Senior Contributing Editors:
Jesus Diaz
| AIM | Twitter
Mark Wilson, Reviews
| AIM | Twitter
Contributing Editors:
Matt Buchanan | AIM | Twitter
Adam Frucci | Twitter
Sean Fallon | Twitter
Jack Loftus | Twitter
John Herrman | Twitter
Dan Nosowitz
Chris Mascari
Kat Hannaford | Twitter
Rosa Golijan | Twitter
Chris Jacob
I'm sorry, maybe it's just a personal thing, but Microsoft, could you please stop making inspiring landscapes your trademark? We get it. You have a photographer friend who gets to go to some cool places.
Design something! For crying out loud. I mean, that guy who did your Windows 7 wallpapers did a great job (and trippy, I might add). Your Win7 loading screens and logos look good. It's not like you can't do this. Now. How's about you wrap all of that up in a nice, all-inclusive package? Maybe wrap all of your Windows-related products together? Why, exactly, is Bing blue and orange when Windows is red, green, blue, and yellow? I'd almost accept "they're two separate brands" as an answer, except they still have one major design element in common: generic landscape shots!
If you phone in WinMo 7*, if you make the default backgrounds just some crappy landscapes, we're gonna have some issues (as an aside, same goes for you Android).
*Disclaimer: That pun was completely unintentional. Upon discovery, I am choosing to leave it.
i personally like going to google.com/bing.com from safari better. I really cant find reason to add a useless app it to access something i can access on the safari app easily...
@samhudson333: dont get what the voice search is good for (except handicapped people)... can you imagine your self at the library binging and saying: "best porn website" and having to repeat it 10 times b/c the computer didnt understand?
Was there any doubt that the apple lawyers would squash them? Nobody needed them anyway, They stole from the opensource community and tried to profit from it. They deserved to die. Tons of alternatives out there for people who wish to tinker, Words can't express how much i hate them.
The obvious analogy here would be to compare this to critical mass. However, I think this idea has much more merit. If cellular networks are built only to handle the average amount of data, what happens during an event that generates above average usage? The system fails. Such an event could be an earthquake, a terrorist attack, or some other catastrophe where being in contact is very, very important. AT&T needs to build out their network to handle usage peaks precisely BECAUSE 80 million customers depend on it. If it can't handle normal traffic, good luck to you when something bad happens.
"We know that the vast majority of customers will see this action for what it is: an irresponsible and pointless scheme to draw attention to a blog."
I know that the vast majority of customers will see this action for what it is: a responsible and point proving scheme to draw attention to AT&Ts shitty service and high prices.
This sounds too draconian to be true. I don't believe it. Is it just one group, like a high clearance development team, or the whole company that's like this? I know in Europe this shit wouldn't fly. Like someone mentioned below, they have laws to protect personal privacy in the work place.
If every iPhone user were in on this, then yes AT&T should be scared. But the amount of techies that actually have heard about this ploy make up such a tiny percentage of the iPhone users, I couldn't imagine we would even put the tiniest strain on the network.
Only a tiny percentage of users have heard about this and an ever smaller percentage will participate. And I don't think this statement is a "please don't do this because were scared of you crashing our network" but more of a "you're a fucking idiot for even trying".
Well, it serves 'em right, and this is what should happen to companies who lift the IP of others and redistribute it without first obtaining rights to resell it.
@Kaiser-Machead: Your right, it's not the same thing since Apple just used the idea and made another product out of it. But if it happened today, Apple wouldn't have stood a chance.
@symbology: Jobs made a deal with PARC, in which he would bring in his team to get a look at their work and use the concepts they saw and implement it into their own products, in exchange for a number of shares of Apple.
I don't think Psystar did anything remotely similar.
@Nathan Obbards: Well actually, that only helps my point. Apple did not deserve the name 'iPhone' for free, and they too had to pony up the dough for it.
@The.Smith: Psystar purchased the sealed copies that they included with some systems, but that doesn't grant them the right to sell a hacked version, which they got off of a master copy from a Mac in-house, which was used for the Open Mac's preloads. It wasn't just the fact that they were selling unauthorized clones, but that each machine was preloaded off of one master copy over and over again, which is piracy.
"We know that the vast majority of customers will see this action [as] an irresponsible and pointless scheme..."
AT&T...how could you have had a run-in with 4chan earlier this year and still manage to miss it: irresponsible and pointless schemes are what the internet is all about! Come on, AT&T, don't you remember? Or should 4chan try to get another nazi symbol up to the top of Google Trends? Perhaps Stephen Colbert should call for his followers to insert him into a bible wiki again? Or someone should get on one of Oprah's message boards and warn her of the over 9000 penises ready to rape all of her viewers children. I bet she'd report that on television with a dead-serious face immediately!
Ooh! You know what would be good? We could invent an annoying redirection prank and consequently give Rick Astley his career back, eventually leading to a gig in the Macy's Day Parade! Oh, what's that? Already been done?
@mattycakes: whatt mattycakes has a gizmodo account??? But yes there was a utorrent app made but wait for it... the app store denied it. Im sure its on cydia. There are other command line based clients too.
12:07 AM
Design something! For crying out loud. I mean, that guy who did your Windows 7 wallpapers did a great job (and trippy, I might add). Your Win7 loading screens and logos look good. It's not like you can't do this. Now. How's about you wrap all of that up in a nice, all-inclusive package? Maybe wrap all of your Windows-related products together? Why, exactly, is Bing blue and orange when Windows is red, green, blue, and yellow? I'd almost accept "they're two separate brands" as an answer, except they still have one major design element in common: generic landscape shots!
If you phone in WinMo 7*, if you make the default backgrounds just some crappy landscapes, we're gonna have some issues (as an aside, same goes for you Android).
*Disclaimer: That pun was completely unintentional. Upon discovery, I am choosing to leave it.
12/15/09
On second though... 98% of my apps are useless.
12/15/09
12:02 AM
12:21 AM
12:24 AM
12/15/09
12/15/09
Or else.
12/15/09
12/15/09
12/15/09
I know that the vast majority of customers will see this action for what it is: a responsible and point proving scheme to draw attention to AT&Ts shitty service and high prices.
12/15/09
The population of the world that doesn't read Fake Steve's blog (or Gizmodo) will simply be having a worse-than-usual day with their cell phones.
12/15/09
12/15/09
12/15/09
12/15/09
If the network has a hiccup, AT&T will blame Operation Chokehold
If nothing out of the ordinary happens, AT&T will declare victory and proclaim that its network could withstand the DDoS.
Either way, Operation Chokehold is a cute joke and a dumb idea.
12/15/09
12/15/09
12/15/09
Only a tiny percentage of users have heard about this and an ever smaller percentage will participate. And I don't think this statement is a "please don't do this because were scared of you crashing our network" but more of a "you're a fucking idiot for even trying".
12/15/09
12/15/09
12/15/09
12/15/09
(not flaming, just giving an example that fits)
12/15/09
12/15/09
12/15/09
12/15/09
I don't think Psystar did anything remotely similar.
12/15/09
12/15/09
12/15/09
Apple just used the name iPhone and then was forced to pay for it.
12/15/09
12/15/09
AT&T...how could you have had a run-in with 4chan earlier this year and still manage to miss it: irresponsible and pointless schemes are what the internet is all about! Come on, AT&T, don't you remember? Or should 4chan try to get another nazi symbol up to the top of Google Trends? Perhaps Stephen Colbert should call for his followers to insert him into a bible wiki again? Or someone should get on one of Oprah's message boards and warn her of the over 9000 penises ready to rape all of her viewers children. I bet she'd report that on television with a dead-serious face immediately!
Ooh! You know what would be good? We could invent an annoying redirection prank and consequently give Rick Astley his career back, eventually leading to a gig in the Macy's Day Parade! Oh, what's that? Already been done?
Yeah. Yeah, that's what I thought.
12/15/09
12/15/09
12/15/09
12/15/09
12/15/09
12/15/09
Step 2: Download lots and lots of porn.
They have a utorrent app for their iphones, don't they? I'm not really too sure.
12/15/09
12/15/09