• Gizmodo
  • bestmodo
  • lifehacker
  • kotaku
  • Profile logout login

#cameras##agtltbrgt

Gizmodo

Share Cancel
   
Upload an image | Add an image URL
×

logging in
  • FAQ. Include # before tag:
  • #tips,
  • #dealzmodo,
  • #rumors,
  • #broken,
  • #iphoneapps,
  • #apple,
  • etc.

New York, 2:33 AM
Wed Nov 25
64 posts in the last 24 hours

FR | IT | DE | SP | JP | AU | BR

Gizmodo Team

Tip your editors:
tips@gizmodo.com

Editorial Director:
Brian Lam | Email | Twitter

Editor:
Jason Chen
Email | AIM | Twitter

Features Editor:
Wilson Rothman
Email | Twitter

Senior Contributing Editors:
Jesus Diaz
Email | AIM | Twitter
Mark Wilson, Reviews
Email | AIM | Twitter

Contributing Editors:
Matt Buchanan
Email | AIM | Twitter
Adam Frucci
Email | Twitter
Sean Fallon
Email | Twitter
Jack Loftus
Email | Twitter
John Herrman
Email | Twitter
Dan Nosowitz
Email
Chris Mascari
Email
Danny Allen
Email | Twitter
Rosa Golijan
Email | Twitter
Chris Jacob
Email

Columnist:
Brendan I. Koerner

Interns:
Don Nguyen
Email
Kyle VanHemert
Email

Comment Intern:
Nick Ellenoff | Email

Heroes and Friends

Comment Account Questions:
Comments@gizmodo.com

SUBSCRIBE TO Gizmodo RSS

New: Breaking news and daily top stories via email
9515 Subscribers
Gizmodo
  • Your version of Internet Explorer is not supported. Please upgrade to the most recent version in order to view comments.
    Dsmvwl  Admin  Promote to frontpage Approve user Ban user ×
    Image of Rift Rift
    11/24/09

    In reply to Avatar: The Result of a Quest for the Holy Grail of Cameras
    I'm surprised at the surprise (unless it's sarcasm I'm not catching). The guy has been innovating film-making for decades. Whether Terminator, Aliens, the Abyss, or Titanic, he has more often than not brought something new to the director's arsenal with each of his offerings.
     Reply
    Rift was starred Rift was unstarred
    Image of Nathan Obbards Nathan Obbards
    11/23/09

    In reply to Gifts for Aspiring Artsy Photographers
    If you're carrying a camera around your neck, you're doing it wrong.

    I couldn't really recommend the GorillaPod, you're better off with a monopod or real tripod.

    Point and shoots make great gifts too and are great for learning, Hell, Alex Majoli, a Magnum Photographer, created quite a few iconic photos using only a point and shoot superzoom camera.
     Reply
    Nathan Obbards was starred Nathan Obbards was unstarred
    Image of Purple Umpteenth Purple Umpteenth
    11/23/09

    @Nathan Obbards: hope you're gonna say you should be carrying it on your shoulder, because no one that shoots pro uses a case.

    those Disgrace shoulder straps are awesome though, really makes a 300mm comfortable on a shoulder.
     Reply
    Nathan Obbards promoted this comment Purple Umpteenth was starred Purple Umpteenth was unstarred
    Image of Nathan Obbards Nathan Obbards
    11/23/09

    @LolitaMalinky: I've heard mixed reviews about the Black Rapid straps. I've heard that their quick release parts have a penchant for breaking and dropping your camera. I've never had problems with a padded body strap, even with a 300mm f/2.8 on the body.

    @Purple Umpteenth: Definitely meant carrying it on your shoulder. That's the only way to go.
     Reply
    Nathan Obbards was starred Nathan Obbards was unstarred
    Image of Ahnduru Ahnduru
    11/23/09

    @Nathan Obbards: How well is a monopod gonna work when you're trying to balance it on a rock?
     Reply
    Nathan Obbards promoted this comment Ahnduru was starred Ahnduru was unstarred
    Image of Nathan Obbards Nathan Obbards
    11/23/09

    @Ahnduru: Why I said a real monopod or tripod. Why are you balancing it on a rock anyways?
     Reply
    Nathan Obbards was starred Nathan Obbards was unstarred
    Image of gstar gstar
    11/23/09

    @Nathan Obbards: I'm not supposed to carry my DSLR around my neck? This is news to me. Please explain.
     Reply
    matt buchanan promoted this comment gstar was starred gstar was unstarred
    Image of matt buchanan matt buchanan
    11/23/09

    @gstar: it's touristy, not artsy.
     Reply
    matt buchanan was starred matt buchanan was unstarred
    Image of Nathan Obbards Nathan Obbards
    11/23/09

    @gstar: It gives you slower access to your camera(s), puts a lot of strain on your neck, gets in the way, can hinder your shooting, a slew of issues. By carrying it on your should you can eliminate most of them. Not only that, but you can often give yourself added stability by shortening the strap and pulling it tight against your arm/shoulder when you shoot.

    @matt buchanan: I worked with cameras for quite a few years. It really isn't that it's artsy or touristy, but ease of use and accessibility.
     Reply
    Edited by Nathan Obbards at 11/23/09 5:16 PM Nathan Obbards was starred Nathan Obbards was unstarred
    Image of Ahnduru Ahnduru
    11/23/09

    @Nathan Obbards: long exposures of a river, where you want to be close to the surface, Also, how the juice are you supposed to hike with a tripod? Maybe if you're a pro a shoot, then you would want to set up the tripod, etc, but otherwise...
    #tips
     Reply
    Ahnduru was starred Ahnduru was unstarred
    Image of Nathan Obbards Nathan Obbards
    11/23/09

    @Ahnduru: Two words: Carbon fiber
     Reply
    Nathan Obbards was starred Nathan Obbards was unstarred
    Image of Xagest Xagest
    11/23/09

    In reply to Spy Camera Detector Guarantees Your Privates Are on the Internet
    I don't know if the second part will work so well in some places.

    "OMG, this house has wifi EVERYWHERE!!"
     Reply
    Xagest was starred Xagest was unstarred
    Image of GitEmSteveDave_ForgotNametag GitEmSteveDave_ForgotNametag
    11/23/09

    In reply to Spy Camera Detector Guarantees Your Privates Are on the Internet
    Mark, is that why I saw you on my cams trying on my clothes while I was at work?
     Reply
    GitEmSteveDave_ForgotNametag was starred GitEmSteveDave_ForgotNametag was unstarred
    Image of fuchikoma fuchikoma
    11/23/09

    In reply to Spy Camera Detector Guarantees Your Privates Are on the Internet
    I know the officially say it's an IR laser, but I'm thinking it's red LEDs since otherwise you'd need a camera to see it, or the lenses you detect would need to be coated in IR-fluorescent material... and of course if it used lasers you'd never get the lucky shot on a hidden camera.

    Wow, that one's expensive! I've seen the detectors before though - basically they just optimally glare off things straight back at your eye.
     Reply
    fuchikoma was starred fuchikoma was unstarred
    Image of mfusion mfusion
    11/23/09

    @fuchikoma: could be what the orange filter you look through is for?
     Reply
    fuchikoma promoted this comment mfusion was starred mfusion was unstarred
    Image of fuchikoma fuchikoma
    11/23/09

    @mfusion: Nope... the orange filter only keeps certain wavelengths from coming through, so if it allowed IR, it'd come through as IR and you still wouldn't see it. I'm 99% certain that it's RED LEDs and a case of Chinese product packaging... (Like a watch I saw today made in Shenzhen that says "London" on it because... it looks good.)

    I've seen cheaper versions with no wifi detector that have a red filter - I think the only reason it's colored is because it'd allow whatever color is shone from the lights on it, and might keep colors like blue from catching your eye if they're also reflected off something.

    #speakup
     Reply
    fuchikoma was starred fuchikoma was unstarred
    Image of Bokusatsu_Tenshi Bokusatsu_Tenshi
    11/22/09

    In reply to 3D Scanning, a Webcam's Latest Trick
    Wow, awesome!

    I see it makes an image recognition (well, points recognition) and recalculates everything on each image captured.

    The math behind this goes totaly beyond my knowledge.

    You'll probably never get a 3D model as optimized as one using... more expensive/ time consuming modeling/ 3d capturing techniques, but the results speak for themselves.

    Now, what we need are some models and this: [xspblog.com]
     Reply
    Bokusatsu_Tenshi was starred Bokusatsu_Tenshi was unstarred
    Image of P3nnst8r P3nnst8r
    11/21/09

    In reply to 3D Scanning, a Webcam's Latest Trick
    I wonder how good this is at mapping humans. If so, I could see some benefits of this!
     Reply
    P3nnst8r was starred P3nnst8r was unstarred
    Image of Gary_7vn Gary_7vn
    11/21/09

    In reply to 3D Scanning, a Webcam's Latest Trick
    You can scan a sandwich and print it on a 3d printer, in colour, even with separate pieces of bread, ham and cheese. But you wouldn't want to eat it.
    A lot of "food products" now get extruded from machines that aren't that different from 3 d printers. If you could load up a 3d printer with potato slurry, cheese ink, and the like, you might be able to print out a "ham and cheese" that looked good, and might even be edible.
     Reply
    Gary_7vn was starred Gary_7vn was unstarred
    Image of GitEmSteveDave_ForgotNametag GitEmSteveDave_ForgotNametag
    11/21/09

    In reply to 3D Scanning, a Webcam's Latest Trick
    So using all four of my webcams, you guys could get a 3d image of how big I am? I may just like this.
     Reply
    GitEmSteveDave_ForgotNametag was starred GitEmSteveDave_ForgotNametag was unstarred
    Image of Pixlmonkey Pixlmonkey
    11/21/09

    @GitEmSteveDave_HazEnvy: SHUT the heck up already about your damn cams, or you'll get the banhammer for spamming. Geez, some people.
     Reply
    GitEmSteveDave_HazEnvy promoted this comment Pixlmonkey was starred Pixlmonkey was unstarred
    Image of GitEmSteveDave_ForgotNametag GitEmSteveDave_ForgotNametag
    11/22/09

    @Pixlmonkey: Really? Why? Is there a link to my site in my comment? No, in fact, I didn't even mention my website. Oh, maybe there's one in my profile. Huh, isn't one there either, is there.

    So in a story about webcams being able to make a 3d model, I mentioned that I had some webcams and wondered if using more than one could make a better 3d model since the article mentioned that there was problems with the one camera system. Yup, that is TOTAL spamming. Before you make statements like that, you better be able to back them up.
     Reply
    GitEmSteveDave_ForgotNametag was starred GitEmSteveDave_ForgotNametag was unstarred
    Image of szrimaging szrimaging
    11/20/09

    In reply to Hasselblad's Multi-Shot H3DII-50 MS Brings 50 Megapixels for $34,000
    Ok, so is it bad that I am getting a wet day dream just thinking about mounting this to a view camera?
     Reply
    szrimaging was starred szrimaging was unstarred
    Image of Gundem Gundem
    11/19/09

    In reply to Hasselblad's Multi-Shot H3DII-50 MS Brings 50 Megapixels for $34,000
    What the fuck do we need 50 mega pixels for ? i have a 10.1 (ALpha100) and a 14.5 (Alpha700) and they both get the job done in high res departments.
     Reply
    Gundem was starred Gundem was unstarred
    Image of zerofourtwo zerofourtwo
    11/20/09

    @Gundem: Well you can't really compare your Alpha 100 and 700 to a Hasselblad such as this one. These cameras were not really intended for private use, Hasselblad produces commerical grade cameras, for professionals. Photographers who shoot for billboard sized ads need resolution like this.
     Reply
    Gundem promoted this comment zerofourtwo was starred zerofourtwo was unstarred
    Image of Gundem Gundem
    11/20/09

    @zerofourtwo: I do professional photography. Not Billboard or super aerial shots. Magazine, poster, calender and etc.

    alpha100 was good enough for those shots (daytiem only because it has too much noise on higher ISO's and that's when alpha700) comes in handy.
     Reply
    Gundem was starred Gundem was unstarred
    Image of zerofourtwo zerofourtwo
    11/23/09

    @Gundem: # Well sure when shooting for off set printing like magazines and such i could see why one would use the cameras that you do, i was just trying to express that this camera was designed for commercial use, i.e large scale printing.
     Reply
    zerofourtwo was starred zerofourtwo was unstarred
    Image of Kaiser-Machead Kaiser-Machead
    11/18/09

    In reply to Gifts for Video Geeks Who Think They're The Next Scorsese
    How can you tell anyone who loves BTTF to not buy one of those hats? If the seller was a pain in the ass, or the hats are cheap crap that disintegrate on your head, I can understand, but if not, you're not the boss of me!!
     Reply
    Kaiser-Machead was starred Kaiser-Machead was unstarred
    Image of nutbastard nutbastard
    11/18/09

    @Kaiser-Machead:

    agreed. this hat would go over well at some of the, shall we say, "chemically charged" parties i enjoy attending.
     Reply
    nutbastard was starred nutbastard was unstarred
    Image of nutbastard nutbastard
    11/18/09

    @Kaiser-Machead: oooh they got one on amazon with a good review, so quality + good seller.

    [www.amazon.com]
     Reply
    Edited by nutbastard at 11/18/09 11:43 AM nutbastard was starred nutbastard was unstarred
    Image of OCEntertainment OCEntertainment
    11/18/09

    In reply to Gifts for Video Geeks Who Think They're The Next Scorsese
    No joke, I'm a video editor and that hat is actually on my Amazon wish list. And I care not for your opinions of just how ridiculous I would look in it. Those movies are my childhood.

    I'd suppose you'd also say no one should ever gift me the original Power Rangers Megazord that I have pined for since I was 6 or whatever?

    Fie, I say. Fie!
     Reply
    OCEntertainment was starred OCEntertainment was unstarred
    Image of mattycakes mattycakes
    11/18/09

    @OCEntertainment: Of all eight of those products, I want the hat the most as well.

    As much as I love watching and making movies, the hat is still the coolest thing out of the list.
     Reply
    OCEntertainment promoted this comment mattycakes was starred mattycakes was unstarred
    Image of Segador Segador
    11/18/09

    In reply to Gifts for Video Geeks Who Think They're The Next Scorsese
    It's a sizeable monetary investment, but if you're serious about video at all, a Steadicam will almost instantly transform your shaky, crappy home movies into smooth, beautiful, pro-quality shots.
     Reply
    Segador was starred Segador was unstarred
    Image of OCEntertainment OCEntertainment
    11/18/09

    @Segador: If you're serious about video, but still have to scrape coins for the dollar menu, then perhaps you could check out the Poor Man's Steadicam.

    I built one myself, took maybe a couple hours. It's not fantastic, mind you, and it takes some work to figure out how to use the counterweight to your advantage. Used properly, however, it's a significant improvement over....nothing.
     Reply
    OCEntertainment was starred OCEntertainment was unstarred
    Image of Segador Segador
    11/18/09

    @OCEntertainment: For sure. A friend of mine build the same thing with plumbing supplies, and it works. It's not the same as an actual Steadicam, but, yeah, it's a big improvement over hand-held.
     Reply
    Segador was starred Segador was unstarred
    Image of OMG! Ponies! OMG! Ponies!
    11/18/09

    In reply to Gifts for Video Geeks Who Think They're The Next Scorsese
    The Flip Ultra Fat-Ass does intrigue me.

    Also, you can always go with editing software (you know - a legitimate copy) or screenwriting software. It's one of the few times that it isn't impersonal.

    And of course, you can always have a family&friends-wide fund to save up for the good stuff. A $1,000 camera sounds like a lot until you have 10 people chipping in to pay for it.
     Reply
    OMG! Ponies! was starred OMG! Ponies! was unstarred
    Image of fauxfilms fauxfilms
    11/18/09

    @OMG! Ponies!: Celtx (celtx.com) is a great screenwriting software that's (legally) free and insanely intuitive. I highly recommend it.
     Reply
    OMG! Ponies! promoted this comment Edited by fauxfilms at 11/18/09 10:29 AM fauxfilms was starred fauxfilms was unstarred
    Image of OMG! Ponies! OMG! Ponies!
    11/18/09

    @fauxfilms: I'm a Final Draft guy myself.

    #tips
     Reply
    OMG! Ponies! was starred OMG! Ponies! was unstarred
    Earlier discussions Other discussions Show all discussions Show featured discussions only Start a new discussion

Login

Enter your username and password.

Please enter a username.
Please enter your password.
logging in
Login via Facebook | Sign Up | Forgot Password?

Reset Password

Please enter your email address to have your password reset.

Please enter your email address.
Please enter a valid email address.
requesting password reset

Register

Registering will give you a user profile and the ability to add other users as friends. To become a commenter, however, you need to audition.

Want to know more? Consult the Comment FAQ and legal terms.

Please enter a username.
Please enter a password.
Please confirm your password.
Passwords are not identical.
Please enter a valid email address.
registration sent, waiting for reply

Submit Your Comment

You don't need to login to comment. Just enter your email address below.

See how your address will be displayed in the Comment FAQ.

Please enter a valid email address.
Please enter a valid email address.
logging in

Login with your Facebook or Gizmodo account.

Sign up here.



  • Archives
  • About
  • Advertising
  • Legal
  • Help
  • Report a Bug
  • FAQ
Original material is licensed under a Creative Commons License permitting non-commercial sharing with attribution.