Senior Contributing Editors:
Jesus Diaz
| AIM | Twitter
Mark Wilson, Reviews
| AIM | Twitter
Contributing Editors:
Matt Buchanan | AIM | Twitter
Adam Frucci | Twitter
Sean Fallon | Twitter
Jack Loftus | Twitter
John Herrman | Twitter
Dan Nosowitz
Chris Mascari
Danny Allen | Twitter
Rosa Golijan | Twitter
Chris Jacob
The guy is wearing a calculator nerd -watch! I love it! I bet he did all the cybernetic design calculations on his nerd-watch! He could've used a massively parallel supercomputer but NO! He used his nerd-watch!
I have an uncle that lost two fingers on his right hand, plus most of the bones of his right index finger. This would have been an excellent solution for him if this had been developed 15 years ago. As of now he's pretty well adapted to doing everything left handed.
@Noobs-R-Us: Well, like every technology, it takes time to optimize and miniaturize. I guess that, with the proper time, it will have the size of a normal human hand.
But just the fact that people can grab things again (no pun intended) is fantastic.
Agree with the majority of votes, it's our minds that give us our humanity, not our bodies. Transplant me into a cat and I'm still a person that could be considered human.
In fact I think the word human is the caveat here. We may stop being human in the biological sense but we don't stop being a person.
I voted on brain, but if technology is in such an advanced state that we could built a device that worked exactly like a human brain, then everything could be replaced... wouldn't even need shreds of original tissue.
Of course, this depends on the very definition of what a human is... #thiscyborglife
Reminds me of my favorite author, Philip Dick. Most of his books deal with the theme of what it means to be human. Often he will offer an android or alien as an example of what is truly human and a person as an example of how inhuman a person can be. His books are awesome mindbending freakouts.
"More Human Than Human is our motto." -Tyrell (from Blade Runner)
Edited by dolo54 blows minds and blows engines! at 11/13/09 8:00 PM
dolo54 blows minds and blows engines! was starred
dolo54 blows minds and blows engines! was unstarred
@dolo54 blows minds and blows engines!: While I agree that the capacity for the subject to experience empathy would be the individual measure of retained humanity, I wonder how such empathy could be accurately judged if the biological human identity of the subject was compromised. I am not speaking of the original consciousness but of the personal perception of belonging to the biological human race. We - biological humans - share the camaraderie of being the same species, but if such an integral part of the biological human identity is removed and replaced, would a new identity form? Would a subject no longer physiologically related to the human race retain any lingering loyalty or sense of belonging to it? Following this vein of thought, if a new identity did form and the subject no longer considered itself connected to biological humans, would the empathy be measured as directed toward other beings similarly expatriated from their biological origins? Or would the connecting empathy between the subject and biological humanity be the only measure? #thiscyborglife
@Laura Woody: @jrghoull: @punknubbins: Actually my answer is one of PK Dick's answers. I don't think there is a "right" answer. But thinking about it that way makes you realize just how difficult a question it is. It may become a serious issue in the future if we do create an AI or have humans whose conscious is completely removed from their original physical bodies. How will these new thinking, feeling creatures be treated? What sort of rights will they have? If you kill an AI that has self-awareness, human or greater intelligence and feelings, is it murder? What if we have genetic experimentation on animals that creates a dog with human level intellect? No easy answers here, but you certainly can't draw the line at some arbitrary percentage of biological makeup. #thiscyborglife
I would argue that the % is lower then the poll eludes. The "body" has more ties to the "mind/soul" then we realize.
If I replace almost my entire body, enabling my static personality/mind to live forever, and I still human? The possibility of Death may contribute to being "human".
Assuming that the majority of Gizmodo readers are "dorks/nerds" ("dorks/nerds" being less physically blessed. Yes, huge generalization/sterotype), would a "Brad Pit" type be more inclined to attach his humanity to his physical body? #thiscyborglife
I'm going to break everyone's heart here and go with, 'when you have a robotic ding dong'... since that didn't come up like fifty times this week. #thiscyborglife
@NeoAkira: True, however, your parameters for what is human did not include the replacement of natural part with robotic. You merely stated that humans are brains and reproductive organs. You statement was that the basic fundamentals a person needs are quality of organic reproduction (period) and a organic brain (period) to qualify for club of humanity "you are no longer human if you lack...". Not "if you replaced with artificial..." Your vagueness was the cause of my query, and not reason enough to be snarky.
12/08/09
Skynet must be destroyed.
12/08/09
(Wipes away a tear...)
12/08/09
12/08/09
12/08/09
12/08/09
But just the fact that people can grab things again (no pun intended) is fantastic.
12/08/09
Since this is first gen it will be cool to see it improve.
12/08/09
12/08/09
11/16/09
In fact I think the word human is the caveat here. We may stop being human in the biological sense but we don't stop being a person.
If any of that rambling makes sense. #thiscyborglife
11/14/09
Of course, this depends on the very definition of what a human is... #thiscyborglife
11/13/09
"More Human Than Human is our motto." -Tyrell (from Blade Runner)
11/13/09
11/14/09
11/14/09
11/13/09
11/13/09
11/13/09
11/13/09
to be human is to have sentience, reason, and language, and to reside in this universe. no animal or computer yet fits the bill. #thiscyborglife
11/13/09
If I replace almost my entire body, enabling my static personality/mind to live forever, and I still human? The possibility of Death may contribute to being "human".
11/13/09
***huge generalization coming up***
Assuming that the majority of Gizmodo readers are "dorks/nerds" ("dorks/nerds" being less physically blessed. Yes, huge generalization/sterotype), would a "Brad Pit" type be more inclined to attach his humanity to his physical body? #thiscyborglife
11/13/09
11/13/09
11/13/09
As such, I would say you're no longer human if you don't have all of the following:
Your original organic brain, and your original organic reproductive system. #thiscyborglife
11/13/09
11/13/09
aha, I knew someone like you might make a response like that.
This article is talking about replacing parts of our body with robotic components. Does your mother have a robotic uterus now? #thiscyborglife
11/14/09
11/14/09
But otherwise, no.