Enter your username and password.
-
posts about #240hztvs more →
What's the Deal With 240Hz HDTVs?
| posts about #240hztvs more → |
What's the Deal With 240Hz HDTVs? |
07/14/09
However, making the extra frames via interpolation is fucking retarded and results in weird looking video. The people who like it are the same 'tards who complain about the film grain in "300" and black bars on letter boxed movies.
Until I can feed 120Hz or 240Hz content to a display from an ourbaod video processor that doesn't suck I'm not interested.
07/14/09
Though NTSC is 29.97fps, and from what I assume from reading a very convoluted in-depth article on PAL, I think it's about 14.8fps, neither of which cleanly divide into even 240 Hz...
...for my money, after doing side by side comparisons, I'll stick with a 60 Hz TV for now since I have no video sources that output more than that in the first place. I have seen some benefit in high-hertz TVs for interlaced video, but a 60Hz with good interpolation can achieve the same effect, unless they've made some kind of amazing leap lately...
07/14/09
07/14/09
07/14/09
I use my TV mainly for either a computer monitor, or to play video games that often have fixed HUD elements, so I cringe at the thought of using a plasma TV... but it's nice that you can refresh your screen an order of magnitude more times than you receive frames to display on it.
07/14/09
Question: Why would 240hz make 24fps look smoother?
Answer: It wont.
07/14/09
It prevents sets from having to do pulldowns because the refresh rate of the screen doesn't match the fps of the video feed.
Along with a few other things.
07/14/09
07/14/09
07/14/09
07/14/09