Why Is Bluetooth Blue?
Let's start at the beginning: As you probably already know, Bluetooth is a wireless protocol maintained by the Bluetooth Special Interest Group. What you might not know is that it's actually named after a 10th century Danish king, King Harald Blatand (Bluetooth) who brought together parts of Scandanavia. This is what Bluetooth was designed to do, except it's bringing together devices—rather than Viking hordes—with a universal wireless standard. The symbol for Bluetooth, even, comes from the runes for Harald Bluetooth's initials, H & B.

Basic Details
Bluetooth is a short-range wireless setup design for personal area networks that rides on the 2.4 to 2.485GHz bands. The core of the radio tech is that it uses a frequency-hopping spread spectrum signal that bounces between 79 different frequencies, which makes it less prone to interference from other 2.4GHz devices in the area—you know, like everything nowadays. It's designed to be low power, but the standard has three different classes of strength, using more power to go farther. Most mobile stuff is Class 2, using about 2.5mW power for a range of 33 feet, but Class 1 will stretch out over 100 feet meters using 100mW.

Profiles, or Where It Gets Confusing
The Bluetooth spec is a series of profiles, which you can think of like capabilities. Devices have to have compatible profiles in order to make certain magic happen. For instance, the Advanced Audio Distribution (A2DP) profile describes how to stream stereo audio, like to headphones from an MP3 player. No A2DP, no stereo. There's a ton of them, from FTP (file transfer profile) to headset profile, which defines how a Bluetooth headset should talk to a gadget. You've also got core protocols, like object exchange (OBEX), which is what you lets swap files between Bluetooth devices, famously crippled by Verizon on some phones.

Bluetooth Spec Versions
• Bluetooth 1.0, in a word, sucked. The puny 1Mbps connection was split between data and voice, so you really only got about 700Kbps transfer rates (if you were lucky) and you could only tether to one device at a time.

• 1.1 fixed some of 1.0 and 1.0B's suckiness

• 1.2 is where it started getting actually better, bringing in Adaptive Frequency Hopping to make it more resistant to interference from the constant 2.4GHz maelstrom, and Enhanced Voice Processing, so it doesn't sound like you're talking through a cat blender. Backward-compatible with 1.1. The original RAZR had Bluetooth 1.2.

• Bluetooth 2.0 + EDR, hello speed, goodbye power. Ratified in 2004, data transfer rates were boosted to 2.1Mbps with Enhanced Data Rate, and power consumption was cut in half. It's the Bluetooth standard that made good headsets possible. Technically, EDR is optional, but what's the point without it? The iPhone is an example of 2.0 + EDR, as is the HTC Touch Pro and T-Mobile's Android G1.

• Bluetooth 2.1 + EDR added further enhancements to the Bluetooth 2 spec—better, faster pairing, with fewer steps and lower power slurpage still, depending on what you're doing. It also adds support for Near Field Communications (NFC), for completely automagical pairing.

Bluetooth 3.0 + HS and Bluetooth Low Energy
Oh hey, you made it. The Bluetooth Core Specification 3.0 High Speed was formally adopted a week ago.

The big deal is that has crazy fast data speeds of up to 24Mbps (fast for Bluetooth, that is), thanks to the fact it piggybacks on good old 802.11 Wi-Fi radio. The standard Bluetooth radio is used for the boring, low intensity part, like profiles and whatnot, but the data shakedown happens over 802.11 when you're doing things like wirelessly syncing music libraries, downloading photos to a printer or sending video files, so you're only using lots of juice when you need to. Unicast Connectionless Data is a feature that'll make devices more responsive (less lag, yo) and Enhanced Power Control will use power more smart and efficiently (so, using less of it, though transferring heavy files like whole music libraries is gonna suck on the power teet hard, obviously). No device has it now, but we should be seeing it live in the next 9 to 12 months, which isn't a bad turnaround, considering it took 4 years for the first Bluetooth 1.0 devices to show up.

At about the same time, Bluetooth SIG revealed Bluetooth low energy technology that will let devices sip power so slowly they can last more than a year on a single battery. It's slow like Bluetooth 1.0 and isn't voice capable, but will be super useful in monitors and sensors and those kinds of gadgets, letting them connect to bigger computers and whatnot.

So that, in a nutshell, is the wacky world of Bluetooth. See, it doesn't have to be just used by douchey business guys.

Still something you still wanna know? Send any questions about why the sky is blue, evil clown dentists or how Coke rots your teeth to tips@gizmodo.com, with "Giz Explains" in the subject line.

As AppleInsider explains, when using Bluetooth devices together, the process often involves a PIN to prevent those awkward "accidental pairings" or unwanted rogue devices from getting on the peripheral network. PINs, as you may know, are difficult if the item is tiny, as is the case with headsets.

So, Apple proposes in the filing that they would solve this issue "by determining the range of the wireless link between the new device and its host." If the devices get, say, within a foot of each other and are looking for a new link, they'll automatically pair up and possibly exchange data, sans romantic music of any kind. If the devices broke their one-foot or so link, the data transfer would cease.

Bluetooth-o-philes will note that this arrangement is very similar to the 2.1 spec, aka Near Field Communications. With the Apple attempt, however, any standard capable of pairing would work with the device. Apple also introduces a few other new ideas, including a wireless dock or in-car adapter for connecting a cell to a PMP or equivalent.

And in other Apple-related news, the App Store changed its review policy so that only owners of each app could give it a review. Makes sense! [Apple Insider, Matt Legend]

Samsung announced that the PMP will actually receive three updates over the next four months. The first update is set for December and will include the Bluetooth 2.0 cell compatibility, as well as AAC playback. The second set of updates will be available in January and will feature games—titles TBA—and additional functions. The final update hits in March and will feature improvements that Samsung will decide based on market research. [Samsung]

Curmudgeonly commentary, plus an assessment of my experience with Bluetooth headphones:

Lanyard headphones are perfect for walkers, and if these Panasonic buds can deliver good performance with the battery life stated here, the company may be onto something. But in my experience, Bluetooth leaves much to be desired.

Is it me, or is Bluetooth a bit connection-challenged? I've tried a pair of Motorola HT-820 (about $70, pictured below) phones for listening to tunes on my Motorola Q, and even when the phone is in my pocket less than three feet away, it drops the Bluetooth signal often enough to be annoying.

It's also a bit dicey pairing the headphones with the phone. The process isn't anywhere near automatic, usually requiring a frustrating tweaking session each time I'd like to use them. And then there's the issue of short battery life.

Which brings up my experience with my Microsoft Bluetooth mouse (pictured below), a pointing device whose signal can travel through the wall of my home theater, but whose battery requires replacement on a too-regular basis, about once a month. And then, sometimes it just simply loses its pairing with its USB Bluetooth dongle plugged into the host computer, requiring a cumbersome re-acquaintance ritual that's starting to try my patience.

Overall, Bluetooth so far has been a pain in the ass. I'm starting to think this technology is not yet ready for prime time. Let's hope Bluetooth 2.0 is an improvement. Commenters, are you having similar experiences? – Charlie White

Panasonic EB-M70083 the lightest Bluetooth earphones [Newlaunches]

We're just hoping this Bluetooth 2.0 spec performs better than most of the Bluetooth 1.x gear we've been testing lately, which can undoubtedly be temperamental. Try your luck for a hundred bucks, available next month. – Charlie White

Logitech unleashes '2nd gen' wireless headphones [Sci Fi Tech]

There's plenty of other goodies packed into the N95, including Carl Zeiss optics, WLAN, Bluetooth 2.0 and dedicated music buttons. Expect more pictures and official, Nokia-blessed information to come out before the end of the day. – Nicholas Deleon

Nokia N95; The Most Fabulous Jewel In The Smartphones World [Symbian Freak]