<![CDATA[Gizmodo: china mobile]]> http://tags.gizmodo.com/assets/base/img/thumbs140x140/gizmodo.com.png <![CDATA[Gizmodo: china mobile]]> http://gizmodo.com/tag/chinamobile http://gizmodo.com/tag/chinamobile <![CDATA[Rumored Lenovo oPhone OS Looks Too Apple-like]]> Chinese bloggers have posted photos that are rumored to depict what the Lenovo oPhone's operating system looks like. Apparently, much like their moniker, the oPhone OS also has that slight Apple-y touch.

Rounded square icons against a black background? It's like they're not even trying to differentiate themselves. Also iPhone like - you slide your finger across the screen to move to the next page of apps.

As a play on their name, the pointer icon is in the shape of an "o." Cute, though it looks like there might be some freezing problems in the initial OS build - check out that shadow in the bottom left corner.

There's an included tab for a customizable list that will give you quick access to your favorite programs. It kind of looks like the iPhone's iTunes page to me.

And this is what it looks like when you bring up the call screen. The numerals are nice, big and bold.

Quite honestly, I'm hoping this doesn't turn out to be the oPhone's final OS design. I was looking forward to getting something that had iPhone-like capabilities, but better—not something that's just more of the same (with a few added specs tacked on). If I wanted an iPhone copycat, I'd just buy a Meizu. [I love oPhone]

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5181550&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Lenovo OPhone Sizes Up Against iPhone, iPhone 3G]]> Some China bloggers got hold of a Lenovo OPhone shell and did a sizemodo against the iPhone and iPhone 3G. Verdict: Similar slimness with more features. *swoon* I know what I want for Christmas.

The OPhone is roughly 1mm bigger than the original iPhone in all dimensions, measuring in at 115.84x61.57x12.03mm. Besides the volume rocker, the OPhone also has its microSD slot on the left side. According to the China bloggers, it'll support microSD cards of up to 16GB.

The phone from the other side. This is supposed to be a dedicated camera button, which I guess makes the OPhone more comfortable to take landscape photos with.

Here's the butt of all three phones. As you can see, the OPhone's placed its headphone jack on its bottom. Also residing down there is the microUSB slot for charging and PC synchronizing. I wonder if that placement choice will render it incompatible with certain speaker docking systems.

On the backside is a removable battery, as well as a flash for the 5MP camera— two things it has on the iPhone. Assuming everything works like it's supposed to, this will be a serious contender to the iPhone and other smartphones. Guess we'll see Q1 next year. Merry Christmas from here in Asia! [Sina Blog]

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5118040&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Lenovo's China-Only Android OPhone Gives Us An O-Face]]> Aside from its wretched battery life, I dig the G1 hardware. But the first shots of the OPhone, Lenovo's Android phone for China Mobile, are making me sad I'm not in Shanghai with Elaine.

We knew Lenovo was planning on bringing out one of the first Chinese Android pieces, we just didn't know it would look this nice; we've only this one shot to go on, but already I'm loving those polka dot send/end/clear buttons. And another thing worth noting is that from this single shot, it doesn't look like the OPhone includes a hardware QWERTY, meaning aside from chinese character stylus entry, the China Mobile folks may have taken some steps forward in developing a software touch keyboard for Android.

Unfortunately, importing this thing will be an impossibility, since it runs on China's own proprietary TD-SCDMA 3G network and will likely feature a customized version of Android that incorporates China Mobile's own homegrown apps and services. Still, it's a good carrot to dangle in front of HTC's nose. [ModMyGphone]

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5108251&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Chinese iPhone 3G Won't Have 3G or Wi-Fi]]> According to the South China Morning Post, in China the iPhone 3G won't have 3G or Wi-Fi. China Mobile wants Apple to disable these two features. The first because they don't have a 3G network in place. The second nobody knows or can imagine why, but it simply makes the iPhone an almost-useless shiny brick. [Cellular News via Gadget Lab]

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5054599&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[China Unicom "Willing to Discuss" iPhone Deal]]> Now that China Unicom is heaving its 156 million subscribers into the ring across from China Mobile's 350 mil in the opening wrassle for the iPhone's Chinese distribution rights, the American market is looking pretty small. A Unicom exec said: "We're not in any discussions with Apple right now, but we're always willing to discuss a good business opportunity." Yesterday China Mobile said it was interested in the iPhone, but not the revenue-sharing scheme that cuts Apple a piece of subscriptions. Analysts say that although this could give Unicom some leverage (if they cave in to Steve), Unicom isn't any more likely to be cool with rev-share either. Oh China, don't you want to sell your soul for a pretty pretty iPhone? [NewsFactor]

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=322730&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[China Mobile CEO Calls iPhone "Fashionable" But Questions Apple Revenue Sharing]]> It's no shock that China Mobile is doing the courtship dance with Apple: the company is the world's largest phone carrier and as of yet, Apple has no announced Chinese carrier partner. China Mobile's CEO, Wang Jianzhou, also stated supreme obviousness when he told reporters, "Our customers like this kind of fashionable product." What makes this newsworthy is the fact that the carrier has problems with the revenue-sharing model, which gives Apple a piece of the subscription pie in addition to handset sales. Says Wang: "We still think we can maintain the operator-centric model because we have the customers." 350 million of them, at last tally. Is that enough to break Apple's streak? [IDG]

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=322065&view=rss&microfeed=true