Enter your username and password.
-
posts about #canonrebelt1i more →
Canon Rebel T1i vs Nikon D5000: Entry-Level DSLR Battlemodo
Nikon D5000 vs. Canon T1i: Place Your Bets

04/30/09
Kidding aside,
I think that the higher ISO on the Nikon looks better and will be more manageable in PP. Lack of noise means nothing if you lose all your detail with it.
Also you will see loss of detail on the Canon on those shots of the cats. Look in the lower left hand corner.
In the end I agree with you overall assessment, although for photos I would prefer the Nikon and the Canon for video.
04/30/09
04/30/09
04/30/09
04/30/09
04/30/09
04/30/09
Mehbeh I'm wrong, please explain.
04/30/09
04/30/09
04/30/09
04/30/09
Mind you, where I live, full frame rate is a leisurely 25 fps. Or 50 fields, if we're going to get picky about it.
04/30/09
04/30/09
04/30/09
04/30/09
I guess the review is thorough, too. But back to the granite, what sealer do you use?
04/30/09
04/29/09
04/29/09
You may find that while the camera says ISO6400 its closer to ISO3200 instead. Not as drastic as that, but you get my point.
04/29/09
04/29/09
04/29/09
Before anyone tries to lecture me on being an idiot, I'm JOKING. I still think Canon is better.
04/29/09
04/29/09
04/29/09
Oh for CHRIST'S SAKE GIZ!! Nobody cares about the Megapixel race since 6 MP on the Nikon D40 proved that consumers don't need anymore than that! And if anything, cramming more megapixels on the Canon will result in poorer images due to cross-pixel noise that increases as the ISO is increased. Also that 20fps 1080's usefulness is debatable and you all know it.
Way to be Canon fanbois.
04/29/09
In short, chill. We'll know if they're "Canon fanbois" when they declare a winner.
(And yes, I shoot on a D40. No point in wasting valuable lens money on something only incrementally better, though I certainly wouldn't turn down a D3 if it fell in my lap.)
04/29/09
04/29/09
04/29/09