Senior Contributing Editors:
Jesus Diaz
| AIM | Twitter
Mark Wilson, Reviews
| AIM | Twitter
Contributing Editors:
Matt Buchanan | AIM | Twitter
Adam Frucci | Twitter
Sean Fallon | Twitter
Jack Loftus | Twitter
John Herrman | Twitter
Dan Nosowitz
Chris Mascari
Danny Allen | Twitter
Rosa Golijan | Twitter
Chris Jacob
I was an Eastman Kodak employee from 1980 to 1999. It's been sad to see this once mighty company implode.
For those not in Rochester, EK is headquartered there. EK's employment in Rochester peak in 1983 with about 68,500 people. It now has less than 8,000 there.
IMHO, EK's downfall is the result of denial. EK demonstrated the first digital camera concept, built the first DSLR for the US military and NASA, and designed the Apple QuickTake 100, the first consumer digital camera. Unfortunately, senior management in the 90's adamently denied that digital photography was going to overtake film as quickly as it did. I remember being told that it would be about 2010 before digital would overtake film.
In the 90's, they brought in George Fisher, their first and still only outside CEO. George came over from Motorola, in a time when Motorola ruled the cellphone industry. Unfortunately, George's efforts to quickly turn the 100+ year old behemoth was, IMHO, sabotaged from within. His division managers kept their heads in the sand and denied that EK needed to change quickly.
I had high hopes that EK would be able to use OLED to recover -- or at least stabilize -- but that's now impossible. Someday soon, I completely expect to read that Kodak is being bought-up by an investment group and liquidated piece-by-piece.
Can anyone think of any other company which has suck so far so quickly?
@Dacker: When I was at Kodak I always felt like the good 'ol boy network got in the way. A lot of the higher ups were just trying to scratch each other's back and this discouraged risk taking. My bosses were mostly thinking about how much they could make now instead of 10 years down the road.
@fuzz54: I have no doubt that the "good 'ol boy" network contributed to EK's situation. EK has been a very insular company with a massive political machine inside.
Given the approximate time you were there, I'd bet there was a lot of pressure to cater to Wall Street's myopic, "make this quarter look good" mentality and not the long term survival of the company. It's unfortunate that this is much too common.
On that, I have to admire the Japanese mentality of driving toward 5-, 10-, or even 20-year goals rather than just this quarter's or this year's results.
What a sad development! There are many negatives to this story, and few positives. I thought they'd have a shot at recovery if they framed their business properly, but sadly they're just shuttering one branch of their company after another. It's easy to judge through the lens of hindsight, but they should have been faster on digital. Now they're just alone in a dark room, overexposed to debt and waiting to be hung out to dry. #puncraft
Haven't people figured out yet that this whole "apple tablet" rumor mill is just a ploy on Apple's part to keep Microsoft busy and distracted while Apple finishes up some other top secret project?
@unique172: If you look really deep into my posts, you see me predict them using Qi screens months ago. It'd really be the smartest move, I think. The screen would cost THEM $500, accounting for THIRTY PERCENT of the costs? If they are going to project a cost anywhere close to that, it'd BETTER be running a full version of OS X. Otherwise, anything at $500+ is simply overpriced for a giant iPod Touch.
@ovil200: I remember someone (you?) saying that, but haven't heard any real news. I agree about the price. I doubt anyone will buy a $1000+ version of the touch, even if it IS shiny.
@unique172: What the heck is that $1000 price tag. Sorry it's just not practical in this time of recession. I'll do my ebook reading and iTunes music with my cheap 10.1 inch Asus 1005HA. It does the same stuff plus more.
@rjbuddyboi: Nobody knows the price; I was saying that I doubt anyone would pay that much. But judging by the non-contract price of the iPhone, I doubt the tablet will be cheap. I'd be very surprised if it was less than $500-600. I have a netbook too, but if it came with a reflective, low-power sunlight readable display I'd be very tempted. Hell, if any real device (that allowed internet access, keyboard input, etc) came with that display, I'd probably drop some $$.
@Nathan Obbards: I read it. The point is to not even put shit like this on your front page, and hand free pageviews to people who make stuff up.
@saronian: Only two of those are official titles. I'd like to think it's pretty simple. Macbooks = plastic, Macbook Pros= aluminum, Air = thin and aluminum.
1. Recreate an existing niche device
2. Drive fanboys wild with covert marketing winks/nods/half truths and denials
3. Add a little mysticism with slick technology and design
4. Price it DOUBLE what would be expected while HALVING its utility with DRM/quirky Apple restrictions
5. Cry foul when mainstream devices are developed and leave it in the dust as a quirky expensive exception with 5% marketshare.
Who cares about reasons for a supposed delay - it could be due to a global shortage of pixie dust for all it matters since we are spreading rumors of rumors about a rumored device that is rumored to be available some rumored day. Come on - tell us the sucker is fission powered and they have to get approval from the nuclear regulatory body before Miley Cyrus will write the start-up song and Buddha waves an arm and it sits in every humans lap of life.
ahahahahahha oh giz... i love a good joke in the morning... if this rumors pans out, this itablet thing will be a mocking-factory for people walking down the street... we're in a recession folks, thrift and savings are all the rage, from the fashion runways to cars... if you see someone on the subway with this stupid 2000$ ebook portable porn machine you won't go up and be like oh wow cool can i see that? (like the iphone) you'll say... what a douchebag....
@Lukasz Fabis: On their more affordable products. Most of their sales actually come from ipods and iphones. Only about 10% to 20% of their gross unit sales include Mac's. (Information guestimated from 2009 Q1 to Q3 sales figures)
Seriously too expensive. Especially if it's capacitive multi-touch. That'll defeat the purposes of all the graphic artists looking for a Macbook/Cintiq crossover.
If Apple insists on stuffing OLED into this poor thing, it's going to join the ranks of the Macbook Air and G4 cube as niche products that were cool but too few could afford.
@erich.strasser: Considering LG hasn't mass produced ANY OLED displays, I'm gonna call BS.
And when was the last time Apple jumped on an "early-adopter" technology they didn't develop? They are usually WAY more conservative than the rest of the market.
I bet what they're not saying is that they've got big plans for some OLED roll-to-roll printing, which -- once they have kinks worked out like ink solvent systems, ink drying times, and printing resolution -- should DRASTICALLY reduce OLED display manufacturing costs.
GE has already got a working prototype (linked below). While it may be lousy and expensive, the technology is advancing quickly, and I think LG is banking on this stuff, to make a bold statement like "OLEDs will be cheaper than LCDs in the future".
12/04/09
At least, that was what they were telling the troops (me included) when I worked for them.
12/04/09
For those not in Rochester, EK is headquartered there. EK's employment in Rochester peak in 1983 with about 68,500 people. It now has less than 8,000 there.
IMHO, EK's downfall is the result of denial. EK demonstrated the first digital camera concept, built the first DSLR for the US military and NASA, and designed the Apple QuickTake 100, the first consumer digital camera. Unfortunately, senior management in the 90's adamently denied that digital photography was going to overtake film as quickly as it did. I remember being told that it would be about 2010 before digital would overtake film.
In the 90's, they brought in George Fisher, their first and still only outside CEO. George came over from Motorola, in a time when Motorola ruled the cellphone industry. Unfortunately, George's efforts to quickly turn the 100+ year old behemoth was, IMHO, sabotaged from within. His division managers kept their heads in the sand and denied that EK needed to change quickly.
I had high hopes that EK would be able to use OLED to recover -- or at least stabilize -- but that's now impossible. Someday soon, I completely expect to read that Kodak is being bought-up by an investment group and liquidated piece-by-piece.
Can anyone think of any other company which has suck so far so quickly?
12/04/09
12/04/09
12/04/09
Given the approximate time you were there, I'd bet there was a lot of pressure to cater to Wall Street's myopic, "make this quarter look good" mentality and not the long term survival of the company. It's unfortunate that this is much too common.
On that, I have to admire the Japanese mentality of driving toward 5-, 10-, or even 20-year goals rather than just this quarter's or this year's results.
12/04/09
12/04/09
12/04/09
11/19/09
11/19/09
11/19/09
11/19/09
#tips
11/19/09
11/20/09
#tips
11/19/09
Also there's no way Apple makes anything at a loss. Ever.
How about Gizmodo starts filtering their "journalism", rather than reblogging any halfwit's dart-board rumor mongering.
11/19/09
"That crazy DigiTimes—purveyors of always-failed-Apple rumors"
and
"No word yet from them on the rumored matter synthesizer and teleporter module, but give it a couple more months, and they will spill it all out. "
11/20/09
@saronian: Only two of those are official titles. I'd like to think it's pretty simple. Macbooks = plastic, Macbook Pros= aluminum, Air = thin and aluminum.
11/19/09
1. Recreate an existing niche device
2. Drive fanboys wild with covert marketing winks/nods/half truths and denials
3. Add a little mysticism with slick technology and design
4. Price it DOUBLE what would be expected while HALVING its utility with DRM/quirky Apple restrictions
5. Cry foul when mainstream devices are developed and leave it in the dust as a quirky expensive exception with 5% marketshare.
11/19/09
6. Profit!
11/19/09
[sigh]
11/19/09
11/19/09
Funny, then, that Apple's sales have been growing despite the recession.
11/19/09
11/19/09
If Apple insists on stuffing OLED into this poor thing, it's going to join the ranks of the Macbook Air and G4 cube as niche products that were cool but too few could afford.
11/19/09
11/19/09
[www.oled-display.net]
11/19/09
And when was the last time Apple jumped on an "early-adopter" technology they didn't develop? They are usually WAY more conservative than the rest of the market.
11/19/09
10/30/09
GE has already got a working prototype (linked below). While it may be lousy and expensive, the technology is advancing quickly, and I think LG is banking on this stuff, to make a bold statement like "OLEDs will be cheaper than LCDs in the future".
[gizmodo.com]
10/30/09
10/30/09