote> <p>The problems for Apple are clear. By setting itself up as a guardian of the store, Apple can't win. Any time a controversial application is approved, or non-allowed elements are snuck into an application post-approval, Apple is blamed. If these apps are pulled ahead of time, Apple is called out as an evil censor.</p> </blockquote> <p>However, that doesn't mean Apple should ban the 17+ app sex-related category to avoid conflicts. There are plenty of adult-oriented applications that won't allow for this kind of dynamic content. But then again, the fact is that <i>any</i> application that allows you to upload pictures and share them could be used to do exactly the same. So where should Apple stop, then? Should they ban any app that can be used to publish pictures or videos? Shouldn't the developers&mdash;and the users&mdash;be responsible about this and not Apple.</p> <p>The problem for Apple is probably not a legal one, but one of public perception, with people and mainstream assuming that&mdash;just because it runs on the iPhone&mdash;it <i>is</i> Apple's app. I'm afraid that, if they want to keep the market fully open, they would have to find the public image battle instead of just pulling the applications that allow for this kind of behavior. [<a href="http://www.wired.com/gadgetlab/2009/07/apple-pulls-out-child-porn-app-disappears-from-store/">GadgetLab</a>]</p> ]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5306377/apple-pulls-iphone-app-that-allowed-for-child-pornography-uploads]]></link>
			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5306377]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ iPhone ]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Beautymeter]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Child Porn]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[iPhone Apps]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Nsfw]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Pornography]]></category>			
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 02 Jul 2009 13:30:00 -0400]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jesus Diaz]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5306377&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
        			
																									<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ NZXT Sentry 2 Touchscreen Fan Belongs In KITT's Dashboard [Accessories] ]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/07/504x_nzxtsentry2.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" style="display:block;float:none;">This is the <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged NZXT SENTRY 2 FAN CONTROLLER" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/nzxt-sentry-2-fan-controller/">NZXT Sentry 2 fan controller</a>. It installs into any 5.25-inch bay, and you can use its touch screen interface to set the speed of up to five fans. Note: Leather pants are not included. [<a href="http://www.nzxt.com/products/sentry_2">NZXT</a> via <a href="http://gadgets.boingboing.net/2009/07/02/touchscreen-fan-cont.html">BBG</a>]</p> ]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5306293/nzxt-sentry-2-touchscreen-fan-belongs-in-kitts-dashboard]]></link>
			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5306293]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ Accessories ]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[2]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Controller]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Fan]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Nzxt]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[NZXT Sentry 2 fan controller]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Sentry]]></category>			
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 02 Jul 2009 11:50:00 -0400]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jesus Diaz]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5306293&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
        			
																									<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Enigma Battleship Is Probably the Best Drinking Game Ever [Games] ]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/07/504x_275671_4GMLJXbhE7CHZ_71CqW0tl0O8.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" style="display:block;float:none;">The <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged ENIGMA BATTLESHIP DRINKING GAME" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/enigma-battleship-drinking-game/">Enigma Battleship Drinking Game</a>&mdash;a classic Battleship game that makes you drink a shot of your favorite alcohol every time you take a hit&mdash;is the last thing I need now, while I'm back visiting friends in Madrid.</p> <p>And still, I want it so badly. It was designed by the genius of Mauricio (Tony) Harion, from Belo Horizonte, Brazil. A place that I hope to visit soon, just to play it this game with this man, who I'm sure will be a future Nobel Prize. Hasbro, come on, get your act together and license this ASAP. And with ASAP I mean right now. [<a href="http://www.coroflot.com/public/individual_file.asp?from_url=true&portfolio_id=2522349&individual_id=275671&is_featured=%2D1&">Coroflot</a>]</p> <p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/07/504x_275671_XE2LwZggLIqSWUK11oEwc0xo8_01.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" style="display:block;float:none;"></p> <p><iframe src="http://digg.com/api/diggthis.php?u=http://digg.com/gadgets/Gizmodo_Enigma_Battleship_Is_Probably_the_Best_Drinking_Ga" align="right" frameborder="0" height="82" scrolling="no" width="55"></iframe></p> ]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5306215/enigma-battleship-is-probably-the-best-drinking-game-ever]]></link>
			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5306215]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ Games ]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Battleship]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Drinking]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Enigma]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Enigma Battleship Drinking Game]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Game]]></category>			
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 02 Jul 2009 10:10:00 -0400]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jesus Diaz]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5306215&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
        			
																									<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ What Is This? [Image Cache] ]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/07/504x_forestraft.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" style="display:block;float:none;">I thought this was some kind of bird hunting device sitting on top of a massive forest. In reality it may be your next vacation destination. And you will need the largest thermal airship to get it up there.</p> <p>This is a canopy raft, an enormous set of nets held together with inflatable tubes that act as an structural frame. It can be placed on top of forests so people can camp, accessing the ground below using a hole and ropes. Apparently, the are so light that the trees don't get harmed at all.</p> <p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/07/504x_forestraft2.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" style="display:block;float:none;"></p> <p>To place them on top of the trees they need a ship capable of handling such a large volume. In this case, they use the AS-300, the world's largest thermal airship. [<a href="http://www.gillesebersolt.com/">Gilles Ebersolt</a> via <a href="http://deputy-dog.com/2009/06/how-to-get-to-top-of-forest.html">Deputy Dog</a>]</p> ]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5306196/what-is-this]]></link>
			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5306196]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ Image cache ]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Forest raft]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Green]]></category>			
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 02 Jul 2009 09:50:00 -0400]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jesus Diaz]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5306196&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
        			
																									<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Here Are Some Cute Ducks Trying to Use an Escalator [Escalators] ]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p><object width="502" height="309" class="left gawkerVideo embeddedVideo"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/KLd-rJMoeko&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22"> <param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"> <embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/KLd-rJMoeko&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="502" height="309" class="left gawkerVideo"></object><a href="http://gizmodo.com/5306173/here-are-some-cute-ducks-trying-to-use-an-escalator">The image associated with this post is best viewed using a browser.</a>Ducks, don't try to use escalators, ok? And humans, <a href="http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/mall-disasters/how-to-fall-up-an-escalator-316299.php">follow the same advice</a>. Except you, <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5018924/girl-spins-on-escalator-thanks-to-physics-or-magic">you sexy spinning escalator girl you</a>. You can use the escalator at any time. [<a href="http://www.darkroastedblend.com/">Dark Roasted Blend</a>&mdash;Thanks Daffy]</p> <p><iframe src="http://digg.com/api/diggthis.php?u=http://digg.com/pets_animals/Cute_Ducks_Trying_to_Use_an_Escalator" align="right" frameborder="0" height="82" scrolling="no" width="55"></iframe></p> ]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5306173/here-are-some-cute-ducks-trying-to-use-an-escalator]]></link>
			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5306173]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ escalators ]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Absurd]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Clips]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Ducks]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>			
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 02 Jul 2009 09:30:00 -0400]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jesus Diaz]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5306173&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
        			
																									<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Hello I'm a Pear, Hello I'm an Apple [Design] ]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p><a href="http://gizmodo.com/5306163/hello-im-a-pear-hello-im-an-apple">The image associated with this post is best viewed using a browser.</a>Do the Pear Post-Its require a Registry to work and get viruses? Are the Apple Post-Its snotty and obnoxious? I don't know, I don't care. They are both pretty and will match your monitor nicely. [<a href="http://www.d-bros.jp/">D-Bros</a> via <a href="http://mocoloco.com/archives/011368.php">Mocoloco</a>]</p> ]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5306163/hello-im-a-pear-hello-im-an-apple]]></link>
			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5306163]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ Design ]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[D-bros]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Pear]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[post-its]]></category>			
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 02 Jul 2009 08:50:00 -0400]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jesus Diaz]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5306163&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
        			
																									<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Cool Time Lapse Video of Atlantis Getting Mounted On Its 747 Mothership [Space] ]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p><script type="text/javascript"> newVideoPlayer("/shuttleferry_gizmodo.flv", 640, 500,""); </script>We have seen the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5112331/stunning-zenithal-shot-of-space-shuttle-flying-on-top-of-747">shuttle on an spectacular shot on top of its 747 mothership</a> and a video of <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5274949/atlantis-impossible-take-off-on-nasas-747-mothership">their almost impossible take off</a>, but we have never seen a time lapse video on how everything gets ready.</p> <p>Someone from NASA has sent us this unique video of shuttle Atlantis: A time lapse of the shuttle getting ready to be mounted on its 747 mothership at the NASA Dryden Flight Research Center, just before returning to Florida. I just can't believe how complex and laborious something that is conceptually so simple could be.</p> <p><iframe src="http://digg.com/api/diggthis.php?u=http://digg.com/space/Gizmodo_Cool_Time_Lapse_Video_of_Atlantis_Getting_Mounted" align="right" frameborder="0" height="82" scrolling="no" width="55"></iframe>It's just sad that many people take for granted the hard and complex work that the boys and girls at NASA do to keep <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5247705/why-we-need-to-reach-the-stars-and-we-will">the much-needed space exploration going on</a> with a meager budget.</p> ]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5306074/cool-time-lapse-video-of-atlantis-getting-mounted-on-its-747-mothership]]></link>
			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5306074]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ Space ]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[747]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Atlantis]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Clips]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ferry]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[mothership]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Nasa]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>			
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 02 Jul 2009 06:05:00 -0400]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jesus Diaz]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5306074&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
    
			</channel>
</rss>