Senior Contributing Editors:
Jesus Diaz
| AIM | Twitter
Mark Wilson, Reviews
| AIM | Twitter
Contributing Editors:
Matt Buchanan | AIM | Twitter
Adam Frucci | Twitter
Sean Fallon | Twitter
Jack Loftus | Twitter
John Herrman | Twitter
Dan Nosowitz
Chris Mascari
Kat Hannaford | Twitter
Rosa Golijan | Twitter
Chris Jacob
Maybe it's the Time Banana yellow, but there's something about the little tablet itself that makes me want it, despite not knowing how well it even operates.
Problem is: as fungible as the tern "netbook" is, it at least has some history to back up a core definition. A netbook is a machine that follows in the tradition of the ASUS Eeepc 701. So when we see a machine described as a "netbook" we expect that it will be very, very small, inexpensive, that there's a good possibility it will feature SSD storage, that it will be powered by a very low-voltage processor and boast long battery life. The term "low cost small notebook PC" is completely meaningless, however. It can mean anything, and thus means nothing.
So what? NONE of the BIG brands these days are worth what they use to stand for, QULITY. The Netbooks listed are probably made in the same damn factory as the BIG brands.
@Dr.Fire: Won't argue with that, but the more important problem is that we we're able to buy stuff from these larger manufacturers. These Asian and European boutique operations? Not so much.
06/05/09
06/03/09
06/03/09
06/03/09
UMPC. How did that work out?
Yeah. We'll be sticking with "netbook", thank you very much.
Love,
Companies that will gladly continue to sell computers that still run XP if you don't piss us off
06/02/09
The Netbooks listed are probably made in the same damn factory as the BIG brands.
06/02/09