• Gizmodo
  • bestmodo
  • lifehacker
  • kotaku
  • Profile logout login

#brammo#popular

Gizmodo

Share Cancel
   
Upload an image | Add an image URL
×

logging in
  • FAQ. Include # before tag:
  • #tips,
  • #dealzmodo,
  • #rumors,
  • #broken,
  • #iphoneapps,
  • #apple,
  • etc.

New York, 11:46 AM
Tue Dec 8
87 posts in the last 24 hours

FR | IT | DE | SP | JP | AU | BR

Gizmodo Team

Tip your editors:

Editorial Director:
Brian Lam | | Twitter

Editor:
Jason Chen
| AIM | Twitter

Features Editor:
Wilson Rothman
| Twitter

Senior Contributing Editors:
Jesus Diaz
| AIM | Twitter
Mark Wilson, Reviews
| AIM | Twitter

Contributing Editors:
Matt Buchanan
| AIM | Twitter
Adam Frucci
| Twitter
Sean Fallon
| Twitter
Jack Loftus
| Twitter
John Herrman
| Twitter
Dan Nosowitz

Chris Mascari

Danny Allen
| Twitter
Rosa Golijan
| Twitter
Chris Jacob

Columnist:
Brendan I. Koerner

Interns:
Don Nguyen

Kyle VanHemert

Heroes and Friends

Comment Account Questions:

SUBSCRIBE TO Gizmodo RSS

New: Breaking news and daily top stories via email
9515 Subscribers
Gizmodo
  • Your version of Internet Explorer is not supported. Please upgrade to the most recent version in order to view comments.

    Dsmvwl  Admin  Promote to frontpage Approve user Ban user ×
    Image of The Lab The Lab
    09/16/09

    In reply to At Giz Gallery '09: Brammo Enertia Electric Motorcycles
    I will fly 3000 miles to NYC if you let me ride this thing.
    Full Disclosue: I have poor impulse control
     Reply
    The Lab was starred The Lab was unstarred
    Image of anon anon
    09/16/09

    @The Lab: you read my mind. mama owes me a birthday present for october. if we can zip up to ny for a few days to see this exhibit, i'll call it square. anyway, she likes gadges as much as i do. :)
     Reply
    The Lab promoted this comment anon was starred anon was unstarred
    Image of dzazter dzazter
    09/16/09

    In reply to At Giz Gallery '09: Brammo Enertia Electric Motorcycles
    Sorry Giz, somethings are better left gas. Also, shifting is a good thing. No one wants an 'auto' motorcycle. If they did, they would sell more of them.
     Reply
    Lizard_King promoted this comment dzazter was starred dzazter was unstarred
    Image of Lizard_King Lizard_King
    09/16/09

    @dzazter: Agreed. Ask Honda how many requests they get for Hondamatics.

    Learning to shift is part of the learning process; it keeps the novice rider in check. Those wanting to just jump on a bike and blast into traffic have this obstacle of a gearbox and have to use a bit of hand-eye-foot coordination to use it.
     Reply
    Lizard_King was starred Lizard_King was unstarred
    Image of ghmlco ghmlco
    09/17/09

    @dzazter: First, there aren't that many automatics. Second, they're considerably more expensive, especially as options on larger, more expensive bikes.

    Third, look at the dramatic increase in sales of motor scooters, particularly higher powered models, which are in fact "auto".

    Sorry, but I think there's a market out there, just as there was a market for that new-fangled automatic transmission in cars, which in turn lowered the barrier to entry and allowed a lot more people to drive.
     Reply
    Lizard_King promoted this comment ghmlco was starred ghmlco was unstarred
    Image of Lizard_King Lizard_King
    09/17/09

    @ghmlco: Maybe these people that aren't coordinated to drive manual, just aren't coordinated to drive period? I did a study in a college marketing class about automobile insurance, at the time (about 12 years ago) the incident statistics for drivers of manual transmission were much lower per person than a driver of an automatic - not distorted by number of automatics vs. manuals. (yet no discount on driving a manual)

    Basic motorcycles now are more powerful than ever. All but the most powerful auto or CVT scooters have far less power than the least powerful motorcycles. Years ago, 350 to 400CC motorcycles were common, now, except for a handful of bikes, displacement for a "beginner" bike is at LEAST 500CC. A burgman only puts out ~35 HP, that is HALF of what most beginner motorcycles put out. The new DN-01 comes to mind when thinking of a big, expensive, heavy, powerful automatic motorcycle - and the thought of fleets of these scares the begeezus out of me.

    Honestly, in my state, we have a education course for riding, for "free" (it is paid for with motorcycle registration, permit and license renewal fees) - as such, it is IMPOSSIBLY hard to get a license outside of this test. A proliferation of cheap powerful automatic motorcycles would offset that nice balance - can't wait til my insurance bill reflects that.

    Learning to drive a manual transmission on a bike is part of the cost of admission.
     Reply
    Edited by Lizard_King at 09/17/09 8:44 AM Lizard_King was starred Lizard_King was unstarred
    Image of anon anon
    09/17/09

    @Lizard_King: To be honest with you, I find this whole line of reasoning a bit strange. I don't see how having a manual transmission on a vehicle is a plus. It's just a side effect of the design. The function of a transmission (leaving aside the clutch aspect for a moment) is to adapt the revolution rate and power curve of the motor to the desired speed and power of the vehicle. For example, if the power plant of a vehicle could rev from 0 to 20,000 RPM and deliver enough power to drive the vehicle over the entire range of revs, then a transmission wouldn't be necessary. As it turns out, electric motors *have* that characteristic and only lack the ability to rev fast enough to deliver highway speeds (for the time being). When I let off the throttle of my electric bike, it just stops. From a standstill, I can yank the throttle back and take off like a rocket. Why introduce a relatively complex clutch and transmission when they aren't required? I've owned a couple off gasoline powered bikes in my time and I hardly noticed the manual gearing and clutch... the operation became automatic anyway and I forgot about it. My electric bike only has a throttle, and it's just as much fun to drive... except I wish it could go faster. I figure that last bit is just a matter of improved batteries and motors.
     Reply
    Lizard_King promoted this comment anon was starred anon was unstarred
    Image of Lizard_King Lizard_King
    09/17/09

    @craighyatt: This is in reply to the last comment about a marketable "need" for automatic bikes. Electric bikes will become more prevalent, and as automatic scooters permiate the market more, there will be no need for manual.

    However, the control of the engine range at speed of a gasoline burner is the main benefit. I have an automatic bike in my garage actually, a sandcast CB750 with a 1978 CB750A engine and transmission. The transmission is more than a side-effect, other than control of gearing range (I am smarter than any auto I've driver, and can shift faster), complexity and maintenence along with cost are other issues.
     Reply
    Lizard_King was starred Lizard_King was unstarred
    Image of anon anon
    09/17/09

    @Lizard_King: Sorry. Didn't realize you were talking about gas burners exclusively. As to "I am smarter than any auto I've driven, and can shift faster" .. I was going to bring that up, but my post was already too damn long. ;) I do understand the joy of running through the gears. It's a visceral thing, so I agree on that level. I have also found times when an automatic (SUV) doesn't work as well as manual because its algorithms aren't smart enough: driving in snow and mountain driving come to mind.
    On the EV side of things, I love getting off the mark at a stoplight way, way faster than conventional vehicles. Not only do you have the super-high torque at low revs, but no shifting delay. Mine is a pedal assist bike with a front hub motor. I kind of enjoy the looks I get when I go from 0 to 25MPH on what looks like a regular bicycle while the cars are still warming up. :-)
     Reply
    anon was starred anon was unstarred
    Image of anon anon
    09/17/09

    duplicate deleted.
     Reply
    Edited by anon at 09/17/09 10:46 AM anon was starred anon was unstarred
    Image of anon anon
    09/17/09


    @Lizard_King: Just bragging. :-)
     Reply
    anon was starred anon was unstarred
    Earlier discussions Other discussions Show all discussions Show featured discussions only Start a new discussion

Login

Enter your username and password.

Please enter a username.
Please enter your password.
logging in
Login via Facebook | Sign Up | Forgot Password?

Reset Password

Please enter your email address to have your password reset.

Please enter your email address.
Please enter a valid email address.
requesting password reset

Register

Registering will give you a user profile and the ability to add other users as friends. To become a commenter, however, you need to audition.

Want to know more? Consult the Comment FAQ and legal terms.

Please enter a username.
Please enter a password.
Please confirm your password.
Passwords are not identical.
Please enter a valid email address.
registration sent, waiting for reply

Submit Your Comment

You don't need to login to comment. Just enter your email address below.

See how your address will be displayed in the Comment FAQ.

Please enter a valid email address.
Please enter a valid email address.
logging in

Login with your Facebook or Gizmodo account.

Sign up here.



  • Archives
  • About
  • Advertising
  • Legal
  • Help
  • Report a Bug
  • FAQ
Original material is licensed under a Creative Commons License permitting non-commercial sharing with attribution.