I'm surprised at the surprise (unless it's sarcasm I'm not catching). The guy has been innovating film-making for decades. Whether Terminator, Aliens, the Abyss, or Titanic, he has more often than not brought something new to the director's arsenal with each of his offerings.
If you're carrying a camera around your neck, you're doing it wrong.
I couldn't really recommend the GorillaPod, you're better off with a monopod or real tripod.
Point and shoots make great gifts too and are great for learning, Hell, Alex Majoli, a Magnum Photographer, created quite a few iconic photos using only a point and shoot superzoom camera.
@LolitaMalinky: I've heard mixed reviews about the Black Rapid straps. I've heard that their quick release parts have a penchant for breaking and dropping your camera. I've never had problems with a padded body strap, even with a 300mm f/2.8 on the body.
@Purple Umpteenth: Definitely meant carrying it on your shoulder. That's the only way to go.
@gstar: It gives you slower access to your camera(s), puts a lot of strain on your neck, gets in the way, can hinder your shooting, a slew of issues. By carrying it on your should you can eliminate most of them. Not only that, but you can often give yourself added stability by shortening the strap and pulling it tight against your arm/shoulder when you shoot.
@matt buchanan: I worked with cameras for quite a few years. It really isn't that it's artsy or touristy, but ease of use and accessibility.
@Nathan Obbards: long exposures of a river, where you want to be close to the surface, Also, how the juice are you supposed to hike with a tripod? Maybe if you're a pro a shoot, then you would want to set up the tripod, etc, but otherwise... #tips
I know the officially say it's an IR laser, but I'm thinking it's red LEDs since otherwise you'd need a camera to see it, or the lenses you detect would need to be coated in IR-fluorescent material... and of course if it used lasers you'd never get the lucky shot on a hidden camera.
Wow, that one's expensive! I've seen the detectors before though - basically they just optimally glare off things straight back at your eye.
@mfusion: Nope... the orange filter only keeps certain wavelengths from coming through, so if it allowed IR, it'd come through as IR and you still wouldn't see it. I'm 99% certain that it's RED LEDs and a case of Chinese product packaging... (Like a watch I saw today made in Shenzhen that says "London" on it because... it looks good.)
I've seen cheaper versions with no wifi detector that have a red filter - I think the only reason it's colored is because it'd allow whatever color is shone from the lights on it, and might keep colors like blue from catching your eye if they're also reflected off something.
I see it makes an image recognition (well, points recognition) and recalculates everything on each image captured.
The math behind this goes totaly beyond my knowledge.
You'll probably never get a 3D model as optimized as one using... more expensive/ time consuming modeling/ 3d capturing techniques, but the results speak for themselves.
Now, what we need are some models and this: [xspblog.com]
You can scan a sandwich and print it on a 3d printer, in colour, even with separate pieces of bread, ham and cheese. But you wouldn't want to eat it.
A lot of "food products" now get extruded from machines that aren't that different from 3 d printers. If you could load up a 3d printer with potato slurry, cheese ink, and the like, you might be able to print out a "ham and cheese" that looked good, and might even be edible.
@Pixlmonkey: Really? Why? Is there a link to my site in my comment? No, in fact, I didn't even mention my website. Oh, maybe there's one in my profile. Huh, isn't one there either, is there.
So in a story about webcams being able to make a 3d model, I mentioned that I had some webcams and wondered if using more than one could make a better 3d model since the article mentioned that there was problems with the one camera system. Yup, that is TOTAL spamming. Before you make statements like that, you better be able to back them up.
@Gundem: Well you can't really compare your Alpha 100 and 700 to a Hasselblad such as this one. These cameras were not really intended for private use, Hasselblad produces commerical grade cameras, for professionals. Photographers who shoot for billboard sized ads need resolution like this.
@Gundem: # Well sure when shooting for off set printing like magazines and such i could see why one would use the cameras that you do, i was just trying to express that this camera was designed for commercial use, i.e large scale printing.
How can you tell anyone who loves BTTF to not buy one of those hats? If the seller was a pain in the ass, or the hats are cheap crap that disintegrate on your head, I can understand, but if not, you're not the boss of me!!
No joke, I'm a video editor and that hat is actually on my Amazon wish list. And I care not for your opinions of just how ridiculous I would look in it. Those movies are my childhood.
I'd suppose you'd also say no one should ever gift me the original Power Rangers Megazord that I have pined for since I was 6 or whatever?
It's a sizeable monetary investment, but if you're serious about video at all, a Steadicam will almost instantly transform your shaky, crappy home movies into smooth, beautiful, pro-quality shots.
@Segador: If you're serious about video, but still have to scrape coins for the dollar menu, then perhaps you could check out the Poor Man's Steadicam.
I built one myself, took maybe a couple hours. It's not fantastic, mind you, and it takes some work to figure out how to use the counterweight to your advantage. Used properly, however, it's a significant improvement over....nothing.
@OCEntertainment: For sure. A friend of mine build the same thing with plumbing supplies, and it works. It's not the same as an actual Steadicam, but, yeah, it's a big improvement over hand-held.
Also, you can always go with editing software (you know - a legitimate copy) or screenwriting software. It's one of the few times that it isn't impersonal.
And of course, you can always have a family&friends-wide fund to save up for the good stuff. A $1,000 camera sounds like a lot until you have 10 people chipping in to pay for it.
09:53 AM
11/23/09
I couldn't really recommend the GorillaPod, you're better off with a monopod or real tripod.
Point and shoots make great gifts too and are great for learning, Hell, Alex Majoli, a Magnum Photographer, created quite a few iconic photos using only a point and shoot superzoom camera.
11/23/09
those Disgrace shoulder straps are awesome though, really makes a 300mm comfortable on a shoulder.
11/23/09
@Purple Umpteenth: Definitely meant carrying it on your shoulder. That's the only way to go.
11/23/09
11/23/09
11/23/09
11/23/09
11/23/09
@matt buchanan: I worked with cameras for quite a few years. It really isn't that it's artsy or touristy, but ease of use and accessibility.
11/23/09
#tips
11/23/09
11/23/09
"OMG, this house has wifi EVERYWHERE!!"
11/23/09
11/23/09
Wow, that one's expensive! I've seen the detectors before though - basically they just optimally glare off things straight back at your eye.
11/23/09
11/23/09
I've seen cheaper versions with no wifi detector that have a red filter - I think the only reason it's colored is because it'd allow whatever color is shone from the lights on it, and might keep colors like blue from catching your eye if they're also reflected off something.
#speakup
11/22/09
I see it makes an image recognition (well, points recognition) and recalculates everything on each image captured.
The math behind this goes totaly beyond my knowledge.
You'll probably never get a 3D model as optimized as one using... more expensive/ time consuming modeling/ 3d capturing techniques, but the results speak for themselves.
Now, what we need are some models and this: [xspblog.com]
11/21/09
11/21/09
A lot of "food products" now get extruded from machines that aren't that different from 3 d printers. If you could load up a 3d printer with potato slurry, cheese ink, and the like, you might be able to print out a "ham and cheese" that looked good, and might even be edible.
11/21/09
11/21/09
11/22/09
So in a story about webcams being able to make a 3d model, I mentioned that I had some webcams and wondered if using more than one could make a better 3d model since the article mentioned that there was problems with the one camera system. Yup, that is TOTAL spamming. Before you make statements like that, you better be able to back them up.
11/20/09
11/19/09
11/20/09
11/20/09
alpha100 was good enough for those shots (daytiem only because it has too much noise on higher ISO's and that's when alpha700) comes in handy.
11/23/09
11/18/09
11/18/09
agreed. this hat would go over well at some of the, shall we say, "chemically charged" parties i enjoy attending.
11/18/09
[www.amazon.com]
11/18/09
I'd suppose you'd also say no one should ever gift me the original Power Rangers Megazord that I have pined for since I was 6 or whatever?
Fie, I say. Fie!
11/18/09
As much as I love watching and making movies, the hat is still the coolest thing out of the list.
11/18/09
11/18/09
I built one myself, took maybe a couple hours. It's not fantastic, mind you, and it takes some work to figure out how to use the counterweight to your advantage. Used properly, however, it's a significant improvement over....nothing.
11/18/09
11/18/09
Also, you can always go with editing software (you know - a legitimate copy) or screenwriting software. It's one of the few times that it isn't impersonal.
And of course, you can always have a family&friends-wide fund to save up for the good stuff. A $1,000 camera sounds like a lot until you have 10 people chipping in to pay for it.
11/18/09
11/18/09
#tips