Senior Contributing Editors:
Jesus Diaz
| AIM | Twitter
Mark Wilson, Reviews
| AIM | Twitter
Contributing Editors:
Matt Buchanan | AIM | Twitter
Adam Frucci | Twitter
Sean Fallon | Twitter
Jack Loftus | Twitter
John Herrman | Twitter
Dan Nosowitz
Chris Mascari
Kat Hannaford | Twitter
Rosa Golijan | Twitter
Chris Jacob
@Tom_Servo: well i was Just listing one more thing the droid does, that they feel the need to advertise and make fun of the iPhone for even though the droid is an inferior device.
I don't get the appeal of multi-touch. If you ask me, single-touch is more advanced than multi-touch because you don't have to use both hands do to something!! With the US droid i can web-browse and zoom in with one hand. I grant that multi-touch is more fun, but practically speaking it's less efficient.
@Starfight: The point is can you safely pinch and hold your phone with one hand? I think not. In ROMs such as the Milestones & Cyanogen's you have the option to do either, but as I understand it the iPhone is Multitouch or nothing.
@Starfight: He just said you can zoom in with one hand (double-tap). As for zooming out, if you tap once, you get an on-screen zoom in/out tool. Some may find that extra work (for some value of "work"), but it does allow you to navigate with one hand free.
And I care not for what the pinch-to-zoom apologists say. If you're pinch-zooming with one hand, the other hand is holding your phone. Otherwise, it's finger gymnastics.
@Hearthatvoiceagain: No, android just zooms in where you happened to tap. or, you know, maybe it tries to jus on that section, but the iPhone does it a LOT better. Like if you're looking at this story on an iPhone, it'll know to zoom on just the comment section and not include the sidebars. I've never managed to get Android to do that right - I always have to move things around after zooming (yes, even with Cyanogen, and Better Browser, and Dolphin).
i believe congress should not take a x-mas break and attend to things of importance! a new law should be brought in front of both the house and the senate and passed immediately. any and all staff of a tech blog should have the free will to buy non-apple products if they so choose to! Im tired of tech blog writers being forced to buy, unwillingly, apple products and being forced to like them for fear of retribution or loss of hipster status. like the whistle blower laws enacted beforehand, this new law should be called the ringtone raid, and allow minorities alike (google, etc.) to break into the hipster empire w/ programs such as affirmative action for smartphones, only on a more longterm and intimate basis. Furthermore, there will be no tolerance for backlash from those that choose to sit on steve jobs' cock and pedal his balls.
@sygyzy: I'm no engineer, but I know that while AT&T do use the same style network, they use different radio frequencies for their 3G access. The radio in the Nexus One only supports T-Mo's frequencies. I'm unsure just how difficult it would be to add a radio that supports other frequencies as well, but at the very least, someone has an issue with doing so right now.
@redman042: The only rumors that held up to any scrutiny that would count as "game-changing" involved pricing, and we have yet to hear about that.
If Google offers it at around $200 without a contract, that could spark some interest in folks not having a contract (which would shake up the industry). It's not a terribly implausible plan since T-Mobile, Google's go-to partner for their Android test runs, just started hyping their Even More Plus plans that are slightly cheaper if you buy the phone up front and then you have no contract.
And, I suppose there's nothing saying an AT&T (or other carriers) version isn't coming. But the FCC filing for this phone didn't indicate anything but T-Mo.
Is multi-touch really that much of a deal breaker? My friend had an iPod touch and didn't even know how to use the multi-touch capabilities and still loved web browsing and maps on it, just like I love it on my Droid.
I have an iPod touch as well and used to browse on it a lot before I got the Droid which rendered the iPod basically useless, I used multi-touch a lot but now that its gone I don't really miss it and it never presents any problems.
Is multi-touch just another iCatfighting weapon?
I do however think that multi-touch with a virtual keyboard is near-essential though. Once you get the single touch rhythm it's manageable, but multi-touch would make it far better.
@yule-and-bellow: I prefer double-tap-to-zoom over multitouch zooming. I have big hands, and on the iphone's screen, it's just frustrating. On the droid's massive screen, it's still not that easy to do. I can double tap and zoom with one thumb. Far easier than holding the thing and pinching.
Can someone please explain to me why multi-touch zooming is so friggin great!? It requires TWO HANDS!
Don't get me wrong, I completely understand multi-touch's usefulness in other apps and other interfaces...
but for zooming... on a device thats made to be used almost entirely in one hand... why is it so important to people!?
I have the multi-touch option in the Dolphin browser, and the first thing I did after trying out said gimmick, was turn the normal zoom buttons back on. Cause I wanted to be able to zoom in with... you guessed it... ONE HAND!
@ghackett: Because the pinch gesture lets you zoom precisely the amount you want, double tapping only zooms a specific amount each tap, and on the web specifically zooms you to a column width.
I prefer the control of pinch zooming, so I will be disappointed if this phone doesn't have true multi-touch. Why is this so damn hard to implement for anyone but Apple?
@The5thElephant: Fair point. I think I have to concede that one.
I'm pretty sure all versions of android 2.0 and above will have Multi-Touch abilities, they just won't be built into the browser or google maps yet (i don't know why they're scared of apple, they just are). But you can always download an alternative browser like Dolphin, which does support multi-touch zooming (and it works on the Droid right now)
@tande04: I was under the impression the legal issues thing was just a rumor.
Palm got in some heat over certain implementations of multitouch when they first came out, but as I understand it, the specific pinch-to-zoom gesture is not something Apple has a patent on.
Three home screens (plus the drawer) is plenty for arranging the applications that you use frequently. However, I also have the quick-search widget, the power control widget, and Astrid's task list summary widget on my homescreens. Each takes up four icons worth of space. If you wanted to add some bigger (or just more) widgets, you'd suddenly find yourself running out of space real fast.
Of course, the obvious caveat is having the processor speed to run all those widgets at the same time, but I think this phone can handle that.
Admittedly, though, 7 would start to get cumbersome to swipe through, especially just to see a widget.
@OCEntertainment: I really wished they just copy Palm's card-like application management system. Widgets are not equivalent since they are essentially always running and are water-downed version of the main apps.
@badbob001: Widgets aren't supposed to be equivalent. Music widgets give you simple "Pause", "Play", and "Next Track" buttons. The Astrid widgets gives your to-do headlines. The power control widget just lets you flip WiFi/GPS/Bluetooth on and off (no settings control). They're exactly what they need to be (usually) without being too watered down.
I will agree that application management is a little wonky. It can be hard to know when stuff is open and when it's not, or where pressing a certain button will take you. But for the most part, it works. You rarely ever want to be multitasking with more than 3-4 active apps anyway.
Also, while it's kind of a hidden feature, you can hold down the home key and it brings up an alt-tab-like menu of the six most recently used apps. It's occasionally handy.
@Serpentor X: @seldomused: On my G1 I use almost all of the space on the three screens available. I keep the search bar on the main page, along with GV, VM, and two folders for utilities and commonly used apps. The other two screens are games, news, weather, and various other apps I use often, but not every day. A couple extra screens would be very welcome for additional widgets and having fewer things hidden in folders. Not a necessity, of course, but handy for sure, with around 55 apps installed, as well as several widgets that I like to switch around.
My friend works at Google and has the phone. I can confirm all of the items written above especially the last bullet. The phone is lightning fast - no lag at all. I couldn't figure out if it was underclocked at all, but it really doesnt matter.
Other than its speed, Android 2.1 and lack of a physical keyboard, it's just another Android phone (albeit an extremely sexy one).
Not sure about battery life, but my friend has yet to have any complaints. He wouldn't let me take any video of the phone sadly - I wanted to take a few showing how fast the processor is.
@liddil101: My opinion would be that lacking multitouch doesn't seem to impede the usefulness or ease-of-use of any of Android's capabilities. Multitouch is a nifty "wow" feature, but for the period of time that I used an iPhone, I used the pinch-zoom once or twice, but after that never found to be necessary or useful (to me). The majority of my time on a smartphone I am using one hand to operate the phone, which makes multitouch about as useful as tits on a bull. If they do add it, that's fine, but I certainly don't miss it, and I'd prefer they work on other practical matters.
As for the memory... a 4GB card included seems ok. For around $40 you can toss a 16GB card into it if you need the extra room for music. It wouldn't be of any use for games though (except for backing up large games maybe, to reinstall later).
@met2art: makes sense...although, since about 90% of web pages lack the proper html and css rules I tend to find myself using the pinch-zoom just to view web pages at a nice close up view that's readable.
Replacing my G1 with better hardware interests me greatly, but I've never really taken a shine to the soft keyboard, whether it be Android or the iPhone.
Maybe I'll bite it and grab a Nexus One, but what I really want to see on T-Mo is an updated G1 or a Droid with a better keyboard.
Multitouch? I could really care less. The functionality is there, it's just not built into any US handsets. I'm sure our fine European neighbors will get a nice Nexus One with multitouch, and all power to them.
@atrus123: My wife didn't want an iPhone because it lacked a keyboard, despite my protest. So I bought her an HTC Tilt2 for Christmas instead, to replace her BlackJack II.
And that's probably more information than you needed.
@atrus123: I think the key to remember here is that we don't know when it's coming out. It went through FCC but Google is being very hush hush about it. When it actually does, it's on T-Mobile which to me is a little bit of a bummer.
@seldomused: Don't be too bummed. It seems that T-Mo likes to release 1.0 Android devices (like the G1 and now the Nexus One). I'm sure it won't be long until we see Nexus Two through Six on other networks, as per the Blade Runner Android models. Maybe one of those will get a keyboard.
Also, I should revise my first statement in the thread to say that multitouch is built into US handsets, just not the native Google apps. I have several Android apps on the market and have experimented with multitouch on the G1, but never had a good reason to release anything with multitouch support.
@atrus123: I hear you. Though the G1 and its KB orientation is what adds to me using the harsware one mostly. Since this screen is wider, I think it will not be a problem, for me personally. PLUS, there are some voice to text apps, which are convenience, but certainly not a replacement for a physical kb. Though, screen size, speed and features is what will make me move on to something like this. I will likely keep my G1 around as a backup.. its a sentimental piece :)
@seldomused: I think it will comeout to the Tmo nedwok first as a locked device and subsidized at 199. Then perhaps a bit later, unlocked sold directly from goog (sold for 399). That is just my opinion though!
IT DOES HAVE MULTITOUCH!!!!!
Read the original LINK and i wish these blog sites would stop spreading false info!!
Pinch to zoom is not in the native google apps, thats all.
Any app downloaded from the market will have the option. This includes 3rd party browsers, games ect.....
Hannaford... read the notes carefully, it says "There's no multitouch support in the browser or in Google Maps," not "There's no multitouch period." There is multitouch, but not yet in GMaps or in the browser.
No multitouch, small battery, no 3G on AT&T? I expected a lot more from Google spec-wise, and expected the price to be near-free. Way to meet expectations, Google.
@BessMilda: You, and the rest of the speculative media, created those expectations. Google never said they were creating a phone compatible with every 3G band in the US and were going to give it away for free.
@Hearthatvoiceagain: ya, oh no.. no pinch zoom lol ... though if you goto her blog, in the comments, she clearly says a few times that its capable just not in google's software... some big info there left out haha
@Kat Hannaford: Oh I know a few of you are, but this site does give a very strong appearance of Iphone fanboism ... I honestly wouldn't of guessed you were a Android user though from the original blog post
@vinterchaos: No it doesnt. I am so sick of hearing this bullshit. Your conspiracy theories are unfounded and stupid. The sad thing is EVERY tech site you go to, there is some group of morons who are saying the exact same thing as you about the writers of that tech site.
Maybe you should stop and think about what is really wrong with your thought process that you would be one of thousands of people with the same ridiculously stupid theory.
Maybe you should accept that Apple makes a nice smartphone that people like.... Rear back your fanboy/anti-apple horse for a second and think about how silly it sounds.
And also dont put your blinders on when you read the tons of great reviews for other phones on this site, but seem to forget about them so you can soapbox about how its not fair that everyone loves apple and nobody loves my xxxxx gadget.
Sorry for the rant, but you can only read so much of this garbage before it really starts to annoy you.
@Kat Hannaford: sure there's plenty wrong with everything in life. I just thought the original title was misleading, and that some tidbits of info was left out, thats all.. you fixed it, kudos!
@Kat Hannaford: I couldn't care less about multitouch, I'm just glad to see some better Android-powered hardware creeping toward T-Mobile. My G1 is still great (people love seeing what it can do) but I want more power. I'm very happy to see a Giz editor who is an Android user and, more importantly, doesn't seem insanely biased in one direction or the other. I love Android, but when it (or the hardware) sucks or is lacking, I want to know about it.
@OCEntertainment: Im glad you started the slow clap. It hasnt made it to us yet here in texas, but im sure it will, unless apple comes in and makes a better clap and then gizmodo will be all like "imma let you finish, but Apple's slow clap is the best slow clap in the world!"
Yeah i took it there, cause you werent willing to.
@vinterchaos: Dont take my post as angry buddy. Just annoyed by the constant conspiracy theories.
If i was angry i would say fuck a bunch and probably get banned. Instead im elated to be able to help you lead a better fuller life of gadget appreciation.
@NorwoodIsMyHero: My post has nothing to do with me being a fanboy. It has everything to do with insane tinfoil hat conspiracies that apple is paying every blog in existence.
Sure its easy to tell i like apple gear, but there is plenty of other gear i like also, and at my job i have to support a glut of different devices, some i like and some i want to run over with the forklift. I do find it interesting you mention perspective in this debate, because that is exactly the problem. Narrow minded perspective.
@vinterchaos: My gadget appreciation comment was in jest, as most of my comments are.
I am glad your wife has an iPhone and would be glad if she had a droid, that wasn't the issue at hand. If i offended anyone in any way with my rant, i apologize for that.
I just see that same thing every day, it gets old, like seeing the stories about death panels, except here i can comment on how ludicrous it is.
@Eulatos: Narrow minded perspective indeed. My perspective is so narrow that I can't find anywhere in this thread where anyone said Apple was paying Gizmodo to be iPhone fanboys, or where anyone posted any conspiracy theory-esque rants regarding it.
Seriously though, if blog comments about Gizmodo's obvious love of the iPhone (which is fine) bother you this much, maybe its time to rethink things a bit. They are after all, just blog comments.
@NorwoodIsMyHero: Obviously THIS TIME nobody said those exact words. So it definitely never ever happened ever. And the subject is certainly not just an extension of the exact same subject.
Bury your head in the sand all you like, but the fact of the matter is this is not an uncommon statement on all tech blogs that even run a small amount of apple stories.
@Eulatos: This thread was the only one I'm referring to. Maybe if you would be more careful in your reading of my comments you would see that.
I'm not burying my head in the sand. I've read the same comments about Apple paying blogs you are referring to. I just ignore them with a bemused smirk. What I'm saying is that if these things bother you so much maybe your letting trolls and conspiracy theorists get the best of you.
People who post those insane conspiracy theories about Apple paying bloggers are either trolling for fanboys and don't really believe them, or are so idiotic as to believe they're true. In either case the best thing to do is ignore them, and its most certainly the best thing to do not to let them bother you.
Otherwise you end up ranting at someone who just called called Gizmodo editors iPhone fans and questioned their bias, which is not unreasonable. It may not be true, but its not unreasonable either.
@NorwoodIsMyHero: Aye you are right. I definitely flew off the hinge a little and for that i apologize. I think a good amount of my ire came from having just ended a very similar discussion over at where gadget news goes to be stomped on by idiots: Engadget.com.
Again, I apologize for targeting vinterchaos, but i still stand by the assertion that while the editors of gizmodo may be apple fans i dont see this huge bias that people talk about. I do see an increasing love for android as the minutes tick by, which is a-ok with me.
So ill settle down, you will settle down, this whole damn blog is out of order..... And ill try not to be an unhinged pig feeding gangster about all this. :)
@Eulatos: "Where gadget news goes to be stopmed by idiots."
Nice.
I don't really see a strong bias myself and I kind of have a sour taste from Apple in my mouth right now. I recently worked in a company where people who shouldn't have been spending as much as they were on MBPs and iPhones had the audacity to complain about their wages when they would have been able to do everything they needed to do with $300 netbooks and dumbphones.
I do think bias could be here at Gizmodo in some small way, but its basically impossible to prove, which is why throwing about accusations of bias is pointless.
12/20/09
12/19/09
12/19/09
12/20/09
12/20/09
12/22/09
12/19/09
12/20/09
12/19/09
12/19/09
12/19/09
12/19/09
12/19/09
And I care not for what the pinch-to-zoom apologists say. If you're pinch-zooming with one hand, the other hand is holding your phone. Otherwise, it's finger gymnastics.
12/19/09
12/19/09
12/19/09
12/19/09
12/19/09
Deep breaths. Go to your happy place and deep breaths.... Calm...
12/18/09
12/18/09
12/18/09
12/18/09
If Google offers it at around $200 without a contract, that could spark some interest in folks not having a contract (which would shake up the industry). It's not a terribly implausible plan since T-Mobile, Google's go-to partner for their Android test runs, just started hyping their Even More Plus plans that are slightly cheaper if you buy the phone up front and then you have no contract.
And, I suppose there's nothing saying an AT&T (or other carriers) version isn't coming. But the FCC filing for this phone didn't indicate anything but T-Mo.
We'll see, I guess.
12/18/09
I have an iPod touch as well and used to browse on it a lot before I got the Droid which rendered the iPod basically useless, I used multi-touch a lot but now that its gone I don't really miss it and it never presents any problems.
Is multi-touch just another iCatfighting weapon?
I do however think that multi-touch with a virtual keyboard is near-essential though. Once you get the single touch rhythm it's manageable, but multi-touch would make it far better.
12/18/09
12/18/09
12/20/09
12/18/09
12/18/09
12/18/09
12/18/09
(Multitouch in some other apps would be nice though, particularly musical ones and games.)
12/18/09
Don't get me wrong, I completely understand multi-touch's usefulness in other apps and other interfaces...
but for zooming... on a device thats made to be used almost entirely in one hand... why is it so important to people!?
I have the multi-touch option in the Dolphin browser, and the first thing I did after trying out said gimmick, was turn the normal zoom buttons back on. Cause I wanted to be able to zoom in with... you guessed it... ONE HAND!
12/18/09
I prefer the control of pinch zooming, so I will be disappointed if this phone doesn't have true multi-touch. Why is this so damn hard to implement for anyone but Apple?
12/18/09
12/18/09
I'm pretty sure all versions of android 2.0 and above will have Multi-Touch abilities, they just won't be built into the browser or google maps yet (i don't know why they're scared of apple, they just are). But you can always download an alternative browser like Dolphin, which does support multi-touch zooming (and it works on the Droid right now)
12/18/09
Palm got in some heat over certain implementations of multitouch when they first came out, but as I understand it, the specific pinch-to-zoom gesture is not something Apple has a patent on.
Engadget had a pretty dang good write up on the subject a while back.
Or was there something else I missed? I know you tend to know your stuff when it comes to Android.
12/18/09
12/18/09
Of the 3 on my Droid, only 2 are full - the other is pretty bare.
12/18/09
12/18/09
Three home screens (plus the drawer) is plenty for arranging the applications that you use frequently. However, I also have the quick-search widget, the power control widget, and Astrid's task list summary widget on my homescreens. Each takes up four icons worth of space. If you wanted to add some bigger (or just more) widgets, you'd suddenly find yourself running out of space real fast.
Of course, the obvious caveat is having the processor speed to run all those widgets at the same time, but I think this phone can handle that.
Admittedly, though, 7 would start to get cumbersome to swipe through, especially just to see a widget.
12/18/09
12/18/09
I will agree that application management is a little wonky. It can be hard to know when stuff is open and when it's not, or where pressing a certain button will take you. But for the most part, it works. You rarely ever want to be multitasking with more than 3-4 active apps anyway.
Also, while it's kind of a hidden feature, you can hold down the home key and it brings up an alt-tab-like menu of the six most recently used apps. It's occasionally handy.
12/18/09
12/18/09
Other than its speed, Android 2.1 and lack of a physical keyboard, it's just another Android phone (albeit an extremely sexy one).
Not sure about battery life, but my friend has yet to have any complaints. He wouldn't let me take any video of the phone sadly - I wanted to take a few showing how fast the processor is.
12/18/09
12/18/09
As for the memory... a 4GB card included seems ok. For around $40 you can toss a 16GB card into it if you need the extra room for music. It wouldn't be of any use for games though (except for backing up large games maybe, to reinstall later).
12/19/09
12/18/09
Replacing my G1 with better hardware interests me greatly, but I've never really taken a shine to the soft keyboard, whether it be Android or the iPhone.
Maybe I'll bite it and grab a Nexus One, but what I really want to see on T-Mo is an updated G1 or a Droid with a better keyboard.
Multitouch? I could really care less. The functionality is there, it's just not built into any US handsets. I'm sure our fine European neighbors will get a nice Nexus One with multitouch, and all power to them.
12/18/09
And that's probably more information than you needed.
12/18/09
12/18/09
Also, I should revise my first statement in the thread to say that multitouch is built into US handsets, just not the native Google apps. I have several Android apps on the market and have experimented with multitouch on the G1, but never had a good reason to release anything with multitouch support.
12/18/09
12/18/09
12/18/09
Read the original LINK and i wish these blog sites would stop spreading false info!!
Pinch to zoom is not in the native google apps, thats all.
Any app downloaded from the market will have the option. This includes 3rd party browsers, games ect.....
12/18/09
12/18/09
12/18/09
12/18/09
12/18/09
12/18/09
12/18/09
12/18/09
a) It matters to most people.
b) It won't be hacked within 30 seconds of release.
12/18/09
12/18/09
12/18/09
12/18/09
12/18/09
12/18/09
Maybe you should stop and think about what is really wrong with your thought process that you would be one of thousands of people with the same ridiculously stupid theory.
Maybe you should accept that Apple makes a nice smartphone that people like.... Rear back your fanboy/anti-apple horse for a second and think about how silly it sounds.
And also dont put your blinders on when you read the tons of great reviews for other phones on this site, but seem to forget about them so you can soapbox about how its not fair that everyone loves apple and nobody loves my xxxxx gadget.
Sorry for the rant, but you can only read so much of this garbage before it really starts to annoy you.
12/18/09
12/18/09
12/18/09
maybe you should stop and think about what is really wrong with your life and maybe your blood pressure won't go up so high over minute things.
12/18/09
12/18/09
12/18/09
Now that you have won, what do you think you are going to do next?
12/18/09
Yeah i took it there, cause you werent willing to.
12/18/09
If i was angry i would say fuck a bunch and probably get banned. Instead im elated to be able to help you lead a better fuller life of gadget appreciation.
12/18/09
my life of gadget appreciation is fine, my wife has an iphone and i'm glad she does, I play games on it when she makes me visit her boring ass family
but just for the sake of you stopping, you are absolutely correct, you have enlightened me, thank you!
12/18/09
12/18/09
Sure its easy to tell i like apple gear, but there is plenty of other gear i like also, and at my job i have to support a glut of different devices, some i like and some i want to run over with the forklift. I do find it interesting you mention perspective in this debate, because that is exactly the problem. Narrow minded perspective.
12/18/09
I am glad your wife has an iPhone and would be glad if she had a droid, that wasn't the issue at hand. If i offended anyone in any way with my rant, i apologize for that.
I just see that same thing every day, it gets old, like seeing the stories about death panels, except here i can comment on how ludicrous it is.
12/18/09
Seriously though, if blog comments about Gizmodo's obvious love of the iPhone (which is fine) bother you this much, maybe its time to rethink things a bit. They are after all, just blog comments.
12/18/09
Bury your head in the sand all you like, but the fact of the matter is this is not an uncommon statement on all tech blogs that even run a small amount of apple stories.
12/18/09
I'm not burying my head in the sand. I've read the same comments about Apple paying blogs you are referring to. I just ignore them with a bemused smirk. What I'm saying is that if these things bother you so much maybe your letting trolls and conspiracy theorists get the best of you.
People who post those insane conspiracy theories about Apple paying bloggers are either trolling for fanboys and don't really believe them, or are so idiotic as to believe they're true. In either case the best thing to do is ignore them, and its most certainly the best thing to do not to let them bother you.
Otherwise you end up ranting at someone who just called called Gizmodo editors iPhone fans and questioned their bias, which is not unreasonable. It may not be true, but its not unreasonable either.
12/18/09
Again, I apologize for targeting vinterchaos, but i still stand by the assertion that while the editors of gizmodo may be apple fans i dont see this huge bias that people talk about. I do see an increasing love for android as the minutes tick by, which is a-ok with me.
So ill settle down, you will settle down, this whole damn blog is out of order..... And ill try not to be an unhinged pig feeding gangster about all this. :)
12/18/09
So take that!
12/18/09
Nice.
I don't really see a strong bias myself and I kind of have a sour taste from Apple in my mouth right now. I recently worked in a company where people who shouldn't have been spending as much as they were on MBPs and iPhones had the audacity to complain about their wages when they would have been able to do everything they needed to do with $300 netbooks and dumbphones.
I do think bias could be here at Gizmodo in some small way, but its basically impossible to prove, which is why throwing about accusations of bias is pointless.
12/18/09
12/18/09
12/18/09