Senior Contributing Editors:
Jesus Diaz
| AIM | Twitter
Mark Wilson, Reviews
| AIM | Twitter
Contributing Editors:
Matt Buchanan | AIM | Twitter
Adam Frucci | Twitter
Sean Fallon | Twitter
Jack Loftus | Twitter
John Herrman | Twitter
Dan Nosowitz
Chris Mascari
Danny Allen | Twitter
Rosa Golijan | Twitter
Chris Jacob
I wish the companies would keep redundant controls on the dashboard. Yeah., it is nice to control everything with one knob but if they left the redundant controls on the dashboard people would be more apt to learn the controller. And I should NEVER have to scroll through menus to operate the radio.
Voice recognition would seem like an easier, safer option than drawing letters on a touch pad. Sure, you have to stop talking to the people in the car for a moment, or, you might have to turn down the music for a moment, but really... Wouldn't the passenger (unless it's a woman! Am-I-right, guys?) be the person to take care of inputting whatever it is you need to find/lookup/etc.. anyway?
@Noobs-R-Us: Because it defeats the entire purpose of including touch in the first place. If you include a screen, people will look at it. The point of this system is to keep peoples' eyes on the road. Hence, putting a screen in tempts people to look at it while driving and promotes unsafe behavior and why you have touch in the first place.
@Noobs-R-Us: No - the GPS will audibly say "Turn left here" or "continue for 2 miles." You're never supposed to look at the screen unless you're pulled over and the disclaimer when you boot the unit up says so for a reason.
@blash: Wow , you guys must be so special. I have never NOT needed to look at my GPS when traveling. You guys are my heroes for only relying on voice directions. Please tell me how you do it? How do you tell which lane of the highway you have to be before your next exit? How do you tell how much further you have until your next turn? Wow! Amazing! I must learn this new trick. Please enlighten me.
@Wrathernaut: Yea, I can read a map too, so what's your point? The fact of the matter is that you HAVE TO look at your GPS when you don't know where you're going. Voice directions will only get you so far.
@Noobs-R-Us: The point is, that if you're going to Citytownsville, there are usually signs that tell you which lane you should be to get there, coupled with prompts of "Take next exit - [Right/Left]" makes getting near the destination quite easy. Once you're in Citytownsville, looking for the box social, or whatever teens are driving to these days, the "Turn left in 100 feet" instructions do not require you to look at the screen. If you're in a city that has machine-pronounceable street names, you're in even better shape.
When I have a competent human navigator, I do not ask them to show me the map at every turn, why would I need a competent digital navigator to do the same?
Combining fairly accurate directions and paying attention to the rest of the driving conditions and drivers is still much better than staring at a screen.
@Wrathernaut: Well that’s where theory vs. the real world diverges. In theory what you said makes sense but in real life that’s NOT how it works. In the real world, you have to go through many different towns and streets to get to where you’re going. The GPS will NOT tell you that you first need to get to somewhere first before getting to your final destination. It will only tell you to turn at the last minute. Nor are there signs many times on the road directing you. A human navigator would tell you the relevant information so you don’t miss your turns or give you context so you don’t feel like you’re lost. Not with a GPS. If you study the route before hand you have some idea of where you are and where you’re navigating to but if you were to just turn it on and ask it to get you somewhere you’d get lost very quickly following just the voice directions.
I can’t tell you how many times I’ve had to override a GPS on directions because it was giving me bad information. You would only know this if you bothered to look at the map on the screen. From what you and some of the others here speak it sounds like you’ve had no real world experience with GPSs.
The real question is where was Tiger's wife? When the cops came he was lying on the ground in and out of consciousness. No mention of where the wife was. So did she just leave him there to die?
A couple of months ago, a drunk driver threw a bottle at my truck and cracked my windshield. I gave the police the license plate #, but nothing happened since it was basically my word against his. Since then, I've been really considering something like this.
I wouldn't say a radar detector is a good gift either. Ask any cop who does speed enforcement and he'll tell you he catches more people with radar detectors than without. Not only that cops NEVER cut you slack if you have a radar detector. The two times I've been pulled over for speeding I got off with a warning and I've never in my life owned a Radar detector.
It's much cheaper to just not speed. Besides speeding nets you no substantial gains in time saved on shorter jaunts.
@MrEvil: "Ask any cop who does speed enforcement and he'll tell you he catches more people with radar detectors than without."
That is a load of bs... Most people don't have detectors so how is that even possible?
I haven't been caught speeding in 11 years and my radar detector has saved me more times than I can even begin to remember. If a cop is sitting on the freeway with his gun on (which is normally how they do it) you will get plenty of warning. Don't kid yourself, if you have a decent one, they do the job, but if you ignore it going off then you will get popped.
The main exception is a laser detector. If it goes off you just got hit with it so it's of little use, but radar detectors are worth every penny.
Isn't #7 just a Nalgene bottle in itself that some individual/group just went to one of those promotional items companies and had them slap "my pee pee bottle" on the side of it?
Marketing Guy 1: "We can't sell these things for the life of us..."
Marketing Guy 2: "Haha, yeah, they're useless. We have too many of them. Everybody who wants one, owns one. All we can do with them now is piss in them."
They both laugh, their boss laughs. He approves it for shits n giggles.
At least, that's how we hope it went.
The alternative is unthinkable...
Does anyone have problems with the Motion X apps finding a signal? I downloaded the free version to see if I wanted to replace RunKeeper with it, I do a lot of off road hiking and riding, and I'm constantly having signal problems.
@lpranal: Don't get me wrong, I love RunKeeper but I'm digging the mapping and waypoints of Motion X. I lead cross country adventure travel trips most of the year and it's a great way to map hikes, viewpoints and places to visit. The same thing with my photography.
Standalone GPSes have an edge over phones in that you have much more control if you want to map out specific routes on the computer. Using Garmin's Mapsource for specific road routes for uses like road rallies is a benefit to some. Having a bank of 500 waypoints that I can create a route from is still an advantage to me.
@Lizard_King: They also enjoy the advantage of not running down the batteries on your phone, and not pulling your phone out of a windshield mount to use it - assuming you don't have Bluetooth. It's also nice not subscribing monthly to being able to see my map, but I'd assume that's changing since the iPhone? (but can the iPhone store the whole country's map on it so it doesn't use data while roaming? My Nuvi came with all of North America circa 2009...)
@Joe Valasek: Yeah, I've played around with one. Still not as flexible as using Mapsource (550 waypoints following one course across the U.S. in a race...but people that need that are few and far between) .
As google and garmin release more stuff for phones, that advantage will certainly shrink. And damn, motorcycle GPSes are WAY to pricey - three times as much for a Zumo that does not much more than a Nuvi, but with a water resistant case and big buttons.
I actually HAVE #1. I've since upgraded to the newer model, but I used the old one in my car to make it a rolling singles ad for myself. And no, it didn't work. [s165.photobucket.com]
I'm currently hoping RoofCoffeeCup, [RoofCoffeeCup.com] , will help me hook a girl. Already gotten me 2 interviews!
escort 8500 x50 is the still raining champ for radar detectors, even years old....have used both. both are fantastic though - never buy a radar detector unless you get a good one. one of those 2 specifically.
@kickace: I've always had great luck with Bell. I know they aren't at the top of the heap, but for the last 12 years the Bell's I've had have been great.
I highly recommend the V1 for a radar detector. Three years running and it has saved me multiple times. You can't rely on it (or any radar detector) completely for driving like a maniac, but it has more than paid for itself with those 15 mph over situations.
@D0rk: +1. Won't drive my bike without it. It's not about speeding, it's about being safe, sometimes safe means outside of the speed limit (flow of traffic) or laws (lane splitting).
The only ticket it didn't save me from was a +4mph... heard the tone, thought i was good, I was wrong.
@cruzer555: It has a remote display, and many aftermarket ways to bury it in the car or bike (mine's in my tailsection, rear of it still gets laser hits through taillight lens).
12/01/09
12/01/09
This seems just as silly as the others to me.
12/01/09
12/01/09
12/01/09
12/01/09
12/01/09
12/01/09
12/02/09
12/02/09
When I have a competent human navigator, I do not ask them to show me the map at every turn, why would I need a competent digital navigator to do the same?
Combining fairly accurate directions and paying attention to the rest of the driving conditions and drivers is still much better than staring at a screen.
12/02/09
I can’t tell you how many times I’ve had to override a GPS on directions because it was giving me bad information. You would only know this if you bothered to look at the map on the screen. From what you and some of the others here speak it sounds like you’ve had no real world experience with GPSs.
12/02/09
12/02/09
11/30/09
11/30/09
On another note, I imagine this would help with court cases and whatnot if things aren't clear.
11/30/09
11/25/09
It's much cheaper to just not speed. Besides speeding nets you no substantial gains in time saved on shorter jaunts.
11/25/09
That is a load of bs... Most people don't have detectors so how is that even possible?
I haven't been caught speeding in 11 years and my radar detector has saved me more times than I can even begin to remember. If a cop is sitting on the freeway with his gun on (which is normally how they do it) you will get plenty of warning. Don't kid yourself, if you have a decent one, they do the job, but if you ignore it going off then you will get popped.
The main exception is a laser detector. If it goes off you just got hit with it so it's of little use, but radar detectors are worth every penny.
11/25/09
11/25/09
11/24/09
11/24/09
Marketing Guy 1: "We can't sell these things for the life of us..."
Marketing Guy 2: "Haha, yeah, they're useless. We have too many of them. Everybody who wants one, owns one. All we can do with them now is piss in them."
They both laugh, their boss laughs. He approves it for shits n giggles.
At least, that's how we hope it went.
The alternative is unthinkable...
11/25/09
11/24/09
No description needed, really.
11/24/09
[www.amazon.com]
11/24/09
11/24/09
11/24/09
11/24/09
11/24/09
11/24/09
11/24/09
11/25/09
I can use google maps and send it to my phone.
Oh the joy of android!
11/25/09
As google and garmin release more stuff for phones, that advantage will certainly shrink. And damn, motorcycle GPSes are WAY to pricey - three times as much for a Zumo that does not much more than a Nuvi, but with a water resistant case and big buttons.
11/24/09
[s165.photobucket.com]
I'm currently hoping RoofCoffeeCup, [RoofCoffeeCup.com] , will help me hook a girl. Already gotten me 2 interviews!
11/25/09
11/25/09
11/25/09
11/24/09
11/25/09
11/24/09
11/24/09
11/24/09
The only ticket it didn't save me from was a +4mph... heard the tone, thought i was good, I was wrong.
11/24/09
11/24/09
It also outperforms the 9500 in my experience.
11/24/09
11/25/09
11/25/09
11/25/09
11/25/09
Definitely not gonna get a $1500 Radar detector for it, or the car. For the $500 range, I'd say the Valentine has the edge.
11/26/09