Senior Contributing Editors:
Jesus Diaz
| AIM | Twitter
Mark Wilson, Reviews
| AIM | Twitter
Contributing Editors:
Matt Buchanan | AIM | Twitter
Adam Frucci | Twitter
Sean Fallon | Twitter
Jack Loftus | Twitter
John Herrman | Twitter
Dan Nosowitz
Chris Mascari
Kat Hannaford | Twitter
Rosa Golijan | Twitter
Chris Jacob
I'm not usually pro-censorship, but a porn filter may not have been that bad of an idea. Considering almost 90% of all internet traffic is porn related, I'm not too keen to have so much tax money paying for porn bandwidth.
Although, I'm also not too keen on nation-wide WiFi at all. The less the government is in charge of the better IMO.
12/31/08
Although, I'm also not too keen on nation-wide WiFi at all. The less the government is in charge of the better IMO.
12/31/08
12/31/08
[www.technewsworld.com]
19% of all traffic is porn-related. This isn't actual bandwidth stats, though, just sites visited.
In any case, I'm agreeing with admoseremic here--why should my tax dollars go to someone's desire to wank? Srsly.
12/31/08
Besides, how often is anyone actually going to make use of 10kbps internet access? "Srsly."