Senior Contributing Editors:
Jesus Diaz
| AIM | Twitter
Mark Wilson, Reviews
| AIM | Twitter
Contributing Editors:
Matt Buchanan | AIM | Twitter
Adam Frucci | Twitter
Sean Fallon | Twitter
Jack Loftus | Twitter
John Herrman | Twitter
Dan Nosowitz
Chris Mascari
Kat Hannaford | Twitter
Rosa Golijan | Twitter
Chris Jacob
@TheSonOfKrypton: and with the BMW vaGINA Concept(oh it's real, look it up) you would have the ultimate fornicating machines.
Can anyone imgine going over speed bumps with this?
Unfortunatelly they killed it when they stated " a lot of carbon" to get rid of brackets.
Carbon fiber = stratospheric price out of the realm of the masses and closer to the realm of Ferrari Enzo ownership. (like out of the realm of 99.9999% of the population)
@aec007: That's a gross overstatement. Especially because it's not the whole body that's CF, just certain parts. Not to mention this isn't even close to being in production.
What do we do with all the dead batteries; it's expensive to recycle them and creates a huge hazard right now for local dumps. I say we stick to gas or diesel and build engines that get 150 mpg. Until a viable solution comes to along.
@Zeus: These are not supposed to be dead batteries, they are batteries that need to be recharged, taking like 6 hours. This place would remove the "dead" battery and hook it up to a recharge station then put a "Fresh" battery in your car.
This type of idea can also be used in the extend the life of your hybrid implementation rather than just being used as a gas station replacement. If people had the assurance that when their battery eventually dies in their hybrid they can replace it rather than having to buy a whole new car, people would be more apt to buy a hybrid. It would also further make the myth of sport utilities having a lower carbon footprint than hybrids incorrect, especially if they find a viable way of recycling/recovering the batteries.
They're going to have to do more than that to replace our economy that revolves on fossil fuels. Just think of all the auto shops out there dedicate to oil change alone.
@ripfire: Retool for electric motor maintenance, lubing the moving parts, etc could be a viable option. There is still stuff on those cars that needs to be maintained, they'll just have to evolve or die.
Anyways, I seriously doubt Internal Combustion is going anywhere anytime soon.
@2Wheelsor4: Ze Ümlaüt in Motörhead: Electric motor maintenance? AC or DC-brushless motors would last at least a couple years before you would need maintenance as opposed to every three months (or 5,000 miles whichever is sooner) with ICE maintenance. Regenerative breaking reduces wear on brakes. Then, there's transmission with ICE...
My point is, internal combustion engines have more maintenance, and the world makes money out of it. You switch to electric vehicles, and you're basically pulling the plug of our economy.
or just make clean hybrids and be done with it. Electric cars are nice but a better short term solution tell we get better batteries is a hybrid motor that runs on a clean fuel.
@Life Is Eat And Die: Yeah, dude. Lets not look more than 10 years into the future. Lets continue to base our infrastructure on dying technology. Lets continue to give oil interests control.
@sunshine06: What dying technology? Combustion engines will be around forever. Ones that run on gasoline won't be. Which is why I mentioned clean fuels.
@Life Is Eat And Die: There isn't enough CNG for everyone to transfer over to and hydrogen's a pipedream. We need a solution now, which is why Obama cut federal funding dollars from hydrogen tech and gave it all to electric vehicles.
The fact is, something better than hydrogen could be found later on - that's the very nature of evolving technology. We would then have to transfer our new hydrogen infrastructure over to MiracleFuel infrastructure, which (like trying to switch over to either a hydrogen or an electric infrastructure now) is costly both in time and money. By investing in an electric infrastructure though, you would only have to invest in new power-plants: can my electric car run on nuclear energy? Yes, if the electricity came from a nuclear plant. Solar energy? Hydrogen? Yes - if the electricity came from either a solar energy plant or a hydrogen energy plant. Same thing with this hypothetical MiracleFuel - my electrical car will run on the MiracleFuel by virtue of running off electricity made by a MiracleFuel power plant. Electric infrastructure is future-proof since it's a hell of a lot simpler to just upgrade the power plants instead of upgrading all the gas stations.
@blash: I agree with you that electric infrastructure is definitely the way to go in the future, but as for saying that it is simpler to upgrade power plants instead of gas stations, I disagree. Everyone needs to remember that electric cars will still produce carbon emissions, unless the electricity is generated cleanly. Thus, we need to invest in carbon neutral power generation technologies like nuclear, solar, wind, and geothermal. Building and implementing all these plants, though, will be mach harder then retrofitting gas stations.
@blash: Hydrogen is more than a pipe dream. The problem with hydrogen is more that it's viability is so far down the road that most people find spending money on it to be frivolous. People don't want to spend money on a technology that won't be coming until 10 years down the road when there is a technology that can be ready in 2-3 years, even if the 10 year solution is more permanent. Unless we replace our plants with cleaner plants and make batteries that last forever, electric/hybrids will continue to be a temporary band aid to the problem.
@climbman27: @ceilingFANBOY: You guys are forgetting about one crucial factor to hydrogen: it's renewable. Unlike fossil fuels, price of the resource will not change over the course of its life. Ever think about how most post-apocalyptic themes are always based on dependency on fuels that will eventually run out?
@kagekiri: No need to run power lines to stations. You just have to make electricity transportable. How? Turn it into chemical.
@ripfire: Hydrogen is great, but I think you are forgetting the process and amount of energy needed to create hydrogen. There is no such thing as a hydrogen "source". Since it has such a low density, storage and transportation are also big issues. One of the more promising technologies I have heard about is using electricity from wind turbines to power hydrogen production. Then you have a completely carbon neutral process. It is definitely a promising fuel source, but as far as price, I think that will fluctuate greatly with how it is produced.
@ripfire: I'm on the same side of the argument as you are. I was just stating that it is currently too expensive cashwise and energywise to obtain hydrogen for it to be viable. However, down the road it will be viable when better methods of obtaining hydrogen are discovered. Who knows, in the future we may even be able to find a way of extracting hydrogen from water that is so efficient that a car could run for years without any external input by using the hydrogen and then re extracting it from the water that is produced.
@climbman27: Yeah, I agree hydrogen production is inefficient now, but its all I could think of that's transportable. Who knows, maybe later on we'll discover a way to produce hydrogen cheaply through organic means (ie, photosynthesis).
Ah, nothing improves resale value like a failure of a lifting mechanism, and then a acid spill.
Of course, this thing will become a moot point once a storage device is designed that can be charged quickly and hold the charge. Then solar panels and energy capture devices on cars would actually do something significant.
@odnet: I know someone who went to Israel to build electric car integrated parking/charging stations. Seriously, people in that country REALLY want to cut their dependence on oil, for obvious reasons.
Replace non-removable car batteries with standard ones that can be recharged separately? This is another of those brilliant obvious things that no one thinks of.
@Hello Mister Walrus: But then they're going to make it different sizes like HH or the smaller HHH or J-Cell or K-Cell, or the ever so useless (except for critical vehicles like a firetruck) 18-volt size.
@Software_Goddess: It sounds to me more like everyone would be sharing their batteries. You don't get a cheap aftermarket battery, you get one from someone else's car that has been charged up to replace your dead battery that will be charged up and eventually put into someone else's car in place of their dead battery which will eventually be charged up and put into someone... I think you get the idea.
@ceilingFANBOY: The OP still has a point, though. Batteries for these cars are (at least, right now) ridiculously expensive, and they have a shelf life. If you have a brand new electric car with a brand new battery, and you swap it out, yo ucould be getting someone's 3 year old battery that's on its last legs. Who covers the cost of replacement once that battery dies? The only way this would work is if the charging / battery swap station owned all the batteries and lent them out, which is a VERY large cost for them to assume (considering the station itself costs 500k).
@bobman1235: My guess is that the way that they would prevent you from getting stuck with a crappy battery is to require you to register with the company to use the service. That way they could keep track of how many miles/years you have put on your battery so that whenever you go to exchange your battery you get one that is of similar wear and tear. Then, if you purchased a new battery, whether it be through your car dealer or through this company, you could have the date and miles reset to reflect your new battery.
More proof that the current lineup of fuel efficient vehicles are bullshit. They have the technology to make something better than 35mpg. Well, they actually have before, but that was killed off.
08/30/09
No, this is fit for Jeff Bridges.
08/30/09
08/30/09
08/30/09
Can anyone imgine going over speed bumps with this?
08/30/09
Unfortunatelly they killed it when they stated " a lot of carbon" to get rid of brackets.
Carbon fiber = stratospheric price out of the realm of the masses and closer to the realm of Ferrari Enzo ownership. (like out of the realm of 99.9999% of the population)
08/30/09
05/13/09
05/13/09
05/13/09
Like swapping rechargeable AA's in your RC Car.
05/13/09
05/13/09
05/13/09
05/13/09
Anyways, I seriously doubt Internal Combustion is going anywhere anytime soon.
05/13/09
My point is, internal combustion engines have more maintenance, and the world makes money out of it. You switch to electric vehicles, and you're basically pulling the plug of our economy.
05/13/09
05/13/09
05/13/09
[www.sciencefriday.com]
05/13/09
05/13/09
05/13/09
05/13/09
05/13/09
05/13/09
05/13/09
The fact is, something better than hydrogen could be found later on - that's the very nature of evolving technology. We would then have to transfer our new hydrogen infrastructure over to MiracleFuel infrastructure, which (like trying to switch over to either a hydrogen or an electric infrastructure now) is costly both in time and money. By investing in an electric infrastructure though, you would only have to invest in new power-plants: can my electric car run on nuclear energy? Yes, if the electricity came from a nuclear plant. Solar energy? Hydrogen? Yes - if the electricity came from either a solar energy plant or a hydrogen energy plant. Same thing with this hypothetical MiracleFuel - my electrical car will run on the MiracleFuel by virtue of running off electricity made by a MiracleFuel power plant. Electric infrastructure is future-proof since it's a hell of a lot simpler to just upgrade the power plants instead of upgrading all the gas stations.
05/13/09
05/13/09
05/13/09
@kagekiri: No need to run power lines to stations. You just have to make electricity transportable. How? Turn it into chemical.
05/13/09
05/13/09
05/13/09
05/13/09
Of course, this thing will become a moot point once a storage device is designed that can be charged quickly and hold the charge. Then solar panels and energy capture devices on cars would actually do something significant.
05/13/09
05/13/09
05/13/09
05/13/09
05/13/09
05/13/09
05/13/09
05/13/09
05/13/09
05/10/09
"It looks like an airplane, without wings."
05/09/09
Either they're not giving him enough to do, or he makes really efficient use of his time.
05/09/09
05/09/09
Keep your tinfoil hats on.
05/09/09
05/09/09
05/09/09