Senior Contributing Editors:
Jesus Diaz
| AIM | Twitter
Mark Wilson, Reviews
| AIM | Twitter
Contributing Editors:
Matt Buchanan | AIM | Twitter
Adam Frucci | Twitter
Sean Fallon | Twitter
Jack Loftus | Twitter
John Herrman | Twitter
Dan Nosowitz
Chris Mascari
Danny Allen | Twitter
Rosa Golijan | Twitter
Chris Jacob
I will buy a Blu-Ray player if it goes to a hundred. But only if it comes with a built-in DVD upscaler. Netflix streaming capabilites are optional, but definitely desired. But seriously, a Blu-Ray player without a DVD upscaler is worthless to me.
@OCEntertainment: That is pretty much a given. I don't know of any blu-ray players that don't do it because it is so cheap to add as a feature. However, depending on how good your TV is, you are probably better off letting your TV do the upscaling.
I would hope these Chinese no name blu-ray players come in at less than $99 by Christmas time. I would rather pay the $129 for a Magnavox or $149 for a Samsung that we had last year than pay $99 next year for a no name player. Yea, I know Magnavox is just a Funai player that has been badged with Magnavox rather than Emerson or Symphonic, but I would still rather pay the $30 more to get that than some brand I have never heard of and be able to get it a year earlier.
@Mr_Human: There are more things to picture quality than just resolution alone. Upconverting attempts to fix the resolution problem, but not perfectly. No matter how you look at it, an upconvertor is trying to make 720 or 1080 lines out of 480, so it is not going to be the same as blu-ray because the details just simply don't exist. Other than that, the audio quality and color saturation on a blu-ray disc are going to be better, and really, the color is more important than the resolution in a lot of cases. I would much rather watch a 720p Samsung LCD than a 1080p Vizio LCD and if you compare that same 1080p Vizio to almost any 720p plasma, the plasma is still going to easily win hands down.
THe deeper question is: Will this force Sony to do a PS3 pricecut, which they've been really good at avoiding so far, if the value of half the system is dminished?
I bought a $99 DVD player around the time of the PS2's second year I think, and PS2 dropped to $from $299 to $199 around the same time. I'll still gladly pay more for a PS3, but a break to $299 or including a stack of free movies or something would soften the blow...
@Zac Shipley: "Will this force Sony to do a PS3 pricecut, which they've been really good at avoiding so far, if the value of half the system is dminished?"
And the answer to that question is No. Thank you for participating.
@oliveboy: I wish I could agree with your seemingly impeccable logic. Unfortunately, it may not work out that way.
To the contrary, it's very possible we will see Blu-ray follow the pattern of inkjet printers and ink cartridges, where the Blu-ray player (inkjet printer) is practically given away so that you continue to buy overpriced BD movie discs (ink cartridges).
If they're not 2.0 compliant or have internal DolbyTrueHD/DTS-HD decoding (which I HIGHLY doubt they will,) they serve no purpose for me.
Yeah, $99 is nice, but it's also preferred to have all the features. When I can get a standalone blu-ray player for ~$150 & below that has all the features, I'll happily buy one.
@Costner: You are giving the typical, mass-market consumer far too much credit. It won't matter whether or not these players are 2.0 compliant (or if they even have a regular complement of other expected features). Joe Average is just going to see "Blu-ray" and "$99" and it's a done deal.
04/21/09
04/21/09
04/21/09
04/21/09
04/21/09
04/21/09
I bought a $99 DVD player around the time of the PS2's second year I think, and PS2 dropped to $from $299 to $199 around the same time. I'll still gladly pay more for a PS3, but a break to $299 or including a stack of free movies or something would soften the blow...
04/21/09
And the answer to that question is No. Thank you for participating.
NEXT!
04/21/09
04/21/09
To the contrary, it's very possible we will see Blu-ray follow the pattern of inkjet printers and ink cartridges, where the Blu-ray player (inkjet printer) is practically given away so that you continue to buy overpriced BD movie discs (ink cartridges).
04/21/09
Yeah, $99 is nice, but it's also preferred to have all the features. When I can get a standalone blu-ray player for ~$150 & below that has all the features, I'll happily buy one.
Until then, my HTPC blu-ray drive will suffice.q
04/21/09
04/21/09
04/21/09