<![CDATA[Gizmodo: broadcasting]]> http://tags.gizmodo.com/assets/base/img/thumbs140x140/gizmodo.com.png <![CDATA[Gizmodo: broadcasting]]> http://gizmodo.com/tag/broadcasting http://gizmodo.com/tag/broadcasting <![CDATA[UStream's iPhone Video Broadcasting App is Live For Jailbroken iPhones, Still Not For App Store]]> It's not quite the App Store, but Ustream's broadcasting app is here on jailbroken iPhones. It joins Qik, which already does the same thing.

Ustream's plan is still to get the app on the official App Store, which would make it much, much more accessible to the general public. The good news is that their latency from streaming to watching is pretty good (about 2-3 seconds), which is live enough to be called live. Not good enough, though, for having a conversation with.

When we tried it over Wi-Fi, the video quality was pretty acceptable for streaming video from a phone. There are a couple short sample videos here. You can actually make out the text if I get in close enough to the screen. What does this say? One, the iPhone 3G's camera is decent enough to take video and the processor is fast enough to process and upload it. Two, we're dying to get this in the App Store so everyone can try.

Another really cool feature is the live poll, which you can activate and have all your viewers vote on. It sends an email to your account address when you close the poll.

The tech is there, so all that's left is for Apple to approve it. You can get it now by jailbreaking.

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5165904&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[First Wave of the Digital TV Switch Hits Today]]> By the end of today—the original, pre-delay shutoff deadline—641 TV (mostly small-market) stations across the country will cease analog broadcast. Panic! [Yahoo]

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5154878&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[How TV Towers Can Easily Make a Land-Based GPS Network]]> GPS satellites are just fast moving clocks, spewing out time code as they hurtle through space. Digital TV towers also spew time code, and could be a terrestrial GPS system or GPS assistant, says Ars.

There's a company called Rosum who has been working on this technology for a while, and is finally getting some headway. Their goal is to help devices that spend all or most of the time indoors enjoy the benefits of global positioning. They're currently focused on integrating their TV-assisted geo-location into femtocells—without a GPS lock, these internet-connected cellular repeaters are useless, even though they're totally meant for use indoors.

By locking onto the timecode embedded in TV signals from known locations, they can get a fix. As you probably know, wi-fi networks mapped by Skyhook use this same basic concept. Rosum likes TV signal because it's especially strong, it penetrates walls, and "it's roughly 12,000 miles closer" than GPS.

Anyway, it's all a heady business, so head over to Ars if you want the 202. The point is, everything can be used to get a fix on your location, and in the future, everything will. [Ars Technica]

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5150233&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Toshiba IK-HD1 is World's Smallest HDTV Camera]]> With vital measurements of 1-6-inches cubed and 2.3-ounces in weight, Toshiba's IK-HD1 waltzes in to easily steal the "Smallest HDTV Camera, Ever" title. Packed to the miniature eyeballs with three CCD chips, the 1K-HD1 can capture video at broadcast-quality at 1080i, but it won't be making its way to your camcorder anytime soon. The tiny marvel is actually intended for professional broadcasting, and needs to be hooked up to a rather sizable control unit, which can be placed up to 90-feet away. It appears Mr Professional Broadcasting wins again. Dammit. [DVice]

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=376539&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Eight Reasons So Many HD Channels Suck Ass]]> Sound & Vision just ran a cool expose on HD cable channels. How can so many good channels be stuck in SD land—I'm looking at you F/X, Comedy Central and Sci-Fi Channel—while new lame HD channels like CNN and QVC cut to the front of the line? And what about those so-called HD channels, like TNT and TBS, that half the time (or more often than that) play stretched upconverted Law & Order reruns? Dubbing the situation "complicated," S&V says there isn't one answer, but eight slimy, frustrating, unfair reasons:

1. Timing: TBS HD launched with MLB playoffs; CNN HD is covering politics in a year when politics isn't BORING.

2. Pretty Picture: Sports, movies and nature top the list of demanded HD. Apparently Reno 911 isn't even near the top.

3. New Content: Converting old stuff costs $$$$$, whereas shooting in HD from the get go is cheaper and cheaper everyday, hence QVC's all-HD all-the-time pitch.

4. Money: You knew this would come up. QVC pays carriers to put their channel up. Who knows what other deals are going down?

5. Visual Upgrades: Even if the video itself isn't HD, some channels like CNBC HD (seriously?) use graphics and stuff in HD.

6. Promises, Promises: According to a source at Comcast, networks who share big 'n' nebulous HD plans for the future can squeeze by with crap programming at launch. (Hey Comcast, they also took the word "Gullible" out of the dictionary.)

7. Simulcasting: Apparently it's cheaper for a channel to broadcast stuff in HD and SD at the same time, because they save on marketing and can tell everyone to watch at the same time, whereas channels that only broadcast in HD are underpromoted.

8. Smoke-Filled Rooms: All of this comes down to deals, handshakes between suits from the carriers and suits from the content owners. (Occasionally, they have to actually shake their own hands!) Whatever variety of above incentives are offered, a deal's a deal. [Sound & Vision]

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=375327&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[By the Numbers: 2006 FIFA World Cup]]> It takes a lot of broadcasting gear to put together the 2006 FIFA World Cup, and we like to count it all up for your extreme gadget-porn entertainment. We gave you the 2006 Super Bowl by the numbers, and many of our dearest readers outside the United States didn't give a rat's ass. So in the interest of world peace and love, here it is—the World Cup, by the numbers:

5,000,000,000: Viewers expected to watch the games
$100,000,000: Estimated cost of voice and data network deployed by Avaya
3,500,000: RFID embedded tickets
45000: Estimated number of network connections for TV production
2200: Hours of feeds produced
2000: Staff of TV productions
2000: Press, commentators
1300: Kilometers of cable for 12 venues
800: Camera positions
750: kilometers of audio/video cables
736: Players
100: Fujinon HD lenses deployed
70: TV studios
64: Number of matches broadcast in HD for 2006 FIFA World Cup
64: Total number of matches played
48: Matches broadcast in HD for previous World Cup (2002)
25: HD cameras used to cover each match (per stadium)
20: Outside broadcast trucks
14: Panels on current FIFA football
12: Cities hosting matches
9: PanAmSats used to send HD signal worldwide
6: Number of television directors
1: Pool feed for broadcasters

FIFA World Cup by the Numbers [Audio Video Producer]

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=180088&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[By the Numbers: ABCs Super Bowl XL Coverage]]>
1,000,000,000 worldwide television audience
130,000,000 US viewers
70,000 fans at Ford Field in Detroit
720p HD standard of the broadcast
500 monitors in control trucks
400 crew people for production, technical, administrative and support
180 frames per second of Sony s new experimental super slo-mo camera
100x optical zoom of the longest Canon lens to be used
90 inputs on the video switcher
90 miles of cable for cameras and microphones
60 microphones, including 12 on-field parabolic mics
54 cameras used by FOX at last year s Super Bowl, but not all were HD as they are this year
40 digital video instant replay units
36 TV cameras
36 seasons of ABC NFL coverage, of which this is the last season and last game
29 mobile vehicles
25 degrees, forecast temperature outside the domed stadium at kickoff, a concern of ABC technicians
20 hard cameras (stationary as opposed to hand-held)
10 television production trucks (not including the infamous horse trailer)
10 commercials bought by the game's biggest advertiser, Anheuser-Busch
7 handheld cameras
6 robotic cameras
6 super slo-mo cameras
5 million dollars per minute to buy a commercial
4 announcers: Al Michaels, John Madden, Michelle Tafoya and Suzy Kolber
3 60-second advertisements (the rest are :30), bought by General Motors, Burger King and ESPN
2 operators for SkyCam: one cameraman, one "pilot"
1 director, Drew Esocoff, his second Super Bowl as a director

ABC Sports Prepares for HD Super Bowl XL [TV Technology]

Super Bowl XL on ABC Sports in SD/HD simulcast [Broadcast Engineering]

Super Bowl XL Ready to Go in Detroit [Broadcast Newsroom]

Super Bowl Gets Supersized Production [Broadcasting & Cable]

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=152538&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Japan to Get TV Via Internet]]>

If you've got it, flaunt it. That's one mantra that hasn't eluded the Japanese when it comes to technology. And because the country has the cheapest high-speed Internet in the world, as well as one of the best broadband markets, it's nice to see everyone working together to bring people streaming TV on their Internet connections. Softbank and Yahoo Japan are the two companies in charge of this new streaming video service and plan to form a company that will operate it. Called "Yahoo!Doga," it is aiming to be a portal site for about 100,000 different programs. Best of all, the companies plan to work with all the different broadcasters, rather than just a few. A trial is in the works as we speak and the service should be available by March 2006.

Softbank, Yahoo Japan start Internet TV service [Reuters]

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=144141&view=rss&microfeed=true