Senior Contributing Editors:
Jesus Diaz
| AIM | Twitter
Mark Wilson, Reviews
| AIM | Twitter
Contributing Editors:
Matt Buchanan | AIM | Twitter
Adam Frucci | Twitter
Sean Fallon | Twitter
Jack Loftus | Twitter
John Herrman | Twitter
Dan Nosowitz
Chris Mascari
Kat Hannaford | Twitter
Rosa Golijan | Twitter
Chris Jacob
@CanadaStig:
Really? I find it's just overkill on a desktop. While XMBC is god on a media PC with a remote I find it's entirely too clunky (compared to other options) if you're navigating with a mouse+keyboard.
Matt, I'm sure you enjoy the casual writing style, but did you have to type out "wanna" nine times? If it's a big article and you're going to feature it along the top bar, why not proofread your article?
Note of Warning: If you leave the network share mounted on snow leopard and put your laptop to sleep it will not be able to access it on wake. Its a known bug that no one seems to care about fixing. Workaround if you forget to unmount before closing your laptop is to turn off airport and then disconnect the network drive with the little eject icon. It will take up to 30 seconds to eject but once you turn the airport back on everything will work just fine.
If you try to eject while still connected to the network, finder will hang and it will stop you from shutting down or restarting normally.
1. make sure its FAT32 for maximum compatibility
2. copy files over
3. walk to Mac, plug it in
4. copy files off
5. rinse repeat
6. laugh at people sharing it over wires pretending these three all talk the same lingo, limited to only LAN connections.
7. If you find you need morethan a flash drive, check back to the early point of article about an NAS, you will fall in love with them, especially if you have multiple users, possibly a few using media sharing especially.
@Slack3r78: Yeah and the NAS units don't really require much of the above hassle.
If you're only sharing a few files between a few, then a flash drive will do, with the benefit of not needing to set anything up at all, and it'll work on PC's outof your network.
If you figure you're going back n forth, just buy a damn NAS, and that's still going to be much simpler than the stuff you have to do up top.
It seems to be only the 'moderate' network user would be in any hassle. light user gets away with the flash drive, heavy user gets the NAS, which also offers up a back up ( I believe the HP ones to timemachine too?)
@deanbmmv: a NAS still isn't a replacement for having your boxes set up to talk to each other. There's a lot of convenience to be had from having access to your user directory on each box you use for what's literally 5-10 minutes worth of setup.
And if you're a 'heavy user' moving large files around, A--B is by definition faster than A--NAS--B.
@deanbmmv: The point is that a NAS is complimentary to point-to-point rather than a total replacement. I don't see what's particularly difficult to understand about that.
@Slack3r78: Oh nothing. I understand that its kinda parallel to it.
But if you have several devices set up and want to share, a NAS is ususally a better option than wrestling with the fact that they don't like each other.
If you've just got a mac and a windows machine, and want to share a couple of files, well you're mostly going to be fine with a portable drive until the 4GB file problem arrives. Though it's rare to be working with 4GB files except for video. And if you're working with video...a NAS is a good idea. (one of the reasons I have one)
Question: My school runs Mac servers and I want to connect to shares from my PC at home. Macs can connect from anywhere using "Go - Connect to Server," but I have no idea how to approach this on my Windows 7 machine. They don't have NFS enabled in Server Admin, which, I have been told, makes the process impossible. This is deliberate on the part of the IT department, because the technology director believes that all Macs are immune from viruses and all PCs are riddled with them. Can anyone help?
@Eric: All I can suggest is to complain until they get an admin that knows what the hell they are doing. In a school environment it's not the admin's job to decide what kind of computers the users have to buy. I administer a network where all of the desktops are Windows and have never had a server infected. Of course the servers aren't Windows...
@token_illiterate_commenter: Yeah, good point. Unfortunately I work for the tech department so it would be bad form to complain about my boss. Especially given the fact that word travels fast and any complaints I registered with the higher-up's would soon reach my boss.
Still, you make a good point that I shouldn't sit idly by. I'll figure something out.
I use Dropbox. It's easier for me because it automatically syncs every connected computer, plus it has a nice web interface. It's basically a fancy gui for svn. The main dowside is the 2GB limit for free accounts.
@Theo Pak: Dropbox is awesome, but it's not really a replacement for local file sharing. Dropbox uses Amazon's S3 backend, which means you're sending everything to the public internet and back. That's fine when you're just moving small documents around, but does you know good once you get to files more than a few meg in size.
I guess you *could* upload a movie-length video file to Dropbox and stream from there, but it's not something I'd really want to do on a regular basis.
@Slack3r78: There's something new in the current version of the Dropbox client (first time I saw it anyway) that will try to replicate files over your LAN before pulling it over your cable/DSL modem. I paid for the 50GB account and I think it's been worth it.
@Louis Krause: If you install an mDNS service (such as Apple's Bonjour) on your Windows XP machine, it can participate in network browsing in the same way that Macs do.
If you then have shares defined on your Windows machine, your Mac should see the machine in the Shared pane of any Finder windows.
mDNS is a standard, and works well for local subnet browsing of any shared network service (file or print).
@Louis Krause: Something has been done, it's called Zeroconf. However, whoever wrote this guide is used to doing it the old-fashioned way out of habit, and wrote the guide accordingly.
You guys should discuss crossover cable sharing. Supposedly that is extremely fast and I have always wanted to learn how to do it between my mac and pc. I always have to send 5-10 gbs worth of media between computers and over the network is too slow. If I learned how to use crossover between my two computers, it would be golden!
@Rohit Chander: Unless there is something wrong with your router there will not be a noticeable difference between a direct connection and connecting via a router.
@MikeSWelch: actually there'll be a huge difference since most cheap routers don't do gigabit (100mb/s) ethernet. so you'll transfer at least 5 times faster through crossover as long as both computers do gigabit (this is the case with modern macs and pcs).
12:34 PM
02:14 PM
Really? I find it's just overkill on a desktop. While XMBC is god on a media PC with a remote I find it's entirely too clunky (compared to other options) if you're navigating with a mouse+keyboard.
12/23/09
12/23/09
12/23/09
12/23/09
12/23/09
12/23/09
Yeah so I'm going to go ahead and say sorry right away...
Sorry
12/23/09
12/23/09
03:13 PM
Did I tell you that you are awesome? =]
12/21/09
12/21/09
12/20/09
If you try to eject while still connected to the network, finder will hang and it will stop you from shutting down or restarting normally.
12/20/09
12/21/09
12/20/09
2. copy files over
3. walk to Mac, plug it in
4. copy files off
5. rinse repeat
6. laugh at people sharing it over wires pretending these three all talk the same lingo, limited to only LAN connections.
7. If you find you need morethan a flash drive, check back to the early point of article about an NAS, you will fall in love with them, especially if you have multiple users, possibly a few using media sharing especially.
12/20/09
Except for the fact that they *do*. SMB/CIFS is supported by Windows, Mac, and Linux. In fact, the NAS units you're championing generally use CIFS.
A flash drive is nice, but network sharing is considerably faster and more convenient once it's set up.
12/20/09
If you're only sharing a few files between a few, then a flash drive will do, with the benefit of not needing to set anything up at all, and it'll work on PC's outof your network.
If you figure you're going back n forth, just buy a damn NAS, and that's still going to be much simpler than the stuff you have to do up top.
It seems to be only the 'moderate' network user would be in any hassle. light user gets away with the flash drive, heavy user gets the NAS, which also offers up a back up ( I believe the HP ones to timemachine too?)
12/20/09
And if you're a 'heavy user' moving large files around, A--B is by definition faster than A--NAS--B.
12/20/09
A-B
B-PS
A-X
D-C
etc etc. you get the point and you can't to topology in the comment box.
12/21/09
12/21/09
But if you have several devices set up and want to share, a NAS is ususally a better option than wrestling with the fact that they don't like each other.
If you've just got a mac and a windows machine, and want to share a couple of files, well you're mostly going to be fine with a portable drive until the 4GB file problem arrives. Though it's rare to be working with 4GB files except for video. And if you're working with video...a NAS is a good idea. (one of the reasons I have one)
12/20/09
12/20/09
12/21/09
Still, you make a good point that I shouldn't sit idly by. I'll figure something out.
12/20/09
if u use this link you get 250MB extra for free. [www.dropbox.com]
12/20/09
I guess you *could* upload a movie-length video file to Dropbox and stream from there, but it's not something I'd really want to do on a regular basis.
12/20/09
12/20/09
12/20/09
If you then have shares defined on your Windows machine, your Mac should see the machine in the Shared pane of any Finder windows.
mDNS is a standard, and works well for local subnet browsing of any shared network service (file or print).
12/20/09
12/20/09
[en.wikipedia.org]
It's built to make these things mostly automatic, and has it's roots in how service discovery was done in the AppleTalk protocol stack.
12/20/09
12/20/09
12/20/09
12/21/09
12/21/09
12/18/09
Now if that screencap said "Apple iPhone 4", it would be a whole different story...
12/18/09
12/18/09
But yeah... Funnel cake sticks... arrghlrghlrhlghlrghlrg
12/18/09
12/18/09
Funnel cake sticks?!
12/18/09
12/18/09