<![CDATA[Gizmodo: CPUs]]> http://cache.gawker.com/assets/base/img/thumbs140x140/gizmodo.com.png <![CDATA[Gizmodo: CPUs]]> http://gizmodo.com/tag/cpus http://gizmodo.com/tag/cpus <![CDATA[AMD X3 Tri-Core Processor Reviewed (Verdict: Get a Quad-Core Chip)]]> x3.jpgMaximum PC has reviewed AMD's tri-core 2.4GHz Phenom X3 8750 CPU. It performs like you'd expect—in between quad and dual cores. Fine, but it's $195. You can pick up AMD's top quad core, the X4 9850 for only $235, or Intel's Q6600 (which mercilessly beat down the X4 9850 in benchmarks) for $224 now, or hell, $200 in a few weeks. So just get a quad core. Maximum PC also hints that a Core 2 Duo might keep pace with the tri-cores, but they're keeping that under wraps for now, bastards. [Maximum PC]

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/382941/amd-x3-tri+core-processor-reviewed-verdict-get-a-quad+core-chip http://gizmodo.com/382941/amd-x3-tri+core-processor-reviewed-verdict-get-a-quad+core-chip Wed, 23 Apr 2008 00:31:00 EDT matt buchanan http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=382941&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[AMD's "Shanghai" Chips Revealed]]> fp__amd_barcelona.pngThe rat race continues: Shanghai will be 45nm, have up to 12 cores, include the long awaited Hypertransport 3.0 for socket-to-socket and southbridge communication, and can emulate quad channel memory. For more: [DailyTech]

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/370033/amds-shanghai-chips-revealed http://gizmodo.com/370033/amds-shanghai-chips-revealed Fri, 18 Apr 2008 21:37:53 EDT Jason Chen http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=370033&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Question of the Day: Do You Prefer AMD or Intel CPUs?]]> amd_vs_intel.jpgThe age-old battle between Intel and AMD is resurrected every year as the two duke it out for control of your computer. Back in the day, when I was broke and into building PCs, I often opted for AMD because of budget restrictions. After I graduated, performance was the objective which, at the time, meant a switch to Intel was in order. I took a case by case approach to the debate between Intel and AMD, but many PC builders out there have fierce loyalties to one side or the other despite their ups and downs. So the question is: Do you prefer AMD or Intel processors?

Gawker Media polls require Javascript; if you're viewing this in an RSS reader, click through to view in your Javascript-enabled web browser.


]]>
http://gizmodo.com/380146/question-of-the-day-do-you-prefer-amd-or-intel-cpus http://gizmodo.com/380146/question-of-the-day-do-you-prefer-amd-or-intel-cpus Tue, 15 Apr 2008 19:50:07 EDT Sean Fallon http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=380146&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Intel Reveals All About Atom Processor Range]]> The detailed specs on Intel's upcoming small'n'cheap Atom processor are now up for grabs. From data released at the Intel Developer Forum in Shanghai, it looks like the first Atom releases will be five different CPUs, destined for a range of portable or "net-top" machines. Each chip has 512kB of on-board L2 caching and supports SSE3 instructions, but will have different processor core speeds and frontside bus speeds. Prices will run from $45 for the cheapest to $160 for the fastest CPU. For the processor fanatics among you, details below.

Z500
800MHz clock, 400 MHz frontside bus. No HyperThreading. TDP of 0.65W

Z510
1.1GHz clock, 400 MHz frontside bus. No HyperThreading. TDP of 2W

Z520
1.33GHz clock, 533MHz frontside bus. Supports HyperThreading. TDP of 2W

Z530
1.6GHz clock, 533MHz frontside bus. Supports HyperThreading. TDP of 2W

Z540
1.86GHz clock, 533MHz frontside bus. Supports HyperThreading. TDP of 2.2W

The Atom processors also are combined with the former "Paulsbo" System Controller Hub chipset and wireless adaptors into the Centrino Atom package. The SCH takes command of north and south bridges, memory control, PCI express, USB and other connectivity and an integrated GPU. This last supports Direct X9, and Intel says the top range version can also cope with HD 1080i output. That's pretty impressive for a chip that may be destined for portable gadgets.

Intel is ready to go with all these chips, and wants them to be on sale within 60 days. [Reg Hardware and Reuters]

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/374976/intel-reveals-all-about-atom-processor-range http://gizmodo.com/374976/intel-reveals-all-about-atom-processor-range Wed, 02 Apr 2008 07:00:04 EDT Kit Eaton http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=374976&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[AMD Quad-Core Phenom X4 9850 Reviewed (Verdict: Owned by Intel Quad Cores)]]> amd_logo_purdy.jpgThe Phenom X4 9850 is at the top of AMD's latest heap of quad-core Phenoms. It's free of the performance-sapping bug that plagued the first batch of Phenoms, and AMD hopes it'll claw back some ground from Intel. Maximum PC stacked it up against two quad-cores from Intel—the mid-rangeish Penryn Core 2 Quad Q9300, as well as an older Core 2 Q6600. Ouchies for AMD, the Intel pair blew past it.

The Penryn-based Q9300 "owned the night," with the Q6600 trailing, and Phenom in back of both. It wasn't "so far behind as to be dead in the water" but "it doesn't quite go head-to-head with the Penryn lite." (They call the Q9300 Penryn-lite because it has half the cache of the higher-end Penryn quad-cores.)

The 9850 X4 is the fastest AM2 chip around, however, so if you're sticking with that board "it's a pretty good upgrade." The bigger problem is that AMD still has nothing to touch Intel's top quad cores, and won't for months, at least. [Maximum PC]

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/372738/amd-quad+core-phenom-x4-9850-reviewed-verdict-owned-by-intel-quad-cores http://gizmodo.com/372738/amd-quad+core-phenom-x4-9850-reviewed-verdict-owned-by-intel-quad-cores Thu, 27 Mar 2008 00:57:39 EDT matt buchanan http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=372738&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Intel's Six-Core Dunnington and Nehalem Microarchitecture Get Official]]> The pair of 45nm Intel chips that Sun oh-so-kindly leaked last month just got all official-like. Dunnington is "the first IA (Intel Architecture) processor with 6-cores, is based on the 45nm high-k process technology, and has large shared caches." Six cores, exciting! But not as exciting as Nehalem, which is Intel's "dynamically scalable" new processor microarchitecture which'll bring "dramatic performance and energy improvements" to Intel's chips. And that means what?

The platform will scale from two to eight cores, and eventually from "notebooks to servers." That's the scalable part, so you'll see it everywhere. Simultaneous Multi-Threading will let each core run two threads at once, plus it quadruples the memory-bandwidth of the current top-o'-the-line Xeons. It's also got an 8MB level-3 cache, Quickpath interconnects (up to 25.6GB per second), integrated memory controller (AMD what?) and supports up to DDR3-1333 memory, plus a bunch of other hardcore geek stuff, which you can scope out at Intel. [Intel]

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/369076/intels-six+core-dunnington-and-nehalem-microarchitecture-get-official http://gizmodo.com/369076/intels-six+core-dunnington-and-nehalem-microarchitecture-get-official Tue, 18 Mar 2008 09:24:55 EDT matt buchanan http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=369076&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[AMD Finally Shows Off Its 45nm Processors]]> At CeBit today AMD finally showed off the fruits of its 45nm labors—one server and one desktop chip, a far cry from the 16 Intel launched with Penryn's debut back in January. But, given AMD's woes lately, on the technical and biznass fronts, we're just glad to see 'em.

On the other hand, AMD's refusal to specify when in the second half of '08 they'll launch is a bit worrying—December would basically put them a year behind Intel, and it wouldn't be the first time they've been late. Come on AMD, be awesome again, please. Update: Press release below.

AMD Demos 45nm Native Quad-Core Processors for Server, Desktop

— Customer Testing of Product Samples Underway —

HANNOVER, Germany. — March 4, 2008 —AMD (NYSE: AMD) demonstrated at the CeBit electronics exhibition its first 45nm quad-core chips running multiple operating systems and a range of processing intensive applications. The processors were produced in Dresden, Germany, in AMD's Fab 36 300mm manufacturing facility, using an advanced 45nm process co-developed with IBM.

AMD 45nm transistors are engineered to enable greater performance-per-watt capabilities in AMD processors and platforms. AMD combines new processes and materials with leading edge technologies, such as immersion lithography and AMD's fourth-generation strained silicon, for a highly-manufacturable, highly-efficient production process.

This important milestone is the first of many as AMD moves toward delivery of 45nm products later this year. The first 45nm chips demonstrated by AMD include the "Shanghai" product for server and "Deneb" for desktop platforms.

[AMD, CW] ]]>
http://gizmodo.com/363593/amd-finally-shows-off-its-45nm-processors http://gizmodo.com/363593/amd-finally-shows-off-its-45nm-processors Tue, 04 Mar 2008 11:41:14 EST matt buchanan http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=363593&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Giz Explains: Why We're Psyched for Silverthorne]]> Silverthorne is a teeny processor built on the 45nm process (like the much-ballyhooed Penryn), designed for UMPCs, subnotebooks, mystery Apple products and any other smallish gadget that needs real crunching on an ultra-lean power diet.

It's about as powerful as the first Pentium M chips (Banias), but while those idled at 5W and averaged 24.5W, this little guy sips as little as 0.1W in its idle state, with peaks up to just 2W on the 2GHz model. It's really cheap to pump out too, tapped for the $200 OLPC at one point.

It comes in a couple different flavors up to that 2GHz version. To get athletic performance—it's a full-fledged x86 chip, not a half-baked cutdown—out of an anorexic processor, Intel worked all kinds of design mojo, like a new quick-wake deep sleep state. It's still a bit too hungry for smartphones, though. So, while it's a neat piece of silicon, as Ars says, it's still got a ways to go, especfially with stiff competition from ARM and TI. But that's a good thing.

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/353761/giz-explains-why-were-psyched-for-silverthorne http://gizmodo.com/353761/giz-explains-why-were-psyched-for-silverthorne Thu, 07 Feb 2008 11:40:34 EST matt buchanan http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=353761&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Intel Delays 45nm Quad-Core CPUs to Give AMD a Breather]]> Rather than continue hammering on AMD while they're down, Intel is apparently taking AMD's troubles as a little break of their own, delaying the launch of three 45nm quad-core Core 2 processors (Yorkfields) until Feb. or March, depending on AMD's release schedule for its upcoming tri-core and Phenom processors. This kind of reminds us of when Toyota wanted to raise its own prices to help out GM and Ford, which makes us sad. We prefer the far bloodier and more competitive processor wars of a couple years ago. [Digitimes via Inquirer]

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/335899/intel-delays-45nm-quad+core-cpus-to-give-amd-a-breather http://gizmodo.com/335899/intel-delays-45nm-quad+core-cpus-to-give-amd-a-breather Wed, 19 Dec 2007 16:45:35 EST matt buchanan http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=335899&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Giz Explains: What's the F is a Penryn?]]> Penryn's sort of a buzzword lately. If you don't know what the hell that is, chances are, you're not alone: Penryn is Intel's latest generation of processors, manufactured with a 45-nanometer process that lets them cram more transistors onto the processor than ever before. They're shrunken Core 2 Duo chips of this generation, with a few extra tricks.

The result is that they're smaller, faster, cooler and more energy efficient than the last generation of chips, so bet on the cram-as-many-cores-as-you-can processor race to really start heating up in 2008, with quad-core and higher becoming increasingly common. These chips also have the fourth generation of SSE instructions for faster technical and multimedia computing. You'll see Penryn chips in everything from gaming PCs to beefy servers to MacBook Pros.

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/giz-explains/giz-explains-whats-the-f-is-a-penryn-335090.php http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/giz-explains/giz-explains-whats-the-f-is-a-penryn-335090.php Wed, 19 Dec 2007 02:10:30 EST matt buchanan http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=335090&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Intel Penryn Arrives In 16 Flavors for Desktops and Servers]]> The wait's over: Penryn is here, as promised, in 16 flavors. On the high-end desktop front is the no-stranger-to-us 3GHz quad-core Core 2 Extreme QX9650 (seen on Lenovo's newest Thinkstations) which runs a not-so-low-power $1000 in bulk (1000 chips or more).

We've also got 12 quad-core Xeons ranging from 2 to 3.2GHz with 1333Mhz or 1600MHz frontside bus options, as well as a triplet of dual-core Xeons that run up to 3.4GHz, but with half the L2 cache (6MB) of the other Penryns. The dual-cores also have a 30-day wait.

The cheapest Penryn you can score appears to be the $177 1.86GHz dual-core E5205 Xeon with a 1066MHz FSB. Quad-core wise, it'd be a 2.0 GHz E5405 Xeon for $209. All of those prices are given in bulk, too. So, race ya to Newegg? [Intel]

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/launch/intel-penryn-arrives-in-16-flavors-for-desktops-and-servers-321435.php http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/launch/intel-penryn-arrives-in-16-flavors-for-desktops-and-servers-321435.php Mon, 12 Nov 2007 04:00:46 EST Matt Buchanan http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=321435&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Sony Pulls Out of 32nm Chip Development]]> ps3cells.jpgDeveloping 32nm processors with IBM and Toshiba has proved too rich for Sony's blood—they're pulling out of the joint R&D, right on the heels of selling their chip-making business to Toshiba a couple of weeks ago. [Reuters]

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/sony/sony-pulls-out-of-32nm-chip-development-319793.php http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/sony/sony-pulls-out-of-32nm-chip-development-319793.php Wed, 07 Nov 2007 03:15:49 EST Matt Buchanan http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=319793&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Gordon Moore, the mind behind Moore's Law, ... ]]> Gordon Moore, the mind behind Moore's Law, predicts his law of doubling processor transistors every two years will be proven wrong in about 10 years. Apparently, there's only so much room on a processor and so small you can make a transistor before you run out of space. [I4U]

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/law-breakers/-301703.php http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/law-breakers/-301703.php Wed, 19 Sep 2007 21:14:24 EDT Adrian Covert http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=301703&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Intel to Enter High-End GPU Market with Larrabee in 2008]]> Intel's Larabee GPU will be out next year, and due to a highly parallelized architecture, it's not only going to be good for video and math processing, but discreet graphics processing, too. The chips should have manufacturing advantages over those from AMD and NVidia, too, with half of the new chips to be made in the 45nm range, ahead of the competition. Interesting. [Infoweek]

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/pcs/intel-to-enter-high+end-gpu-market-with-larrabee-in-2008-301608.php http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/pcs/intel-to-enter-high+end-gpu-market-with-larrabee-in-2008-301608.php Wed, 19 Sep 2007 16:22:39 EDT Brian Lam http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=301608&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Intel introduced their quad-core Xeon 7300 ... ]]> Intel introduced their quad-core Xeon 7300 series processors. [Reuters]

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/cpus/-297311.php http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/cpus/-297311.php Thu, 06 Sep 2007 22:26:36 EDT Adrian Covert http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=297311&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Via releases a one watt (0.1 watts when idle) ... ]]> Via releases a one watt (0.1 watts when idle) 500MHz x86 CPU designed for mobile, industrial and embedded applications. Stick it in my toothbrush and make it play Doom. [Via]

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/pcs/-292874.php http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/pcs/-292874.php Thu, 23 Aug 2007 16:32:40 EDT Jason Chen http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=292874&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Tilera introduced a 64-core processor that ... ]]> Tilera introduced a 64-core processor that is said to be substantially faster than the Intel dual-core Xeon processor. [Electronista]

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/cpus/-291533.php http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/cpus/-291533.php Mon, 20 Aug 2007 19:38:46 EDT Adrian Covert http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=291533&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Intel's Mobile Core 2 Extreme Will Give Lappies a Shot of Adrenaline]]> Mobile gamers listen up. Intel's prepping a mobile version of their Core 2 Extreme processor. It's expected to give laptops (gaming laptops in particular) a nice shot of adrenaline without zapping your battery (Intel claims the dual-core CPU will have energy-saving features). It'll use Intel's Santa Rosa 800MHz front-side bus, though actual clock speeds are still up in the air. It's expected to come out in Q3, so you might wanna wait if you're shopping for a gaming notebook.

Intel Core 2 Extreme for Gaming Notebooks [Laptoping]

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/gaming-on-the-go/intels-mobile-core-2-extreme-will-give-lappies-a-shot-of-adrenaline-266423.php http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/gaming-on-the-go/intels-mobile-core-2-extreme-will-give-lappies-a-shot-of-adrenaline-266423.php Wed, 06 Jun 2007 11:16:13 EDT Louis Ramirez http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=266423&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[AMD's Barcelona Chips Make a Quick Appearance]]> Perhaps it's a mild case of jealousy, but the folks at AMD are trying to win back the spotlight from Intel by revealing their long-awaited Barcelona CPU.

They demoed a dual processor setup alongside a quad-processor rig for ultimate 4x4 power. The folks at [H]Enthusiast claim the octo-core set up was able to encode 1080p video to H.264 very close to real time. They also said the CPUs are good at keeping their cool (though they did have fans on each CPU). Now all we need is for AMD to hurry and get them out.

AMD Barcelona in Action [HEnthusiast via Gadget Lab]

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/amd-shows-what-its-got/amds-barcelona-chips-make-a-quick-appearance-259384.php http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/amd-shows-what-its-got/amds-barcelona-chips-make-a-quick-appearance-259384.php Thu, 10 May 2007 13:02:40 EDT Louis Ramirez http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=259384&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Informed Speculation: Apple Macbook With Santa Rosa Coming Very Soon?]]> With Lenovo and LG's Santa Rosa laptop offerings (not to mention various other PC vendors as well) almost upon us, we're left wondering what Apple is going to do. If you remember, Core 2 Duos hit PC laptops around July/August, but Apple's MacBook Pros only got them late October. Will we have to wait nearly three months for Centrino Pro? Maybe not.

A chain partner revealed to us that a new model of MacBook is coming out as soon as next week, which is pretty ridiculous if we do say so ourselves. However, since PC makers are making the transition to Santa Rosa very soon, it's not out of the question that Apple will as well—maybe as soon as WWDC. After all, it's been more than a year since the switch to Intel, and they should be pretty good with this stuff by now. What do you think?

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/apple/informed-speculation-apple-macbook-with-santa-rosa-coming-very-soon-258775.php http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/apple/informed-speculation-apple-macbook-with-santa-rosa-coming-very-soon-258775.php Tue, 08 May 2007 19:00:42 EDT Jason Chen http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=258775&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Can Your CPU Mess with Your GPS Unit?]]> We're not sure how accurate this study is, but the Swedish Defense Research Agency has found out that using your GPS unit near a computer with a CPU clocked at 1.7GHz or above can cause your GPS to malfunction. In some cases, the GPS unit failed completely. Most people wouldn't have a PC next to their GPS to begin with (unless you got a car-puter or a laptop handy), but any of you guys experience anything remotely close?

Your PC Could Knock Your GPS Out [Tech.co.uk via Navigadget]

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/gadgets/can-your-cpu-mess-with-your-gps-unit-255207.php http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/gadgets/can-your-cpu-mess-with-your-gps-unit-255207.php Wed, 25 Apr 2007 19:45:32 EDT Louis Ramirez http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=255207&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Next-Gen Penryn CPU Benchmarks Show Intel Still Toasting AMD]]> Intel has given the world a quick glimpse at what their next-gen Penryn processors are capable of. The dual- and quad-core chips (which clock in at speeds of over 3GHz and carry up to a 12MB L2 cache) showed as much as a 22% performance boost when pitted against Intel's current king, the quad-core QX6800. Keep in mind that these are Intel's numbers, so you may wanna tone your enthusiasm a bit, but until AMD's Barcelona steps up to the plate, it looks like Intel will continue wearing the heavyweight belt.

Intel Penryn Performance Preview [Anandtech]
Intel Unveils Penryn Performance [DailyTech]
IDF: Intel Releases 45nm Penryn Benchamrk Numbers [TG Daily]
Image courtesy Anandtech

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/pcs/next+gen-penryn-cpu-benchmarks-show-intel-still-toasting-amd-253459.php http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/pcs/next+gen-penryn-cpu-benchmarks-show-intel-still-toasting-amd-253459.php Wed, 18 Apr 2007 20:48:29 EDT Louis Ramirez http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=253459&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Intel Preps Quad-Core CPU for Lappies]]> flaming-laptop_200x149.jpg 2008 is gonna be an interesting year if Intel keeps its promises. You see, on their 2008 roadmap sits a quad-core Penryn mobile processor designed for intense gaming and hardcore power users. Quad-core to go? You better believe it.

Intel's not saying how they plan on achieving this or what kinda battery life these lappies will have, but as long as they don't fry my kneecaps or burst into flames, this will definitely be worth waiting for, even if only for bragging rights.

Intel to Offer Quad Core Mobile CPUs in 2008? [LaptopLogic]

]]>
http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/laptops/intel-preps-quad+core-cpu-for-lappies-253242.php http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/laptops/intel-preps-quad+core-cpu-for-lappies-253242.php Wed, 18 Apr 2007 10:25:23 EDT Louis Ramirez http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=253242&view=rss&microfeed=true