Bullocks. Without a neutral gray background, you will not know what "good black levels" are. The wall is blue and beige. And the shadow of the set on the wall is a darker black without any depth.
The only true LED set would have an LED for each pixel. And we won't see that in our living rooms for a long, long time...
@Turbostraw: Most of the lawyers involved such cases are not US citizens typically. They're either Japanese, Chinese, or Taiwanese so that one can speak the native language of the people who built the fucking thing.
If you're Japanese, do you want a white lawyer representing you, or do you want a Japanese lawyer representing you that speaks English, and Japanese, and understands cultural nuanced use of language natively so that he can request clarification of terms as they are translated into English for the court proceedings?
OK, here's the basics behind manufacturers screwing other manufacturers.
Company A builds product.
Company B reverse engineers product, copies it, sends their product to market while knowingly infringing upon Company A's patent/patents
Company B then works to come up with a work-around the patent/s before Company A sues them.
Company A sues them.
Company A then requests that all products from Company B are banned from import during hearing.
Company B's products are then either banned, or not banned temporarily.
Company A then requests for all monies Company B made selling infringing products.
Company will then usually get portion of Company B's sales.
Company B releases work-around.
Company B retires infringing product line in US.
Company B is then cleared to continue now importing non infringing crap to US.
Occasionally Company B gets thumped hard before it gets to this end point and is effectively shut out of the US market entirely until case is resolved and products are no longer infringing upon Company A's products.
The short version as my former IP paralegal wife states it: Crooked Asian company sues other crooked Asian company in an attempt to corner market. The end.
@asnpcwiz: Who makes an LCD screen first has nothing to do with patents. You do realize that there is more than one way to build an LCD right? And that all the electronics contained within are not equal perhaps? And that maybe one company may invent something that increases the quality of their product that another company may wish to acquire so that their products are perceived as on par?
Or, are you just some sort of flaming moron who throws out idiotic comments like the one you just posted above?
@yugoAK: President has authority over trade disputes. He has advisers to recommend a course of action to take. Same as when it comes to military action, reforming health care, or anything else he attempts to do. He gets advice from (allegedly) very smart people.
in college we had 2 CRT TV's stacked on top of each other (living in a quad as a freshman sucked) and had 2 different things going simultaneously (HALO, cable tv, movie, etc)
@Lou_Rosenthal: no, princess leia pleasuring herself with a lightsaber is porn for geeks. this is just awesomeness that will soon turn to indifference that will soon turn to disappointment.
Obviously someone does have one, and it's a chick. Can someone do an imdb search on that finger, and then we can stalk her house, beat her up, and take her phone???
@weatherman: *Yawn*. That sentence should be "Crappy closed systems hold no allure FOR ME." No one else cares about your Apple hate. lol.....Im loving my iPhone....Hope you like your phone just as much.
@TheSonOfKrypton: well I said it, so you should infer that closed systems hold no allure for me. To say it would be redundant.
Anyway, I wasn't talking about the iPhone. I am an iPhone user and I think it's the greatest thing since the original Palm OS. By crappy closed systems I meant the kinds we see on everything from Razrs to the LG Prada type phones. Those are truly closed systems. iPhone OS, Windows Mobile, Android, Symbian.. those are all "open" systems to some extent. Obviously the iPhone is more closed than the others because apps require approval and must be downloaded though the iTunes store, but it's still an open platform ,technically speaking.
A lot like the iPhone? I'd say if the iPhone didn't exist, neither would this.
Seriously, it's one thing to take interface and interaction cues from another device. That's fine. It's another to style the device and theme the UI such that you need to wonder if they even have an industrial designer onboard.
07/07/09
The only true LED set would have an LED for each pixel. And we won't see that in our living rooms for a long, long time...
06/24/09
I mean, how else will they finish paying their Cayennes otherwise?
06/24/09
If you're Japanese, do you want a white lawyer representing you, or do you want a Japanese lawyer representing you that speaks English, and Japanese, and understands cultural nuanced use of language natively so that he can request clarification of terms as they are translated into English for the court proceedings?
06/24/09
Company A builds product.
Company B reverse engineers product, copies it, sends their product to market while knowingly infringing upon Company A's patent/patents
Company B then works to come up with a work-around the patent/s before Company A sues them.
Company A sues them.
Company A then requests that all products from Company B are banned from import during hearing.
Company B's products are then either banned, or not banned temporarily.
Company A then requests for all monies Company B made selling infringing products.
Company will then usually get portion of Company B's sales.
Company B releases work-around.
Company B retires infringing product line in US.
Company B is then cleared to continue now importing non infringing crap to US.
Occasionally Company B gets thumped hard before it gets to this end point and is effectively shut out of the US market entirely until case is resolved and products are no longer infringing upon Company A's products.
The short version as my former IP paralegal wife states it: Crooked Asian company sues other crooked Asian company in an attempt to corner market. The end.
06/24/09
06/24/09
Except in this case, Company A is Sharp...I'm pretty sure the were making LCD's waaaaay before Samsung.
06/24/09
Or, are you just some sort of flaming moron who throws out idiotic comments like the one you just posted above?
06/24/09
06/24/09
agreed. they're much better than Dull Infernus.
06/24/09
06/24/09
06/24/09
06/24/09
06/24/09
06/24/09
that vizio waitin at home for ya?
06/24/09
06/24/09
06/24/09
but... the cake is a lie!
06/24/09
12/19/08
11/02/08
bad idea...
10/30/08
10/30/08
10/30/08
10/30/08
10/30/08
10/30/08
Touchscreen phones are great, but it's all about the OS. Crappy closed systems hold no allure.
10/30/08
10/30/08
But I agree, closed architecture phone OSs completely neuter the usefulness of the hardware...
(while apparently only providing a marginal improvement in stability/user experience)
10/30/08
10/30/08
Anyway, I wasn't talking about the iPhone. I am an iPhone user and I think it's the greatest thing since the original Palm OS. By crappy closed systems I meant the kinds we see on everything from Razrs to the LG Prada type phones. Those are truly closed systems. iPhone OS, Windows Mobile, Android, Symbian.. those are all "open" systems to some extent. Obviously the iPhone is more closed than the others because apps require approval and must be downloaded though the iTunes store, but it's still an open platform ,technically speaking.
10/30/08
10/30/08
Seriously, it's one thing to take interface and interaction cues from another device. That's fine. It's another to style the device and theme the UI such that you need to wonder if they even have an industrial designer onboard.
10/30/08
10/30/08
10/30/08
Because if you didn't, you guys would be lying about being in love with shiny new things. The point is to fawn over them, not necessarily to own :D