• Gizmodo
  • bestmodo
  • lifehacker
  • kotaku
  • Profile logout login

#westerndigital

edit true "tagmeta=westerndigital","tagmeta=westerndigital", tags, front=false

Gizmodo

Share Cancel
   
Upload an image | Add an image URL
×

logging in
  • FAQ. Include # before tag:
  • #tips,
  • #whitenoise,
  • #dealzmodo,
  • #broken,
  • etc.

New York, 7:27 PM
Sun Dec 27
33 posts in the last 24 hours

FR | IT | DE | SP | JP | AU | BR

Gizmodo Team

Tip your editors:

Editorial Director:
Brian Lam | | Twitter

Editor:
Jason Chen
| AIM | Twitter

Features Editor:
Wilson Rothman
| Twitter

Senior Contributing Editors:
Jesus Diaz
| AIM | Twitter
Mark Wilson, Reviews
| AIM | Twitter

Contributing Editors:
Matt Buchanan
| AIM | Twitter
Adam Frucci
| Twitter
Sean Fallon
| Twitter
Jack Loftus
| Twitter
John Herrman
| Twitter
Dan Nosowitz

Chris Mascari

Kat Hannaford
| Twitter
Rosa Golijan
| Twitter
Chris Jacob

Columnist:
Brendan I. Koerner

Interns:
Don Nguyen

Kyle VanHemert

Heroes and Friends

Comment Account Questions:

SUBSCRIBE TO Gizmodo RSS

New: Breaking news and daily top stories via email
9515 Subscribers
Gizmodo
  • posts about #westerndigital more →

    Western Digital Advanced Format Gives You 11 Percent More Hard Drive Space

    Now Available

    Quick Test: Seagate's 1TB Portable FreeAgent Go

    WD Puts E-Labels on My Book Elite and Studio, Includes Dock With My Passport Elite Portable Drive

    WD's Ever-Smaller External Hard Drives Bring Better Security and Incremental Backups

    Leaked Western Digital TV-2 Media Player Reveals Modest Upgrades, Codec Support

    WD Scorpio Blue Drive Is First One Terabyte Mobile Drive Ever—Yes, 1TB

    My Book World Edition II (4TB) Lightning Review

    Western Digital's My Book World Edition II Offers 4TB of RAID Network Storage

    Western Digital's SiliconDrive III Lineup Are Their First SSD Offerings

    WD My Book Studio Edition II: 4 Terabytes + 4 Interfaces

    TiVo Will Not Approve (or Even Test) Seagate Showcase and Other DVR Expanders

    Best Buy Sells Egregiously Crappy, 9-Year-Old Hard Drive As New, Then Refuses Refund

    Western Digital 2TB My Book World Drive Uses One Single 2TB Disk

    Western Digital's 8TB ShareSpace NAS is One Beast of a Storage Hub

    Western Digital WD20WEADS Is the First 2TB Internal Drive

    Giz Explains: Everything You Need to Know About Hard Drives

    Hard Drive Failure Soundboard Guarantees Debilitating Flashbacks

    Western Digital WD TV HD Media Player Streams from Hard Drives on the Cheap

    How To Choose the Best Network Storage for a Mac/PC Home

  • Your version of Internet Explorer is not supported. Please upgrade to the most recent version in order to view comments.

    Dsmvwl  Admin  Promote to frontpage Approve user Ban user ×
    Image of jsparakov jsparakov
    12/11/09

    In reply to Western Digital Advanced Format Gives You 11 Percent More Hard Drive Space
    Western Digital: on the frontier of cutting-edge porn storage technology.

    edit... sorry, I meant family photos and HD camcorder footage of my dog.
     Reply
    whiteknight89 digs DBZ promoted this comment Edited by jsparakov at 12/11/09 7:24 PM jsparakov was starred jsparakov was unstarred
    Image of orbitbreak orbitbreak
    12/11/09

    In reply to Western Digital Advanced Format Gives You 11 Percent More Hard Drive Space
    Doesn't formatting at smaller cluster size always mean more space, but at a drop in performance for reading bigger files?
     Reply
    kagekiri promoted this comment orbitbreak was starred orbitbreak was unstarred
    Image of Nitesh Singh Nitesh Singh
    12/11/09

    In reply to Western Digital Advanced Format Gives You 11 Percent More Hard Drive Space
    Polishing brass on the titanic. WD, just start working on affordable SSD's for the masses, mmkay?
     Reply
    Nathan Obbards promoted this comment Nitesh Singh was starred Nitesh Singh was unstarred
    Image of TailsNZ TailsNZ
    12/11/09

    @Nitesh Singh: I think it'll be a long time before SSD's can compete with 2TB hard drives in terms of $/per GB. Meanwhile I still want to keep all my movies and music etc on a hard drive, no need for SSD speeds on those.
     Reply
    TailsNZ was starred TailsNZ was unstarred
    Image of Canoehead Canoehead
    10/13/09

    In reply to Now Available
    Wish this had been out before - would have saved some bucks over the Popcorn Hour.
     Reply
    Canoehead was starred Canoehead was unstarred
    Image of Noobs-R-Us Noobs-R-Us
    10/10/09

    In reply to Quick Test: Seagate's 1TB Portable FreeAgent Go
    Wait for the new Intel/Apple optical cabled drives next year. It will put USB 3/Firewire 800 to shame.
     Reply
    Noobs-R-Us was starred Noobs-R-Us was unstarred
    Image of otko otko
    10/10/09

    In reply to Quick Test: Seagate's 1TB Portable FreeAgent Go
    Seagate vs WD. Which is better? Is it a matter of preference or is there an actual difference in stability?
     Reply
    jakebathman promoted this comment otko was starred otko was unstarred
    Image of jakebathman jakebathman
    10/10/09

    @otko: I want to know this as well, because I'm looking to get a 1TB portable before the year is out, and I'll be keeping it for a few years
     Reply
    jakebathman was starred jakebathman was unstarred
    Image of chaos215bar2000 chaos215bar2000
    10/10/09

    In reply to Quick Test: Seagate's 1TB Portable FreeAgent Go
    Why would a larger drive be slower? I would think that packing the bits closer together would make it faster.
     Reply
    lostarchitect approved this comment chaos215bar2000 was starred chaos215bar2000 was unstarred
    Image of lostarchitect lostarchitect
    10/10/09

    @chaos215bar2000: it's about the platter spin speed, not the density of data. this is a 5400 rpm drive, which is common but slowish. many people prefer a 7200 rpm unit.
     Reply
    lostarchitect was starred lostarchitect was unstarred
    Image of Argo117 Argo117
    10/10/09

    In reply to Quick Test: Seagate's 1TB Portable FreeAgent Go
    I think, now that TBs are becoming more feasible as common storage space, we should refer to them as "tubs" like we refer to GBs as "gigs"
     Reply
    phunnyballs promoted this comment Argo117 was starred Argo117 was unstarred
    Image of phunnyballs phunnyballs
    10/10/09

    @Argo117: but when somebody writes

    "whats the difference between tub and gig" into google, they may find themselves looking at a tub girl. And that would always be on my mind
     Reply
    Edited by phunnyballs at 10/10/09 12:03 PM phunnyballs was starred phunnyballs was unstarred
    Image of Diziet_Sma Diziet_Sma
    10/10/09

    @Argo117: Or 'tebs'?
     Reply
    Edited by Diziet_Sma at 10/10/09 1:21 PM Diziet_Sma was starred Diziet_Sma was unstarred
    Image of giusepe giusepe
    10/10/09

    @Diziet_Sma: Or tits? Oh, wait..
     Reply
    Diziet_Sma approved this comment giusepe was starred giusepe was unstarred
    Image of Diziet_Sma Diziet_Sma
    10/10/09

    @giusepe: That's it! I don't care about anyone else, I'm calling them tits from now on. Then, next time I'm having a geek-chat with my husband, I can be all, "Cool, that [drive/laptop/tower] sounds interesting - how many tits has it got?"
     Reply
    Diziet_Sma was starred Diziet_Sma was unstarred
    Image of macserv macserv
    10/06/09

    In reply to WD Puts E-Labels on My Book Elite and Studio, Includes Dock With My Passport Elite Portable Drive
    I've been a big fan of WD's offerings lately, but this seems like a step backwards... If you're going to break up the clean lines of a MyBook, you need to use something pretty, and a segmented LCD display is not pretty.

    Put an eInk or OLED matrix on there, and now you're talkin'. Oh, and make it thinner and longer, like an actual book spine.
     Reply
    dingus promoted this comment macserv was starred macserv was unstarred
    Image of dingus dingus
    10/06/09

    @macserv: These displays are probably cholesteric, which is kind of a precursor to e-ink. They're segmented because it's much cheaper to make than a full raster display. There's no way in hell they can justify $100 extra on their bill of materials to have a somewhat nicer display on a freakin' hard drive.

    When the flexible, cheap, raster e-ink screens that have been talked about for years hits reality, I'll be the first to wrap one of these drives in one like a book cover.
     Reply
    dingus was starred dingus was unstarred
    Image of Odin Odin
    09/10/09

    In reply to WD's Ever-Smaller External Hard Drives Bring Better Security and Incremental Backups
    I have an old 320GB My Passport and 250GB My Book. While the My Book is nothing special (Lacie drives just feel more sturdy to me for the same size category) the My Passport is a brilliant little drive. It solves the biggest hassle I had with my old externals, while the drive itself wasn't overly massive they were still bulky and in addition you had to carry a cable and brick with it (adding the problem of finding a free socket wherever you wanted to set up).

    The Passport however fits comfortably in a coat pocket and all you need is a mini-USB and you're set. My only gripe with it (though this may have been resolved in the new passports) is that WD provide you with a very short USB cable for it and the drive is very fussy about using other mini-USB/USB extension cables. To date I've found one extension cable that works with it. So yeah minor issue otherwise they're actually pretty damn good.
     Reply
    Edited by Odin at 09/10/09 8:18 AM Odin was starred Odin was unstarred
    Image of Cash907Censored Cash907Censored
    08/16/09

    In reply to Leaked Western Digital TV-2 Media Player Reveals Modest Upgrades, Codec Support
    "Western Digital's decent WD TV was a moderately priced 1080p-pumping media player at $130. WD, apparently content to not mess with success, is preparing a slight feature update in the upcoming TV-2."

    Slight update? Adding network support makes a great product absolutely perfect. There is nothing "slight" about that.

    "and a component plug (for better picture quality on SD displays)."

    OR early adopters like me, who own HDTV's built before HDMI became the new standard, and were pretty much fucked by the very movement we supported.

    Christ, what is with your weekend writing staff Giz. Not only is this story almost word for word a cut/paste from Engadget's post, but you guys somehow managed to add an unhealthy amount of snark to a three short paragraph blurb. You all hung over this morning, or what?
     Reply
    Cash907Censored was starred Cash907Censored was unstarred
    Image of -zargon- -zargon-
    08/16/09

    @Cash907Censored: "OR early adopters like me, who own HDTV's built before HDMI became the new standard, and were pretty much fucked by the very movement we supported."

    HDMI has been on TVs for about 5 years now, it may be time to upgrade! I bought my first TV a little before DVI came out and a couple years before HDMI came out, I felt the same for a little while until I realized that my TV was 5 years old and I would just be better off upgrading the TV.

    If you must continue to use your TV, look for a device that will output all the video to component, they are out there, but for the price, you probably are just better off buying a new tv...
     Reply
    Cash907Censored promoted this comment -zargon- was starred -zargon- was unstarred
    Image of Cash907Censored Cash907Censored
    08/16/09

    @-zargon-:
    My TV is a 65" Mitsubishi, which I paid 7 grand for 6 years ago. To replace it, I would be looking to pay another 4 grand if I wanted to go flat panel, as the cheaper plasma's aren't an option because of the ambient light in my tv room. I could replace it with a similar sized DLP set for about half as much, but that would require me to A) invest a sizable amount on already obsolete technology, as well as B) spend about 200 bucks at least every 2 years or so on replacement lamps.

    Beyond that, I don't feel that six years is enough of a return on a 7,000 dollar investment.
     Reply
    Cash907Censored was starred Cash907Censored was unstarred
    Image of Paul Fulbright Paul Fulbright
    08/16/09

    In reply to Leaked Western Digital TV-2 Media Player Reveals Modest Upgrades, Codec Support
    Modest upgrades? It went from needing a USB HDD to being a network player. For me, that's the difference between "yes!" and "hell no!"

    Also, DTS is a MUST, and I assume you meant decoding not encoding. So that's huge too.
     Reply
    The Lab approved this comment Paul Fulbright was starred Paul Fulbright was unstarred
    Image of greenwald3132 greenwald3132
    08/16/09

    In reply to Leaked Western Digital TV-2 Media Player Reveals Modest Upgrades, Codec Support
    I think they should include directions on how to download a torrent in the manual, seeing how this could have no other use....
     Reply
    The Lab promoted this comment greenwald3132 was starred greenwald3132 was unstarred
    Image of drew00629 drew00629
    08/16/09

    In reply to Leaked Western Digital TV-2 Media Player Reveals Modest Upgrades, Codec Support
    i love my wdtv. you can stream over the internet wirelessly now if you have a dongle. no need to wait for a new one
     Reply
    Jack Loftus promoted this comment drew00629 was starred drew00629 was unstarred
    Image of Ioncloud9 Ioncloud9
    08/16/09

    In reply to Leaked Western Digital TV-2 Media Player Reveals Modest Upgrades, Codec Support
    Whats the difference between this and say an Apple TV or xbox media center extender?
     Reply
    Ioncloud9 was starred Ioncloud9 was unstarred
    Image of Cash907Censored Cash907Censored
    08/16/09

    @Ioncloud9:
    It works?
     Reply
    Cash907Censored promoted this comment Cash907Censored was starred Cash907Censored was unstarred
    Image of Eruanno Eruanno
    08/16/09

    In reply to Leaked Western Digital TV-2 Media Player Reveals Modest Upgrades, Codec Support
    Ethernet? *Runs to the store*
    Oh right. Not out yet. Damn.
     Reply
    Jack Loftus promoted this comment Eruanno was starred Eruanno was unstarred
    Image of MePerson MePerson
    07/27/09

    In reply to WD Scorpio Blue Drive Is First One Terabyte Mobile Drive Ever—Yes, 1TB
    Coming soon: the new iPod Classic 1TB! Up to 175 continuous days of your favorite music!
     Reply
    MePerson was starred MePerson was unstarred
    Image of VenomIreland VenomIreland
    07/27/09

    In reply to WD Scorpio Blue Drive Is First One Terabyte Mobile Drive Ever—Yes, 1TB
    12.5mm is 2.5" right?
     Reply
    VenomIreland was starred VenomIreland was unstarred
    Image of MacBandit MacBandit
    07/27/09

    @VenomIreland:

    Wrong. 25.4mm in an inch. They are referring to the thickness of the HDD. Most 2.5" drives are 9.5mm thick and fit in any computer that uses 2.5" drives. These drives are 12.5mm thick and only fit in some laptops (mostly the thicker/bigger laptops that have the room to fit the larger size).
     Reply
    VenomIreland promoted this comment MacBandit was starred MacBandit was unstarred
    Image of VenomIreland VenomIreland
    07/27/09

    @MacBandit: Ah thanks. Very Strange size for a HD.
     Reply
    VenomIreland was starred VenomIreland was unstarred
    Image of FuturePastNow FuturePastNow
    07/27/09

    @VenomIreland: 12.5mm is the thickness. Most mobile drives are 9.5mm thick.

    This won't fit in very many notebooks.
     Reply
    FuturePastNow was starred FuturePastNow was unstarred
    Image of FooSchnickens - Full of SCAR FooSchnickens - Full of SCAR
    07/27/09

    In reply to WD Scorpio Blue Drive Is First One Terabyte Mobile Drive Ever—Yes, 1TB
    Wow.... This might be reason enough to start carrying around a small notebook and ditching my photobank...

    DECISIONS....
     Reply
    FooSchnickens - Full of SCAR was starred FooSchnickens - Full of SCAR was unstarred
    Image of ValfridBuccaneer ValfridBuccaneer
    07/27/09

    In reply to WD Scorpio Blue Drive Is First One Terabyte Mobile Drive Ever—Yes, 1TB
    @dark42 He's referring to height. Yes, it's a standard 2.5" HDD (whereas the MBA uses a 1.8") however there is 12mm height, and 9.5mm height (same situation with ODDs: Most MacBook/Pros takes 9.5mm whereas i/PowerBooks take 12mm). Only the 17" non-unibody MacBook Pros will accept 12mm ODDs, and quite possibly this 12mm HDD.
     Reply
    gemcosta promoted this comment ValfridBuccaneer was starred ValfridBuccaneer was unstarred
    Earlier discussions Other discussions Show all discussions Show featured discussions only Start a new discussion

Login

Enter your username and password.

Please enter a username.
Please enter your password.
logging in
Login via Facebook | Sign Up | Forgot Password?

Reset Password

Please enter your email address to have your password reset.

Please enter your email address.
Please enter a valid email address.
requesting password reset

Register

Registering will give you a user profile and the ability to add other users as friends. To become a commenter, however, you need to audition.

Want to know more? Consult the Comment FAQ and legal terms.

Please enter a username.
Please enter a password.
Please confirm your password.
Passwords are not identical.
Please enter a valid email address.
registration sent, waiting for reply

Submit Your Comment

You don't need to login to comment. Just enter your email address below.

See how your address will be displayed in the Comment FAQ.

Please enter a valid email address.
Please enter a valid email address.
logging in

Login with your Facebook or Gizmodo account.

Sign up here.



Edit tagpage description

Please make the text shorter.
sending changes
  • Archives
  • About
  • Advertising
  • Legal
  • Help
  • Report a Bug
  • FAQ
Original material is licensed under a Creative Commons License permitting non-commercial sharing with attribution.