Senior Contributing Editors:
Jesus Diaz
| AIM | Twitter
Mark Wilson, Reviews
| AIM | Twitter
Contributing Editors:
Matt Buchanan | AIM | Twitter
Adam Frucci | Twitter
Sean Fallon | Twitter
Jack Loftus | Twitter
John Herrman | Twitter
Dan Nosowitz
Chris Mascari
Kat Hannaford | Twitter
Rosa Golijan | Twitter
Chris Jacob
I'd recommend not using cellphones while driving, period.
But I know the exact same people that really NEEDS to stop using their cellphones while driving will never respect such a recommendation or even a law if it existed, so AT LEAST people should user speaker systems... not headsets, but speakers.
It'd be closer to having someone on the passenger seat talking to you.
Another comment nailed it though: the problem with all the car crashes isn't the cellphone or whatever... it's just lack of common sense from drivers.
People just don't realize anymore the dangers of driving, and how they are dragging around tons of metal in high speed which requires very little to kill people around.
And this will never change unless the entire society drastically changes on so many levels that- well, I think we are closer to creating a system that enables cars to crash without killing it's passangers inside than changing the mindset of it's users.
Do empirical evidence and double blind studies mean anything anymore?
June 29, 2006 -- Three years after the preliminary results first were presented at a scientific meeting and drew wide attention, University of Utah psychologists have published a study showing that motorists who talk on handheld or hands-free cellular phones are as impaired as drunken drivers. [www.unews.utah.edu]
Using a driving simulator under four different conditions: with no distractions, using a handheld cell phone, talking on a hands-free cell phone, and while intoxicated to the 0.08 percent blood-alcohol level, 40 participants followed a simulated pace car that braked intermittently.
Researchers found that the drivers on cell phones drove more slowly, braked more slowly and were more likely to crash. In fact, the three participants who collided into the pace car were chatting away. None of the drunken drivers crashed. [news.cnet.com]
The studies just go on and on, this is not climate change, this is settled science.
Anecdotal evidence is for kids.
I remember the same trash talk about seat belts...
@Nathan Obbards: Yeah, pretty weird... I can easily think of places to keep at least 6 more of them. Only having three would suggest that somebody hasn't moved on past pockets just yet.
@Nathan Obbards: Haha, I saw that too. Maybe he/she keeps forgetting where he/she put it, and gets a new one, and keeps dropping them in the basket without looking.
I regularly drive on the Belt Parkway in both bumper-to-bumper traffic and while going 70 mph in a 50 zone while talking on the phone with a headset. I also talk on the phone while doing 90 in the left lane on the Jersey Turnpike.
At the same time, I leave stopping distance, regularly check my mirrors, and keep a close eye on the cars immediately around me in case they decide to cut me off.
If you can't handle doing two things at once, you shouldn't be driving on busy highways at rush hour.
11:54 AM
Now, texting while driving... that's just courting Darwin.
02:25 AM
12/14/09
12/14/09
Id assume the House is the same way.
12/14/09
12/14/09
But I know the exact same people that really NEEDS to stop using their cellphones while driving will never respect such a recommendation or even a law if it existed, so AT LEAST people should user speaker systems... not headsets, but speakers.
It'd be closer to having someone on the passenger seat talking to you.
Another comment nailed it though: the problem with all the car crashes isn't the cellphone or whatever... it's just lack of common sense from drivers.
People just don't realize anymore the dangers of driving, and how they are dragging around tons of metal in high speed which requires very little to kill people around.
And this will never change unless the entire society drastically changes on so many levels that- well, I think we are closer to creating a system that enables cars to crash without killing it's passangers inside than changing the mindset of it's users.
12/14/09
June 29, 2006 -- Three years after the preliminary results first were presented at a scientific meeting and drew wide attention, University of Utah psychologists have published a study showing that motorists who talk on handheld or hands-free cellular phones are as impaired as drunken drivers.
[www.unews.utah.edu]
Using a driving simulator under four different conditions: with no distractions, using a handheld cell phone, talking on a hands-free cell phone, and while intoxicated to the 0.08 percent blood-alcohol level, 40 participants followed a simulated pace car that braked intermittently.
Researchers found that the drivers on cell phones drove more slowly, braked more slowly and were more likely to crash. In fact, the three participants who collided into the pace car were chatting away. None of the drunken drivers crashed.
[news.cnet.com]
The studies just go on and on, this is not climate change, this is settled science.
Anecdotal evidence is for kids.
I remember the same trash talk about seat belts...
12/14/09
12/14/09
12/14/09
12/14/09
12/14/09
12/14/09
12/14/09
12/14/09
12/14/09
Post its - The root of all evil.
12/14/09
12/14/09
12/14/09
That said, I now have some nefarious ideas with Post-It notes.
12/14/09
12/14/09
12/14/09
I regularly drive on the Belt Parkway in both bumper-to-bumper traffic and while going 70 mph in a 50 zone while talking on the phone with a headset. I also talk on the phone while doing 90 in the left lane on the Jersey Turnpike.
At the same time, I leave stopping distance, regularly check my mirrors, and keep a close eye on the cars immediately around me in case they decide to cut me off.
If you can't handle doing two things at once, you shouldn't be driving on busy highways at rush hour.