<![CDATA[Gizmodo: 480P]]> http://cache.gawker.com/assets/base/img/thumbs140x140/gizmodo.com.png <![CDATA[Gizmodo: 480P]]> http://gizmodo.com/tag/480p http://gizmodo.com/tag/480p <![CDATA[ LG Getting New KC910 As Flagship Phone With Killer Camera Features ]]>

There's apparently a new touchscreen handset from LG on the way, and early word is that it's slated to be the Korean phone maker's new flagship phone. So far known as the KC910, it appears to be more camera than phone, shooting at 8-megapixels with a real Xenon flash, face detection, image stabilization and a 480p camcorder function, which is worth noting. It also supposedly has an 800x480 resolution screen, which means it can show 16:9 movies with no cropping, all in a form factor a little over half an inch thick. If they can throw in a few other high-end features like Wi-Fi and a good browser then this handset could out-media the iPhone and be a real challenger, but we're holding our judgment till we've seen it in action. [Electronista, via DC Sources, via Ubergizmo]

]]>
Tue, 01 Jul 2008 20:51:59 EDT Matt Hickey http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5021310&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Apple TV vs. Vudu vs. Xbox 360: Video Download Battlemodo ]]> If you've been wondering how to compare the video-download options of Apple TV, Vudu and the Xbox 360, I think today is your lucky day.

A few weeks back, I wrote up a piece on Vudu's high-definition video falling short of my expectations. Today I bring you a more thorough report of the three most compelling set-top boxes and their video-download capabilities. Apple TV, Vudu and Xbox 360 all have a lot going for them, but by looking at them side-by-side, you can see how their makers are all taking different paths to get to the ultimate desired end. Dive into the chart, then have a look at the screengrabs from three movies, to really get a feel for the progress, or lack of progress, in the world of HD downloads.

Just so you know, in addition to skipping everything that requires an actual PC (including HP's MediaSmart receivers), I omitted TiVo from the running for now, for two reasons: 1) the Amazon Unbox on TiVo doesn't yet offer HD movie downloads; and 2) TiVo itself is a subscription service, whereas these systems don't charge a monthly fee for the privilege of renting movies.Movie_Download_Box_Battlemodo_Chart.jpgYou can see how frustrating it is to pick a winner when you look at the three systems on paper. Fortunately, things clear up a bit when you compare stills I shot at the same time, on the same Panasonic 1080p plasma TV.

Screens from Ratatouille—note that the Vudu shot is standard-definition only:
Screens from 3:10 to Yuma—note that the Apple TV shot is standard-definition only:
Screens from Transformers—here the three devices are all running high-def versions, and I've mixed in a screen from the HD DVD of it as well, for surprising comparison.
Keep in mind that the key here is to compare the shots with each other, as they were all shot the same way. (Note that the same perceived down-rezzing issue I noted before on Vudu's high-def is still obvious.)

Now that you've seen all the evidence I could gather. It's a toss-up to me, though I think for content I have to lean towards Vudu and for pure video quality (and most HD content) the Xbox 360 is hard to beat. Meanwhile, Apple TV is cheapest and lives up to its name with the best access to actual TV programming—though NBC is still painfully absent. How about helping me make the call here?

Gawker Media polls require Javascript; if you're viewing this in an RSS reader, click through to view in your Javascript-enabled web browser.

[Apple TV; Vudu; Xbox 360]

]]>
Tue, 04 Mar 2008 12:15:00 EST Wilson Rothman http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=363600&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Vudu Test Confirms HD Download Worries (Plus: What Needs to Be Done) ]]> Over the weekend, I checked out three versions of the Transformers movie: standard-def and high-def instantaneous downloads to the Vudu box with 4-Mbps net connection, as well as the HD DVD of the movie, playing through the Xbox 360. As you can see in the image above, the so-called HD experience from Vudu wasn't one that could come close to comparing with the HD DVD playback. In fact, it was awfully hard to see a vivid difference between that and the perfectly fine (and $2 cheaper) SD download.

A lot of people (including Steve Jobs) like to talk about the imminent arrival of HD downloads, a magic talisman that will help peace-loving technophiles avoid the atrocities of the last shiny-silver-disc format war. But as we've discussed and others have researched, bandwidth, and not resolution, determine final quality.

It's a no-brainer, and one that Vudu is well aware of, especially as it enters its newest round of content offerings. To its credit, the company decided that it's more important to offer high-quality downloads instantly, rather than make people wait for the 8+ hour download that might look more like video from a Blu-ray or HD DVD disc. But can we still call them HD?

In the frames above, you see snapshots I took all at the same time depicting Vudu paused in standard-def and high-def playback, as well as more or less the same frame paused on the HD DVD as well. One could argue that the frames look funny because of the way Vudu pauses, so let me be clear: the difference in playback between the HD DVD and the HD download was huge. My wife laughed, saying "Even I can see the difference." The difference between the SD and HD Vudu downloads was not significant at all. In fact, it was not especially noticeable. Again, to Vudu's credit, the standard def version looks really nice, and both videos started playing the instant I rented them.

The bottom line is that HD downloads are a novelty item now, and they'll probably stay that way until:

• Higher bandwidth permits the rapid download of huge files
• A quality-assurance system is agreed upon where "HD" refers to specific attributes that go beyond frame resolution
• Hollywood deems it fit to start releasing mainstream videos in great quantities in HD—remember, those dudes hold the keys, now and forever, whether we like it or not.

]]>
Mon, 04 Feb 2008 14:25:24 EST Wilson Rothman http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=352392&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ InFocus 720p DLP Projector ]]>
The InFocus line of low-end home theater projectors don't draw great reviews. But I have high hopes for the company's upcoming models because they are all shiny black and alien looking. These all use DLP, and the IN76 is a native 720p high definition unit. The demo gal said she thinks the contrast ratio is 3000:1 on all three — but there is nothing in the press material or on the website to confirm that. The number of ports on the rear end looked a bit sparse — here's a picture:
infocusback.jpg

The projector sits on a swiveling base that is removable for ceiling or wall mounting. The 720p model (IN76) is $2,999. The mid-range unit (IN74) is a 16:9 and the 480p model (IN72) is $1,299. Available in the first quarter of next year.

Prices for InFocus DLP Projectors [Amazon]

]]>
Tue, 15 Nov 2005 19:43:07 EST Noah R http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=137541&view=rss&microfeed=true