Tethering doesnt make much sense because no ones network can really handle it. A high price means they are waiting to improve the backend before really trying to offer it to everyone. However, I'm not expecting to see that until well into 2010 when Verizon has 4G up and running. #verizon
I really wonder how the amount they make on these fees compares to the number of customers they lose or that never join them due their reputation for nickel and diming customers to death. #verizon
@ibelli: Yep. I bet you're not alone. How many people out there decide smartphones aren't for them because they charge so much for data and then tethering? They could likely be getting more people into costlier plans with higher margins if they took that into account.
They're probably thinking of the business users when they set that price. Makes sense being that they come from the Blackberry world. If you are on the road for work a lot, it's worth $30. They need to get that smartphones are in the consumer market now. I'm sure part of the reasoning behind keeping the cost high is also that they don't want you using this to replace your home internet, loading their network, and possibly becoming ex-Verizon Internet customers. I get that. How about allowing a middle ground? How about allowing everyone with an unlimited data plan a certain number of tethering days a month or a year? I don't tether often but occasionally I'm out or on vacation and want to. I've probably used the tethering on my phone 10 times in the last year. I still want the ability to do that in a pinch but I absolutely will not pay the same amount again as I pay for their "unlimited" data.
Of course, I'm betting we'll be able to just root this phone and get around it but it's still bad business. #verizon
@ibelli: Yea honestly, the ONLY reason I don't own a smartphone right now is due to the ridiculous fees.
If they made it an UNLIMITED unlimited plan (from what I hear all those plans still have caps) I'd think about it, but still, I am a firm believer that there should be no additional cost for tethering.
Data is data. My phone receives it. Anything beyond my phone is my business. (Like a modem--you pay the fee to use the modem--how the signal is used PAST that router is MY business. It's like charging extra money to use a second PC on your home network, connceted to the internet. 100% bullshit, if you ask me) #verizon
The sad part for us Canadians is that $30 a month for 5GB is considered a really good deal, being close to the $30/6GB plan that Rogers/Fido has offered for limited periods in the past.
Or I guess we can pay the usual $25 for 500MB. Awesome.
@FigNinja: I suspect that the high price is to discourage too many people from jumping on and, like AT&T and the iPhone, bringing the network to its knees.
And why would one ever need to "root" an open-source, Linux-based phone that let's you do everything? (grin) #verizon
@mj001: That $30 gets you 6GB for on phone data + tethering. No extra fee... At least for now. Who knows what the future holds. Right now I can tether all I want though. #verizon
"The nation's fastest 3G network" - theoretically. Look, AT&T. Just because your HSPA network can THEORETICALLY get up to 3.2 Mbps doesn't mean it actually is achieved.
If you look at the results from user-supplied testing at Boy Genius Report, [www.boygeniusreport.com] - it clearly shows that Sprint EvDO, at 1361 Kbps, is faster than the user-supplied results for AT&T, at 933 Kbps.
The sad thing is this, in regards to their 3G coverage: I live close enough that I can pick up BOTH Telus and Bell Mobility HSPA+ 21Mbps towers on my device but get stuck on AT&T EDGE otherwise. #attinternalmemo
A frivolouts lawsuit isn't one you disagree with. AT&T has the prerogative to utilize the court system to address issues like these. The truth is that while most of us wouldn't be confused by a 3G comparison map, most of the population definitely will.
We should be glad that companies and courts work against misleading advertising, or does everyone here enjoy that aspect of our free market? #attinternalmemo
@crackel: Actually the money spent on lawyers and lawsuits would better be spent on upgrading their crappy network, hiring competent friendly staff and finding ways to lower the users price against competition.
As for "misleading advertising", you cannot accurately figure who would and would not be confused based on speculation. I have yet to see a statistic that this led to misinformation to the greater public of consumers who had switched due to the campaign. So this lawsuit is based on conjecture. #attinternalmemo
@Mr_Nowitt: you have a point. There is no statistic for AT&T to prove this was misleading, and it will be their burden to do so. I speak solely on the merit of my observation, having met thousands of people throughout my professional life and realizing that they wouldn't know the difference between 3g, 2g, edge, data, or even cell technology.
Can you honestly tell me you believe Verizon didn't spin this just enough to confuse some people but not give AT&T the ammo to sue? I've worked at several blue chip companies and believe me, they'll do anything they can get away with.
I don't appreciate the misuse of courts, but it's nice to see an oligopoly compete, even if it's not (yet) in price. Txt message rate hikes did not come from a fight but implicit collusion.
When courts stop being the right place to fight, we'll see better competition. Which is why even though I defend AT&T's right to sue, I hope they lose. #attinternalmemo
It almost feels awkward reading this. It's like at&t is that kid that sucks at sports but swears he's awesome, it's just that his pump shoes weren't fully pumped. #attinternalmemo
Soldier_CLE says DON'T STOP AT THE STAR! REVOKE THE WHOLE DAMN THING, OWEN!!! was starred
Soldier_CLE says DON'T STOP AT THE STAR! REVOKE THE WHOLE DAMN THING, OWEN!!! was unstarred
@ThisIsSharksTerritory: Trust me, they are delicious! Granted, you can find them everywhere, though I know that for some reason, others have not seem them, much less eaten them.
Soldier_CLE says DON'T STOP AT THE STAR! REVOKE THE WHOLE DAMN THING, OWEN!!! was starred
Soldier_CLE says DON'T STOP AT THE STAR! REVOKE THE WHOLE DAMN THING, OWEN!!! was unstarred
Soldier_CLE says DON'T STOP AT THE STAR! REVOKE THE WHOLE DAMN THING, OWEN!!! was starred
Soldier_CLE says DON'T STOP AT THE STAR! REVOKE THE WHOLE DAMN THING, OWEN!!! was unstarred
well i just checked out mobile speed test and im keeping 4000-5000kbps on the 500kb, 1mb, 2mb and 3mb test. so maybe they did roll these out. im in the ohare area of chicago. #tmobilehspa72rollout
@we be illin: Unfortunately there's not a neat way of doing it on the phone other than purchasing an app or using the screenshot action in the SDK. #tmobilehspa72rollout
@psxndc: It was a rhetorical question, but the point is...we don't have private highways because everyone needs it, so it is best built using public funds.
The companies can compete on providing the service, but the technology should be standardized and the wire should be public-owned. #3g
@Arms Akimbo: Northern Michigan and the UP are absolutely beautiful. If your only impression of the state is Detroit, than I am sorry, you don't know the state at all.
And the only thing that will save Detroit is knocking down all the abandoned buildings and making a few more trendy/artsy areas. #3g
11/05/09
11/05/09
11/05/09
11/05/09
They're probably thinking of the business users when they set that price. Makes sense being that they come from the Blackberry world. If you are on the road for work a lot, it's worth $30. They need to get that smartphones are in the consumer market now. I'm sure part of the reasoning behind keeping the cost high is also that they don't want you using this to replace your home internet, loading their network, and possibly becoming ex-Verizon Internet customers. I get that. How about allowing a middle ground? How about allowing everyone with an unlimited data plan a certain number of tethering days a month or a year? I don't tether often but occasionally I'm out or on vacation and want to. I've probably used the tethering on my phone 10 times in the last year. I still want the ability to do that in a pinch but I absolutely will not pay the same amount again as I pay for their "unlimited" data.
Of course, I'm betting we'll be able to just root this phone and get around it but it's still bad business. #verizon
11/05/09
If they made it an UNLIMITED unlimited plan (from what I hear all those plans still have caps) I'd think about it, but still, I am a firm believer that there should be no additional cost for tethering.
Data is data. My phone receives it. Anything beyond my phone is my business. (Like a modem--you pay the fee to use the modem--how the signal is used PAST that router is MY business. It's like charging extra money to use a second PC on your home network, connceted to the internet. 100% bullshit, if you ask me) #verizon
11/05/09
11/05/09
Or I guess we can pay the usual $25 for 500MB. Awesome.
11/05/09
11/05/09
11/05/09
And why would one ever need to "root" an open-source, Linux-based phone that let's you do everything? (grin) #verizon
11/05/09
11/05/09
If you look at the results from user-supplied testing at Boy Genius Report, [www.boygeniusreport.com] - it clearly shows that Sprint EvDO, at 1361 Kbps, is faster than the user-supplied results for AT&T, at 933 Kbps.
The sad thing is this, in regards to their 3G coverage: I live close enough that I can pick up BOTH Telus and Bell Mobility HSPA+ 21Mbps towers on my device but get stuck on AT&T EDGE otherwise. #attinternalmemo
11/05/09
We should be glad that companies and courts work against misleading advertising, or does everyone here enjoy that aspect of our free market? #attinternalmemo
11/05/09
As for "misleading advertising", you cannot accurately figure who would and would not be confused based on speculation. I have yet to see a statistic that this led to misinformation to the greater public of consumers who had switched due to the campaign. So this lawsuit is based on conjecture. #attinternalmemo
11/05/09
Can you honestly tell me you believe Verizon didn't spin this just enough to confuse some people but not give AT&T the ammo to sue? I've worked at several blue chip companies and believe me, they'll do anything they can get away with.
I don't appreciate the misuse of courts, but it's nice to see an oligopoly compete, even if it's not (yet) in price. Txt message rate hikes did not come from a fight but implicit collusion.
When courts stop being the right place to fight, we'll see better competition. Which is why even though I defend AT&T's right to sue, I hope they lose. #attinternalmemo
11/05/09
11/05/09
11/05/09
11/05/09
11/05/09
An internet cookie for you, Sir. #attinternalmemo
11/05/09
sounds SUUUPER nooby but that is the first time i've heard that one #attinternalmemo
11/05/09
*bytes into another one* #attinternalmemo
11/05/09
@Soldier_CLE: Internet cookie? #attinternalmemo
11/05/09
You also get my first awarded "Headshot!" Achievement Unlocked! +10 Pts. #attinternalmemo
11/04/09
3960.4 kbps on the 2MB test
I'm in the metro Atlanta area. Pretty far outside the perimeter, so my speeds may not be an indication of the city as a whole.
Oh, and lest we forget, #RosaRocks #tmobilehspa72rollout
11/04/09
Also, #RosaRocks #tmobilehspa72rollout
11/04/09
11/04/09
11/04/09
11/04/09
11/04/09
11/03/09
11/04/09
11/04/09
The companies can compete on providing the service, but the technology should be standardized and the wire should be public-owned. #3g
11/03/09
11/03/09
Huh...we have been using it wrong all this time. #3g
11/03/09
11/03/09
Just kidding. I'll be happy to get out of the Detroitlet once I'm done with school though. #3g
11/04/09
And the only thing that will save Detroit is knocking down all the abandoned buildings and making a few more trendy/artsy areas. #3g