Senior Contributing Editors:
Jesus Diaz
| AIM | Twitter
Mark Wilson, Reviews
| AIM | Twitter
Contributing Editors:
Matt Buchanan | AIM | Twitter
Adam Frucci | Twitter
Sean Fallon | Twitter
Jack Loftus | Twitter
John Herrman | Twitter
Dan Nosowitz
Chris Mascari
Kat Hannaford | Twitter
Rosa Golijan | Twitter
Chris Jacob
"No one - including Hogan - is yet claiming that GEO600 has found evidence that we live in a holographic universe. It is far too soon to say. "There could still be a mundane source of the noise," Hogan admits."
It's good to know he at least suspects that he is full of shit.
The universe is mostly empty space anyway. 3D, 2D, doesn't matter since everything is 99.99% nothing. Even we are made up primarily of the space between our atoms.
What a load of crap....these people have way too much time on their hands thinking up this tripe. Give a guy a white coat and a Degree and his word becomes law...ugh.
@gaiking: This idea isn't one guy's musings. This theory has been mulled over by many prominent physicists who have come to consider it a compelling idea over the last 15 years.
@gaiking: "..whatever...theories are just that ....theories..they may think what they will but they are still simply men that can be, and are more often than not, wrong."
You are correct, but that's just part of scientific progress. For every breakthrough, there are always many more failures and wild goose chases. Statistically, scientists need to pursue many theories in the hope that one of them will be legitimate. If we were not willing to spend time and resources on things like this, science would never move forward.
@vladdybear: ...(sigh)... Nothing... I don't study anything ok?.... I have no opinion ... I'll simply agree with everyone here and admit I was mistaken... You know I just took a really close look at the article and now I believe the physicists are absolutely correct and I never should have doubted a word they said... Again I apologize for the unenlightened tone I originally had... I have learned the error of my ways. Is that good enough? Good grief.
@gaiking: @DeusExMach: yes... I have learned not to question. I shall now chang my name to Montag, conform and go burn some books. If everyone thinks the same then no one can be offended.
@gaiking: Actually, I don't mind your disbelief. Sometimes, people need to hear that. Although your argument would have been more effective if you could at least provide clues to why you think this theory is flawed.
@gaiking: Dont take it personally, pretty much everyone tears the comments apart here, regadless of who posts them. A sharp, but brutal group sometimes. Dare to be different (but have back up cause these folks will pick you to pieces if you dont.)
@ripfire: see he actually doesnt need to back up with his opinions with facts based on observations because that would be the scientific method, which is the very thing he is rebelling against!!
but seriously. you gotta have the difference of opinion otherwise we would all be bored.
@pevans34: "see he actually doesnt need to back up with his opinions with facts based on observations because that would be the scientific method, which is the very thing he is rebelling against!!"
If we actually do discover the true makeup of our universe, will it just make us more depressed? Would you feel depressed if you discovered you are nothing more than a grainy pixel in a gigantic hologram?
@gaiking: "..whatever...theories are just that ....theories..they may think what they will but they are still simply men that can be, and are more often than not, wrong."
You are correct, but that's just part of scientific progress. For every breakthrough, there are always many more failures and wild goose chases. Statistically, scientists need to pursue many theories in the hope that one of them will be legitimate. If we were not willing to spend time and resources on things like this, science would never move forward.
I saw a short play on TV once that was based on earth and all we know as reality being just someones science experiment. (It had Terri Garr and Martin someone in it.) When I start thinking about how big and important we humans and our earth is, I remember the lessons "Horton Hears a Who" taught me. It helps keep it all in perspective.
@Curves: And of course it makes you wonder if the beings who are observing us as a science experiment are themselves being observed as someone else's experiment...
I try not to wrap my brain too hard around this stuff since it gives me a headache.
@Jrsy is the dude, playing the dude, disguised as another du...: I dont begin to claim to have the IQ to understand all this existential stuff, but what little my mind grasps seems to suggest the more answers we get the more questions we get. Its fascinating and challenges my imagination, even on the very basic level of understanding I have, which is pretty low.
@Curves: Well I'm no big brain either. I get most of what goes on in the Universe, laws of physics and such. I just have a hard time grasping where it actually is and what's beyond it.
01/15/09
01/15/09
01/15/09
...
Nah, I kid, I kid.
01/15/09
For years everyone's told me I'm one dimensional.
01/15/09
"No one - including Hogan - is yet claiming that GEO600 has found evidence that we live in a holographic universe. It is far too soon to say. "There could still be a mundane source of the noise," Hogan admits."
It's good to know he at least suspects that he is full of shit.
01/15/09
01/15/09
01/15/09
01/15/09
01/15/09
01/15/09
You are correct, but that's just part of scientific progress. For every breakthrough, there are always many more failures and wild goose chases. Statistically, scientists need to pursue many theories in the hope that one of them will be legitimate. If we were not willing to spend time and resources on things like this, science would never move forward.
01/15/09
And what do you study?
01/15/09
01/15/09
01/15/09
01/15/09
01/15/09
but seriously. you gotta have the difference of opinion otherwise we would all be bored.
01/15/09
01/15/09
Ha! Touché!
01/15/09
01/15/09
01/15/09
01/15/09
01/15/09
01/15/09
Also in a good physics course at better engineering schools.
01/15/09
01/15/09
01/15/09
You are correct, but that's just part of scientific progress. For every breakthrough, there are always many more failures and wild goose chases. Statistically, scientists need to pursue many theories in the hope that one of them will be legitimate. If we were not willing to spend time and resources on things like this, science would never move forward.
01/15/09
01/15/09
01/15/09
01/15/09
Hulkamaniac rather...
01/15/09
01/15/09
It's 9:30 in the morning
01/15/09
01/15/09
I try not to wrap my brain too hard around this stuff since it gives me a headache.
01/15/09
01/15/09
01/15/09
01/15/09
01/15/09
01/15/09
01/15/09
01/15/09
01/15/09
01/15/09