@Bos'un's Mate: well, this tech doesnt have polarization at its core. the glasses are actually lcd screens. and they close one eye *turn on lcd* and open the other eye *turn off lcd to make it see through* in rythm with the television. so when the tv shows the right side pic, you only see it through your right eye. Mitsubishi has this tech on all their DLP tvs as well. its a pretty cool tech. the glasses communicate wirelessly with the television to make sure everything is in sync. I think NVidia has a similar tech for their 3D displays and graphics cards.
@switchblade saints: Look at it another way - because one of my eyes is bad, my brain collects 3D data many other ways, including guessing distances from proportions and relative object sizes.
In a way, we've always had 3D movies and TV - no special hardware required, the brain does it all.
Don't forget Video Games! The only problem with video games is the double framerate, which is needed for smooth viewing and requires more GPU power. Stereoscopy really adds to the immersion when gaming.
3D is not lame, and while it may not be as popular as it's proponents would like, it won't fail. It's been alive and slowly growing for decades!
I grow weary of these Scientific Atlantic boxes. I want to grind them. I want to put them into a giant blender, and pulverize these wretched set-top turds into a fine toxic powder, mix it with ketel one and floor cleaner, and funnel this poisonous swill down the gaping maw of our cable repair man.
It actually sounds more like they were trying to say that if you don't have a built-in digital tuner, your "cable-ready TV" will still need a digital cable box (or a store-bought digital converter) to interpret the signal. The coaxial wire alone is not any better than an antenna.
@ZLevee: Another thing: Since this guy is probably going to find out that he needs a converter box or cable box after all since the uncles TV probably doesn't have a digital turner despite being "cable-ready", he should know that in Manhattan at least if you use a generic converter, you get better results with an antenna that with the cable line, as ridiculous as that sounds. So either go with the actual cable box if you want to use the wire, or cancel the cable service and get a converter with the antenna.
@ZLevee: thirdly, I still think cable-company employees don't know shit.
I say this despite them being somewhat correct in this instance. It's evident here not only by the fact that they didn't suggest a simple converter (could be they wanted a sale) but by the fact that they couldn't explain the difference between "cable-ready" and a digital tuner which would have cleared up why soem type of box might be needed.
@Elliuotatar: Digital Tuners - some TVs say it right on them, but otherwise I'd either check the manual or look up your model on the manufacturer's website.
You're gonna have to get more specific with your cable card question. Generally, cablecards were supposed to eliminate set top boxes and allow you to get digital and HD channels directly to a cablecard TV, cablecard PC, or cablecard DVR. Certain non-cable company DVRs (Tivo HD for example) accept cable cards. I haven't seen a Media Center PC that takes one yet, though I have seen an external ATI box that connects to a PC which can use cable cards to get HD channels from digital cable service. There are single stream cable cards and multistream cable cards, the latter of which will let a Tivo HD for example get 2 broadcasts simultaneously while only requiring one card. The downside of cable cards is that cable companies haven't made them compatible with sending info, so you can't order Pay Per View or On Demand content with them. Version 2 is supposed to fix this, along with adding switched video (basically frees up bandwith for other services by not sending you channels you aren't watching at the moment). Other tech is in the works that may replace all this.
Actually, in more and more regions cable-cos are going all digital. The first neighborhoods seem to be high density, like Brooklyn, as a means of preventing piracy. So maybe the old guy needs a "cable ready" TV... with CableCARDs. If he doesn't want a box.
@mnerd: Both the dude making the request and the cable company don't know what their talking about.
The 95-yr old uncle might have a "cable-ready TV" but they called TVs that before the days of digital tuners. His is probably one of these older types. Without a digital cable box or digital converter box, it ain't gonna work. The guy asking and the guy explaining both seem to think they're so knowledgable but neither seems to know that.
And yes, they both should have known about the option of a converter box with an antenna without any cable service.
@ZLevee: Actually, some cable companies (Comcast & Charter as far as I know) still transmit basic analog signals through the cable along with the digital signal. That's how my parents get digital cable in the living room but still get basic from a split wire hooked directly to their TV in the bedroom.
@ZLevee: You're making some pretty large assumptions but I was thinking the same thing. Especially since Cablevision has switched so many of their channels (don't know if that includes OTA channels) to digital only. That *would* require a cable box.
I hate Cablevision with a passion, but even the FiosTV reps do the hard sell on the 'free' channels. Hoping that you'll forget to cancel the free services at the end of the trial period...
@ZLevee: "As for the nation's analog-cable subscribers, cable operators must either convert the digital signal to analog at the point where the cable signal originates, OR SUPPLY CUSTOMERS WITH A 'DOWN-CONVERTER' DEVICE THAT WILL CHANGE DIGITAL SIGNALS TO ANALOG AT THE TV SET."
Or you could be out of luck today. This seems to be what Cablevision was opting for. Hand out cable boxes to the customers who don't have ATSC-ready TVs, and cut your transmission costs in half. Being that it was probably SOP, it _would_ actually require a manager's approval to do anything different.
It's not that easy in BK or anywhere in NYC for that matter. If you're in an apartment you proably can't use a dish cause you'd have to install it (unless you have a window facing the correct direction). If your building has a deal with CableVision, you're stuck with em. That's the only reason I'm suckling the TimeWarner tite.
@ghackett: Preceisely. I was going to cut the Cablevision cord last week (to save some money) but it would only save about $45 a month. I need to have a landline for my fax machine and dropping cable would make my phone service go from $15 to $30. Also, I'd lose my movie discount and see an increase in my cost for internet.
@ghackett: I keep trying to explain to one of my coworkers that just because her apartment complex has an exclusive contract with Comcast doesn't mean she can't opt for AT&T's U-verse service, since it comes in on the phone lines. Likewise, she could drop AT&T for Comcast's phone and internet, since they come in on the cable lines. These days, there's _always_ a choice, unless you live in a place that doesn't have cable and/or phone service available.
08/20/09
BTW, what idiot put the TV directly under a fluorescent light fixture?
08/21/09
08/20/09
well I guess you don't know what you are missing anyway.
08/20/09
In a way, we've always had 3D movies and TV - no special hardware required, the brain does it all.
08/20/09
08/21/09
08/20/09
3D is not lame, and while it may not be as popular as it's proponents would like, it won't fail. It's been alive and slowly growing for decades!
08/20/09
02/23/09
02/23/09
Is there any way of finding out which neighborhoods require it and which do not, in order to avoid being scammed if it's not needed?
02/23/09
02/23/09
02/23/09
02/23/09
02/23/09
I say this despite them being somewhat correct in this instance. It's evident here not only by the fact that they didn't suggest a simple converter (could be they wanted a sale) but by the fact that they couldn't explain the difference between "cable-ready" and a digital tuner which would have cleared up why soem type of box might be needed.
02/23/09
02/23/09
You're gonna have to get more specific with your cable card question. Generally, cablecards were supposed to eliminate set top boxes and allow you to get digital and HD channels directly to a cablecard TV, cablecard PC, or cablecard DVR. Certain non-cable company DVRs (Tivo HD for example) accept cable cards. I haven't seen a Media Center PC that takes one yet, though I have seen an external ATI box that connects to a PC which can use cable cards to get HD channels from digital cable service. There are single stream cable cards and multistream cable cards, the latter of which will let a Tivo HD for example get 2 broadcasts simultaneously while only requiring one card. The downside of cable cards is that cable companies haven't made them compatible with sending info, so you can't order Pay Per View or On Demand content with them. Version 2 is supposed to fix this, along with adding switched video (basically frees up bandwith for other services by not sending you channels you aren't watching at the moment). Other tech is in the works that may replace all this.
02/23/09
02/23/09
02/23/09
The 95-yr old uncle might have a "cable-ready TV" but they called TVs that before the days of digital tuners. His is probably one of these older types. Without a digital cable box or digital converter box, it ain't gonna work. The guy asking and the guy explaining both seem to think they're so knowledgable but neither seems to know that.
And yes, they both should have known about the option of a converter box with an antenna without any cable service.
02/23/09
02/23/09
02/23/09
Of course, for the 95 yr old guy that might be long enough.
02/23/09
I hate Cablevision with a passion, but even the FiosTV reps do the hard sell on the 'free' channels. Hoping that you'll forget to cancel the free services at the end of the trial period...
02/23/09
02/23/09
02/23/09
02/23/09
"As for the nation's analog-cable subscribers, cable operators must either convert the digital signal to analog at the point where the cable signal originates,
OR SUPPLY CUSTOMERS WITH A 'DOWN-CONVERTER' DEVICE THAT WILL CHANGE DIGITAL SIGNALS TO ANALOG AT THE TV SET."
Or you could be out of luck today. This seems to be what Cablevision was opting for. Hand out cable boxes to the customers who don't have ATSC-ready TVs, and cut your transmission costs in half. Being that it was probably SOP, it _would_ actually require a manager's approval to do anything different.
02/23/09
02/23/09
Still, I am looking at something like a Vudu box.
02/23/09
I keep trying to explain to one of my coworkers that just because her apartment complex has an exclusive contract with Comcast doesn't mean she can't opt for AT&T's U-verse service, since it comes in on the phone lines. Likewise, she could drop AT&T for Comcast's phone and internet, since they come in on the cable lines. These days, there's _always_ a choice, unless you live in a place that doesn't have cable and/or phone service available.