Senior Contributing Editors:
Jesus Diaz
| AIM | Twitter
Mark Wilson, Reviews
| AIM | Twitter
Contributing Editors:
Matt Buchanan | AIM | Twitter
Adam Frucci | Twitter
Sean Fallon | Twitter
Jack Loftus | Twitter
John Herrman | Twitter
Dan Nosowitz
Chris Mascari
Kat Hannaford | Twitter
Rosa Golijan | Twitter
Chris Jacob
If I were to take one shot in RAW format, wouldn't I be able to create the necessary three different exposures out of the one shot, making the necessary exposure adjustments on the computer?
Some of us like the clown vomit, btw. (Great metaphor, JM.) The surreal versus the documentary photo, versus the "realistic" (but adjusted) photo are all matters of taste. And only that. There is no rule for creating "right" images. Only successful or failed attempts at achieving a photographer's intentions. And ultimately, execution, not intention, is the measure of all things. So stop hating on the clowns. The rodeo is big enough for us all.
Great tips guys. I've been using one of the recommended camera's for getting HDR, the Pentax K10. I take 5 exposures at 2 stop differences and I created a really crappy one in my living room in a matter of minutes.
@e0ytk: Sorry e0ytk. That comment was misdirected to you by Gawkers busted commenting system. I did not mean to insult your photography. That was suppose to be a general comment to the article.
04/02/09
Though I'm surprised that it took the Vice President of the colonies to come up with this.
04/02/09
04/02/09
04/02/09
03/16/09
03/16/09
03/15/09
03/16/09
03/14/09
[img.photobucket.com] Photos/comparison.jpg
But outside and at night or at dusk it'll really be evident and look amazing. Great article.
03/14/09
03/14/09
I think this will work too:
03/14/09
@balls187: Well very true but I believe I already stated this wasn't a great shot, it was merely a sample of it working on small scale in any home.
03/16/09
Again, I apologize.
03/14/09