If you plug a cordless phone (or fancy corded one) into a Uninterruptable Power Supply you can still use it in a blackout until the UPS runs out of juice. Also, if you get your phone through VOIP via a cable modem, that can be plugged in to the UPS too (and, a lot of cable modems already have their own backup battery).
The WH NEVER loses power. EVER. It has like 5 backup generators or some silly number like that which is good BECAUSE while your right corded phones will work with a power loss, corded phones hooked into a office system like the one on his desk will NOT work, as it needs more power than is transmitted by a simple phoneline, and likely his doesnt even use standard phone cable but CAT-5 or CAT-6
@bysty: agreed. our main phones are the cordless ones... but I have one corded phone hooked into the landline incase of flat batteries, power outs etc.
I'm willing to bet that his phone still needs power. It appears to be a Nortel/Avaya, etc type of phone which would be attached to some kind of phone switch, that certainly needs power. That being said, I hope there are triple and quadruple redundancies to prevent power loss in the White House.
I never considered a cheap $10 radio to be technology inaccessible to a hobo. And such a radio probably would be able to pick up analog signals from older cordless telephones (which is how I was able to use dads old tube based radio to find out that the next door neighbors daughter was a naughty naughty girl...).
However, more modern cordless phones are digital in nature and use DSS frequency hopping to increase range and secure the signal. Espionage agents probably could defeat most off-the-shelf solutions if they could peacefully share the presidential lawn with the hobo, but I gotta think that if the Prez want a cordless phone that the CIA or DOD probably could provide him with a custom one that would do the job...)
@OddManOut: I've actually picked up one of my neighbors' phone conversations on a pair of cordless headphones that I use when I'm doing stuff around the house while watching TV (or at least listening to it). It only happened the one time, though.
It's pretty sad that kids these days don't realize these things. I guess I take this knowledge for granted, and consider that it should be very obvious (common sense, really). Unfortunately many kids grow up completely sheltered by half-ass technology that offers them less security and makes them more susceptible to identitiy theft and loss of freedom, while they blithely assume it offers them unlimited freedom.
Such is the power of advertising. One hand giveth, while the other taketh away.
@BeautifulAgony: The proper way to outfit a house with landline phones is to set up cordless phones in convenient locations, and put one corded low-tech phone on the main floor. That way, you don't have to screw around with corded phones all the time, but you have that one secure phone that you can use if you need to recite your credit card numbers or SSN, or you need to make a call when the power is out.
And just because you only have corded phones doesn't mean you're safe from a power outage. I lived at a friend's house for a couple months in between semesters of college, and they had a power outage when I was the only one there. The security system went nuts (naturally), but all his friggen phones were hooked up into a seriously complex phone network (you could listen to the audio from the main TV on the phones in either bathroom, BTW). Guess what? Networks need power, which is exactly what you don't have during a power outage. I couldn't call him to find out the code to make the security system stop reporting a potential break-in to the police (all I had was my personal door entry code, which wasn't any help). Thankfully, he had something rigged up to page him if the power went out, so he showed up after about 20 minutes of ear-piercing alarm noises, but I still had him install a very basic, non-networked phone in one of the kitchen cabinets the next day. I mean, his mom was an insulin-dependant diabetic, and he had a pacemaker since he was a little kid, so not being able to call an ambulance during a power outage was a legitimate concern.
Seriously? Are you trolling? If not, here's the lowdown...
The first weakness of any secure information system is how easily the information can be intercepted. On a secure, hardwired phone, all lines will be shield against RF leakage. Thus denying potential snoopers means of remote interception by radio. Cordless phones deny that advantage, and give potential snoopers a signal to work with.
The next level of protection is encryption. On a hardwired phone your encryption is not broadcast from your location by RF, meaning it gives snoopers less time to work with the information in progress. A cordless phone may have basic encryption, but bandwidth limitations and computational power limits will necessarily lessen the effective power and security of the device and add additional drain to the onboard battery. A hardwired phone does not have this limitation, as it can run on power both from the phone, from AC power, and from onboard batteries as well, offering multiple levels of redundancy.
Third level of protection is dedicated, uninterrupted lines; Secured, shielded and direct, uninterrupted lines between one location and another. Such lines are in use in secure facilities to prevent tapping at switching locations by means of inserting taps at the wired-pair junctions. Once again, a cordless phone eliminates this level of security by broadcasting its RF signal from the handset to the base before ever reaching the hardline.
However secure the encryption might be on a given cordless handset, the first rule of info-sec is not to let the information get into the snooper's hands in the first place. Barring that possibility, you do the best you can with simple and short radio transmissions using assumed secure encryption. In a secure building there is no excuse not to use a shielded, secured hardline whenever possible.
Lastly, in relation to the article, do you really want the President of the United States to have to switch phones and call back when he's trying to negotiate a peace treaty with a foreign official, because the battery in his cordless handset started to die?
I wonder less about the cord on the phone and more about whether he's dressed like a sportscaster behind that desk. Shirt and tie on top, boxers and flip-flops below.
I'm pretty sure the White House would never ever lose power.
I was just thinking today though... what does this man know now that he didn't know 2 days ago? The secrets the man must be privy to now... I can't even imagine...
Back on topic, the Prez should totally use a corded phone yo. For the reasons listed above basically.
@B0LUBA questions the gravity of the situation..: You are correct. Corded phones work just being plugged into the landline. No electricity needed. SO I guess another reason would be cable management.
@B0LUBA questions the gravity of the situation..: That has always puzzled me. The fact that we hear a tone on the land line means there must be a power source somewhere - probably at the switching facility that the line gets routed to. So, does the phone line go off if that place loses power?
01/22/09
01/22/09
01/21/09
01/21/09
01/22/09
He's got the nuclear launch codes now. Such things are not allowed to happen.
01/21/09
Sorry. . .
01/21/09
If you were sorry when you typed the word sorry, then you wouldn't have hit submit. Which necessarily happened after you wrote sorry.
Sorry. . .
01/21/09
01/21/09
01/21/09
01/21/09
01/21/09
01/21/09
01/21/09
01/21/09
01/21/09
01/21/09
01/21/09
I never considered a cheap $10 radio to be technology inaccessible to a hobo. And such a radio probably would be able to pick up analog signals from older cordless telephones (which is how I was able to use dads old tube based radio to find out that the next door neighbors daughter was a naughty naughty girl...).
However, more modern cordless phones are digital in nature and use DSS frequency hopping to increase range and secure the signal. Espionage agents probably could defeat most off-the-shelf solutions if they could peacefully share the presidential lawn with the hobo, but I gotta think that if the Prez want a cordless phone that the CIA or DOD probably could provide him with a custom one that would do the job...)
01/22/09
I've actually picked up one of my neighbors' phone conversations on a pair of cordless headphones that I use when I'm doing stuff around the house while watching TV (or at least listening to it). It only happened the one time, though.
01/21/09
Such is the power of advertising. One hand giveth, while the other taketh away.
01/22/09
The proper way to outfit a house with landline phones is to set up cordless phones in convenient locations, and put one corded low-tech phone on the main floor. That way, you don't have to screw around with corded phones all the time, but you have that one secure phone that you can use if you need to recite your credit card numbers or SSN, or you need to make a call when the power is out.
And just because you only have corded phones doesn't mean you're safe from a power outage. I lived at a friend's house for a couple months in between semesters of college, and they had a power outage when I was the only one there. The security system went nuts (naturally), but all his friggen phones were hooked up into a seriously complex phone network (you could listen to the audio from the main TV on the phones in either bathroom, BTW). Guess what? Networks need power, which is exactly what you don't have during a power outage. I couldn't call him to find out the code to make the security system stop reporting a potential break-in to the police (all I had was my personal door entry code, which wasn't any help). Thankfully, he had something rigged up to page him if the power went out, so he showed up after about 20 minutes of ear-piercing alarm noises, but I still had him install a very basic, non-networked phone in one of the kitchen cabinets the next day. I mean, his mom was an insulin-dependant diabetic, and he had a pacemaker since he was a little kid, so not being able to call an ambulance during a power outage was a legitimate concern.
01/21/09
01/21/09
Seriously? Are you trolling? If not, here's the lowdown...
The first weakness of any secure information system is how easily the information can be intercepted. On a secure, hardwired phone, all lines will be shield against RF leakage. Thus denying potential snoopers means of remote interception by radio. Cordless phones deny that advantage, and give potential snoopers a signal to work with.
The next level of protection is encryption. On a hardwired phone your encryption is not broadcast from your location by RF, meaning it gives snoopers less time to work with the information in progress. A cordless phone may have basic encryption, but bandwidth limitations and computational power limits will necessarily lessen the effective power and security of the device and add additional drain to the onboard battery. A hardwired phone does not have this limitation, as it can run on power both from the phone, from AC power, and from onboard batteries as well, offering multiple levels of redundancy.
Third level of protection is dedicated, uninterrupted lines; Secured, shielded and direct, uninterrupted lines between one location and another. Such lines are in use in secure facilities to prevent tapping at switching locations by means of inserting taps at the wired-pair junctions. Once again, a cordless phone eliminates this level of security by broadcasting its RF signal from the handset to the base before ever reaching the hardline.
However secure the encryption might be on a given cordless handset, the first rule of info-sec is not to let the information get into the snooper's hands in the first place. Barring that possibility, you do the best you can with simple and short radio transmissions using assumed secure encryption. In a secure building there is no excuse not to use a shielded, secured hardline whenever possible.
Lastly, in relation to the article, do you really want the President of the United States to have to switch phones and call back when he's trying to negotiate a peace treaty with a foreign official, because the battery in his cordless handset started to die?
01/21/09
01/21/09
01/21/09
I know that's how I'd roll. :)
01/21/09
01/21/09
I was just thinking today though... what does this man know now that he didn't know 2 days ago? The secrets the man must be privy to now... I can't even imagine...
Back on topic, the Prez should totally use a corded phone yo. For the reasons listed above basically.
01/21/09
01/21/09
Anybody want to back me up?
01/21/09
01/21/09
01/21/09
If your techability is high enough--you shouldn't even need an answer.
And yes, I did just coin the word techability. [Jan. 21st 2009: 9:07pm]
01/21/09
[www.google.com]
01/21/09
01/21/09
[www.google.com]
01/22/09
Is that a hill-billy dressed in bling made of old computer chips or something?