Senior Contributing Editors:
Jesus Diaz
| AIM | Twitter
Mark Wilson, Reviews
| AIM | Twitter
Contributing Editors:
Matt Buchanan | AIM | Twitter
Adam Frucci | Twitter
Sean Fallon | Twitter
Jack Loftus | Twitter
John Herrman | Twitter
Dan Nosowitz
Chris Mascari
Kat Hannaford | Twitter
Rosa Golijan | Twitter
Chris Jacob
That is an awesome as well as very purrty chart -- alas, the one flaw is that it's presumed that figure of "number of flights" is worldwide, so therefore you cannot say there have been only 6 terrorist attacks on planes since 1999. Six must be the four from 9/11, Richard Reed and this most recent douchebag. While only four of those were domestic flights, along with the two that are international:
According to Airdisaster.com:
03/03/2001 Bangkok, Thailand Thai Airways
05/07/2002 Off Dalian, China China Northern Airlines
08/24/2004 Toula, Russia Volga-Avia Express
08/24/2004 Rostov-on-Don, Russia Sibir Airlines
12/24/1999 Amritsar, India Indian Airlines
05/25/2000 Manila, Philippines Philippine Air Lines
03/15/2001 Medina, Saudi Arabia Vnukovo Airlines
..are seven more that involve commercial flight terrorism... and while the addition of these probably wouldn't change your overall astronomically high figures, i figured i should be servicey™ :[]
Looking at the odds, death by terrorist is rare and near negligible. Terrorists bomb planes for the publicity. Remove the publicity and they will stop bombing airplanes. The Fourth Estate assists terrorist acts through free publicity.
Where I live the press does not report subway jumpers even though they can cause great disruption to communter traffic and pedestrian lives. They do not report it because of the contagious nature of suicides.
I wonder why they can exercise restraint on a local level but not on a national/international level? Or maybe I have it wrong. One jumper may not be as interesting as 250 screaming passangers plumpeting to their deaths.
How do we not 'consume' news about terrorism when every media outlet is scrambling to out-report each other?
You know, I think this is a very good chart. It lays it out pretty well. What it does not account for is that regardless of the number of actual deaths, the goal of terrorism is to strike fear in those who live, and to cause the enemy to look for enemies from within and to let go of freedoms of privacy and civil rights. One can make the case that the airplane deaths due to terrorism amount to nothing, if you look at it from the standpoint of those eho want to spread fear. They've been able to co-opt the governments and travel safety offices of dozens of nations around the world to their cause -- by making them agents of the fear, presenting it to the traveling public as a credible threat, making it bigger than the statistics would indicate. I've just spent the last week with all the right-wingers in my family, and they fully expect that all Americans will be forced to be chipped and have their movements tracked everywhere they go... a true manifestation of Orwellian fiction. They believe this because of the big-government threat that the current president represents to them, and strangely enough, -=shockingly=-, they are OK with it. I am not. I fly home tomorrow, and I'm dreading the whole thing, and I hope that the current congress and executive does not take the latest incident as an excuse to buckle down even harder on civil liberties. I am unafraid, and I believe the fear is unwarranted. Thanks, Jesus, for putting this together.
@nolimitsplayer: ... and it also does not include terrorist-related deaths on trains like in London or Madrid, and it does not include other victim deaths on the ground, like those who died in the WTC or at the pentagon. So, yeah, the data is very narrowly described. Yet, flying as a passenger on an airplane is remarkably safe when compared to other modes of transport, even if you account for accidents that are not related to terrorism.
I'm not sure I understand the reasoning behind some of this - why would an iPhone be rated a wait when it's halfway through its product cycle (the refresh isn't coming for a year) but the Cinema Displays be "cautious buys" when they're clearly outclassed. At what point is it ok to purchase a tech product during its life cycle? Not in the beginning, of course, because of manufacturing issues. Apparently not in the middle, because of a product refresh (and by extension anytime from then on). That leaves you a pretty narrow window.
@Doc Benway: Rumor I heard (YMMV) is that there'll be a new SKU soon, as they're supposed to be rereleasing the R3610 with a VESA adapter for back-of-the-monitor, redneck-all-in-one action.
That Aspire Revo, nice as it may be for a little underpowered HTPC doesnt even come close to being a comparative product. The mac mini is a REAL computer, the aspire and EEEBox are NetTops. Atom vs 2.2ghz C2D isnt even a comparison.
The link about how its not competitive brings you to a story about HTPC's which is great. But then you go on to talk about the Zino and the Revo and the EEEBox. All of these use atoms or the woefully underpowered AMD ULV.
You might as well compare a ZuneHD since it can output video to your TV also.
@Eulatos: Even the single core, 1GB (yes, I own it, and know of what I speak) version plays back in 1080p, streams 1080p cleanly and reliably, and does everything else I need in a HTPC. And it does it dead quiet, and damn cheap. I've got a "Real" computer; it sits across the room. The Revo does everything it needs to, without extra fluff. Sometimes "More Power" is not the answer.
@AmishJohn: I never said the revo wasnt a good choice. What i said is this article and the ones linked are wrong. It is plenty competitive in the space that its made for, which is a tiny full powered computer which is also capable of the same stuff as one of these mini HTPC's.
I would love to get an aspire one to replace the monolith like media server that is my old gaming computer, it works great but its extremely loud.
@AmishJohn:
Can't play Hulu. Doesn't have OSX, Plex, remote control, bundled software, a real processor, a real GPU, capability to use with a desktop monitor and a TV at the same time. Also, not as quiet or as green as Mac Mini.
Revo is the second best choice for an HTPC but there are lots of things that it can't do. The only thing that makes Mac Mini less than perfect is the lack of HDMI and higher cost. But, if you can spend $580 for a Mini, you can also spend $20 for an HDMI adaptor. Is it too much for a Mac that replaces both your HTPC and desktop PC?
@escanselcuk: There are alternates to Hulu - that aren't regionlocked. It doesn't need OSX; a dedicated HTPC OS (XBMCLive)is more than enough. You've got to pay extra for the remote, same as me. I'm glad I didn't get a pile of 'bundled' SW that does nothing to accomplish the unit's primary mission. Not a 'Real' processor / GPU? Again; I want it to stream video, not find the Higgs boson. Same answer for the monitor / TV output. I'm doing either one or the other. Not as quiet? The only time I hear the fan is during POST; the rest of the time it's silent. Not as green? 65W Max power on the Acer vs. 11oW on the Apple? Most of your argument seems to boil down to 'It's not made by Apple', and 'It doesn't do everything'. That's fine. It's also a third of the cost of the mini; the extra $400 can buy a lot of HD space. I don't want it to replace my desktop, I want it to stream media. And that's what it does.
I am about to read this article from my brand new imac---that I just unboxed an hour ago :) still, it is beautiful and does more than what I need and want, so no remorse from this buyer :)
@meg9: Sigh.
I've been waiting a month for my 27" i5 iMac to ship. But I figure it's since Apple is holding them for the software, firmware and packaging updates, so I'm grateful they're holding off to get it done right.
I got bit by timing once and only once. Back in 2000 I bought my first Mac, a PowerBook G3 Pismo. I was stoked when I got it. A week later the iBook DV was released with better specs and a lower pricetag than the PowerBook I'd signed my soul away in order to buy.
Ever since then I've made sure that every mac I used was bought with someone else's money, usually my employer.
@StupidPopMediaReference: Or not buy a laptop a week before Jobs delivers the brand-spanking-new iterations?
Or if you do, return it (you could have, you should have, you didn't) and they would have taken it back, no questions, and cheerfully exchanged it for a new one.
I'd add that you're stretching quite a bit to recall a time a decade ago when you made a series of unfortunate consumer choices, failed to fix it, then ten years later, are trying to blame Apple. Try harder next time?
@Trai_Dep: For one - You take things way too seriously. For two - I never directly blamed Apple for what happened. For three - get the full story before you make assumptions: I chose not to return it because I didn't like the design of the iBooks. I was actually very happy with my PowerBook; the tech nerd in me was just a little bummed at not having the latest and greatest.
As to the not buying Apple with my own money that was meant to be comical. I don't buy Apple on my dime simply because I don't make enough justify the expense. Especially so when I can build a machine for $500 or less and put my choice of OS on it. I like Apple's products I just don't LOVE them. So long as they maintain the price points they have I most likely never will love them.
Condescension is not an effective mode of communication, especially when you're operating on absolutely zero familiarity with the intended audience.
@StupidPopMediaReference: Ah.
That was a "joke". Your "humor". Very "funny"!
The same guy that buys an Apple laptop a week before a MacWorld conference, then fails to return it when he could have, then stews over these facts for ten years before finally venting here (of all places) is someone that builds his own <$500 laptop that has a better performance/feature set than what Cupertino has to offer?
The mind reels. It also calls shenanigans.
That wasn't condensation. That was pointing out the many, many flaws in what you wrote, and perhaps your thinking. If it makes you uncomfortable, become a better thinker or learn to write better in public. Or get used to discomfort:
the Internets can get a little rough, snowflake.
Condensation: (Psychology) The process by which a single symbol or word is associated with the emotional content of several, not necessarily related, ideas, feelings, memories, or impulses, especially as expressed in dreams.
-OR- (Chemistry) Forming a liquid from a gaseous state.
I don't think either of you meant the above so here ya go...
Condescending: Displaying a patronizingly superior attitude.
@edison234: You know, I saw that post-click. It didn't look right, then I pondered whether to switch to "condescending". But considering the topic, I thought it might come off as "smug".
Good catch, tho!
When to buy an Apple Product? Always. By all means, stay away from all products that don't have a piece of fruit branded on them. They're obviously far superior to all other competing products.
02:59 AM
According to Airdisaster.com:
03/03/2001 Bangkok, Thailand Thai Airways
05/07/2002 Off Dalian, China China Northern Airlines
08/24/2004 Toula, Russia Volga-Avia Express
08/24/2004 Rostov-on-Don, Russia Sibir Airlines
12/24/1999 Amritsar, India Indian Airlines
05/25/2000 Manila, Philippines Philippine Air Lines
03/15/2001 Medina, Saudi Arabia Vnukovo Airlines
..are seven more that involve commercial flight terrorism... and while the addition of these probably wouldn't change your overall astronomically high figures, i figured i should be servicey™ :[]
02:11 AM
02:03 AM
Where I live the press does not report subway jumpers even though they can cause great disruption to communter traffic and pedestrian lives. They do not report it because of the contagious nature of suicides.
I wonder why they can exercise restraint on a local level but not on a national/international level? Or maybe I have it wrong. One jumper may not be as interesting as 250 screaming passangers plumpeting to their deaths.
How do we not 'consume' news about terrorism when every media outlet is scrambling to out-report each other?
12:38 AM
12:28 AM
12:27 AM
12:27 AM
12:43 AM
01:50 AM
12/28/09
12/28/09
12/28/09
I have wanted one for ages, and personally, I shall be waiting. It is surely due a huge refresh imminently!?
12/28/09
12/28/09
My theory is they need to keep some features iPhone-only to keep the iphone in demand.
12/28/09
12/28/09
12/28/09
12/28/09
12/28/09
12/28/09
It just makes one less trip for the person trying to get this info. Now you can get your latest news and mac details all on one site.
12/28/09
The link about how its not competitive brings you to a story about HTPC's which is great. But then you go on to talk about the Zino and the Revo and the EEEBox. All of these use atoms or the woefully underpowered AMD ULV.
You might as well compare a ZuneHD since it can output video to your TV also.
12/28/09
12/28/09
I would love to get an aspire one to replace the monolith like media server that is my old gaming computer, it works great but its extremely loud.
12/28/09
Can't play Hulu. Doesn't have OSX, Plex, remote control, bundled software, a real processor, a real GPU, capability to use with a desktop monitor and a TV at the same time. Also, not as quiet or as green as Mac Mini.
Revo is the second best choice for an HTPC but there are lots of things that it can't do. The only thing that makes Mac Mini less than perfect is the lack of HDMI and higher cost. But, if you can spend $580 for a Mini, you can also spend $20 for an HDMI adaptor. Is it too much for a Mac that replaces both your HTPC and desktop PC?
12/28/09
12/28/09
12/28/09
I've been waiting a month for my 27" i5 iMac to ship. But I figure it's since Apple is holding them for the software, firmware and packaging updates, so I'm grateful they're holding off to get it done right.
12/28/09
Ever since then I've made sure that every mac I used was bought with someone else's money, usually my employer.
12/28/09
Or if you do, return it (you could have, you should have, you didn't) and they would have taken it back, no questions, and cheerfully exchanged it for a new one.
I'd add that you're stretching quite a bit to recall a time a decade ago when you made a series of unfortunate consumer choices, failed to fix it, then ten years later, are trying to blame Apple. Try harder next time?
12/28/09
As to the not buying Apple with my own money that was meant to be comical. I don't buy Apple on my dime simply because I don't make enough justify the expense. Especially so when I can build a machine for $500 or less and put my choice of OS on it. I like Apple's products I just don't LOVE them. So long as they maintain the price points they have I most likely never will love them.
Condescension is not an effective mode of communication, especially when you're operating on absolutely zero familiarity with the intended audience.
12/28/09
That was a "joke". Your "humor". Very "funny"!
The same guy that buys an Apple laptop a week before a MacWorld conference, then fails to return it when he could have, then stews over these facts for ten years before finally venting here (of all places) is someone that builds his own <$500 laptop that has a better performance/feature set than what Cupertino has to offer?
The mind reels. It also calls shenanigans.
That wasn't condensation. That was pointing out the many, many flaws in what you wrote, and perhaps your thinking. If it makes you uncomfortable, become a better thinker or learn to write better in public. Or get used to discomfort:
the Internets can get a little rough, snowflake.
12/28/09
@StupidPopMediaReference:
Condensation: (Psychology) The process by which a single symbol or word is associated with the emotional content of several, not necessarily related, ideas, feelings, memories, or impulses, especially as expressed in dreams.
-OR- (Chemistry) Forming a liquid from a gaseous state.
I don't think either of you meant the above so here ya go...
Condescending: Displaying a patronizingly superior attitude.
12/28/09
Good catch, tho!
12/28/09
Must...refrain from...saying it.
(inside joke to those who know that I am NOT an Apple fan)
12/28/09
Tell you what. Just for you:
When to buy an Apple Product? Always. By all means, stay away from all products that don't have a piece of fruit branded on them. They're obviously far superior to all other competing products.