Gizmodo 
Enter your username and password.
Tip your editors:
Editorial Director:
Brian Lam | | Twitter
Editor:
Jason Chen
| AIM | Twitter
Features Editor:
Wilson Rothman
| Twitter
Senior Contributing Editors:
Jesus Diaz
| AIM | Twitter
Mark Wilson, Reviews
| AIM | Twitter
Contributing Editors:
Matt Buchanan
| AIM | Twitter
Adam Frucci
| Twitter
Sean Fallon
| Twitter
Jack Loftus
| Twitter
John Herrman
| Twitter
Dan Nosowitz
Chris Mascari
Danny Allen
| Twitter
Rosa Golijan
| Twitter
Chris Jacob
Columnist:
Brendan I. Koerner
Interns:
Don Nguyen
Kyle VanHemert
Comment Intern:
Nick Ellenoff |
Comment Account Questions:
Original material is licensed under a Creative Commons License permitting non-commercial sharing with attribution.
02/04/09
02/02/09
Can anyone explain?
02/04/09
02/02/09
02/02/09
02/02/09
So?
02/02/09
02/02/09
Secondly, he claims that his company ceased operations, yet at the same time he says that his company is suing the aforementioned companies for infringement. He can't have it both ways; either his company shut down, or it is active and actively protecting its patents
02/02/09
Considering he owns the company, and the patents tied to the company, he's quite capable of re-starting said company at any time. They were also infringing upon his patent prior to his company ceasing operation.
02/02/09
02/02/09
I have a feeling that he did disclose it. I mean, I keep all paperwork related to my employment (emails, what was sent to whom, etc.)
I hope he wins.
02/02/09
02/02/09
02/02/09
01/14/09
/musician who has nothing to do with iTunes upgrade fees, and RIAA douche-baggery, and still doesn't like to be stolen from.
01/14/09
01/14/09
01/14/09
01/14/09
01/14/09
01/14/09
That said, I agree with the minority that I am not certain Apple is under any obligation to make this a pain-free experience. If you purchased a 128K DRM track, then that is what you purchased. Now that something better has come along you can purchase it again, or you can upgrade your entire library at a discounted price.
Personally, I would never have bought the DRM product to begin with.
01/14/09
On the other hand --- and this is the argument I've always made regardless of the item(s) --- you got exactly what you paid for, a DRMed 128kbps track. If you're not satisfied with it, you should've have bought it. That's what I did; while the temptation was certainly there, I never bought any shitty 128kbps tracks from iTunes. So, you either remain satisfied with your purchase, or, suck it up and pay the upgrade price. Just be glad that there is a means to "upgrade" rather than re-purchase the entire thing.
After all, we've all been forced to do exactly that with all movies (VHS to DVD to Blu-ray) and all music (LP to cassette to CD to SACD).
Now, not being able to choose which tracks to upgrade and which not to is a different matter, and should be rectified immediately.
01/14/09
01/14/09
1) Backup songs.
2) Delete the ones you dont want to upgrade.
3) Upgrade.
4) Re-upload other songs.
Simple. Easy. Works.
I need my own blog.
01/14/09
01/14/09
Thanks, i appreciate it.
And although i havent tried it, im 99% sure it will.
Actually im going to test it now. be right back buddy.
I wont rest till i solve your problem :D
01/14/09
01/14/09
Goddamnit Apple, you're doing it wrong.
*sigh*
01/14/09
And that's why you shouldn't buy digital media. Hell, I have an iPod and I still prefer to buy my albums on vinyl. If I have to, I'll buy a CD ... and you can bet your ass that I'll gladly buy a CD over a digital download any day of the week.
To me, digital downloads are good if you want to buy a song or two off of one album ... and that's it. If you want the entire album, you really should by the CD. You get the power to do what you want from there, either encode those tracks at 320kbps ... or some god awful bitrate like 128kbps.
01/14/09
I love hearing people who buy their music digitally piss and moan about stuff like this. Meanwhile, my music has always been DRM-free...ripped straight from the CD. Built-in backup with cover art and full liner notes tucked safely into my CD cabinet.
01/14/09
01/14/09
01/14/09
A lot of labels are actually doing that these days. Where you buy the vinyl version of the album, and they provide a slip of paper that gives you a code and address to download the lossless digital version of the album. Matador first comes to mind, as well as Merge. There's lots of other labels doing it too.
@f0rge:
Let them make fun. Let them be ignorant. You've clearly got the upper hand here, buy buying into the right media ... which gives you the choice to do whatever you want.
@Wilson Rothman:
Good article Wilson, very well written. My personal threshold is 320Kbps. Of course, I do have the occasional eMusic or iTunes file which are encoded in 192Kbps or higher. I know what you mean about convenience, and that's why digital media is so damn hot ... because it's convenient. But convenience isn't always a good thing. There's lots of analogies we could throw out, fast food, hookers, drugs ... still, it's nice to have a bit of patience these days and choosing to go that extra step for something better is something that we should all do on a daily basis.