Senior Contributing Editors:
Jesus Diaz
| AIM | Twitter
Mark Wilson, Reviews
| AIM | Twitter
Contributing Editors:
Matt Buchanan | AIM | Twitter
Adam Frucci | Twitter
Sean Fallon | Twitter
Jack Loftus | Twitter
John Herrman | Twitter
Dan Nosowitz
Chris Mascari
Danny Allen | Twitter
Rosa Golijan | Twitter
Chris Jacob
@TheSonOfKrypton: Their app store, their rules. Honestly, the app store is full enough of worthless crap...the last thing I need is an advertising app getting in the way of finding something useful.
@comrade_leviathan: Wow. The fact that you're attempting to rationalize this blows my mind. You're likely the kind who thinks mobile phone operators should disallow google voice/Skype use on their networks, huh?
@TheSonOfKrypton: Wow, +1 for a completely unrelated comparison.
No, I don't think cell companies should disallow VOIP on their networks. In fact, cell carriers will soon have to acknowledge that voice plans are dead as dead, and the only thing anyone needs is data.
@comrade_leviathan: You just don't get it do you? This type of restrictions is not one Apple originally said they'd hold over the App Store. Proof? There it is.
What are you going to say? God Forbid they disallow apps that compete with them? Is that why they approved Rhapsody, Spotify, and the plethora of other apps that compete with them?
@TheSonOfKrypton: Do you honestly expect ANY company to allow something like that? So should NBC have to advertise American Idol on their network if Fox pays them? You have some seriously ludicrous expectations of the free market system, my friend! Apple, like any other company, is completely within their rights to deny an app (or any other form of advertisement) with no functional purpose other than to promote their competition.
Don't like it? Use Android. Apple owns their app store, and reserves the right to refuse any app they see fit. A lot of their decisions to revoke apps I don't agree with because they are more based on AT&T's requirements, and not a valid flaw with the app (Google Voice, for one), but that argument in this scenario is completely nonsensical.
@jepzilla: Haha, an opinion to which you are certainly entitled.
Although the billions of dollars in app sales, along with a hugely popular phone on arguably the worst cell network in the history of verbal communication might beg to differ.
@Traveshamockery: So don't use it. Even if it gets zero downloads (quite likely considering how useless the app is) Apple has no right to tell users what they can/cannot run on their phones.
@jepzilla: Hardly. Twilight has *maybe* been a best-seller in the US for the last 5 years. English-language literature has been around for 500+ years.
Try comparing Twilight book sales to Shakespeare.
The Apple App Store was the first smartphone application store on the market and has sold thousands of times as many apps as all other app stores combined. [en.wikipedia.org]
I'm may be an Apple fanboy, but you've got to at least pose some reasonably rational comparisons.
@macpatrik: k well all of the old songs work while recording.. but songs from my itunes library definetly dont work. it says recording but when i click on play, it doesnt play and it says cannot share and cannot publish. am i the only one?
Never have I wanted an iPhone more. Imagine all the random people I could piss off in public. The friends I could embarrass in public. The list goes on of all other annoying activities I could do in public...
A bit more technical about the rejections and a lot less retarded. [apprejections.com]
They list why an app was rejected and if the app developer "fixed" the issue to be allowed back in.
11/30/09
11/30/09
11/30/09
This is why apps that advertise beer & loose women do get approved, since the iPhone doesn't have those features built in yet.
11/30/09
11/30/09
11/30/09
11/30/09
iPhone apps are intended to boost sales of iPhones. To allow advertising on that platform which directs sales AWAY from iPhones is antithetical.
How is this a difficult concept?
11/30/09
11/30/09
No, I don't think cell companies should disallow VOIP on their networks. In fact, cell carriers will soon have to acknowledge that voice plans are dead as dead, and the only thing anyone needs is data.
11/30/09
What are you going to say? God Forbid they disallow apps that compete with them? Is that why they approved Rhapsody, Spotify, and the plethora of other apps that compete with them?
11/30/09
11/30/09
Don't like it? Use Android. Apple owns their app store, and reserves the right to refuse any app they see fit. A lot of their decisions to revoke apps I don't agree with because they are more based on AT&T's requirements, and not a valid flaw with the app (Google Voice, for one), but that argument in this scenario is completely nonsensical.
11/30/09
11/30/09
Although the billions of dollars in app sales, along with a hugely popular phone on arguably the worst cell network in the history of verbal communication might beg to differ.
11/30/09
11/30/09
11/30/09
Try comparing Twilight book sales to Shakespeare.
The Apple App Store was the first smartphone application store on the market and has sold thousands of times as many apps as all other app stores combined. [en.wikipedia.org]
I'm may be an Apple fanboy, but you've got to at least pose some reasonably rational comparisons.
11/29/09
don't listen if you're one of those unfortunate shlubs stuck at work on a Sunday night
11/29/09
99 cents. hours of drunken karaoke.
11/29/09
11/29/09
11/29/09
11/29/09
11/29/09
11/29/09
11/29/09
11/28/09
11/28/09
11/28/09
[applerejectedme.com]
11/28/09
[apprejections.com]
They list why an app was rejected and if the app developer "fixed" the issue to be allowed back in.
11/28/09
just looked at the rejections, they could have all been avoided by reading the f---ing manual.
11/28/09
11/25/09
11/25/09