Senior Contributing Editors:
Jesus Diaz
| AIM | Twitter
Mark Wilson, Reviews
| AIM | Twitter
Contributing Editors:
Matt Buchanan | AIM | Twitter
Adam Frucci | Twitter
Sean Fallon | Twitter
Jack Loftus | Twitter
John Herrman | Twitter
Dan Nosowitz
Chris Mascari
Danny Allen | Twitter
Rosa Golijan | Twitter
Chris Jacob
I guess I have to download and archive all my juicy e mails from Yahell to protect them. $60 would be a very low price for all the dirt thats in there.
The only thing I really use Yahoo for is the email address that I get all my spam sent to. I guess they can have that if they want. Sometimes there is pron. Maybe they will like that as well.
@Crimson33: The article twists the meaning somewhat. Yahoo isn't really "selling" information. When law enforcement agencies subpoena a company (Yahoo, Google, MS, whoever) for information, there is nothing much that they can really do about it. The numbers above just say how much Yahoo is reimbursed for using its resources to provide this information.
Meaning - Yahoo is probably not the only company with a chart of prices like this. It just so happens that Yahoo's chart got published here. I was sort of joking in my first comment.
So, can I give them sixty bucks to not give away my information? Clearly Yahoo is willing to whore themselves out for cheap, but I am curious if they will take any customer, or if they have some element of discrimination.
I've TRIED to use what was it? chandler? anyways it just doesn't stack up. google, wikipedia and wolfram alpha seem to be doing a pretty damn good job of telling me what i need to know. #markcuban
There's a better way for MSFT to try to kill Google. Just offer to list Google's customers for free. It worked in the borwser war and it will work here. There's no better way to destroy your competition than to offer something for nothing.
That, of course, begs the question whether or not Bing is a good search engine to begin with. If not, no one will take the free offer. #markcuban
If you're a top 1000 website, you're going to lose a hell of a lot more than one million dollars if you delist yourself from Google.
The only result this plan would achieve is that the remainder of the top 2000 websites would fall into the top spots to replace the ones that just committed suicide. #markcuban
That's an interesting concept, but I'm pretty sure you would need to pay much more than $1,000,000 to get many of the top 1000 websites to delist from Google. I mean, Yahoo, EBay, CNN, Facebook, etc. are up there. To them, that's pocket change. #markcuban
12/07/09
12/07/09
12/07/09
12/07/09
Meaning - Yahoo is probably not the only company with a chart of prices like this. It just so happens that Yahoo's chart got published here. I was sort of joking in my first comment.
12/07/09
I'm the commissioner in name only!
TwoHandTouch(myself)Football is runnin' the thing!
I swear!
12/07/09
12/07/09
12/07/09
11/17/09
[www.venganza.org] #markcuban
11/17/09
11/17/09
11/17/09
11/17/09
11/17/09
Uh huh. #markcuban
11/17/09
hear hear! #markcuban
11/17/09
That, of course, begs the question whether or not Bing is a good search engine to begin with. If not, no one will take the free offer. #markcuban
11/17/09
11/17/09
The only result this plan would achieve is that the remainder of the top 2000 websites would fall into the top spots to replace the ones that just committed suicide. #markcuban
11/17/09