Enter your username and password.
Tip your editors:
Editorial Director:
Brian Lam | | Twitter
Editor:
Jason Chen
| AIM | Twitter
Features Editor:
Wilson Rothman
| Twitter
Senior Contributing Editors:
Jesus Diaz
| AIM | Twitter
Mark Wilson, Reviews
| AIM | Twitter
Contributing Editors:
Matt Buchanan
| AIM | Twitter
Adam Frucci
| Twitter
Sean Fallon
| Twitter
Jack Loftus
| Twitter
John Herrman
| Twitter
Dan Nosowitz
Chris Mascari
Danny Allen
| Twitter
Rosa Golijan
| Twitter
Chris Jacob
Columnist:
Brendan I. Koerner
Interns:
Don Nguyen
Kyle VanHemert
Comment Account Questions:
Please enter your email address to have your password reset.
Registering will give you a user profile and the ability to add other users as friends. To become a commenter, however, you need to audition.
Want to know more? Consult the Comment FAQ and legal terms.
You don't need to login to comment. Just enter your email address below.
See how your address will be displayed in the Comment FAQ.
12/05/09
The appropriate punishment would have simply been to hold them in the theater until they were the last ones and then release them, with no police escort, to the waiting horde of twilight fans.
Also acceptable would have been forcing them to watch the movie on a constant loop A Clockwork Orange style.
12/04/09
12/04/09
12/04/09
the only thing more inane than singing happy birthday... is recording it and replaying it later.
12/04/09
12/04/09
12/04/09
12/04/09
12/04/09
12/04/09
12/04/09
12/04/09
12/04/09
Learn2differentiate.
12/04/09
12/04/09
12/04/09
12/04/09
Drown it in the ocean (although, you would have the raising waterlevel then...)
12/04/09
12/04/09
12/04/09
(Though I did watch the movie)
12/04/09
Then I remembered that I'd heard there is a birthday party scene in the movie.
Then I realized that I knew helpful facts about Twilight.
Then I shot myself.
12/04/09
12/04/09
12/04/09
12/04/09
12/04/09
12/04/09
12/04/09
12/04/09
It doesnt even matter what movie it is. The fact of the matter is that it is hard to draw the line of what is accepted and what is not. It is a slippery slope indeed.
Imagine if this lady is found innocent. Then that sets a precedent for the next fool that shoots 3 minutes in a theater and gets caught.
12/04/09
What's the assumption, by the way? That this girl is not a danger to society?
12/04/09
Now if you want to get into an argument about what she should be charged with thats a whole different story and there is plenty of time at this point to change those charges (which there is little doubt will happen).
I'm assuming the assumption (does that make an ass out of everyone or still just me?) was that she wasn't going to attempt to profit from it.
12/04/09
And with the other piece, I think that assuming the assumption cancels it out, so I'd assume that we're all good again. Wait a second. Damn it, that didn't last too long.
I don't think I was assuming anything in the first place, though, since she wasn't being charged for anything involving resale of the recording. I can be blamed me for assuming that she's not a serial killer, too!
12/04/09
To be even more honest I'm not even sure where we started. I get going on one of these things and I just keep it rolling :p
I think my point was that the penalty meets the crime that she was charged with. Saying that isn't the crime she should be charged with is completely different than saying the "system is flawed." Complaints can be amended charges can be changed. Throwing out what is actually a perfectly legitimate charge for a perfectly legitimate crime isn't the answer. She was charged with reselling it. Its inherent in the "criminal use of" part of the charge.
I think I may have been making a point about the whole thing being an after she got caught cover at the time but that was a lot of caffeine, nicotine, and sleep (or lack there of) ago.
12/03/09
[www.the-editing-room.com]
12/03/09
12/03/09
12/04/09
My bad!
12/03/09
Good thing they're locking her up so she can't harm her brain anymore by watching this garbage.
12/03/09
12/03/09
12/03/09
12/03/09
12/03/09
12/03/09
12/03/09
There was a guy in front of me at Transformers trying to record it with his cellphone.
He also should be in jail.
12/03/09
Though signing would be much more awesome and probably not near as annoying.
12/03/09
12/03/09
12/03/09
12/04/09
The guy that Huckabee set FREE was a killer, and then killed 4 cops after being PAROLED, yet this chick is facing prison time for a camera in a movie.
Man, I love the US but sometimes Canada and England sound better and better.
12/04/09
Prison is for rapists, murders, etc.
She will not go to prison over it. Of that I am quite sure. A couple of nights in an orange jumpsuit never killed anyone (well not usually).
I would put myself in her shoes but I'm considerate enough to put shit like that in my pocket where it belongs so I never would be in her shoes.
The theater owner got what he wanted which was some press really about nothing more than not being a dick in a theater which is hopefully a lesson a lot of people take to heart.
And what law should be changed here? Nothing needs updated but people's consideration of others.
12/04/09
12/04/09
12/04/09
The justice system certainly has its flaws but the people in charge of these things aren't nearly as stupid as TV and movies make them out to be.
12/04/09
12/04/09
Possible? Maybe. Probable? Not very likely.
Like I said these people in general are much smarter then they're always portrayed on TV.
On the off chance that this small Chicago suburb happened to lock up a violent murderer in the city jail before being moved to a more appropriate location I gaurantee you that some one is going to say "hey lets not put her in with the cute little blond that got a raw deal on that theater thing."
12/04/09