Senior Contributing Editors:
Jesus Diaz
| AIM | Twitter
Mark Wilson, Reviews
| AIM | Twitter
Contributing Editors:
Matt Buchanan | AIM | Twitter
Adam Frucci | Twitter
Sean Fallon | Twitter
Jack Loftus | Twitter
John Herrman | Twitter
Dan Nosowitz
Chris Mascari
Kat Hannaford | Twitter
Rosa Golijan | Twitter
Chris Jacob
Jesus, are you sure that's just not a prop from the movie, "Attack of the 50 Foot Woman"? The, uh, unreleased X-rated version? (For the G-rated poster, this fuselage was swapped out with a car.)
@bosskev: Crap and dammit! See how the new "image" button function just SCREWS UP images, cropping them randomly and wrongly? Yeah, I know you can click on the photo and have it go all Flashy to full-size, but (a) how many other people already know that, and (b) even if they do, how many will bother?
PLEASE give us back the previously-included ability/option to use HTML tags to embed our photos directly so they DON'T get messed up, just like this one did.
@bosskev: You can add inline images just like before, just beware that hitting the edit button will permanently remove all html formatting from your post. (even if you try to edit them back in)
I appreciate your thoughts but, no, it is NOT working, at least not for me. I've tried it several times now, doing it exactly as I've done hundreds of times before, and nothing. Photos never post even the first time, let alone to disappear, as you describe, during subsequent edits--they just never show at all.
Bigbadbikernerd promoted this comment
Edited by ithyphallus, bonks morrigan at 07/22/09 2:08 PM
ithyphallus, bonks morrigan was starred
ithyphallus, bonks morrigan was unstarred
Everyone has the fantasy of being able to turn their car into a plane in heavy traffic and simply take off, leaving congested lanes of traffic in the dust as you soar high above them.
I wonder how much it'd cost to buy this thing and pepper the sides with Harrier style engines for vertical take off during rush hour? Hmmm.....
Somewhat fascinating my question is why did they remove the skin from the aircraft, I understand the rest of it being stripped down the skin removal just seems a bit odd.
@Die Fledermaus: Since it says it will be used for loading/unloading training, the skin was probably un important. They probably just needed a junk plane fuselage.
@zanzan42, @jakebathman: You've obviously not seen the bears I run into. Even the longest of sleeves and highest of collars wouldn't hide the thickets thriving therein.
i remember growing up watching c-5s land in japan and in san antonio. never got to see a c-17 up close, but big planes are friggin sweet. look at all the buttons.
I once went to an air show to see the Thunderbirds in Ohio, and they had one of these bad boys wide open for us to take a look inside. Truly an awesome cargo jet.
@Kaiser-Machead: They being the airshow I presume? The Thunderbirds use a C-130 transport for their support crew. Complete with JATO demonstrations on some air fields.
@Captain Chaos Lite: This wasn't a Thunderbirds carrier. This was just a standard USAF gray-colored jet on the tarmac, along with lots of other planes and helicopters as an exhibit for the event.
07/22/09
Jesus, are you sure that's just not a prop from the movie, "Attack of the 50 Foot Woman"? The, uh, unreleased X-rated version? (For the G-rated poster, this fuselage was swapped out with a car.)
07/22/09
PLEASE give us back the previously-included ability/option to use HTML tags to embed our photos directly so they DON'T get messed up, just like this one did.
07/22/09
07/22/09
I appreciate your thoughts but, no, it is NOT working, at least not for me. I've tried it several times now, doing it exactly as I've done hundreds of times before, and nothing. Photos never post even the first time, let alone to disappear, as you describe, during subsequent edits--they just never show at all.
07/22/09
07/22/09
07/22/09
I wonder how much it'd cost to buy this thing and pepper the sides with Harrier style engines for vertical take off during rush hour? Hmmm.....
07/22/09
07/22/09
And now you get to ride in the back.
07/22/09
07/22/09
07/22/09
07/22/09
05/22/09
05/22/09
05/22/09
05/22/09
05/22/09
05/22/09
05/22/09
05/22/09
05/22/09
05/22/09
05/22/09