Senior Contributing Editors:
Jesus Diaz
| AIM | Twitter
Mark Wilson, Reviews
| AIM | Twitter
Contributing Editors:
Matt Buchanan | AIM | Twitter
Adam Frucci | Twitter
Sean Fallon | Twitter
Jack Loftus | Twitter
John Herrman | Twitter
Dan Nosowitz
Chris Mascari
Kat Hannaford | Twitter
Rosa Golijan | Twitter
Chris Jacob
We will fight, on our honor! What is right - we'll defend! Fight the zone - zone riders! Earth's most powerful soldiers, are Earth's last chance against the Spiral Zone !
Don;t get me wrong, a user friendly experience is paramount ... but not when it takes away your only USP and leaves you with a silly looking alternative of a pre-existing product.
It's a necessary evil because of the way it works. The Uno accelerates by leaning forward, similar to a Segway. If you lean forward too much at too high of a speed there is a danger of face-planting. The Segway automatically slows down at a certain tilt and the body's natural reaction is to lean back, returning the tilt to a safe level and keeping the rider on the vehicle. The Uno, in the interest of allowing this thing to be used on public roads, had to do this, or be condemned to a 20mph internal speed limit.
His idea was to make something with better low speed turning for more city oriented travel, unicycle can turn on a dime with the included technology. It makes sense and I personally prefer his new design. Segways already scare the crap out of me as you lean to accelerate, a 60 mph Segway would be very uncomfortable.
a segway at 60 mph would be almost unridable. the lack of a suspension coupled with side by side wheels means every bump exerts its, uh, bumpiness all at once. even tiny speed bumps in parking lots are virtually insurmountable obstacles.
granted larger wheels would help, as would a suspension, but the side by side issue means that all impacts are doomed to be dangerous.
@nutbastard: Exactly why it's better to have one wheel extend at higher speed. You still have the small turning radius at low speeds, something I wish my motorcycle could accomplish, while the safety of a motorcycle at high speeds.
@njdevil: well considering that slowing down/stopping is simply acceleration in the opposite direction, if the vehicle can start, it should have no problem stopping.
@anole3000: A unicycle would have same problem going 0-20mph in under 5 seconds as going from 20-0mph in under 5 seconds. You just end up with a different half of your body broken.
Momentum, inertia, Center of Gravity and all that good stuff have a lot to say here
12/14/09
12/14/09
And the tandem Unicycle next to it seems pretty bad too.
12/14/09
12/14/09
Almost as silly as the bike above.
12/14/09
12/14/09
12/14/09
I weigh about 200 pounds and my wife is about 135....
12/14/09
12/14/09
Wait, can you do wheelies if you only have one wheel?
12/14/09
12/04/09
12/04/09
12/04/09
And why would anyone want to go faster than 20mph anyway?
12/03/09
12/03/09
12/03/09
Spiral Zone !
12/03/09
Don;t get me wrong, a user friendly experience is paramount ... but not when it takes away your only USP and leaves you with a silly looking alternative of a pre-existing product.
12/03/09
12/03/09
12/03/09
12/03/09
You gots ta pump ya brakes and ride slow, homie!
12/03/09
12/03/09
a segway at 60 mph would be almost unridable. the lack of a suspension coupled with side by side wheels means every bump exerts its, uh, bumpiness all at once. even tiny speed bumps in parking lots are virtually insurmountable obstacles.
granted larger wheels would help, as would a suspension, but the side by side issue means that all impacts are doomed to be dangerous.
12/03/09
12/03/09
This looks exactly like the rex wheelie, minus the fangs and eyeball.
12/03/09
12/03/09
12/03/09
12/03/09
12/03/09
Momentum, inertia, Center of Gravity and all that good stuff have a lot to say here