@J2M3: Neutral. Nehalem was already used in the Pros, so the support was there. I'm not big on hackintoshing, but there may be some particulars to the P55 motherboards that it helps because of the new i5/i7's being used. #newimacs
One should also note that the high end 27" has the 2.8 Ghz core i7 option. What you gain from this is a virtual 8 cores, due to hyper-threading being enabled. The core i5 does not feature hyper-threading, but is still a quad-core processor. #newimacs
@Lite: hates Illinois Nazis: If it takes advantage of multiple cores, it takes advantage of hyper-threading. People were coding programs with independent threads even before we had dual cores. The advantage of having hyper-threading is the Turbo Boost. If you use 2 threads in one core as opposed to 1 thread in 2 cores, that 1st core can be OC'ed more than those two, yielding higher performance. #newimacs
@Lite: hates Illinois Nazis: All you need to take advantage of it is more threads running concurrently. Even if NONE of your apps take advantage of HyperThreading directly, you will benefit from it.
Hyperthreading wasn't absent from Intel's newer chips because it was inherently bad -- it was absent because it was first baked into the Pentium 4 architecture, which as you may recall, was a steaming pile. They have in recent years ported HT to the Atom and i7 architectures.
HT was a MUST-HAVE for the P4 because it's obscenely-long pipeline made cache misses too expensive. In a CPU with an architecture as short as a Core2Duo it's not nearly as beneficial.
So help me understand, because obviously 7 is moar better then 5, but it's not clear from your prior article what I'm missing out on:
The new Core i7 chips, launched last month, are for desktop and mobile. The desktop variant is codenamed Lynnfield, and it more closely resembles its mobile equivalent, codenamed Clarksfield, than it does the Bloomfield monster—dual-channel memory, not triple, for instance.
...
Core i5 is going to be Intel's more mainstream Nehalem-microarchitecture chip brand, and as a broader brand, the chip differentiation gets a little more confusing. Core i5 actually includes some, but not all, of the desktop Lynnfield processors. For now, the only Core i5 chip is quad-core, but you're going to start seeing dual-core Core i5 chips, and soon enough they will make up the bulk of Intel's mainstream processors. In English: Unless you're looking for a crazyfast new computer, your next machine will probably run an Intel Core i5 CPU.
Is i5 not as "crazyfast" as i7? Am I being crazy to hold out? I run an i7 on my desktop and the system screams - but I crave the design sensibility/form factor/software suite of the MB Pro. Help me understand more clearly the i5/i7 tradeoffs, wise one. #newimacs
@Unsolicited Advice: The core i7 features hyper-threading (allow a second thread to be run on each core for a total of 8), and Intel has also hamstringed the motherboards for i5 by limiting the number of PCI express channels (as well as three down to two memory channels). Turns out, game benchmarks don't give a shit. So, gamers are starting to migrate to the i5 cores now. #newimacs
So there's a requirement for software support that's likely to be some time coming. Hyperthreading has been in and out of Intel's product lines IIRC because utilization has been low. An i5 will still scream, but processing-intensive tasks like encoding and the like have untapped potential in an i7 that might be incorporated by developers into apps like ProTools, etc. - processors where you're encoding or crunching a lot of data. Sounds safe enough to me.
So then, Steve, my business proposition is clear - shove an i5 or better into the MacBook Pro and you will receive $2K-$3K. But I'm not buying a C2D in late 2009. #newimacs
@Unsolicited Advice: Yeah, you got it right, now. I am sure that dual-core i5s will show up in MacBook Pros soon. And thanks Anexanhume—you must be related to Matt Buchanan! #newimacs
@Unsolicited Advice: Expect MBP updates in Early 2010 (perhaps February to April) with core i5 branded parts. They will be 32 nm dual core parts with IGP and hyper-threading. #newimacs
@Bizdady: BILLY MAYES HERE WITH PROCESSOR PUTTY. ITS SO STRONG, IT CAN HOLD NOT TWO ATHLON64x2s , BUT 4 ATHLON64 CPUs TOGETHER FOR FASTER PROCESSING POWER ACT NOW AND I'LL THROW IN NOT ONE, NOT TWO, NOT EVEN FOUR STICKS OF DDR3 RAM, I'LL THROW IN 8 STICKS OF DDR3 RAM! THAT VINCE GUY PEDDLING INTELS HAS NOTHING ON THIS! ACT NOW!
@Stndsh0: Like myself, you are a unapproved commenter. Don't worry, people will see the comments that are deemed worthy of approval by those with stars.
If they don't approve it, thank them, it's probably better no one saw it anyway...
@SigmundTheSeaMonster: Yeah, I actually work twice a week in South Jersey, about 3 miles from the TJ on 73. However, I am about 3 miles from one here in PA and when the BYOB dinner invite comes, I am often visiting the Spirits Shoppe. I should just have some on hand, but it seems odd to store $3-a-bottle wine, you know?
When I was 20, and my friend was 21, he drove over the Tacony Palmyra bridge, pulled a U turn at one Roger Wilco and hit the other, crappier one on the westbound side of 73. He purchased a few bottles of booze and hopped in the car and headed back to the bridge. We got pulled over in between the toll booths and the bridge, the cop asked him to see the alcohol he purchased and informed him it was illegal to take it accross the bridge. At this point my buddy looks at the cop and says 'I thought this was the UNITED States'. Fun night, true story.
@mathemology: They just built a Trader Joes close to me in the Twin Cities. Apparently, the shipping charge for 1 bottle of wine is 1 dollar because the Charles Shaw here is $2.99. It may be 3 buck chuck but it is still worth it.
@resource: No immediate affect, as hardware needs to be coded to support multiple cores. There is a diminishing effect for adding more cores to a CPU, as the jump from 2 to 4 won't be as big as 1 to 2, etc...
CPU intensive tasks that can be performed in a parallel fashion are what scale the easiest. Usually this involves programs that work with large sets of data like video encodes or photo processing. It should also take off more burden when multi-tasking. However, it will NOT make single-core programs like Office any faster.
10/20/09
i7 sounds good. Anyone have any idea of the difficulty level to transfer an Adobe CS3 license to a new computer?
Thanks #newimacs
10/20/09
10/20/09
10/20/09
10/20/09
10/20/09
10/20/09
10/20/09
I mean, Intel hasn't had a ht capable CPU for over 4 years between it's Core Duo and Core 2 Duo cpus... #newimacs
10/20/09
10/20/09
Hyperthreading wasn't absent from Intel's newer chips because it was inherently bad -- it was absent because it was first baked into the Pentium 4 architecture, which as you may recall, was a steaming pile. They have in recent years ported HT to the Atom and i7 architectures.
HT was a MUST-HAVE for the P4 because it's obscenely-long pipeline made cache misses too expensive. In a CPU with an architecture as short as a Core2Duo it's not nearly as beneficial.
10/20/09
10/20/09
10/20/09
10/20/09
So help me understand, because obviously 7 is moar better then 5, but it's not clear from your prior article what I'm missing out on:
The new Core i7 chips, launched last month, are for desktop and mobile. The desktop variant is codenamed Lynnfield, and it more closely resembles its mobile equivalent, codenamed Clarksfield, than it does the Bloomfield monster—dual-channel memory, not triple, for instance.
...
Core i5 is going to be Intel's more mainstream Nehalem-microarchitecture chip brand, and as a broader brand, the chip differentiation gets a little more confusing. Core i5 actually includes some, but not all, of the desktop Lynnfield processors. For now, the only Core i5 chip is quad-core, but you're going to start seeing dual-core Core i5 chips, and soon enough they will make up the bulk of Intel's mainstream processors. In English: Unless you're looking for a crazyfast new computer, your next machine will probably run an Intel Core i5 CPU.
Is i5 not as "crazyfast" as i7? Am I being crazy to hold out? I run an i7 on my desktop and the system screams - but I crave the design sensibility/form factor/software suite of the MB Pro. Help me understand more clearly the i5/i7 tradeoffs, wise one. #newimacs
10/20/09
10/20/09
So there's a requirement for software support that's likely to be some time coming. Hyperthreading has been in and out of Intel's product lines IIRC because utilization has been low. An i5 will still scream, but processing-intensive tasks like encoding and the like have untapped potential in an i7 that might be incorporated by developers into apps like ProTools, etc. - processors where you're encoding or crunching a lot of data. Sounds safe enough to me.
So then, Steve, my business proposition is clear - shove an i5 or better into the MacBook Pro and you will receive $2K-$3K. But I'm not buying a C2D in late 2009. #newimacs
10/20/09
10/20/09
09/16/09
09/16/09
09/16/09
09/16/09
09/16/09
09/16/09
09/16/09
09/16/09
09/16/09
If they don't approve it, thank them, it's probably better no one saw it anyway...
09/16/09
08/28/09
08/28/09
08/28/09
08/28/09
08/28/09
08/28/09
08/28/09
08/28/09
When I was 20, and my friend was 21, he drove over the Tacony Palmyra bridge, pulled a U turn at one Roger Wilco and hit the other, crappier one on the westbound side of 73. He purchased a few bottles of booze and hopped in the car and headed back to the bridge. We got pulled over in between the toll booths and the bridge, the cop asked him to see the alcohol he purchased and informed him it was illegal to take it accross the bridge. At this point my buddy looks at the cop and says 'I thought this was the UNITED States'. Fun night, true story.
08/28/09
08/28/09
08/28/09
08/28/09
08/28/09
08/28/09
07/15/09
I have a 2.0 GHz c2d.
If I get a 2.0 GHz with four quads will my CD's and DVDs rip faster?
What will be the immediate effect?
07/15/09
CPU intensive tasks that can be performed in a parallel fashion are what scale the easiest. Usually this involves programs that work with large sets of data like video encodes or photo processing. It should also take off more burden when multi-tasking. However, it will NOT make single-core programs like Office any faster.