• Gizmodo
  • bestmodo
  • lifehacker
  • kotaku
  • Profile logout login

#bomb

Gizmodo

Share Cancel
   
Upload an image | Add an image URL
×

logging in
  • FAQ. Include # before tag:
  • #tips,
  • #dealzmodo,
  • #rumors,
  • #broken,
  • #iphoneapps,
  • #apple,
  • etc.

New York, 1:41 PM
Wed Nov 11
54 posts in the last 24 hours

FR | IT | DE | SP | JP | AU | BR

Gizmodo Team

Tip your editors:
tips@gizmodo.com

Editorial Director:
Brian Lam | Email | Twitter

Editor:
Jason Chen
Email | AIM | Twitter

Features Editor:
Wilson Rothman
Email | Twitter

Senior Contributing Editor:
Jesus Diaz
Email | AIM | Twitter
Mark Wilson, Reviews
Email | AIM | Twitter

Contributing Editors:
Matt Buchanan
Email | AIM | Twitter
Adam Frucci
Email | Twitter
Sean Fallon
Email | Twitter
Jack Loftus
Email | Twitter
John Herrman
Email | Twitter
Dan Nosowitz
Email
Chris Mascari
Email
Danny Allen
Email | Twitter

Columnist:
Brendan I. Koerner

Interns:
Don Nguyen
Email
Chris Jacob
Email

Comment Intern:
Nick Ellenoff | Email

Heroes and Friends

Comment Account Questions:
Comments@gizmodo.com

SUBSCRIBE TO Gizmodo RSS

New: Breaking news and daily top stories via email
9515 Subscribers
Gizmodo
  • posts about #bomb more →

    This Is Probably the Cruelest Bomb Ever Invented

    30,000-Pound Massive Ordnance Penetrator Is Not What You Think

    Israel Has Nukes, US Army Confirms

    Secret Kinetic Rocket Fire Balls Can Create Hell Anywhere

    F-16 Pilot Drops Bomb on Tulsa, Accidentally

    USB Bomb is Bursting With Storage Space

    Time Bomb Alarm Clock Wakes You Up With a Boom

    Video of Army Robot Eating Some Bomb Blast

    Vacuum Bomb Ushers in Cold War 2.0

    Suicide Bomb Box
  • Your version of Internet Explorer is not supported. Please upgrade to the most recent version in order to view comments.
    Dsmvwl  Admin  Promote to frontpage Approve user Ban user ×
    Image of nutbastard nutbastard
    06/26/09

    In reply to This Is Probably the Cruelest Bomb Ever Invented
    isn't it easier to make a bomb that just, you know, explodes?
     Reply
    nutbastard was starred nutbastard was unstarred
    Image of Hello Mister Walrus Hello Mister Walrus
    06/26/09

    @nutbastard: I get the feeling that there were thousands of other far-fetched inventions during WW2 that never got produced on a wide scale.
     Reply
    Hello Mister Walrus was starred Hello Mister Walrus was unstarred
    Image of Nick Nick
    06/26/09

    In reply to This Is Probably the Cruelest Bomb Ever Invented
    so this is how they're distributing the swine flu vaccine in the nanny state, eh?
     Reply
    Nick was starred Nick was unstarred
    Image of shorty63136 shorty63136
    06/26/09

    In reply to This Is Probably the Cruelest Bomb Ever Invented
    Well, suicide bombers have kinda taken that over. They pad themselves with nails and rat poison (anti-coagulant). Not exactly poison but it'll fuck you up just as bad.
     Reply
    shorty63136 was starred shorty63136 was unstarred
    Image of shorty63136 shorty63136
    06/26/09

    Hm. Yes. Yes, it is poison.
     Reply
    shorty63136 was starred shorty63136 was unstarred
    Image of 92BuickLeSabre 92BuickLeSabre
    06/26/09

    In reply to This Is Probably the Cruelest Bomb Ever Invented
    Just the idea of this has me on pins and needles!


    Which only serves to ironically re-enforce my very fears!

     Reply
    92BuickLeSabre was starred 92BuickLeSabre was unstarred
    Image of know1 know1
    06/26/09

    In reply to This Is Probably the Cruelest Bomb Ever Invented
    Wouldn't the cruelest bomb be the one that fell on Japan? I know the popular notion is that dirty bombs are somehow more outrageous, but in all actuality, the bomb that kills the most people is the "cruelest".
     Reply
    know1 was starred know1 was unstarred
    Image of Jestermeister Jestermeister
    06/26/09

    @know1: I think napalm is probably crueler. You are trying to burn people to death as opposed to just kill them and get them out of the picture. Plus, I hear it sticks to babies.
     Reply
    Jestermeister was starred Jestermeister was unstarred
    Image of GitEmSteveDave_IsSlacking GitEmSteveDave_IsSlacking
    06/26/09

    @Jestermeister: Actually, even worst than napalm is self igniting napalm. They would mix white phosphorous in with the napalm so it would ignite as exposed to air. What would also happen is when hitting the skin, the napalm might be brushed off, but the phosphorous chips would burn their way into the skin, and could smolder for weeks, with the only slight relief coming from completely immersing the affected body part in water.
     Reply
    GitEmSteveDave_IsSlacking was starred GitEmSteveDave_IsSlacking was unstarred
    Image of GitEmSteveDave_IsSlacking GitEmSteveDave_IsSlacking
    06/26/09

    @Jestermeister: Also, if dropped over a bunker or tank, it would actually suffocate the people in both as it consumed all available oxygen.
     Reply
    GitEmSteveDave_IsSlacking was starred GitEmSteveDave_IsSlacking was unstarred
    Image of bustedchain bustedchain
    06/10/09

    In reply to 30,000-Pound Massive Ordnance Penetrator Is Not What You Think
    Way to go telling them how deep and how strong their sh!t has to be to try to withstand the impact. Hopefully it is a lie and only 1/2 of actual capacity. "oops did we say 200 feet of 5kpsi reinforce concrete... our bad, we mean way more than that."


    It wouldn't be a bad idea to under state the capability in the public eye.

     Reply
    bustedchain was starred bustedchain was unstarred
    Image of GitEmSteveDave_IsSlacking GitEmSteveDave_IsSlacking
    06/10/09

    @bustedchain: Building a bunker w/a 200ft thick roof takes a LOOOOOOOONG time. Picture building a roof equal to something like the Hoover Damn.
     Reply
    GitEmSteveDave_IsSlacking was starred GitEmSteveDave_IsSlacking was unstarred
    Image of DustyButt™ DustyButt™
    06/10/09

    @bustedchain: What do you THINK they did with the specs?


    You must believe everything you read on the inturnedt.

     Reply
    DustyButt™ was starred DustyButt™ was unstarred
    Image of GitEmSteveDave_IsSlacking GitEmSteveDave_IsSlacking
    06/10/09

    @DustyButt™: Ah but they know you know that they know that you fudged your numbers.
     Reply
    GitEmSteveDave_IsSlacking was starred GitEmSteveDave_IsSlacking was unstarred
    Image of Zanzan42 Zanzan42
    06/10/09

    @SafetyMachete_GitEmSteveDave: never go in against a Sicilian when death is on the line!
     Reply
    Zanzan42 was starred Zanzan42 was unstarred
    Image of GitEmSteveDave_IsSlacking GitEmSteveDave_IsSlacking
    06/10/09

    @Zanzan42: Congrats!
     Reply
    GitEmSteveDave_IsSlacking was starred GitEmSteveDave_IsSlacking was unstarred
    Image of GitEmSteveDave_IsSlacking GitEmSteveDave_IsSlacking
    06/10/09

    In reply to 30,000-Pound Massive Ordnance Penetrator Is Not What You Think
    I have a GBU 39


    I also have a GBU-28, which if you put two together would be a GBU-56...
     Reply
    GitEmSteveDave_IsSlacking was starred GitEmSteveDave_IsSlacking was unstarred
    Image of Nick Nick
    06/10/09

    @SafetyMachete_GitEmSteveDave: word to gitem
     Reply
    Nick was starred Nick was unstarred
    Image of GitEmSteveDave_IsSlacking GitEmSteveDave_IsSlacking
    06/10/09

    @Nick: That was supposed to be a reply to your comment. My commenting is off today. I blame sunspots. Either that or the ninja assassins that, according to his lawyer, killed David Carridine are screwing with me.
     Reply
    GitEmSteveDave_IsSlacking was starred GitEmSteveDave_IsSlacking was unstarred
    Image of Nick Nick
    06/10/09

    In reply to 30,000-Pound Massive Ordnance Penetrator Is Not What You Think
    ps
    VIDEO!!!!
     Reply
    Nick was starred Nick was unstarred
    Image of GitEmSteveDave_IsSlacking GitEmSteveDave_IsSlacking
    06/10/09

    In reply to 30,000-Pound Massive Ordnance Penetrator Is Not What You Think
    Finally, something we can use in our war against the C.H.U.D.S. And the morlocs.
     Reply
    GitEmSteveDave_IsSlacking was starred GitEmSteveDave_IsSlacking was unstarred
    Image of TrollSlayer TrollSlayer
    06/10/09

    In reply to 30,000-Pound Massive Ordnance Penetrator Is Not What You Think
    For some reason I read the whole article with Billy Mays voice SCREAMING in my head.
     Reply
    TrollSlayer was starred TrollSlayer was unstarred
    Image of GitEmSteveDave_IsSlacking GitEmSteveDave_IsSlacking
    06/10/09

    @TrollSlayer: Hi folks. Billy Mays here. Are you tired of your ordinance NOT penetrating sub-terranian bunkers, even when fitted with an Awesome-Auger? Then have I got the solution for you! It's the Mighty Blow-It...Up.
     Reply
    GitEmSteveDave_IsSlacking was starred GitEmSteveDave_IsSlacking was unstarred
    Image of Hello Mister Walrus Hello Mister Walrus
    06/10/09

    In reply to 30,000-Pound Massive Ordnance Penetrator Is Not What You Think
    Are those army guys in camouflage engineers? It must give them a tactical advantage in water cooler ambushes.
     Reply
    Hello Mister Walrus was starred Hello Mister Walrus was unstarred
    Image of Purple Dave Purple Dave
    06/10/09

    @Hello Mister Walrus:
    The construction of this is what we'd term a "state secret". I'm sure the design/manufacturing facilities will have a full complement of military security forces on duty 24/7/365.
     Reply
    Purple Dave was starred Purple Dave was unstarred
    Image of LastVigilante LastVigilante
    06/10/09

    @Hello Mister Walrus: Overall I thought it an odd situation for a group photo op. "Look at this thing we made that will kill tons of people by burying them alive in their caves! This is going to make for a great Christmas card this year!"
     Reply
    LastVigilante was starred LastVigilante was unstarred
    Image of fuzz54 fuzz54
    06/10/09

    @LastVigilante: Why wouldn't a group take a photo op after completing a project? If they were ashamed of what they were doing then they wouldn't be doing it. Who knows if it will ever kill people. It might be good as a deterrant towards douchebag moves by terrorist nations when they know we could get them anytime and anywhere if we had the intel.
     Reply
    fuzz54 was starred fuzz54 was unstarred
    Image of Purple Dave Purple Dave
    06/11/09

    @fuzz54:
    The only way that it will never kill people is if our military never decides to deploy it. We could turn all of the Middle East into a glass parking lot, and that's still not deterrent enough. I can't see that this will have any effect on the war against terrorism except by being used. Either that or it'll just inspire them to start building their bunkers under sites that they know we won't bomb, like schools.
     Reply
    Purple Dave was starred Purple Dave was unstarred
    Image of Nick Nick
    06/10/09

    In reply to 30,000-Pound Massive Ordnance Penetrator Is Not What You Think
    dude, if i worked at boeing i would so be the dude sittin' on top of that thing with a cowboy hat. i calling my friend john and telling him to get me a guest pass.
     Reply
    Nick was starred Nick was unstarred
    Image of GitEmSteveDave_IsSlacking GitEmSteveDave_IsSlacking
    06/10/09

    @Nick:
     Reply
    GitEmSteveDave_IsSlacking was starred GitEmSteveDave_IsSlacking was unstarred
    Image of hanspecans hanspecans
    06/10/09

    In reply to 30,000-Pound Massive Ordnance Penetrator Is Not What You Think
    fat moms and dads proud to be future murderers of brown children far, far away.
     Reply
    hanspecans was starred hanspecans was unstarred
    Image of GitEmSteveDave_IsSlacking GitEmSteveDave_IsSlacking
    06/10/09

    @hanspecans: They may also be relatives and team mates of people KILLED by the people who will be cowering in this bunker for a reason. It's a concrete hardened bunker, not a tornado shelter.
     Reply
    GitEmSteveDave_IsSlacking was starred GitEmSteveDave_IsSlacking was unstarred
    Image of PurpleMonkeyDishwasher: PurpleMonkeyDishwasher:
    06/10/09

    In reply to 30,000-Pound Massive Ordnance Penetrator Is Not What You Think
    ....can penetrate 200 feet (60 meters) of 5,000 psi reinforced concrete, 26 feet (8 meters) of 10,000 psis reinforced concrete, or 130 feet (40 meters) of moderately hard rock.


    but can it penetrate Osama Bin Laden's vagina?

     Reply
    PurpleMonkeyDishwasher: was starred PurpleMonkeyDishwasher: was unstarred
    Image of Hello Mister Walrus Hello Mister Walrus
    06/10/09

    @Purple Monkey Dishwasher: Wha what?


    But anyway, I doubt that those are it's real capabilities. Otherwise Kim Jong Il, after reading Gizmodo, could foil them by building a bunker with 61 feet of concrete protection. The actual missile is probably more powerful.

     Reply
    Hello Mister Walrus was starred Hello Mister Walrus was unstarred
    Image of Gruv Gruv
    06/10/09

    In reply to 30,000-Pound Massive Ordnance Penetrator Is Not What You Think
    America. F--k yeah.


    Actually I'm surprised that we're still in the "bigger is better" mindset. I thought we were going "lighter and smarter" (i.e., Predator drones) against a clearly unconventional enemy.


    But at least everyone will know America has a bigger penis than all the other countries.

     Reply
    Gruv was starred Gruv was unstarred
    Image of Kaiser-Machead Kaiser-Machead
    06/10/09

    @Gruv: And will hump the earth like it's never been humped before....literally.
     Reply
    Kaiser-Machead was starred Kaiser-Machead was unstarred
    Image of Nick Nick
    06/10/09

    @Gruv: perhaps we should just these for strip mining? that way we can rape the earth?
     Reply
    Nick was starred Nick was unstarred
    Image of Hello Mister Walrus Hello Mister Walrus
    06/10/09

    @Gruv: The military just has thousands of projects going on at once. Naturally, some of them are going to involve bigger things that blow up. For every new big ass bomb, there are lots of other "unconventional" projects like the weird snake thing in the other article. When I was in college, I was amazed by how many engineering labs were funded by DARPA - wall climbing robots, autonomous vehicles, lasers, mini helicopters, everything.
     Reply
    Hello Mister Walrus was starred Hello Mister Walrus was unstarred
    Image of Piker247 Piker247
    06/10/09

    @Gruv:


    "America. F--k yeah."


    Why the attitude? If we didn't spend all that money on "bigger and better bombs" the rest our fair-weather-allies would be forced have military budgets of their own. Just look at our military spending as welfare spending for you and yours, maybe say thank you from time to time, and then move along.

     Reply
    Piker247 was starred Piker247 was unstarred
    Image of Purple Dave Purple Dave
    06/10/09

    @Gruv:
    Why yes, we do. As of 1986, you'd have to take the next ten biggest penii combined to (almost) equal our one massive penis.


    On a more serious note, in a way we _aren't_ going the "bigger is better" route with this. If we were, we'd have just gone back 64 years to the two most powerful bombs ever dropped in a wartime capacity. No conventional bunker would survive that sort of attack, and on the off chance that they actually did have a NORAD-style bunker, they'd pretty much be stuck in there for a while until the worst of the radiation had cleared up.

     Reply
    Purple Dave was starred Purple Dave was unstarred
    Image of xThadd xThadd
    06/10/09

    @Piker247:


    Er, thank you. I guess.


    Actually, your military spending has got us into a l-o-t of trouble over the years. Maybe you could thank US for trying to hold you guys back from your own worst excesses. Not that you've always listened. 'nam, anyone?

     Reply
    xThadd was starred xThadd was unstarred
    Image of Purple Dave Purple Dave
    06/11/09

    @xThadd:
    Ah, you mean the whole mess that the French started, and that we might well have won if the Secretary of Defense hadn't been so obsessed over the cost of bullets? Yeah, my dad (who, along with his brother, served in that war) would tell you flat out that we lost because we _didn't_ spend enough.
     Reply
    Purple Dave was starred Purple Dave was unstarred
    Earlier discussions Other discussions Show all discussions Show featured discussions only Start a new discussion

Login

Enter your username and password.

Please enter a username.
Please enter your password.
logging in
Login via Facebook | Sign Up | Forgot Password?

Reset Password

Please enter your email address to have your password reset.

Please enter your email address.
Please enter a valid email address.
requesting password reset

Register

Registering will give you a user profile and the ability to add other users as friends. To become a commenter, however, you need to audition.

Want to know more? Consult the Comment FAQ and legal terms.

Please enter a username.
Please enter a password.
Please confirm your password.
Passwords are not identical.
Please enter a valid email address.
registration sent, waiting for reply

Submit Your Comment

You don't need to login to comment. Just enter your email address below.

See how your address will be displayed in the Comment FAQ.

Please enter a valid email address.
Please enter a valid email address.
logging in

Login with your Facebook or Gizmodo account.

Sign up here.



  • Archives
  • About
  • Advertising
  • Legal
  • Help
  • Report a Bug
  • FAQ
Original material is licensed under a Creative Commons License permitting non-commercial sharing with attribution.