<![CDATA[Gizmodo: bombs]]> http://tags.gizmodo.com/assets/base/img/thumbs140x140/gizmodo.com.png <![CDATA[Gizmodo: bombs]]> http://gizmodo.com/tag/bombs http://gizmodo.com/tag/bombs <![CDATA[The True, Heartbreaking Faces of the Nuclear Era]]> Sometimes I write about high-tech weapons. There's something fascinating about the technological terror that humans have been developing to obliterate each other for centuries, so it's easy to forget about the real consequences of this mad race. [EXPLICIT IMAGES AHEAD]

A few years after the United States unleashed the horror of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, the Soviet Union tested their first nuclear warhead ever. They appropriately called it "First Lightning," the opening of a series 456 atomic tests that brought Hell to Earth sixty years ago. For all of us, that summons terrifying, but beautiful images into our brains:




Sadly, to more than one million innocent people living near the Semipalatinsk Polygon—the Soviet nuclear testing site in the northeast of Kazakhstan—it means this:

For three generations, and more to come, those tests mean deformed babies. They mean premature aging, and countless diseases caused by radiation poisoning. The bombs' ghosts still live in the dead steppe, their invisible fangs ready to suck seven years off the life of every person living around that place. That's the difference in life expectancy with the rest of Kazakhstan.

Of course, it's not the only horror inflicted by weapons in the Soviet Union—or in the rest of the world. I recently read all about them in a fascinating book by Ryszard Kapuściński, one of the best journalist and writers of our time. The book, called Imperium, talks about the Soviet Union through a series of adventures and trips that reach all the corners of the Red Empire. The mosaic is a frightening view of the deadliest, most insensitive killing machine that has ever existed, all through the eyes of the people who suffered it. Not even Hitler matched the horrors of Stalin and his cohorts.

Imperium's raw stories moved me to tears many times, and these images by Ed Ou are a perfect summary of the atrocities inflicted upon hundreds of millions that Kapuściński describes in his book.

However, as I watch through glassy eyes how Mayra Zhumageldina massages her daughter Zhannoor, or how 29-yo Berik Syzdykov sings and plays piano despite being deformed and blind since birth—he was exposed to a nuclear blast while he was inside his mom's womb—I try to smile. I try to smile and be a bit optimistic because, no matter how monstrous some men and women can be, the human spirit always seems to find a way to survive. [Adventures With Light and Getty Images via Big Picture]

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5400857&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[How a Soviet Doomsday Master Missile Looks and Works]]> Yesterday we learnt that the Soviets still have a working doomsday system in place. This is an SS-17 ICBM master missile, which are launched first. Once they are in the skies, they activate the launch for all the Russian nukes.

That includes every single nuclear weapon, every one of the Russian Inter-Continental Ballistic Missiles in ground silos, nuclear submarines, and heavy bombers around the world. Scary stuff indeed.

But fear not, fellow humans, because the Dead Hand system is not completely automatic. The actual red button is apparently activated by a soldier hidden in some underground bunker.

Yes, I feel so much safer now. [gradremstroy—in Russian via DRB]

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5367737&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Get Nervous: Rusty Soviet Doomsday System Still Turned On]]> Wired Magazine has a fascinating article on the doomsday system that was built by the Soviets 25 years ago. It was designed to obliterate the US no matter what happened to the USSR—and it still works today. Shiver.

The point of the system, he explains, was to guarantee an automatic Soviet response to an American nuclear strike. Even if the US crippled the USSR with a surprise attack, the Soviets could still hit back. It wouldn't matter if the US blew up the Kremlin, took out the defense ministry, severed the communications network, and killed everyone with stars on their shoulders. Ground-based sensors would detect that a devastating blow had been struck and a counterattack would be launched.

The technical name was Perimeter, but some called it Mertvaya Ruka, or Dead Hand. It was built 25 years ago and remained a closely guarded secret.

The scary thing is that Perimeter still works today. At least according to Valery Yarynich, a former Soviet colonel now 72 years old. Yarynich should know, though: He worked 30 years at the Soviet Strategic Rocket Forces and Soviet General Staff helping to build it.

US Officials won't even like to mention it, but with the Cold War over and Russia being more or less a friend, why risk having such a system in place? I really don't like the idea of something going wrong in a rusty 25-year-old piece of Soviet-era technology.

Not when it can automatically launch a nuclear attack capable of taking out Humanity out of the map. [Wired]

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5365813&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[The Bomb Vase is a Hippie's Secret Weapon]]> As a statement against war, these Peaceful Bomb Vases were created to hold flowers instead of violence. As someone with an irrational fear for potted plants, it makes me want to hide. [LikeCool via geekologie]

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5230178&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[93-Year-Old Japanese Man Certified as Double A-Bomb Victim]]> You have some lousy luck if you're near the site of an A-bomb strike. You have really, really bad luck if, three days later, you get hit with another nuke.

That's exactly what happened to Tsutomu Yamaguchi back in 1945. He was on a business trip in Hiroshima, where he suffered serious burns to his upper body after the US dropped a nuke on the city. He spent the night in the city then returned home to Nagasaki, just in time for the second bomb to drop. [AP]

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5182427&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[The Fancy Security Gear the FBI Busted Out for the Inauguration]]> An event like the inauguration is a great excuse for the FBI to roll out all of its super-expensive security gear, like a truck you can explode a live bomb in without hurting anyone.

New Scientist has a full gallery, but my favorite is definitely the aforementioned truck. The Bomb Containment Vessel can be used to transport a live bomb safely, and it's strong enough to have the bomb explode in its belly if need be. It won't be used, in all likelihood, but it sure is fun to know it's there. [New Scientist via Dvice]

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5135393&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[How Each Nuclear-Capable Country Got Its Bombs, Visualized]]> As the NY Times point out in their review of two upcoming histories of The Bomb, Robbert Oppenheimer originally assumed that little could stop anyone from developing nuclear weapons. Thankfully, he was wrong.

With a geek's typical hubris, Oppenheimer assumed that since the laws of physics were universal, very little could stop anyone in getting a nuclear weapon, given the time and resources. Alas, the time and resources needed are indeed scarce, so to this day, only nine countries are nuclear-equipped—the United States, Russia, United Kingdom, France, China, India, Pakistan, North Korea and Israel. Here we see these links visualized, starting with the Manhattan project and fanning out over the last six decades (click here for the full-size popup).

Instead, three proliferation experts demonstrate how nuclear capabilities were passed as political bargaining chips, stolen via espionage, and limited with diplomacy. Both books seem like fascinating reads. Check out much more at the Times: [NYTimes]

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5106956&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Low Cost Robot On Wheels Can Spy Baddies, Paint Them to Death]]> ROMP—or Remotely Operated Mobile Platform—is a poor man's version of an iRobot battlefield bot. Instead of fancy tracks and miniaturized sensors, these ROMPs seem more like sophisticated all-terrain RC cars rigged with consumer cameras. Until you meet the older brother, of course, the weaponized WROMP with its big gun on top. In the words of its creator, Chris Rogers:

[The WROMP] is a weaponized version of the Remotely Operated Mobile Platform. The operator can "drive" the vehicle and fire the weapon although it is out of visual range. WROMP can also be used for reconnaissance and bomb investigation and remote detonation

As you can see, the weapon in this case is just a paintball machine gun. Enough for me, although Chris says the platform has been designed for any use, "including remote surveillance, security patrolling and bomb investigation." The system uses an audio/video system linked to an VR headset for control, aiming, and firing. [Coroflot via Dvice]

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5096078&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Everyone Will Be a Walking Nuclear Weapon Detector]]> Researchers at Purdue University are working on tech that will turn every cellphone into a roaming nuclear weapon sniffer and are lobbying Congress to legally require cellphone users and carriers to participate. The Distributed Nuclear Detection by Ubiquitous Cellphone project would be kind of like the massive cellphone dragnet in The Dark Knight, but it would look for terrorists sneaking dirty bombs and nuclear weapons instead of the Joker.

Like the Batman system, the more phones on the ground, the better, since it would be able to triangulate the source of radiation more accurately. Phones closest to the deadly stuff as they pass by would give off stronger signals, pinpointing where it's at, or how it's moving in real time. Also, the larger the scale of the project, the less the system would cost per phone—right now it's around $50-$100 a phone. Blown up to a hundred million phones, the price would plummet.

Obviously, there are some major civil rights issues here, especially if you're legally required to be a constantly lo-jacked, walking bomb detector for the Man. Newsweek suggests a more diplomatic and less creepy solution, where government agencies would pay you to opt-in. I think that's one paycheck I'd have to pass on. [Newsweek]

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5055928&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[New Army Cluster Bomb Rains Down Thousands of Deadly Darts]]> Cluster bombs are increasingly frowned upon—there's an international agreement banning them, though the US hasn't signed on—in part because even low dud rates leave lots of little unexploded bombs scattered over a wide area. An alternative developed by the army is a GPS-guided version of the Multiple Launch Rocket system with a payload of thousands of small darts, or as the army calls them, "kinetic energy rods." The warhead spins as it's launched, so it breaks open at high altitude, evenly raining down thousands of unique metal snowflakes of death, using straight up gravity and aerodynamics for its killing force, no explosions required. Um, I guess that's better than having a real cluster bomb dropped on you? [Danger Room]

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=394242&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Eco-Friendly Bombs Ensure No Smog Results from The Destruction of Your Ancestral Village]]> I have a problem I'm sure you're all familiar with: eco guilt. Whenever I'm about to drop a gigantic bomb on say, a small village, I get to thinking about the impact of the bomb on the environment. I mean, I'm not a monster. Popular explosives like TNT and HMX create nitrogen oxides when they explode, and those create smog and acid rain. Good heavens!

Luckily for warlords such as myself, experts at the University of Munich have developed new types of bombs using the compounds HBT and G2ZT, bombs that only produce ammonia when detonated. That'll leave target areas nice and clean with no acid rain to pour down on the charred remains of my victims. And people say I'm evil!

To be fair, the same compounds may be used in rocket fuels in the future, which are less destructive than bombs and have legitimate reasons to be eco friendly. But initially, at least, it's all about the bombs. [American Chemical Society via io9]

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=393775&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Divine Thunderbolt Bunker Buster: Bye Bye Mole People]]> The Air Force's old bunker buster, BLU-113, was a bunch of explosives crammed inside of an old howitzer barrel. Its latest instrument of boom, the BLU-122, uses a new a steel shell with a hardened nose and 780lbs of thermobaric explosive to pound through 28 feet of concrete or 120 feet of dirt like styrofoam, with 70 percent more explosive power. If that's not the ticket to scattering your bits everywhere, they've also got a bouncy bomb.

Yes, they've got a bubblegum bomb that skips like a stone across water to knock down your door. And land between your legs, no doubt. Still not exploded? How 'bout a guidance system that'll chuck six rubber bullet bombs your door, for some Bomberman-style chain booms. Actually, that sounds awesome: a dude in a Bomberman suit chucking bombs at stuff would own everything. [Danger Room, Danger Room]

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=352547&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Pentagon Drops $100 Million on Instant Global Strike Weapon]]> The Pentagon doesn't care where on earth those freedom hatin' terrists are, they want to be able to blow them up. That's why they're spending $100 million on the Falcon project, a weapon that could strike anywhere on the planet in less than 2 hours after being launched from the United States. Similar programs have been scrapped because it's too hard to tell regular missiles from nukes, meaning there's a chance for a mistake with each launch that'll send a nuclear weapon by accident, which would clearly be pretty bad. Not so with the Falcon project! Nope, they clearly mark on the bombs themselves "nukes" or "not nukes but'll still mess dudes up pretty good," which helps prevent mistakes. Thanks for being so responsible, Pentagon! [Danger Room]

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=322155&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Russia's "Father of All Bombs" Not Quite That Manly]]>
To our innocent eyes, the video of Russia's "Father of All Bombs" looked pretty impressively explosive, but US big-boom experts are now questioning Russia's hoax-y claims about the weapon's size and power. For one, it might not even be a shockwave-generating thermobaric bomb—one expert says it actually looks like a fuel-air bomb, which is just a smaller explosive device strapped to lots of fuel—not exactly a marvel of Russian military science.

Another analyst, from the Center for Defense Information, says at best its blast is just 50 percent bigger than our MOAB. The list just keeps going: It wasn't dropped from a bomber (as implied in the video, but check the cut when the bay doors open), but probably shoved out the side of a cargo plane, which is almost kind of cute in its quaintness. But regardless of its actual size or power, we still wouldn't want one dropped in our backyard. [Wired]

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=307307&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Bomb Detector Powered by Bee Tongue]]> A company named Inscentinel Ltd. has developed Vapour Detection Instrumentation with the promise of detecting explosives, cancer, drugs and basically anything you'd like to smell. And for this advanced olfactory detection, Inscentinel is deploying the world's most advanced techniques—trained bee tongue.

The company literally trains bees as a police force might train dogs. Using Pavlovian principles, the bees are given a food reward when they sniff, let's say, cocaine. Over time, the bees are conditioned to stick out their tongues in hunger over the smell of this substance.
Dark%20blue%20bee%20PER%20and%20logo.jpg
Then, in a highly scientific operation, the bees are taped to your measurement device. A camera closely tracks the bee tongues while the you pray that the SWAT team really is on their way (lest you need to release your "measurement device" for self-defense).

We're planning on going back to bed now. And when we wake up, we'd better not see any more bee bomb detectors. [product via geekologie]

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=299525&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ELITE Bomb Detector Kit Identifies Explosives in a Minute]]> Now you could argue that a minute is one minute too slow, but for those times when the bomb squad ain't around, the pocket-friendly ELITE (Easy Livermore Inspection Test for Explosives) detector lets you sniff out up to 30 different types of explosives. Just rub one of the ELITE swipes on the suspicious package (hopefully you won't set it off while doing this) and wait a minute for the color-coded results (just like a pregnancy test!). The kit will only set you back $10.

Quick and Easy Explosive Detector Kit [Crave]

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=238956&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Aqua Teen Bombs: A Reflective Response]]> Watch it, then hit the jump for my response.

mooninite2.jpgOh no! A bomb has been embedded in our webpage!! WHAT HAVE THE CARTOON HACKERTERRORISTS DONE NOW??

Comment before it's too late! Meanwhile, I will heroically jump on my laptop to save you all.

Thanks Brian!

Video Page [redban]

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=233755&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Suicide Bombing Gadget Gallery]]> It has to be a slow news day when we are dipping into this risqu category and showing a gallery of various suicide bombing vests. As disgusting as they are, some of these are pretty damn fancy—triggers, complex wiring and shrapnel, while some others are Wile E. Coyote style, consisting of just a bomb in a pocket. They're used to train law enforcement. It may be worth a good look, too—couldn t hurt knowing what these look like just in case you're ever in a questionable situation.

Gallery

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=138818&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Robots + Bombs = Safety and Fun - A Missive from Iraq]]> Friend of Gizmodo, Noah "Sand Bag" Shachtman, just rolled out a massive piece on robotics in the war zone. He talks about all the goodies: robotic arms that place incindieary charges, Warlock radio jamming systems, and the men and women who risk live and limb to keep convoys and patrols safe on the ground. Excellent reading.

Inside the "Baghdad Bomb Squad" [DefenseTech]

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=134498&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Cellphone Bomb Jammer]]> The world may never know if there are or aren't cell-phone bomb jammers out there, but DefenseTech has stumbled on a patent that may shed light on the subject:

The device includes a transmitter that mimics a cell phone base station and a metal horn to concentrate the signal from a 10 milliwatt power source in a single direction. Scanning... a concealed phone... with the tool... tricks it into thinking it is in range of a new network base station and blocks it from any genuine stations in the vicinity.

It seems that the overhead would be a little high to create a full cellphone jammer and, according to folks in Iraq, most IEDs use cordless phones instead of relying on Iraq's spotty cell network.

Phone Bomb Interceptor on the Line? [DefenseTech]

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=117100&view=rss&microfeed=true