There is also the carrying of aromatics out of the beverage through the carbonation, as per the recent articles on champagne bubbles. (e.g. [www.guardian.co.uk]). This only refers to bubbly, but I would be rather surprised if the same principle was not at work in other carbonated beverages. After all, beer and cola are full of aromatics as well. #gizmodoremainders
Wait so nobody felt the need to post about the baby nearly dying because it wasn't 'gadget-related' enough for Gizmodo, but you jumped in with a BREAKING article about a balloon flying away? And then posted 5 more articles about the most retarded hoax ever, even though it didn't have any "cellphone-related mayem?" #gizmodoremainders
@G-Ram: the balloon is actually a really cool gadget (er...was). Apparently once it was filled with helium there was a small electrical current applied to parts of the outer skin to help it navigate. I have no idea of the physics of it all (or even if it would work, since this guy is a bit weird as it is) but that's the story.
Whether or not giz knew that at the time is another thing. I think they just wanted to get a bit more site traffic :) #gizmodoremainders
Wait so this baby stroller video doesn't end with, "Just kidding, the baby was not actually in the stroller and was hiding in an attic" ? #gizmodoremainders
@92BuickLeSabre: You have to be careful with fudge, people tend to not temper their sugar properly which makes that crystallized dry crap that drips crumbs and shit all over you when you eat it.
@92BuickLeSabre: You choke on a dry lump of fudge with all the flavor and wonder of a charcoal briquette. Which, if you've just ingested poison might be the only way to save your life.
Actually, the actual final "boss" greenhouse gas is water vapor, not CO2. Still an interesting development, and hopefully this doesn't end up in theoretical limbo in science journals.
@Rabid Penguin: or their home universe has been destroyed, and our evolution was seeded. Wouldn't be that hard for a significantly advanced civilization to accomplish. Question is, why they wouldn't program any of their previous intelligence in us?
@lpranal: Maybe when they seeded Earth they only created one or two super-intelligent beings, and after thousands and thousands of years of inbreeding, here we are.
@lpranal: Maybe our instinct hasn't caught up to the level of intelligence they have prepared for us. Who knows, once we reach a certain point of evolution, it will trigger all of the sudden.
is the question of the existence of life in space really contested much in this day and age? with all the UFO sightings, all the high strangeness and government black projects, does anyone really believe that despite all the evidence to the contrary that so far no unearthly life has ever been encountered by man?
@nutbastard: Don't blame me i voted for Ron Paul edition: It can't really be contested unless a specific claim is made. That there 'may' be life out there isn't really contested. But assuming that intelligent life exists out there may not be an inevitability.
If you read enough on theoretical science and physics a common theme is the "goldilocks zone", or rather zones that the earth exists in. Basically, for intelligent life as we know it to evolve, many, many specific conditions have to be met. We aren't 100% certain how many of these zones are absolutely necessary for some level of intelligence to exist, but it's safe to say that the kind of intelligence that can travel between galaxies is a rare fucking thing.
But then the definition of "as we know it" is problematic. I have a hard time understanding the UFO phenomenon as extraterrestrial 'contact' or 'visitation'. The evidence that's out there doesn't isn't very convincing other than that something we don't understand is happening, and It could be nothing more than the 3-dimensional shadows of their 5-dimensional spaceships flying past our planet. My thinking is that any of our encounters with higher intelligences would be almost beyond our comprehension, i mean these guys could be x-ray colored and made out of dark matter, and eat black holes as a method of communication. The odds of finding something similar to us, that we can interact or have the remotest possibility of communicating with seem like a huge long shot.
"but it's safe to say that the kind of intelligence that can travel between galaxies is a rare fucking thing."
how do you define 'rare'? given the timescale of the universe, it's likely that there are races of technological beings thousands, millions, or even billions of years ahead of us. WE are going to figure out intergalactic travel in the next 1000 years if all goes well. so if you assume that any intelligent, driven population will eventually go starward, then you've got to conclude that, in all likelihood they already have.
I hope not. When I'm staring up at the sky, blanketed by a warm summer breeze, thinking about what is and what could be, asking my self the question "are we alone in this world", I'm usually naked. I do my best pondering while I'm naked. I don't need anyone staring at me.
@nutbastard: Don't blame me i voted for Ron Paul edition: The way I see it, to invest generations of development, years of toil and likely countless lost lives in the far longer path of technological advancement on their end, only to skulk about the heavens evading all of our modern means of detection, and reducing any onlookers to raving lunatics would be a seriously monumental, no, galactic waste of time.
10/17/09
10/17/09
10/17/09
and babies #gizmodoremainders
10/17/09
10/17/09
10/17/09
Whether or not giz knew that at the time is another thing. I think they just wanted to get a bit more site traffic :) #gizmodoremainders
10/16/09
10/16/09
10/16/09
10/16/09
04/20/09
04/20/09
04/20/09
04/20/09
04/20/09
04/20/09
04/20/09
04/20/09
04/20/09
04/20/09
04/20/09
04/20/09
04/20/09
04/20/09
04/20/09
04/20/09
04/20/09
04/20/09
04/20/09
[www.thesun.co.uk]
12/10/08
12/10/08
12/10/08
12/10/08
There home planet has been destroyed. They're all already on Earth.
12/10/08
12/10/08
12/10/08
12/10/08
12/10/08
12/10/08
If you read enough on theoretical science and physics a common theme is the "goldilocks zone", or rather zones that the earth exists in. Basically, for intelligent life as we know it to evolve, many, many specific conditions have to be met. We aren't 100% certain how many of these zones are absolutely necessary for some level of intelligence to exist, but it's safe to say that the kind of intelligence that can travel between galaxies is a rare fucking thing.
But then the definition of "as we know it" is problematic. I have a hard time understanding the UFO phenomenon as extraterrestrial 'contact' or 'visitation'. The evidence that's out there doesn't isn't very convincing other than that something we don't understand is happening, and It could be nothing more than the 3-dimensional shadows of their 5-dimensional spaceships flying past our planet. My thinking is that any of our encounters with higher intelligences would be almost beyond our comprehension, i mean these guys could be x-ray colored and made out of dark matter, and eat black holes as a method of communication. The odds of finding something similar to us, that we can interact or have the remotest possibility of communicating with seem like a huge long shot.
12/10/08
"but it's safe to say that the kind of intelligence that can travel between galaxies is a rare fucking thing."
how do you define 'rare'? given the timescale of the universe, it's likely that there are races of technological beings thousands, millions, or even billions of years ahead of us. WE are going to figure out intergalactic travel in the next 1000 years if all goes well. so if you assume that any intelligent, driven population will eventually go starward, then you've got to conclude that, in all likelihood they already have.
video:
12/10/08
12/10/08
12/10/08