Let's go to Mars now during Obama's second term for $20 Billion and collaborating with all other countries. Corporations can pay $1 for each Government $1 through sponsoring with ads in the HD video coverage of the Mars missions. #nasa
@MichelleDatsun: You do realize that we landed on the moon more than once back then, right? Like everyone has said, it's a we've-been-there-done-that kinda deal. Why spend money going back? #nasa
I really do appreciate your efforts. Believe me, I really do. However, these past couple of years have been pretty disappointing. I know we tried to make it work, but I feel like our relationship is a little one-sided. Whenever I try to visit you, you're always a little hostile and cold. You sometimes lash out with debris and constantly threaten me with solar flares.
Also, I've been kinda seeing someone else. You may know it well. I was hopeful with you, but you seem either unable or unwilling to supply me with aliens, but the ocean has some shit you wouldn't believe. I'm very sorry. Hopefully you'll find someone, but it can't be me.
Having lived in Florida my entire life, I've always been very interested in space travel, and have always wanted to go into space, but I don't have anywhere near the intelligence required to be an astronaut, so I'll just keep praying that I hit the powerball so I can buy a trip there. #nasa
@Gann: Only is really based on a realistic scenario. It would be pretty awesome if we could go out there and find the Wookie planet... Since that's probably not gonna happen, I think setting out sites on the nearest planet is the only realistic scenario... Weapons, well... Let's see what the Chinese are up to first. #nasa
I don't think the public will ever care. First, the cost is what I hear most people bring up. Second, the idea of going to the moon bored people 50 years ago shortly after we went there as it does now. To really garner attention and support, it needs to be cheap (private industry perhaps?), and spectacular. Like going to Mars. Until then, I'm just going to have to be content watching star trek, star gate, star wars, and battlestar galactica to get my space travel fix.
@pɹɐoqʎǝʞuǝʞoɹq: I agree the general public won't care unless is something "Spectacular", but how many things do we enjoy on a daily basis from that same goal. If you do away with the space program you might as well continue thinking inside the box and halt all scientific progression altogether. #nasa
@retrac: Most people would argue that spacecraft and robots can achieve the same result without putting a person up there in the first place. Even the space station is pretty boring. When did you last hear about some great scientific discovery on the station? But you probably have heard about the multi million dollar toilet they installed. I love manned space. I'm excited about colonization of the moon. But most people have just heard about our dicking around on the space station and the costs that could go elsewhere on the planet like orphans in Africa or some other thing. #nasa
I sometimes wonder if humanity will forget that we went to the moon. It will be a myth; people will hear the tales from the elders, but, wont believe it, because its such a far fetched idea that men would get into a tiny box and hurl themselves off this planet and all the way to that distant orb in the night sky. Preposterous, they will say.
Let's see, well had we pushed further and kept pushing we'd probably be having less of an impact upon our planet's resources and environment than what we do now.
One of the biggest uses of photo-cells is for powering spacecraft and satellites. The biggest drive to make them more efficient is the same.
Perhaps if we had kept the push past the early 70's instead of thinking of sending people to the moon as 'ho-hum' we'd have already been building houses standard w/ solar cell shingles since the mid 80's....
I find it depressing that we've forgotten so much of the technology we had in the 60's, and now have to spend billions upon billions just to rediscover it.
I understand that my view of space exploration being integral to inspiring people to educate themselves at a time when teachers are fighting to keep their jobs, but nobody is going to learn unless they are able to dream about what they can do with that education.
I find our lack of belief in what NASA bring brings us on an intangible level of inspiration scary. Yet someone always says: "We can always find a better use for the money."
Can we? Is throwing money at a problem the best way to encourage people as a society to address the ills in their community?
I find it interesting that in his list of achievements over the past 40 years he skips mention of all the robotic process. The Mars rovers I think are the greatest engineering and scientific achievement NASA has had (well, maybe Hubble), and I think they aren't mentioned specifically because they show the alternative option for NASA's future. Not as dramatic, not as fast, but hot damn, we can send robots there for pennies on the dollar of a manned mission, and they can sometimes VASTLY outlast their expected lifetime. That is incredible.
The boy in me wants a man on the mars so that I can know the awe that he felt as a boy eating that spam and peanut butter sandwhich. But the reality today is that Mars is probably just not worth it.
Make no mistake. We went to the moon to prove we could nuke Russia from space. Until we are under threat from martians, there will be no political will to go to Mars.
@TracyPaddock: Right, but how many of the people who built the rovers, and the robots, grew up inspired by people going to the moon, and Star Trek, and the Shuttle missions.
It wasn't like they woke up one day and said, "I want to build a robot to go to Mars." We've been ending unmanned craft to planets for a long time, and it's still a great way to explore.
However there is something intangible about people walking on the moon, or people walking on mars. It's a frontier, it's exploration, and people can reach out and touch it rather than just look at pictures.
People are much more inspired by the thought that maybe one day they too can go into space than, "Maybe one day I can build a robot to scurry about Mars and attempt to kill Val Kilmer!"
11/02/09
[www.rainydaymagazine.com]
10/31/09
10/30/09
All I know is that we went from concept to supposed moon landing in 9 years.
40 years later, no one on this planet has gone back. What's wrong with this picture?
If you compare the first 9 years of the space program with what we have currently, we should have landed on Mars at least 20 years ago.
We go from landing on the moon to orbiting the earth a billion times in 40 years? Give me a break.
10/30/09
10/30/09
10/30/09
10/30/09
I really do appreciate your efforts. Believe me, I really do. However, these past couple of years have been pretty disappointing. I know we tried to make it work, but I feel like our relationship is a little one-sided. Whenever I try to visit you, you're always a little hostile and cold. You sometimes lash out with debris and constantly threaten me with solar flares.
Also, I've been kinda seeing someone else. You may know it well. I was hopeful with you, but you seem either unable or unwilling to supply me with aliens, but the ocean has some shit you wouldn't believe. I'm very sorry. Hopefully you'll find someone, but it can't be me.
Love,
K-M #nasa
10/30/09
10/30/09
Nothing quite excites like POWER! #nasa
10/30/09
10/30/09
10/30/09
10/30/09
10/30/09
10/30/09
10/30/09
10/30/09
10/30/09
10/30/09
07/21/09
I sometimes wonder if humanity will forget that we went to the moon. It will be a myth; people will hear the tales from the elders, but, wont believe it, because its such a far fetched idea that men would get into a tiny box and hurl themselves off this planet and all the way to that distant orb in the night sky. Preposterous, they will say.
We are lucky to have lived in this time.
07/21/09
One of the biggest uses of photo-cells is for powering spacecraft and satellites. The biggest drive to make them more efficient is the same.
Perhaps if we had kept the push past the early 70's instead of thinking of sending people to the moon as 'ho-hum' we'd have already been building houses standard w/ solar cell shingles since the mid 80's....
I find it depressing that we've forgotten so much of the technology we had in the 60's, and now have to spend billions upon billions just to rediscover it.
I understand that my view of space exploration being integral to inspiring people to educate themselves at a time when teachers are fighting to keep their jobs, but nobody is going to learn unless they are able to dream about what they can do with that education.
I find our lack of belief in what NASA bring brings us on an intangible level of inspiration scary. Yet someone always says: "We can always find a better use for the money."
Can we? Is throwing money at a problem the best way to encourage people as a society to address the ills in their community?
07/21/09
The boy in me wants a man on the mars so that I can know the awe that he felt as a boy eating that spam and peanut butter sandwhich. But the reality today is that Mars is probably just not worth it.
Make no mistake. We went to the moon to prove we could nuke Russia from space. Until we are under threat from martians, there will be no political will to go to Mars.
07/21/09
It wasn't like they woke up one day and said, "I want to build a robot to go to Mars." We've been ending unmanned craft to planets for a long time, and it's still a great way to explore.
However there is something intangible about people walking on the moon, or people walking on mars. It's a frontier, it's exploration, and people can reach out and touch it rather than just look at pictures.
People are much more inspired by the thought that maybe one day they too can go into space than, "Maybe one day I can build a robot to scurry about Mars and attempt to kill Val Kilmer!"