Enter your username and password.
-
posts about #adamolaptop more →
Dell Adamo Is New "Thinnest Notebook Available"
| posts about #adamolaptop more → |
Dell Adamo Is New "Thinnest Notebook Available" |
03/17/09
Dell gets an A for effort, but I'd give the final product a C. The Macbook Air has nicer specs, but if I were to upgrade the lower end model with an SSD, we're looking at $300 more, but do get the better shared graphics and a slightly better processor.
03/17/09
Dell as always, totally misses the point. This thing is fugly.
03/17/09
03/17/09
03/17/09
03/17/09
I think I'll stick with "Waiting for the mobile i7".
03/17/09
03/17/09
Can't you two see, that you're in love with each other?
Anyway, there's no comparison between this and an Atom-powered netbook. This thing may be weaker than a Macbook Air, but it would likely run rings around the likes of an NC10 and Dell Mini.
03/17/09
03/17/09
03/17/09
My comp from 2 years ago is a 1.8 w/2 gigs for $1,200 ....
Id go with this for cheaper apparently?:
[store.apple.com]
03/17/09
03/17/09
03/17/09
03/17/09
03/17/09
03/17/09
03/17/09
No, you got it all wrong it doesn't run OSX, it runs Windows
"...the Adamo runs Windows Home Premium (64-bit, to be exact)" Don't worry it happens to the best of us.
03/17/09
03/17/09
03/17/09
And if Dell is trying to compete with Apple, the Adamo isn't going to cut the mustard. Sure the MacBook is significantly thicker, but it's only half a pound heavier, has its own graphics card and is $700 cheaper. I'd much rather get a new Mac than this, and I'm not even a fan of Mac OS.
This is a really bad sign for Dell; they've completely mistimed the market, and they've brought out a device that is supposed to be their flagship for a new brand but is surely going to tank. Hopefully Dell can come back to former glory days by continuing their efforts to make well-designed reasonably priced machines.
NOTE TO EDITORS: please bring back preview.
03/17/09
03/17/09
You guys are crazy:
- Buying an Adamo for gaming (or say graphic design/CAD work) makes no sense whatsoever.
- Getting discrete graphics if you are not gaming or doing graphic design / CAD work makes no sense whatsoever.
So Dell essentially *nailed* it by leaving out the discrete GPU.
Let me explain:
1. The GMX4500 is only shitty when it comes to gaming (and other scenarios mentioned above). For anything else - productivity, multimedia etc. you will never notice a difference between the GMX4500 and discrete graphics.
2. So if that's what you do (productivitiy stuff, coding, multimedia, email, web etc.) - here are the advantages of going with the GMX4500:
- It costs less (moot point in a $2000 laptop of course)
- It consumes *much* less power (longer battery life)
- It generates *much* less heat (longer battery life - no fan)
- It makes the laptop a fraction lighter.
And this doesn't even take into account the insane overheating/reliability issues nVidia GPUs have been having. Who needs to deal with that?
Don't listen to the performance enthusiasts who blindly keep recommending discrete graphics without paying attention to your requirements. Discrete graphics are faster, but they're pricier, eat your battery, and for most people they represent wasted potential performance in their laptops that they never end up using.
03/19/09
The Adamo isn't a business laptop - I doubt anyone but a CEO would get it past accounting. It's a lifestyle machine, aimed squarely at Apple users who do everything that I've just described above. And if it doesn't do it as well as a Mac with 256 megs of video RAM that costs 2/3rds the price, it's going to have a hard time stealing market share.