• Gizmodo
  • bestmodo
  • lifehacker
  • kotaku
  • Profile logout login

#shuffle

Gizmodo

Share Cancel
   
Upload an image | Add an image URL
×

logging in
  • FAQ. Include # before tag:
  • #tips,
  • #dealzmodo,
  • #rumors,
  • #broken,
  • #iphoneapps,
  • #apple,
  • etc.

New York, 12:18 PM
Sat Dec 5
66 posts in the last 24 hours

FR | IT | DE | SP | JP | AU | BR

Gizmodo Team

Tip your editors:

Editorial Director:
Brian Lam | | Twitter

Editor:
Jason Chen
| AIM | Twitter

Features Editor:
Wilson Rothman
| Twitter

Senior Contributing Editors:
Jesus Diaz
| AIM | Twitter
Mark Wilson, Reviews
| AIM | Twitter

Contributing Editors:
Matt Buchanan
| AIM | Twitter
Adam Frucci
| Twitter
Sean Fallon
| Twitter
Jack Loftus
| Twitter
John Herrman
| Twitter
Dan Nosowitz

Chris Mascari

Danny Allen
| Twitter
Rosa Golijan
| Twitter
Chris Jacob

Columnist:
Brendan I. Koerner

Interns:
Don Nguyen

Kyle VanHemert

Heroes and Friends

Comment Account Questions:

SUBSCRIBE TO Gizmodo RSS

New: Breaking news and daily top stories via email
9515 Subscribers
Gizmodo
  • posts about #shuffle more →

    Mini MP3 DV Cam Gives The iPod Shuffle Video Capability

    Apple 9/9/09 Liveblog

    Scosche TapStick Makes iPod Shuffle 3G Significantly Less Annoying, More Usable

    iPhone Nano Wannabe Actually Looks Like It Came From Cupertino

    The Kindle 2 and iPod Shuffle Perform Blade Runner

    ChocoShuffle Case Turns iPod Into Something No More Edible

    New Shuffle Costs Apple $21.77 to Build

    iTunes 8.1 Kindly Suggests You Get New iPod Shuffle By Scrambling Old Shuffle's Brains

    We Discover the Dark Side of the New iPod Shuffle

    The New Shuffle Available in Pretty Colors for $129, Unofficially
  • Your version of Internet Explorer is not supported. Please upgrade to the most recent version in order to view comments.
    Dsmvwl  Admin  Promote to frontpage Approve user Ban user ×
    Image of discounteggroll discounteggroll
    06/05/09

    In reply to Scosche TapStick Makes iPod Shuffle 3G Significantly Less Annoying, More Usable
    Scosche? EWW. as much as I promoting afternarket vendors, Scosche is like a punch in the ribs. Am I getting post-factory components from Scoshe?


    are they trustworthy? (No)


    Proceed to reliable vendors. No shout-outs, just drop the dime on more than you see @ Wal-Mart/Sam's Club...

     Reply
    discounteggroll was starred discounteggroll was unstarred
    Image of eagles3 speeeedin eagles3 speeeedin
    06/05/09

    In reply to Scosche TapStick Makes iPod Shuffle 3G Significantly Less Annoying, More Usable
    This is getting dumb. Apple should drop this generation of shuffle entirely and revert to the old one until they have some sort of buttons attached to this current model.
     Reply
    eagles3 speeeedin was starred eagles3 speeeedin was unstarred
    Image of Kaiser-Machead Kaiser-Machead
    06/05/09

    @eagles3: I agree. A 2-4GB 2nd gen shuffle is just about perfect.
     Reply
    Kaiser-Machead was starred Kaiser-Machead was unstarred
    Image of Nick Nick
    06/05/09

    In reply to Scosche TapStick Makes iPod Shuffle 3G Significantly Less Annoying, More Usable
    This might just be a lipstick-on-a-pig


    i believe that is exactly the kind of thing Ponies! goes for.

     Reply
    Nick was starred Nick was unstarred
    Image of Kaiser-Machead Kaiser-Machead
    06/05/09

    In reply to Scosche TapStick Makes iPod Shuffle 3G Significantly Less Annoying, More Usable
    Oh shuffle, at one time you actually had a point, and now you're just an adapter prone Helen Keller without your fancy headphones.
     Reply
    Kaiser-Machead was starred Kaiser-Machead was unstarred
    Image of Nick Nick
    06/05/09

    @Kaiser-Machead: dank youuu
     Reply
    Nick was starred Nick was unstarred
    Image of Jrsy Devil's Advocate® Jrsy Devil's Advocate®
    04/24/09

    In reply to iPhone Nano Wannabe Actually Looks Like It Came From Cupertino
    Given their proficiency at copying everything else I'm going to predict China will be the first, whether by accident or design, to produce a viable human clone...
     Reply
    Jrsy Devil's Advocate® was starred Jrsy Devil's Advocate® was unstarred
    Image of Nick Nick
    04/24/09

    In reply to iPhone Nano Wannabe Actually Looks Like It Came From Cupertino
    it looks slick, but what is magical voice?
     Reply
    Nick was starred Nick was unstarred
    Image of Kaiser-Machead Kaiser-Machead
    04/24/09

    In reply to iPhone Nano Wannabe Actually Looks Like It Came From Cupertino
    The polish and panache of these quasi-clones usually goes as far as their product spreads. Meet them in person, and it'd probably give off the similar visual impact a Matchbox car would in specially marked boxes of cereal.
     Reply
    Kaiser-Machead was starred Kaiser-Machead was unstarred
    Image of Jrsy Devil's Advocate® Jrsy Devil's Advocate®
    04/24/09

    @Kaiser-Machead: Hey now, I wouldn't mind finding a Matchbox or Hot Wheels car in my box of Frosted Lucky Charms..
     Reply
    Jrsy Devil's Advocate® was starred Jrsy Devil's Advocate® was unstarred
    Image of Lite: hates Illinois Nazis Lite: hates Illinois Nazis
    04/24/09

    In reply to iPhone Nano Wannabe Actually Looks Like It Came From Cupertino
    So this is what happens if a store full of apple products inbreeds?
     Reply
    Lite: hates Illinois Nazis was starred Lite: hates Illinois Nazis was unstarred
    Image of Serolf Divad Serolf Divad
    04/23/09

    In reply to The Kindle 2 and iPod Shuffle Perform Blade Runner
    The Kindle was pretty decent. Not sure I'd want it to read a whole book to me, but it might be OK for e-mails.
     Reply
    Serolf Divad was starred Serolf Divad was unstarred
    Image of Jrsy Devil's Advocate® Jrsy Devil's Advocate®
    04/23/09

    In reply to The Kindle 2 and iPod Shuffle Perform Blade Runner
    They're both replicants..
     Reply
    Jrsy Devil's Advocate® was starred Jrsy Devil's Advocate® was unstarred
    Image of nick's after the gnarly necter.. 800. nick's after the gnarly necter.. 800.
    04/23/09

    @Jrsy Devil's Food Cake®: I still call bullshit on that, Scott decided not to make Deckard a replicant before the movie was released, then a decade later decided that it would have been cooler if he was and put in and started putting together the directors cut to imply it. retroooacctiivee hissstorryyyy
     Reply
    nick's after the gnarly necter.. 800. was starred nick's after the gnarly necter.. 800. was unstarred
    Image of Jrsy Devil's Advocate® Jrsy Devil's Advocate®
    04/24/09

    @nick800: True, but the scene re-enacted above didn't include Deckard.
     Reply
    Jrsy Devil's Advocate® was starred Jrsy Devil's Advocate® was unstarred
    Image of Monty Monty
    04/17/09

    In reply to ChocoShuffle Case Turns iPod Into Something No More Edible
    Shuffles are like a box of chocolates, since you never know what song you are going to get.
     Reply
    Monty was starred Monty was unstarred
    Image of cddude cddude
    04/13/09

    In reply to New Shuffle Costs Apple $21.77 to Build
    it's amazing how someone can sell a flash drive as a music player for $80. i have a flash drive that's twice that size i paid $15 for. so i'm basically paying $65 for the ability to play music off it portably?
     Reply
    cddude was starred cddude was unstarred
    Image of Kaiser-Machead Kaiser-Machead
    04/13/09

    @cddude: It isn't just a flash drive. If it was just a flash drive, it would do nothing more than store data. obviously, that's not the case. By that logic, my iPod touch is just a 32GB flash drive, because the other components around the medium with which it stores information is insignificant.


    That flash drive that you paid $15 for probably costs a few cents to produce individually, thus the markup on that cheap flash drive is probably similarly proportioned to this product.

     Reply
    Kaiser-Machead was starred Kaiser-Machead was unstarred
    Image of shadowproof9 shadowproof9
    04/13/09

    In reply to New Shuffle Costs Apple $21.77 to Build
    I dont understand why more people dont hate Apple, exactly for reasons like this. over 75% markup??? Thats simply immoral.
     Reply
    shadowproof9 was starred shadowproof9 was unstarred
    Image of GitEmSteveDave_HatesFriday GitEmSteveDave_HatesFriday
    04/13/09

    @shadowproof9: Take this empty glass:
     Reply
    GitEmSteveDave_HatesFriday was starred GitEmSteveDave_HatesFriday was unstarred
    Image of shopperciti.com shopperciti.com
    04/13/09

    In reply to New Shuffle Costs Apple $21.77 to Build
    Dont act surprised GIZHEADS, if you where a MON(APPLE)LY you would do the same thing. I work in sales for a BOILERROOM type company making 100k a year just talkn on the phone, its all about supply and demand which in sales is the only two rules that exist and im sure at the rate they are pump'n out they are making at least a 65-75% profit so the costs that where just specified are way to high. High profits low parts cost cause your able to buy more in bult at a cheaper rate than your comptition. These guys are DDD-DIGITAL DOPE DEALERS and im a helpless TECHEAD whos fix is never satisfied unless the toy is considered the latest and greatest thats out. They have me by the cockandballs!
     Reply
    shopperciti.com was starred shopperciti.com was unstarred
    Image of GitEmSteveDave_HatesFriday GitEmSteveDave_HatesFriday
    04/13/09

    @shopperciti.com: Sorry, as soon as you said Boiler Room, I pictured you as either Giovanni Ribissi or Vin Diesel, and your words transformed into grunts.
     Reply
    GitEmSteveDave_HatesFriday was starred GitEmSteveDave_HatesFriday was unstarred
    Image of Andreas Mueller Andreas Mueller
    04/13/09

    In reply to New Shuffle Costs Apple $21.77 to Build
    Why are people offended that it costs less to make than its sold for?


    How many of you "outraged" posters work at cost? You could be fed, clothed and housed for $10/day, why don't you ask for a paycut if you think taking profit is immoral or a ripoff?

     Reply
    Andreas Mueller was starred Andreas Mueller was unstarred
    Image of GitEmSteveDave_HatesFriday GitEmSteveDave_HatesFriday
    04/13/09

    @Andreas Mueller: How many outraged posters are posting at work, on someone elses dime, so they are producing less than what they are getting paid for?
     Reply
    GitEmSteveDave_HatesFriday was starred GitEmSteveDave_HatesFriday was unstarred
    Earlier discussions Other discussions Show all discussions Show featured discussions only Start a new discussion

Login

Enter your username and password.

Please enter a username.
Please enter your password.
logging in
Login via Facebook | Sign Up | Forgot Password?

Reset Password

Please enter your email address to have your password reset.

Please enter your email address.
Please enter a valid email address.
requesting password reset

Register

Registering will give you a user profile and the ability to add other users as friends. To become a commenter, however, you need to audition.

Want to know more? Consult the Comment FAQ and legal terms.

Please enter a username.
Please enter a password.
Please confirm your password.
Passwords are not identical.
Please enter a valid email address.
registration sent, waiting for reply

Submit Your Comment

You don't need to login to comment. Just enter your email address below.

See how your address will be displayed in the Comment FAQ.

Please enter a valid email address.
Please enter a valid email address.
logging in

Login with your Facebook or Gizmodo account.

Sign up here.



  • Archives
  • About
  • Advertising
  • Legal
  • Help
  • Report a Bug
  • FAQ
Original material is licensed under a Creative Commons License permitting non-commercial sharing with attribution.