Senior Contributing Editors:
Jesus Diaz
| AIM | Twitter
Mark Wilson, Reviews
| AIM | Twitter
Contributing Editors:
Matt Buchanan | AIM | Twitter
Adam Frucci | Twitter
Sean Fallon | Twitter
Jack Loftus | Twitter
John Herrman | Twitter
Dan Nosowitz
Chris Mascari
Kat Hannaford | Twitter
Rosa Golijan | Twitter
Chris Jacob
Either it was an impressive feat of engineering, or the software was written so poorly it took six months to fix it, or what they were intending all along. They get to double dip (GEORGE!) the same product. They got a boost of sales at launch, were expecting a downturn, and now they can say 85% better battery life, the New Kindle. It's all a marketing ploy in my opinion.
@daftrok: Yeah, that large an increase seems only possible if there were major inefficiencies to start with. At least it's still free for people who bought it earlier.
@Segador: Yep. Generally that is part of the early adopter tax. But on the bright side you got to read lots of books on a device that's a good deal more convenient than paper. I'm still happy with my gen1 Kindle. I don't really care about the PDF so much since most of my PDFs are formatted for letter/A4 and wouldn't work well on a small screen. Reflowable text works fine but then it also converts fine. Lots of readers can list PDF support as a feature. That doesn't mean it works well. I'm going to wait to upgrade until either my Kindle breaks or some great new screen tech comes out.
@aidemthgink: That sounds like it's probably a good idea. However there will still most likely be an issue with waste products being produced by the battery itself. #bloodbatteries
Where's the Carl Sagan autotune now? Come one, we all know that anaerobic glycolysis would fill a thousand 500-page volumes via "Cosmos". Now I want to hear the autotune version, please. #bloodbatteries
Okay, commenting specifically on the Usa subset: We currently run our bodies with an enormous glucose energy excess, caused by changing the balance of our diet a few millenia ago towards large amounts of refined grains. This creates, among many other things, the obesity and diabetes "pandemic."
Installing bio-batteries that use this glucose isn't a bad idea. We already put excess energy into our systems, so we wouldn't have to adopt new diets to fuel them. Other problems could be caused, however, if their use of glucose doesn't fit into the body's normal response curves - we could also introduce a whole new set of diet-related issues. #bloodbatteries
@Gann: Personally I'd install the version that can convert excess battery energy to ketones instead (or give me a choice of conversions), but either way I like the idea. And you're right about the difference between biorhythms and society's rhythms - programmed correctly, this could do double duty and plug some of the gap. #bloodbatteries
@Gann: At which point it occurs to me that we're talking about becoming The Culture from Iain M. Banks' novels, at least biologically. But yes - if we figure out how to synthesize a molecule on that level using in-body material, I doubt the process will be molecule-specific. Aside from getting high, we can have on-demand self-produced doses of vaccine or antibiotic or caffeine or vasopressin or melatonin or god this is going to be awesome. #bloodbatteries
@FriarNurgle: Haha, I'm imagining some kind of inductive power transfer system. I think there's already too many plugs for the human body, but maybe I'm a prude? #bloodbatteries
From the article "their waste products will need to be removed without allowing any harmful substances to leach out into the blood stream". That could mean that, while the metabolic waste itself may not be harmful, other components of the battery may be.
From the limited amount I know about yeast, I don't believe they produce anything that our livers can't handle. #bloodbatteries
If you're using yeast to process glucose, the waste product is going to be ethanol.
I'm pretty sure I'm not alone here, but I for one would certainly pay good money for a device that charges batteries and intoxicates at the same time. #bloodbatteries
12/02/09
Alas, I am not a chemist and I can only look at the picture and say "ooh"
11/24/09
11/24/09
11/24/09
11/24/09
11/24/09
11/24/09
11/24/09
11/24/09
11/16/09
[www1.umn.edu]
Lactic acid is a byproduct of muscle tissue and some bacteria, i.e. Shewanella, can convert it into electricity. Just a thought.
11/16/09
11/16/09
11/16/09
Installing bio-batteries that use this glucose isn't a bad idea. We already put excess energy into our systems, so we wouldn't have to adopt new diets to fuel them. Other problems could be caused, however, if their use of glucose doesn't fit into the body's normal response curves - we could also introduce a whole new set of diet-related issues. #bloodbatteries
11/16/09
Conversely, if the device were able to convert energy back into blood sugar it might be a viable alternative to coffee in the morning. #bloodbatteries
11/16/09
11/16/09
11/16/09
11/16/09
Your're gonna want a little lube to plug this in. #bloodbatteries
11/16/09
11/16/09
11/16/09
@Curves: #bloodbatteries
11/16/09
11/16/09
11/16/09
11/16/09
11/16/09
11/16/09
11/16/09
It'd be a device that is powered by glucose to process glucose.... #bloodbatteries
11/16/09
11/16/09
From the limited amount I know about yeast, I don't believe they produce anything that our livers can't handle. #bloodbatteries
11/16/09
Considering the fear/joy which resulted from a simple math equation like E=mc², we should think on this one.
...never mind "The Matrix", fear Exxon. #bloodbatteries
11/16/09
I'm pretty sure I'm not alone here, but I for one would certainly pay good money for a device that charges batteries and intoxicates at the same time. #bloodbatteries
11/16/09
11/16/09