This should be called a "darkhole" if anything, rather than a blackhole. Also, the people who call it a "blackhole" shall be labeled as "assholes" from now on.
The great Psychonaut has spoken. All things extant in this world, Gods of Heaven Gods of Earth, let everything be as it should be. So mote it be.
@psychonaut2021: Agreed, calling this device a black hole isn't just highly disingenuous, it's utterly wrong.
This device simply traps light, and by means of its design, disallows the electromagnetic wave from being released, forcing it to be converted directly into heat energy once it reaches the center. #tabletopblackhole
Even if it was a real black hole, it would not necessarily mean the end of the world as some think. A black hole is after all made from atoms. They are just very compressed. A black hole made from 2 (e.g.) hydrogen atmos, would still only weigh as much as two hydrogen atoms and have the same gravitational pull as those two atoms have.
If it was one gram of hydrogen, the black hole would "weigh" one gram and it would "have the same gravity". It would just be in a very small spot. Which is good, because it means that it would probably never get to "eat" anything ;).
Now that does not sound that scary anymore after all, does it?
Also, small black holes tend to evaporate really quickly.
It's a trap, not a black hole in the classical sense (since gravity is not involved in any way).
If it were a real black hole with gravity so strong that it sucks up everything, we wouldn't be having this conversation. Unless the black holes don't work that way... Or something.
@Mr. Damage: If the sun were to turn into a black hole today, skipping that whole blowing off the outer part bit, the only difference we'd see from here is it would get dark really quick. It wouldn't suck in the solar system, it wouldn't even suck in Mercury.
I don't know...looks like a photoshop black hole if I ever saw one. I mean look at those pixels! I could have made that in 5 minutes and called it Heaven.
Um, it's a picture of a galaxy with millions or billions of stars. Regardless of how massive the black hole at the center may be, it's a speck compared to the size of a galaxy. The bright spot at the center is just made of stars, not the black hole at the center.
@dinsey: if you read the link it actually says that 40% of the light was from the host galaxy, and the rest from the ionized gas around the black hole. A roughly 5 x 5 pixel chunk of that blob of pixels is from the black hole. they show that in the second figure. if its a speck, its a very large speck.
@Eriamjh: It is a false-color image. From the link: "Figure 1: False-color image of the QSO (CFHQSJ2329-0301), the most distant black hole currently known. In addition to the bright central black hole (white), the image shows the surrounding host galaxy (red). "
@Eriamjh: We don't see the black hole, we observe how the light is bent by the black hole's extreme gravity. Certain deformations of light path can only point to something so massive, it must be a black hole.
@anexanhume: You can detect a black hole by bent light, but usually they're detected by the massive amount of energy released by matter as it is pulled into the black hole.
@fughedaboudit:
Commander Data: There appears to be an accretion disk surrounding your black hole.
Chief Engineer Geordi LaForge: Data, seeing Uranus put me in this stupid VISOR!
@Hiphopopotamus: It is probably refering to arcseconds, which is a measure of degree, sort of like a radian. You can convert arcseconds with the distance to find out about how wide it is, is you also have how far away the object is, using a bit of basic trigonometry.
Edit: so i did the math, and im pretty sure i did it right, though it has been a little while, anyways, you convert 4" to degrees, so you divide 4 by 3600, as there are 3600 arcseconds in every degree, and get .00111. Then take tan(.0011)=width/distance our distance is 12.8 billion lightyears. so 12.8*tan(.0011)=width= 2.48 * 10^5 ly, or about 248 thousand lightyears wide, so a bit larger than 4inches
10/15/09
10/15/09
From Milton Brothers." #tabletopblackhole
10/15/09
10/15/09
10/15/09
The great Psychonaut has spoken. All things extant in this world, Gods of Heaven Gods of Earth, let everything be as it should be. So mote it be.
10/15/09
This device simply traps light, and by means of its design, disallows the electromagnetic wave from being released, forcing it to be converted directly into heat energy once it reaches the center. #tabletopblackhole
10/15/09
10/15/09
10/15/09
10/15/09
If it was one gram of hydrogen, the black hole would "weigh" one gram and it would "have the same gravity". It would just be in a very small spot. Which is good, because it means that it would probably never get to "eat" anything ;).
Now that does not sound that scary anymore after all, does it?
Also, small black holes tend to evaporate really quickly.
10/15/09
If it were a real black hole with gravity so strong that it sucks up everything, we wouldn't be having this conversation. Unless the black holes don't work that way... Or something.
10/15/09
10/15/09
But to point at hand, this isn't black hole since gravity ain't involved. #tabletopblackhole
09/02/09
09/02/09
09/02/09
09/02/09
I didn't know God had sent out that many of his children.
09/02/09
09/03/09
Ahem..."Aren't we all God's children"? I say no, because there is no God.
09/02/09
09/02/09
@dinsey: if you read the link it actually says that 40% of the light was from the host galaxy, and the rest from the ionized gas around the black hole. A roughly 5 x 5 pixel chunk of that blob of pixels is from the black hole. they show that in the second figure. if its a speck, its a very large speck.
09/02/09
09/02/09
No...Subaru's only come in deep blue...with gold rims. You will have to love it anyway.
09/02/09
@Jux: Win.
09/02/09
09/02/09
09/02/09
09/02/09
09/02/09
Google the phrase "accretion disk".
09/02/09
Commander Data: There appears to be an accretion disk surrounding your black hole.
Chief Engineer Geordi LaForge: Data, seeing Uranus put me in this stupid VISOR!
09/03/09
09/02/09
09/02/09
Edit: so i did the math, and im pretty sure i did it right, though it has been a little while, anyways, you convert 4" to degrees, so you divide 4 by 3600, as there are 3600 arcseconds in every degree, and get .00111. Then take tan(.0011)=width/distance our distance is 12.8 billion lightyears. so 12.8*tan(.0011)=width= 2.48 * 10^5 ly, or about 248 thousand lightyears wide, so a bit larger than 4inches
09/02/09
09/03/09
09/02/09