Senior Contributing Editors:
Jesus Diaz
| AIM | Twitter
Mark Wilson, Reviews
| AIM | Twitter
Contributing Editors:
Matt Buchanan | AIM | Twitter
Adam Frucci | Twitter
Sean Fallon | Twitter
Jack Loftus | Twitter
John Herrman | Twitter
Dan Nosowitz
Chris Mascari
Kat Hannaford | Twitter
Rosa Golijan | Twitter
Chris Jacob
"All active electronic devices, including wireless receivers used to trigger to IEDs - radiate electronic energy, and US researchers have developed ways to detect and identify such devices based on these "unintentional" emissions."
I'm damned glad that we are getting tech like this into service. I've had too many friends injured/killed from (comparatively) stone aged tech overseas. Hope this works as well as advertised. #unmannediedsniffinghelicopter
"will be able to survey areas for the electromagnetic emissions associated with receivers and provide an early warning to soldiers." ???
In my book a receiver is passive and can't be detected, less getting its "electromagnetic emissions associated". What's next? warp drive?... #unmannediedsniffinghelicopter
@The Lab: Actually, that is one way that can be sent.
While it would be bad form for me to mention exactly how it works, it is within the safety briefings that troops of many countries are given. #unmannediedsniffinghelicopter
Soldier_CLE says DON'T STOP AT THE STAR! REVOKE THE WHOLE DAMN THING, OWEN!!! was starred
Soldier_CLE says DON'T STOP AT THE STAR! REVOKE THE WHOLE DAMN THING, OWEN!!! was unstarred
@Meantux: Most receivers use oscillators to tune their receiver, and those oscillators emit RF. Sensitive detection circuitry can tell if you have a receiver operating, and what frequency it's tuned to.
It's similar to the way the VG-2 "radar detector detector" works - it listens for frequencies emitted by your radar detector as it listens for radar, and alerts the police that you have a radar detector in the car. #unmannediedsniffinghelicopter
Soldier_CLE says DON'T STOP AT THE STAR! REVOKE THE WHOLE DAMN THING, OWEN!!! was starred
Soldier_CLE says DON'T STOP AT THE STAR! REVOKE THE WHOLE DAMN THING, OWEN!!! was unstarred
During this flight the craft rose out of hearing of those on the ground.
Just before coming back into audible range, however, one small nearsighted child with a knit cap looked up and said, "Choppers!"
This thing can't fly. There are no control surfaces for turning. On a real helicopter, the main rotor blades have little linkages near the main turbine that allow the pilot to tilt the blades. Real helicopters also have the ability to title the whole main shaft and blades forward and backwards.
That's how real helicopters move forward, backwards, left and right. Notice all of that is missing from this thing.
If he did even get off the ground, and managed to power the rear rotor enough to keep the vehicle from spinning wildly out of control, he'd have no way to control the path of his flight. He'd literally be at the mercy of the wind.
@Travis Collins: As a helicopter pilot, I would have to say that it would take some serious balls to even get 1 foot off the ground in this thing. I doubt that engine could do it with that tiny amount of rotor surface area.
Shenna.......Bullshit! just Bullshit! Is that rope holding the engine in place? If RC helicopters have taught me anything, it's that you cannot tie the engine in place and get off the ground.
Jack Loftus promoted this comment
weshirecat tells it in the form of a question? was starred
weshirecat tells it in the form of a question? was unstarred
@Elliuotatar: Are you implying that because Mythbusters could not get off the ground with a pair of 4' ducted fans, someone else would not be able to build a helicopter? It's basic propeller theory... a larger propeller will produce more thrust with the same amount of power with a lower flow velocity. It's the reason why turbofans are so much more efficient than turbojets, and turboprops are so much more efficient than turbo fans, but each is capable of lower top speeds than the last.
Don't get me wrong, I think this is awesome. But is anyone else bothered by the entire quote in the original story that says he managed to assemble this thing using "relevant knowledge [found while] surfing the internet via my prototype 4G Apple iPhone?"
Why do I want to call shenanigans on this one?
Oh right... because wood would splinter and fly apart if it was subjected to the kind of stress needed to lift an object like that.
Not buying it. Someone may have built it, but I'm not going to believe that it can fly.
@dufus: We have a call of Shenanigans! But this call is being declined by this self admitted "dufus" not knowing that some plane propellers are still made today of said "wood", and that the first helicopters were flown in the 1900's, well before the common usage of fiberglass, aluminum, and carbon fibre.
@GitEmSteveDave_HasAList: While I recognize that the earliest props were made from wood, the wood they used was largely laminated for strength and had to be tuned to keep the device from wobbling apart.
I'm still not buying it.
OK, so let me see if I have the totals correct. So far Chinese "Farmers" have built a helicopter, a plane(or two), and robots. For some reason, I'm starting to think SkyNet isn't the one to fear/watch.
11/03/09
"All active electronic devices, including wireless receivers used to trigger to IEDs - radiate electronic energy, and US researchers have developed ways to detect and identify such devices based on these "unintentional" emissions."
I'm damned glad that we are getting tech like this into service. I've had too many friends injured/killed from (comparatively) stone aged tech overseas. Hope this works as well as advertised. #unmannediedsniffinghelicopter
11/03/09
11/03/09
11/03/09
In my book a receiver is passive and can't be detected, less getting its "electromagnetic emissions associated". What's next? warp drive?... #unmannediedsniffinghelicopter
11/03/09
11/03/09
While it would be bad form for me to mention exactly how it works, it is within the safety briefings that troops of many countries are given. #unmannediedsniffinghelicopter
11/03/09
It's similar to the way the VG-2 "radar detector detector" works - it listens for frequencies emitted by your radar detector as it listens for radar, and alerts the police that you have a radar detector in the car. #unmannediedsniffinghelicopter
11/03/09
DARPA.... get to work on it! #unmannediedsniffinghelicopter
08/09/09
Just before coming back into audible range, however, one small nearsighted child with a knit cap looked up and said, "Choppers!"
08/09/09
08/09/09
That's how real helicopters move forward, backwards, left and right. Notice all of that is missing from this thing.
If he did even get off the ground, and managed to power the rear rotor enough to keep the vehicle from spinning wildly out of control, he'd have no way to control the path of his flight. He'd literally be at the mercy of the wind.
08/09/09
it's controlled by Party doctrine.
08/09/09
08/09/09
08/09/09
08/09/09
08/09/09
There's no way this thing worked.
08/09/09
08/09/09
08/09/09
08/09/09
Oh right... because wood would splinter and fly apart if it was subjected to the kind of stress needed to lift an object like that.
Not buying it. Someone may have built it, but I'm not going to believe that it can fly.
08/09/09
@dufus: We have a call of Shenanigans! But this call is being declined by this self admitted "dufus" not knowing that some plane propellers are still made today of said "wood", and that the first helicopters were flown in the 1900's, well before the common usage of fiberglass, aluminum, and carbon fibre.
08/09/09
[en.wikipedia.org]
08/09/09
08/09/09
[www.woodenpropeller.com]
[www.modernwoodenpropellers.com]
A fixed wing propeller rotates at much higher speed and thus is exposed to greater forces than a rotary wing is.
Many aircraft today still use wooden props - they are things of engineering and aesthetic beauty.
So; your comment = fail.
08/10/09
I'm still not buying it.
08/09/09
08/09/09
08/09/09
07/09/09
07/08/09