Are D-pads really necessary anymore for touch screen phones? The closest thing the G1 has is a trackball, and seriously, it's pretty useless outside of tabbing through a block of multiple hyperlinks on a webpage where your finger might hit the wrong link.
My only concern with this phone is that beyond the initial specs (which sound good so far), the device itself is pretty boring in form factor and aesthetics. I looks like the engineers told the designers to just put a plastic box around their hardware. It has no "pick-up" appeal.
Edited by HeartBurnKid: Agent of R.O.A.C.H. at 10/14/09 1:30 PM
HeartBurnKid: Agent of R.O.A.C.H. was starred
HeartBurnKid: Agent of R.O.A.C.H. was unstarred
I've been rocking the HERO OS on my G1 for a week or so now and can honestly say I don't know why you would want to use anything else. I wish they would come out with a HERO phone with a qwerty is all I'm sayin..
You know I've tripped a lot of circuits, oh lord I've maxed a lot of capacitors; but I never touched nothing that my logic board could kill.
you know I've seen a lot of machine intelligences ambulating around with BSODs in their eyes, but the pusherbot don't care if you simulate life or if your main-board fries.
@cudthecrud: why would you do that when Cyanogen's ROM still gives you functions that the legit 1.6 update isn't going to give you? Apps2SD ALONE is reason enough for me not to give a rat's ass for the legit update.
@cudthecrud: Just give it a few weeks and i'm sure there will be a cyanogen update with all those extras put in there (if they're any better than what it's already packaged in 4.0.4).
@Bloodbeard: same here. Been running Donut in one form or another for weeks thanks to Cyanogen. Overall it's good, new camera blows though. It runs faster when a lot of things aren't going on in the background. It's great when you're trying to do something, like, send a text message while on the phone through bluetooth but you have some other crap running in the background.
Ahhhh Android....so much potential, hamstrung by shit hardware....thanks HTC...really, I mean it thanks for the brillance that is the G1.
So I guess the discussion now is that Donut isn't 2.0 like cupcake wasn't 1.5. So multitouch might not be part of Donut but it might be part of 2.0 (or 1.6 or whatever).
@Chon: Cyanogens latest roms all have multi touch zoom in the browser, but it's not like the multi touch zoom on the hero roms - it just recognises the "pinch" movement and hits the zoom in or zoom out button accordingly. It's quite accurate, but only zooms into the centre of the screen.
As a software engineer, I am not surprised at all.
They know what they need to do - hello iPhone. They have a young, fresh code base without a lot of legacy issues. They have good programmers. All that means that Android is well positioned to kick some serious butt.
WinMo, Symbian, and even BB are all hopeless comparatively, they have a huge legacy code base that acts like a ball and chains. The best coders can't change this.
Word of a new release leaks. Google's Android engineers start posting on some blog fan pages. TONS of new features suddenly appear -- Multitouch, search gestures, built-in VPN.
And, no sign anywhere of a legal statement saying their lawyers require they charge for all of this. Why? Because the whole damn thing is FREE!
@PhineasJW: Um....Shocker? If you're meaning to imply that Apple has ever charged PHONE users for an update, you're categorically wrong. Phone != music player
@TheSonOfKrypton:Oh, so original iPhone buyers can record video without having spent any money to upgrade anything? Good to hear that Apple is just as friendly as Google then.
@freakout: I'm sure they had plans to implement multitouch long before the Pre. The hardware was always capable and underlying code base was there from the beginning. The only thing Apple patented was one Method to do it. Everyone else simply found another method.
@dallasmay2: Actually, Apple have a metric fuckton of multitouch patents, due to their acquisition of Fingerworks. And Steve made a big show of this at the first iPhone keynote. Remember "And boy, have we patented it"?
The fact that the code was there from the beginning and that it just wasn't turned on speaks volumes. Google, for some bizarre reason, was afraid of Apple. Not anymore, it seems.
10/14/09
10/14/09
10/14/09
Are D-pads really necessary anymore for touch screen phones? The closest thing the G1 has is a trackball, and seriously, it's pretty useless outside of tabbing through a block of multiple hyperlinks on a webpage where your finger might hit the wrong link.
My only concern with this phone is that beyond the initial specs (which sound good so far), the device itself is pretty boring in form factor and aesthetics. I looks like the engineers told the designers to just put a plastic box around their hardware. It has no "pick-up" appeal.
10/14/09
Touchscreen controls are nice if a game is built around them, but I like emulators, and touchscreen controls suck for emulators.
10/02/09
10/01/09
you know I've seen a lot of machine intelligences ambulating around with BSODs in their eyes, but the pusherbot don't care if you simulate life or if your main-board fries.
10/01/09
10/01/09
10/02/09
10/01/09
10/01/09
Ahhhh Android....so much potential, hamstrung by shit hardware....thanks HTC...really, I mean it thanks for the brillance that is the G1.
10/02/09
And I swear the first person who cites the mythbusters episode is getting a trout to the face.
08/04/09
09/25/09
07/26/09
07/26/09
07/26/09
"Regarding multitouch in Donut.. Nothing in the Android code itself, but there ARE new kernel commits to support it."
07/26/09
07/26/09
07/26/09
They know what they need to do - hello iPhone. They have a young, fresh code base without a lot of legacy issues. They have good programmers. All that means that Android is well positioned to kick some serious butt.
WinMo, Symbian, and even BB are all hopeless comparatively, they have a huge legacy code base that acts like a ball and chains. The best coders can't change this.
07/25/09
And, no sign anywhere of a legal statement saying their lawyers require they charge for all of this. Why? Because the whole damn thing is FREE!
Imagine that!
07/26/09
07/26/09
07/25/09
07/26/09
07/26/09
07/26/09
The fact that the code was there from the beginning and that it just wasn't turned on speaks volumes. Google, for some bizarre reason, was afraid of Apple. Not anymore, it seems.
http://digital.venturebeat.com/2009/02/09/apple-asked-google-not-to-use-multi-touch-in-android-and-google-complied/
07/25/09
why did they name their OS versions after tasty patisserie items?
07/25/09