7D FTW. Nice try... Nikkor HAHA! so cute... Maybe Google will send some of their peeps over there and donate some better video tech. #nikond300shanggliding
@Grendel: Nikon is still about the pictures. For most basic PJ work, at least what I have come across, you don't need more than video for the web, which 720p covers just fine. Better AF, dual card slots, and, at least to me, better ergos with the Nikon. Sorry, I'll take the D300s instead of a 7D. #nikond300shanggliding
@szrimaging: You're one of those people who splurged on Nikon didn't you. And now, being stuck with Nikkor lenses, its not financially viable to go the "better" route. First, no one will ever argue the ergonomics and speed settings of the 7D. Far better weather proofing for the model price-range, AND 1080p. Second, I am a photographer. I get paid to take pictures of people doing "strange" things. I use the HD video for various purposes. Short films, Photo journalism, family photos etc... I've used Nikon and Nikkor exclusively for a while until I got fed up with it. So I took a gamble and bought a Canon 5D Mark II about 5 months ago.
I have since pawned all my old lenses, bought some seriously awesome L series lenses and have ZERO regrets. I shoot in RAW almost all the time so the dual-card slots is not a really big issue. Granted, its nice but not a deal breaker. And we aren't fully up to speed on the new 7D's features (we've tinkered but it takes time). But I have to say, I'm blown away by the AF (At least with USM L lenses).
Canon FTW! (pppppsssst... I deserve a free camera all these pro-canon posts!) #nikond300shanggliding
@Grendel: Odd, I'm a photographer too. I get paid to take photos of people skiing and snowboarding. Usually while catching big air.
This is the first year though that my company may not be able to afford a separate video person.
As for switching, I actually only have two lenses I don't need to upgrade anyways. So switching, if I felt the need, is not an issue. I just don't feel that constantly switching brands just because one has a better camera at the moment is a good choice. Both have some amazing lenses in the lineup, so that argument is null. And as long as I can capture the images I need to with the gear I have, what is the point of constantly upgrading. My camera, as long as it does what I need, should last 4 years. That gives it time to pay for itself and some of the other equipment around it. #nikond300shanggliding
There is also the carrying of aromatics out of the beverage through the carbonation, as per the recent articles on champagne bubbles. (e.g. [www.guardian.co.uk]). This only refers to bubbly, but I would be rather surprised if the same principle was not at work in other carbonated beverages. After all, beer and cola are full of aromatics as well. #gizmodoremainders
Wait so nobody felt the need to post about the baby nearly dying because it wasn't 'gadget-related' enough for Gizmodo, but you jumped in with a BREAKING article about a balloon flying away? And then posted 5 more articles about the most retarded hoax ever, even though it didn't have any "cellphone-related mayem?" #gizmodoremainders
@G-Ram: the balloon is actually a really cool gadget (er...was). Apparently once it was filled with helium there was a small electrical current applied to parts of the outer skin to help it navigate. I have no idea of the physics of it all (or even if it would work, since this guy is a bit weird as it is) but that's the story.
Whether or not giz knew that at the time is another thing. I think they just wanted to get a bit more site traffic :) #gizmodoremainders
Wait so this baby stroller video doesn't end with, "Just kidding, the baby was not actually in the stroller and was hiding in an attic" ? #gizmodoremainders
"The real issue, at least with Apple, is probably that Woolworths might expand its retail business into electronics and somehow threaten that lucrative iPod business."
Because we all know that MP3's sound a lot better on a Tomato!
Jack Loftus promoted this comment
RuBBa_cHiKiN: The real question is can it fit in the Batmobile? was starred
RuBBa_cHiKiN: The real question is can it fit in the Batmobile? was unstarred
Before you start laughing about them being a supermarket and not in competition with Apple, perhaps you ought to do some Due Diligence (as I'm sure Apple's legal eagles did...) and read this Wikipedia entry.
Both their history as a variety store and their ownership of the Dick Smith Electronics subsidiary make an objection necessary - and they have a history of appropriating the names/trademarks of others.
Apple MUST act to maintain their right to the trademark, and Woolworth, since they DO sell consumer electronics, should have known better.
Like it or not, it's pretty clear Apple is in the right here.
@Synthfilker: Apple has the right to a very specific apple logo, not every apple logo. This W in the shape of an apple hardly qualifies as trademark infringement.
@Barion: Take away the leaf, and all you have is a curved W without a leaf. Apple is suing a supermarket for using the 23rd letter of the alphabet as their logo.
Jack Loftus promoted this comment
RuBBa_cHiKiN: The real question is can it fit in the Batmobile? was starred
RuBBa_cHiKiN: The real question is can it fit in the Batmobile? was unstarred
@Synthfilker: I wouldn't go so far as to say that "it's pretty clear Apple is in the right here," but I would say that Apple is pretty much obligated to give it a shot because of Federal trademark laws which put the burden on the owner of a trademark to do stuff like this. If Apple didn't do this, it could (albeit perhaps tenuously) lead to brand dilution, like Xerox(r) and Band-Aid(r).
@Signore Pinko-Panko!: The only company "in the right" is Apple records, who allowed Apple computers to use the name Apple so long as they never entered the music industry. Oops.
it looks like fruit? why don't we be a little more honest here, shall we? IT'S A FREAKING APPLE. or were you not able to make that connection? but i suppose you think they just go around suing companies with any type of fruit logo, like a banana? wait, they haven't. only apple's. how odd. not that i think it's a valid complaint..
@bigfatduck: I think that everyone knew the fruit in question would be an apple. The only stated it that way to emphasize how ridiculous it is that a company would think they have the right to be the only company that uses a certain kind of fruit in their logo.
10/19/09
10/19/09
10/19/09
10/19/09
I have since pawned all my old lenses, bought some seriously awesome L series lenses and have ZERO regrets. I shoot in RAW almost all the time so the dual-card slots is not a really big issue. Granted, its nice but not a deal breaker. And we aren't fully up to speed on the new 7D's features (we've tinkered but it takes time). But I have to say, I'm blown away by the AF (At least with USM L lenses).
Canon FTW! (pppppsssst... I deserve a free camera all these pro-canon posts!) #nikond300shanggliding
10/20/09
This is the first year though that my company may not be able to afford a separate video person.
As for switching, I actually only have two lenses I don't need to upgrade anyways. So switching, if I felt the need, is not an issue. I just don't feel that constantly switching brands just because one has a better camera at the moment is a good choice. Both have some amazing lenses in the lineup, so that argument is null. And as long as I can capture the images I need to with the gear I have, what is the point of constantly upgrading. My camera, as long as it does what I need, should last 4 years. That gives it time to pay for itself and some of the other equipment around it. #nikond300shanggliding
10/19/09
10/17/09
10/17/09
10/17/09
and babies #gizmodoremainders
10/17/09
10/17/09
10/17/09
Whether or not giz knew that at the time is another thing. I think they just wanted to get a bit more site traffic :) #gizmodoremainders
10/16/09
10/16/09
10/16/09
10/16/09
10/05/09
10/05/09
10/05/09
Because we all know that MP3's sound a lot better on a Tomato!
10/05/09
10/05/09
[en.wikipedia.org]
Both their history as a variety store and their ownership of the Dick Smith Electronics subsidiary make an objection necessary - and they have a history of appropriating the names/trademarks of others.
Apple MUST act to maintain their right to the trademark, and Woolworth, since they DO sell consumer electronics, should have known better.
Like it or not, it's pretty clear Apple is in the right here.
10/05/09
10/05/09
10/05/09
"Both their history as a variety store and their ownership of the Dick Smith Electronics subsidiary make an objection necessary."
No it doesn't. You don't see Dick Smith using the mentioned logo.
10/05/09
10/05/09
Apple records should be handed iTunes.
10/04/09
10/05/09