Enter your username and password.
Tip your editors:
tips@gizmodo.com
Editorial Director:
Brian Lam | Email | Twitter
Editor:
Jason Chen
Email | AIM | Twitter
Features Editor:
Wilson Rothman
Email | Twitter
Senior Contributing Editors:
Jesus Diaz
Email | AIM | Twitter
Mark Wilson, Reviews
Email | AIM | Twitter
Contributing Editors:
Matt Buchanan
Email | AIM | Twitter
Adam Frucci
Email | Twitter
Sean Fallon
Email | Twitter
Jack Loftus
Email | Twitter
John Herrman
Email | Twitter
Dan Nosowitz
Email
Chris Mascari
Email
Danny Allen
Email | Twitter
Rosa Golijan
Email | Twitter
Chris Jacob
Email
Columnist:
Brendan I. Koerner
Interns:
Don Nguyen
Email
Kyle VanHemert
Email
Comment Intern:
Nick Ellenoff | Email
Comment Account Questions:
Comments@gizmodo.com
Please enter your email address to have your password reset.
Registering will give you a user profile and the ability to add other users as friends. To become a commenter, however, you need to audition.
Want to know more? Consult the Comment FAQ and legal terms.
You don't need to login to comment. Just enter your email address below.
See how your address will be displayed in the Comment FAQ.
11/29/09
11/29/09
11/29/09
As for the heads moving, I see plenty of keystoning (sp?), which is precisely what I would expect.
11/29/09
11/29/09
I'm a big believer in Occam's Razor and, quite frankly, Velcro-ing a bunch on mini-projectors on some kids still seems like likeliest answer.
That being said, no...I cannot explain the head turn phenomenon.
11/29/09
11/29/09
11/29/09
11/29/09
11/26/09
11/26/09
I'm not coming out against DSLR or anything, but for my uses... they're just so huge I'd never have it with me, and the price is so high I couldn't buy one for non-professional use.
11/26/09
11/26/09
11/26/09
But yes, the new Sony WX1 is quite amazing in low light and panoramics... havent seen 100% crops side by side tho, I just toyed with one at a friends house.
11/26/09
To me, I'd get a DSLR for more artistic effects like depth of field, very long exposures, bokeh, or HDR, but a while back a friend and I were comparing our cameras - he had some kind of 7MP Olympus DSLR and I had a 7MP Sony DSC-P150. In extreme darkness you could see the sensor noise on my camera, and he could just set a very long exposure, so that was a clear win for him if we were printing hi-res posters or competing in a photo competition.
But ultimately, while he's very happy with it because he does make use of all the features, when we compare ordinary shots, his camera's pics look 3-5% better, but his camera cost about 220% as much before lenses. I'd love to have all the manual features he does, but I just can't pay that when I take about 50 shots a year and keep about half that many...
11/28/09
11/26/09
The Nikon D3000 is a D60 with an idiot guide, and the D60 is a D40 with a rangefinder and a few more megapixels... no big deal.
The Canon 450D retains better high ISO quality than the 500D (t1i) in some respects. The T1i's main draw is the video and slightly improved (in my opinion) ergonomics, but the 450D is a hell of a lot cheaper.
11/26/09
11/26/09
11/27/09
11/26/09
11/26/09
I just picked up a Nikon D70 from Nikon for $200, 18-55mm lens included.
Most times it's something basic wrong with the camera that Nikon will fix in 10 minutes and resell for a tiny fraction of the cost of new.
The camera is five years old, but for $200, you really cannot go wrong.
11/26/09
11/26/09
11/26/09
11/26/09
11/26/09
11/26/09
11/26/09
11/26/09
11/26/09
I am assuming that if you bought such an expensive camera that you would back it up with a few Nikkors, in which case the move to Canon would have made even less sense. However, the Canon 7D is a hell of a camera, and it would be interesting to see how Nikon responds to it for the next Dx00.
11/26/09
11/26/09
11/26/09
It is only about $480 @newegg, and comes with the lens, battery/charger, etc.
11/26/09
11/26/09
11/26/09
11/26/09
11/26/09
11/26/09
11/26/09
11/26/09