Enter your username and password.
Tip your editors:
Editorial Director:
Brian Lam | | Twitter
Editor:
Jason Chen
| AIM | Twitter
Features Editor:
Wilson Rothman
| Twitter
Senior Contributing Editors:
Jesus Diaz
| AIM | Twitter
Mark Wilson, Reviews
| AIM | Twitter
Contributing Editors:
Matt Buchanan
| AIM | Twitter
Adam Frucci
| Twitter
Sean Fallon
| Twitter
Jack Loftus
| Twitter
John Herrman
| Twitter
Dan Nosowitz
Chris Mascari
Kat Hannaford
| Twitter
Rosa Golijan
| Twitter
Chris Jacob
Columnist:
Brendan I. Koerner
Interns:
Don Nguyen
Kyle VanHemert
Comment Account Questions:
Please enter your email address to have your password reset.
Registering will give you a user profile and the ability to add other users as friends. To become a commenter, however, you need to audition.
Want to know more? Consult the Comment FAQ and legal terms.
You don't need to login to comment. Just enter your email address below.
See how your address will be displayed in the Comment FAQ.
10:35 PM
09:06 PM
09:23 PM
08:26 PM
VLC is the only "free" OS X player that gives me 5.1 (suck it, Apple DVD player) - it's essential for my HTPC.
08:51 PM
09:06 PM
10:29 AM
I mean, aren't they just PCs running MacOS in the same way Macs Run Windows? I mean, give and take a little R&D in creating working drivers and an installation work around.
ASSUMING they bought one copy of boxed MacOS per system they built, the only thing they've disrupted is the EULA, which is technically a crock of sh*t when you consider certain End-user rights are protected by Fair Use. In a sense "Unconstitutional."
Any OS that I, as an end user, purchase legally, I am protected by my right to modify that OS as I see fit, including drivers, software, workarounds, registry mods, etc. My only limitation is whether or not I am breaking OTHER laws, such as copyright infringement, installing malicious software, or using the system as a tool for other crimes.
10:44 AM
12:28 PM
Consider any private computer builder, in fact, commercial ones, too, such as DELL. All of them use modified installers with Windows. Throw in some service packs, hotfixes, drivers, software, put it all into an unattended install, or better yet, hard drive image. Pump out fully working OSs as fast as you can build them.
Only catch is that if you Sell 100 computers running Windows, you need to purchase 100 licenses.
12/15/09
12/15/09
I never would have imagined AT&T would come to Psystar's rescue. Interesting development!
12/15/09
12/15/09
12/15/09
12/15/09
In other words, this didn't do shit.
12/15/09
• Intentionally inducing, aiding, assisting, abetting or encouraging any other person or entity to infringe Apple's copyrighted Mac OS X software.
• Circumventing any technological measure that effectively controls access Mac OS X, including, but not limited to, the technological measure used by Apple to prevent unauthorized copying of Mac OS X on non-Apple computers.
• Playing any part in a product intended to circumvent Apple's methods for controlling Mac OS X, such as the methods used to prevent unauthorized copying of Mac OS X on non-Apple computers.
• Doing anything to circumvent the rights held by Apple under the Copyright Act with respect to Mac OS X.
12/15/09
Microsoft can't even bundle a web browser with Windows 7 in Europe without getting sued and Apply can bundles tons of software like Safari in OSX. It's time Apple is brought down a peg. It's becoming a mini monopoly in it's own right.
Companies like Dell, HP, Sony should be able to offer the OSX operating system on any machine they sell.
12/15/09
12/15/09
Also Microsoft, being a primarily software company would never try to compete directly with Apple. They would be mutilated. Looking at the figures for Xbox failure, should give you some idea as to how that would end. It would make no business sense.
12/15/09
It is their IP....they don't have to open it up.
Their "closed" system is clearly not for everyone as they are clearly not a big player by percentage of market share.
We use them because we need to get things done rather than trying to get things to work.
02:32 PM
It wouldn't be a lawsuit waiting at the end for you, but a high-paying job.
12/15/09
12/15/09
12/15/09
12/15/09
(not flaming, just giving an example that fits)
12/15/09
12/15/09
12/15/09
12/15/09
I don't think Psystar did anything remotely similar.
12/15/09
12/15/09
12/15/09
Apple just used the name iPhone and then was forced to pay for it.
12/15/09
12/15/09
12/15/09
Android keeps getting more and more interesting to me.
12/15/09
12/15/09
12/15/09
Shut the fuck up, you worthless thief.
02:02 PM
04:19 PM
That's not an excuse you fucking asswipe. If it's not worth the sale price to you, simply don't buy it.
You wouldn't go into a grocery store and say, "Oh, I don't think these tomatoes are worth $5 per lb, so I think I'll just grab them for free," would you? Seriously, just because you paid some parties for some apps doesn't grant you the right to steal apps from other parties.
I honestly hope you get your service cut, one way or another.
12/13/09
Oh no wait. I'm not surprised.
12/13/09
12/13/09
12/13/09
@Aetius: It's so easy to spot a troll. I still really want to know which account you were that had been banned. ISOHaven?
12/13/09
As for the new macs, its a shame there's a significant percentage of them not working properly upon arrival, considering Apple's not-too-shabby record of non-problematic products in the past. Though I'm still wondering on the fact of why Giz didn't post one of their in-story quote pictures like they usually do for other companies when its negative news.