I bought one of those ny coffee mugs at alphabets on 6th and a about 3 years ago. That's my favorite coffee mug by far. Besides the cute factor, it just feels really good in your hand. Hard to describe, but it has a nice tactile feel to it, I really like the fake paper seam up the side.
It's just plain stupid to advise against cases. I just shelled out £200 for a new 3rd gen 32GB iPod touch and the first* thing I did was shove that motherfucka in a nice Belkin leather folio case. Provided you don't get a shit ass case your iPod/iPhone can look just as good wrapped in something that protects both its form and its function.
I generally like to preserve both these aspects of my devices. But if I have to sacrifice one it'd be the looks every time. A broken device is useless and therefore its design is useless. There's only so much you can appreciate about the design of a paperweight.
Plus unless you have money to burn on replacements then if you crack or scratch your phone generally its design and beauty are ruined anyway so you've lost both. Better to sacrifice some measure of style for the security of keeping your investment intact.
My advice is just don't buy ugly cases. Get a nice one, keep your beautiful screen unscratched and fully functional.
Only way I'd want a gadget case is if it was that fancy-pants new case Apple's using on their iPods for point-of-sale with the card swipe and barcode scanner on it.
@nikkitoria: Resistive touch screen uses multiple layers of thin material. As the pressure applied compresses the layers they register the central point of incresed resistance (voltage differential) and the software determines the X/Y coordinates. Pros include lower cost and generally higher durability, cons include potentially less visibility (as more light has to pass through more layers of material), and somewhat lower accuracy.
Capacitative touch screen uses a single layer of material that conducts an electrical field across the screen. They require almost no contact as they don't register to pressure, but instead react to capacitance interference from your fingertip (hence they don't work as well, or at all, with a stylus, or while wearing gloves). However, they register multitouch if the controller supports it. They permit more visible light through the surface, and have extremely accurate X/Y positioning, but are generally more expensive to manufacture and require a somewhat more advanced controller to interpret the touch data.
@the_guy_elsewise_known_as_beeb...: Right, looks like two beamed quarter notes, which, as I recall, Apple didn't invent (unless they have a patent filing somewhere that's over 250 years old).
@Jim Halpert: A grid of icons with text underneath is copying the iPhone interface? I had many phones before the iPhone was released that had similar interfaces.
Apple didn't invent the icon or the rectangular array.
@Jim Halpert: Here is a screenshot of a Nokia N95 with icons.
As you can see, quite similar, yet it predates the iPhone by over a year (which would imply it was in development more than a year before the first iPhone was ever glimpsed by a fanboy). The OS, Symbian, was around even before that.
So, you see, not everything is about Apple. Prettily arrayed icons on a black background isn't Apple's baby, much as you'd like to think so. As far as phone formfactor, well, adult human hands are all pretty much the same, so any rectangular phone made in black...
@Jim Halpert: Well then, what exactly is your point? The Samsung menu and the Nokia N95 menu are virtually identical. In fact, neither even uses the iPhone icon style, which is to say, the rounded corner "full block" glass-style icons.
I honestly think you're simply being a fanboy troll. Not only have you done nothing but whine snarkily, you've also done nothing to serve your point, as others besides myself, have pointed out. Get over your iPhone fetish, already. There is no denying that the iPhone formfactor is stylish (at least to many), but claiming that Apple originated the look of icons laid out in a grid style is ludicrous and simply entrenches the already well-established idiocy of the Apple fanboy base.
And for the record, embe dyour images with standard HTML tags, but don't close the tag with the trailing
My primary mega yacht is in the shop right now, so this would normally be a perfect opportunity for installation. Even better, I am already using a Bang & Olufsen server to control the twelve flat screens, fourteen DVR's, and sub-zero water dish for Fido. However, until they can offer this device in caput mortuum, or at least an earthy firebrick, the color would surely clash with the aesthetics, and that is concern number one for any grounded mega yacht owner.
11/27/09
11/27/09
11/27/09
11/27/09
They are stupid expensive but worth it.
11/27/09
Until the replacements are on his bob, that pretentious bloke can piss off. There's nothing wrong with iPhone cases.
11/27/09
I generally like to preserve both these aspects of my devices. But if I have to sacrifice one it'd be the looks every time. A broken device is useless and therefore its design is useless. There's only so much you can appreciate about the design of a paperweight.
Plus unless you have money to burn on replacements then if you crack or scratch your phone generally its design and beauty are ruined anyway so you've lost both. Better to sacrifice some measure of style for the security of keeping your investment intact.
My advice is just don't buy ugly cases. Get a nice one, keep your beautiful screen unscratched and fully functional.
* The second thing I did was jailbreak it.
11/27/09
11/26/09
11/11/09
Right? #beovision7
11/11/09
Paris Hilton and MONSTER cable approve of your comment. #beovision7
11/11/09
11/11/09
02/07/09
02/09/09
Capacitative touch screen uses a single layer of material that conducts an electrical field across the screen. They require almost no contact as they don't register to pressure, but instead react to capacitance interference from your fingertip (hence they don't work as well, or at all, with a stylus, or while wearing gloves). However, they register multitouch if the controller supports it. They permit more visible light through the surface, and have extremely accurate X/Y positioning, but are generally more expensive to manufacture and require a somewhat more advanced controller to interpret the touch data.
02/07/09
02/09/09
Next?
02/07/09
I know its the most popular phone on the market, but seriously, think for yourself for once.
02/07/09
02/07/09
Apple didn't invent the icon or the rectangular array.
02/07/09
Oh come on.
Dont even try and say that isnt the iphone interface.
02/08/09
As you can see, quite similar, yet it predates the iPhone by over a year (which would imply it was in development more than a year before the first iPhone was ever glimpsed by a fanboy). The OS, Symbian, was around even before that.
So, you see, not everything is about Apple. Prettily arrayed icons on a black background isn't Apple's baby, much as you'd like to think so. As far as phone formfactor, well, adult human hands are all pretty much the same, so any rectangular phone made in black...
02/08/09
Actually that is way diffferent than the iphone's.
Gotta pay attention to detail dude.
[IMG][i392.photobucket.com]]
02/08/09
I honestly think you're simply being a fanboy troll. Not only have you done nothing but whine snarkily, you've also done nothing to serve your point, as others besides myself, have pointed out. Get over your iPhone fetish, already. There is no denying that the iPhone formfactor is stylish (at least to many), but claiming that Apple originated the look of icons laid out in a grid style is ludicrous and simply entrenches the already well-established idiocy of the Apple fanboy base.
And for the record, embe dyour images with standard HTML tags, but don't close the tag with the trailing
02/07/09
11/12/08