There is already a type of armor to defeat to defeat shaped charge penetration rounds: slat/bar/cage armor. This ia already used on the Stryker. It works by destroying the projectile a safe distance from the vehicle so that it's energy can not be concentrated enough to penetrate.
Russia is no joke. These guys are on the move toward the western world. They've sold Russian helicopters to Venezuela. They are helping Venezuela build a nuclear reactor. They are doing naval exercises of the coast of Venezuela. They are drilling for oil of the Gulf of Mexico. AND they are putting a base in Venezuela. All of this is being done because our military is way over extended and we've elected a President with absolutely no experience.
Obama has his work cut out for him. That's for damn sure.
ok, I think this could really be useful in human form too - I could have a little midget run into a room 2 seconds before I enter, and no one would focus any attention on me, allowing me to pass through undetected. I'm adding this to my ninja arsenal. plus, midgets are just funny.
It's a brilliant move actually, if you're selling weapons to both sides.
And as for the hats: you can make them as high as you want, but if they don't have a spike on top or horns on the sides, they'll never be maximum cool.
@EVEs_Mako: The Soldiers and Marines will all be riding Unicorns firing rainbows from peace pandas. So no kind of out dated Russian rocket will stand up to that.
I think were on the M1 A3 anyway and from my experience tanks, usually traveling in packs of 5, do just sit and get fired at. Nor do all the support crew, infantry, and various other grand war machines and trained fighters that are accompanying them.
Some of the Depleted Uranium rounds we used in Africa could punch a hole through any type of armor we encountered but not the M1. They should be afraid, very afraid.
One more thing check out a Fléchette Round. Now that's fun for the whole family
@Hiroak: Best story I ever heard about the M1 was that in either Desert Shield or Desert Storm one of our Abrams got disabled, and when the crew called in to request field repairs, they were told that it would take too long and that they should scuttle the tank. That's supposed to be accomplished by blowing the ammo bay, but when they did that, they discovered that the Abrams ammo bay is designed to blow outwards (so as to protect all the squishy meaty bits inside should something go _WRONG_). A little while later, a repair crew showed up and had the thing running again in no time.
The easiest way to take out an Abrams is probably to "turtle" it, and even that won't really destroy it.
@Kaspir: If that kid can throw as fast as an RPG, I think there are many a MLB team who would bring him, his family, AND his village over to the US in about three seconds.
@Git Em SteveDave loves this guy->★: If this works on detecting missiles of certain speed only, I predict Dune-style 'slow bullet' weapons being developed as counter-measure.
The best defense is a good offense. They should have named this porcupine, since that is what it puts me in the mind of. (OK, so maybe I need more coffee, but thats what it reminded me of.)
I'm no weapons engineer, but this does seem a little complicated for deployment. The timing issue is a big one - it'll work with plenty of time for detecting and acquiring the target, but in close quarters combat it would seem to inherently take too long to launch; shoot up, correct down, launch forward, explode... just too much could go wrong, especially in a combat situation.
Wasn't there another system that is already deployed - a kind of "active armor" that essentially just explodes outwards before the RPG hits? That seems like it would work more reliably in all situations. Maybe it's not as effective though. That test sure made this thing look effective!
@weatherman: Did you see then end of the video when they did it real time? It took less than a second for the RPG to fire and the system to explode it. As for something going wrong, if you didn't have the system, you'd be defenseless. Even if it stops the RPG 50% of the time, that's still more than no system.
I think you are thinking of reactive armor that tanks use. IIRC, it doesn't detect the inbound round, but reacts when the round imapacts it.
@Git Em SteveDave loves this guy->★: yeah, you're right. I looked at it and it definitely happens really quick. Actually a heck of a lot quicker than 1 second. And if it works in combat situations, I'm all for it. More protection is more protection, after all, and we definitely need something better than the chicken wire we're using against RPGs.
@weatherman: I wonder what'll happen if the RPG comes from another angle. Are there corrective rockets on all sides of the thing? How would it correct in another direction? Does its platform rotate super quick, too?
@weatherman: I had to watch the end a couple of times b/c I didn't understand what they were showing. The slow mo just makes it seem like what was at the end couldn;t have been what happened it was so quick, especially with the direction changes. This reminds me of a system I saw for the President which is in essence a kevlar airbag wall. If it detects a gunshot or incoming round, it inflates a vertical wall to catch the bullet. It's a stationary unit, but they said it could be used along common paths the President walk and at events.
@Cisco-Kid: phase four, conceived by Dick Cheney, goes after a guy in another country who kinda reminds us of the shooter in some way because he looked at us cross-eyed once.
Sorry, it's reflexive at this point. Thank goodness I don't have to keep that up for another four years...
12/01/08
This ia already used on the Stryker. It works by destroying the projectile a safe distance from the vehicle so that it's energy can not be concentrated enough to penetrate.
[www.defenseindustrydaily.com]
12/01/08
12/01/08
12/01/08
Obama has his work cut out for him. That's for damn sure.
12/01/08
12/01/08
12/01/08
12/01/08
What is the deal with the Russian officer hats? The bigger they are the higher the rank? Or is it like cars in this country, merely an extension?
12/01/08
It's a brilliant move actually, if you're selling weapons to both sides.
And as for the hats: you can make them as high as you want, but if they don't have a spike on top or horns on the sides, they'll never be maximum cool.
12/01/08
That's exactly what I was thinking. Sell your old tanks to your opponent and then blow them up real good.
12/01/08
12/01/08
I think were on the M1 A3 anyway and from my experience tanks, usually traveling in packs of 5, do just sit and get fired at. Nor do all the support crew, infantry, and various other grand war machines and trained fighters that are accompanying them.
Some of the Depleted Uranium rounds we used in Africa could punch a hole through any type of armor we encountered but not the M1. They should be afraid, very afraid.
One more thing check out a Fléchette Round. Now that's fun for the whole family
12/02/08
Best story I ever heard about the M1 was that in either Desert Shield or Desert Storm one of our Abrams got disabled, and when the crew called in to request field repairs, they were told that it would take too long and that they should scuttle the tank. That's supposed to be accomplished by blowing the ammo bay, but when they did that, they discovered that the Abrams ammo bay is designed to blow outwards (so as to protect all the squishy meaty bits inside should something go _WRONG_). A little while later, a repair crew showed up and had the thing running again in no time.
The easiest way to take out an Abrams is probably to "turtle" it, and even that won't really destroy it.
11/21/08
11/21/08
11/21/08
11/21/08
11/21/08
11/21/08
11/21/08
Alot less than Randy Johnson.
+ Watch video
11/21/08
11/21/08
11/21/08
11/21/08
11/21/08
so, how fast can it fly after it has been laden?
11/21/08
11/21/08
11/21/08
then I woulda predicted that Raytheon would have no problem.
11/21/08
Wasn't there another system that is already deployed - a kind of "active armor" that essentially just explodes outwards before the RPG hits? That seems like it would work more reliably in all situations. Maybe it's not as effective though. That test sure made this thing look effective!
11/21/08
I think you are thinking of reactive armor that tanks use. IIRC, it doesn't detect the inbound round, but reacts when the round imapacts it.
11/21/08
11/21/08
11/21/08
11/21/08
11/21/08
I wonder, however, if, when it's deployed, it will still be called the "Future Combat System"?
Surely "Present Combat System" would be more appropriate at that point, but it doesn't sound as good.
Possibly they will need to give it a new name, like BANGWHAMMER or something, then the can figure out words to make that into an acronym.
I guess that's what the DoDs highly trained reverse acronym department (R.A.D) is paid to figure out.
11/21/08
11/21/08
Phase three goes after his family.
11/21/08
Sorry, it's reflexive at this point. Thank goodness I don't have to keep that up for another four years...
11/21/08